Abiansemal District, Badung Regency
II. Research Methodology
2.1 Determination of Research Locations The research location was conducted in Subak Sengempel, Bongkasa Village, Abiansemal District, Badung Regency.
This research took place from November to December 2019. The determination of the study area was carried out by pusposive sampling method with the basic consideration that Subak Sengempel would become ecotourism.
2.2 Data Sources
In this study using the following data sources.
2.2.1 Primary Data
Data obtained directly from data sources through interviews using a list of questions that have been prepared previously. Primary data in this study are the characteristics of farmers including the age of farmers, the level of formal education, livelihoods.
2.2.2 Secondary Data
Data obtained indirectly from the data source. In this study the secondary data is the monograph of farmland farmer groups.
2.3 Data Collection Methods
This study uses the following data collection methods.
1. Library research, by conducting library research related to research such as reading books related to research, browsing the internet, reading the results of previous research related to it, as well as documenting studies by collecting data from documents related to research.
2. Field research, namely data collection techniques that are carried out directly to the field or research location.
2.3 Data Analysis Methods
Data obtained in research in the field were analyzed using quantitative analysis methods and descriptive analysis.
1. Quantitative Analysis Method
The application of Tri Hita Karana (THK) to the Sub-Sengempel was analyzed by the matrix of the relationship between all subsystems of the technological system and all subsystems of the cultural system. Where technology as a system has five subsystems namely:
software (concept/mindset), hardware (material), humanware (labor related to its ability to the technology), organoware (organization/management), and infoware (information related to technology the).
Meanwhile, the cultural system has three subsystems namely mindset/concept, social, and artifacts/material. Where the matrix of the relationship between all subsystems of the technological system and all subsystems of the cultural system will be discussed, which is as follows.
Matrix of relationships between all subsystems of the technology system and all subsystems of the cultural system:
57 a. The matrix form of the relationship
between elements of the business system based on Tri Hita Karana. So that the functional relations of the elements of the business system can be characterized by behavior, then in this methodological study a simplification is made, namely by doing discretization.
35 34 33 32 31
25 24 23 22 21
15 14 13 12 11
a a a a a
a a a a a
a a a a a a A ij
Information:
A = a business system based on Tri Hita Karana
aij = elements of the relationship of all subsystems of the cultural system with all subsystems of the technological system.
i = cultural system (1 = culture/mindset; 2 = social; 3 = material/artifact).
j = technology system (1 = software; 2 = hardware; 3 = humanware; 4 = organoware; 5 = infoware).
b. Ideal business system performance The performance of an ideal business system stated by A (aij) will be similar if the requirements of the aij
element are met, even though they are in different environments.
Furthermore, if improvements are made to the air element, then there is a chance that the performance of the business system will achieve ideal performance. Suppose the performance of an ideal business
system matrix is expressed as a matrix H (hij) , then the following relationship is obtained.
A . X = H …(1)
Because various elements of the business system are in the form of a matrix, the matrix can have a transformation form (Chapra &
Canale, 1985; Supranto, 1992;
Suwondo, 1993). The transformation value can be determined by looking at the matrix value X , which is obtained by calculating the inverse matrix A , as follows.
X = A1 H…(2)
The matrix in equation (1) can be said as a model/form of the transformation matrix, because it transforms a business system with certain performance characteristics into a business form with an ideal performance, in accordance with the Tri Hita Karana foundation. The difference in matrix A and X is expressed by its determinant value (D).
Table 2.1 Matrix of relationships between all subsystems of the technology system and all subsystems of the cultural system
Subsystem Mindset
Subsystem Social
Subsystem Artifacts Subsystem
Software
Subsystem
Hardware
Subsystem
Humanware
Subsystem
Organoware
Subsystem
Infoware
d. Inverse Analysis
58 The inverse analysis is carried out because the inverse results that have the same value as one of the relationship matrices of the technological and cultural relations of the business system to be transformed. In conducting an inverse matrix there are a number of things that need to be considered.
First, if the matrix is not a quadratic matrix, then to make it a quadratic matrix, the matrix equation (1) must first be multiplied by the transpose matrix of the matrix to be invoked (Jhonston, 1984), so the formula becomes:
A . X = H A A . X = H T
(A A ) X = H T
X = (A A )T -1H …(4)
Second, if the determinant is equal to zero, then the matrix will not be able to process or have no solution. This means that the transformation matrix is equal to zero, or there is no transformation matrix. But Nurrochman (1998) provides a mathematical solution for a matrix that has a determinant equal to zero, namely by manipulating the matrix.
How to manipulate the matrix X as follows X .
i. Take or remove one of the columns from the matrix A so that the matrix
A will become a matrix A
ii. Take or remove one of the rows from the matrix A corresponding to item i above, so that the matrix A becomes a matrix A .
Furthermore, as seen in equation (3), after the matrix can be calculated, and the matrix is known, the two matrices can be distinguished by calculating the determinant (D).
The value of Z in equation (3) shows the probability of the sample (business) company to be transformed. The business system can be transformed (known the THK application capability), determined by the absolute value of the determinant differences D and D *, and or the value of D * is zero, then the business cannot be transformed (does not transform/apply Tri Hita Karana). A business system can be transformed (has the value of applying Tri Hita Karana) if the value is D> D *> 0.
The greater the value of Z, the greater the ability of the business to implement Tri Hita Karana. The details are as follows.
i. If the value of Z, 0 <Z <33% can be interpreted as poor implementation of the Tri Hita Karana.
ii. If the value of Z, 33% ≤Z <67%
can be interpreted quite well the application of Tri Hita Karana.
iii. If the Z value, 67% ≤Z <100%
can be interpreted well the application of Tri Hita Karana.
1. Descriptive Analysis
The types of activities carried out in Subak Sengempel use descriptive analysis. Descriptive analysis method is a method of presenting the analysis of data interpretation by describing a social and environmental
59 phenomenon by interpreting the facts in the field.
III. Result And Discussion