MINUTES OF THE DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING HELD AT THE HILLS SHIRE COUNCIL ON TUESDAY, 15 DECEMBER 2020 PRESENT:
Cameron McKenzie Group Manager – Development & Compliance (Chair) Paul Osborne Manager – Development Assessment
Ben Hawkins Manager – Subdivision & Development Certification Angelo Berios Manager – Environment & Health
Craig Woods Manager – Regulatory Services Nicholas Carlton Manager – Forward Planning Kristine McKenzie Principal Executive Planner
APOLOGIES:
TIME OF COMMENCEMENT: 8:30 am TIME OF COMPLETION: 8:48am
ITEM-1 CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES RESOLUTION
The Minutes of the Development Assessment Unit Meeting of Council held on 24 November 2020 to be confirmed.
ITEM 2: DA 278/2021/LA - CONSTRUCTION OF A DETACHED GARAGE AND RETAINING WALLS - LOT 287 DP 1152852, NO. 7 CARDELL ROAD, KELLYVILLE
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION OF THE DETERMINATION PURSUANT TO ITEM 20(2)(c) AND (d) OF SCHEDULE 1 OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING & ASSESSMENT
ACT, 1979 DECISION
The Development Application is recommended for refusal.
REASONS FOR THE DECISION
Section 4.15 (EP&A Act) – Unsatisfactory.
LEP 2019 – Unsatisfactory.
DCP Part D Section 7 – Balmoral Road Release Area –Unsatisfactory
DCP Part B Section 2 – Residential – Unsatisfactory.
HOW COMMUNITY VIEWS WERE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT IN MAKING THE DECISION The development application was notified and no submissions were received during the notification period.
ITEM 3: DA 910/2020/ZB - SUBDIVISION CREATING FIVE RURAL RESIDENTIAL LOTS - LOT 1 DP 544723, 8 ST JOHNS ROAD, MARAYLYA
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION OF THE DETERMINATION PURSUANT TO ITEM 20(2)(c) AND (d) OF SCHEDULE 1 OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING & ASSESSMENT
ACT, 1979 DECISION
The application is recommended for refusal.
REASONS FOR THE DECISION
Section 4.15 (EP&A Act) – Unsatisfactory
Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016 – Unsatisfactory
The Hills DCP 2012 – Part B Section 1 Rural – Variation sought (see report)
HOW COMMUNITY VIEWS WERE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT IN MAKING THE DECISION The development application was notified between 16 January 2020 and 24 February 2020 and no submissions were received.
ITEM 4: 470/2018/ZA/A - SECTION 4.55(2) MODIFICATION TO A SUBDIVISION CREATING 104 RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND ONE RESIDUE LOT TO DELETE 12 LOTS AND THREE LANEWAYS, AMEND THE LOT LAYOUT AND INTRODUCE STAGING - LOTS 1 AND 2 DP 1246839, 32- 34 MASON ROAD, BOX HILL
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION OF THE DETERMINATION PURSUANT TO ITEM 20(2)(c) AND (d) OF SCHEDULE 1 OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING & ASSESSMENT
ACT, 1979 DECISION
The Development Application is recommended for Approval subject to conditions.
REASONS FOR THE DECISION
Section 4.15 (EP&A Act) – Satisfactory
Section 4.55 (EP&A Act) – Satisfactory
SEPP (Sydney Region Growth Centres) 2006 – Appendix 11 The Hills Growth Centre Precinct Plan – Satisfactory
SEPP 55 – Remediation of Land – Satisfactory
SREP 20 – Hawkesbury-Nepean River – Satisfactory
Box Hill Growth Centre Precincts Development Control Plan – Satisfactory
HOW COMMUNITY VIEWS WERE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT IN MAKING THE DECISION The application was notified and two submissions were received. The issues raised were considered in the report.
ITEM 5: DA 1515/2020/HC- SENIORS HOUSING CONTAINING 12 SINGLE STOREY SELF-CONTAINED DWELLINGS AND TORRENS TITLE SUBDIVISION - LOT 102 DP 1205322, 1A MILLS ROAD GLENHAVEN
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION OF THE DETERMINATION PURSUANT TO ITEM 20(2)(c) AND (d) OF SCHEDULE 1 OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING & ASSESSMENT
ACT, 1979 DECISION
The Development Application is recommended for Approval subject to conditions.
REASONS FOR THE DECISION
Section 4.15 (EP&A Act) – Satisfactory.
The Hills LEP 2019 – Satisfactory.
SEPP (Housing for Seniors or People with a Disability) 2004 – Satisfactory.
State Environmental Planning Policy No 55—Remediation of Land – Satisfactory.
DCP Part B Section 1 – Rural – Satisfactory.
HOW COMMUNITY VIEWS WERE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT IN MAKING THE DECISION The application was notified and 5 late submissions from an adjoining property owner was received. Note: A further submission from an owner within “Glenhaven Gardens” raising concern with the lack of notification to her was tabled and considered at the meeting. It was noted that the landowner and operators of the site provided valid owners consent. Five late submissions from owners within “Glenhaven Gardens” were tabled in support of the development.
