PAGE 1 MINUTES OF THE DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING HELD AT THE HILLS SHIRE COUNCIL ON TUESDAY, 16 JULY 2019
PRESENT
Paul Osborne Acting Group Manager – Development & Compliance (Chair) Andrew Brooks Manager – Subdivision & Development Certification
Angelo Berios Manager – Environment & Health Craig Woods Manager – Regulatory Services Nicholas Carlton Manager – Forward Planning Kristine McKenzie Principal Executive Planner
APOLOGIES
Cameron McKenzie Group Manager – Development & Compliance
TIME OF COMMENCEMENT
8:30am
TIME OF COMPLETION 8:40am
ITEM-1 CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES
RESOLUTION
The Minutes of the Development Assessment Unit Meeting of Council held on 9 July 2019 be confirmed.
ITEM-2 DA 1267/2019/HA - PROPOSED BOARDING HOUSE UNDER SEPP (AFFORDABLE RENTAL HOUSING) 2009 - LOT 102 WINDSOR ROAD, KELLYVILLE
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION OF THE DETERMINATION PURSUANT TO ITEM 20(2)(c) AND (d) OF SCHEDULE 1 OF THE ENVIRONMNTAL PLANNING & ASSESSMENT AT, 1979 DECISION
The Development Application be refused for the following reasons:
PAGE 2 1. The proposal does not comply and is inconsistent with the relevant provisions of State
Environmental Planning Policy (Affordable Rental Housing) 2009.
(Section 4.15(1)(a)(i) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979)
2. The proposal lacks adequate and necessary supporting documentation required by Schedule 1 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000. As a result, the application is unable to demonstrate compliance and consistency with the applicable planning controls.
(Section 4.15(1)(a)(iv) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979)
3. The proposal does not comply and is inconsistent with the relevant provisions of State Environmental Planning Policy No 55 – Remediation of Land.
(Section 4.15(1)(a)(i) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979)
4. The proposal does not meet the objectives of Clause 4.1 of The Hills Local Environmental Plan 2012.
(Section 4.15(1)(a)(i) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979)
5. The proposal does not comply and is inconsistent with the outcomes of The Hills Development Control Plan 2012 – Part D Section 7 – Balmoral Road Release Area – with regards to setbacks, road design, stormwater management and landscape corridors.
(Section 4.15(1)(a)(iii) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979)
6. The proposal does not comply and is inconsistent with the outcomes of The Hills Development Control Plan 2012 – Part B Section 4 – Multi Dwelling Housing – with regards to waste management, landscaped area, acoustic privacy, building separation, car parking.
(Section 4.15(1)(a)(iii) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979)
7. The proposal does not comply and is inconsistent with the outcomes of The Hills Development Control Plan 2012 – Part C Section 1 – Parking.
(Section 4.15(1)(a)(iii) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979)
8. The proposal does not comply and is inconsistent with the outcomes of The Hills Development Control Plan 2012 – Part C Section 3 – Landscaping.
(Section 4.15(1)(a)(iii) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979)
REASONS FOR THE DECISION
Section 4.15 (EP&A Act) – Unsatisfactory.
The Hills LEP 2012 – Unsatisfactory.
SEPP (Affordable Rental Housing) 2009 – Unsatisfactory.
SEPP No 55 – Remediation of Land – Unsatisfactory.
DCP Part B Section 4 – Multi Dwelling Housing – Unsatisfactory.
DCP Part D Section 7 – Balmoral Road Release Area – Unsatisfactory.
Section 7.11 Contribution:$797,590.36
HOW COMMUNITY VIEWS WERE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT IN MAKING THE DECISION The development application was notified and two (2) submissions were received. The issues raised were discussed in the report.
PAGE 3 ITEM-3 DA 446/2018/HA - DEMOLITION OF EXISTING STRUCTURES & CONSTRUCTION OF A MULTI- DWELLING HOUSING DEVELOPMENT - LOT 21 DP 27805, NO. 2-4 LIVINGSTONE AVENUE, BAULKHAM HILLS
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION OF THE DETERMINATION PURSUANT TO ITEM 20(2)(c) AND (d) OF SCHEDULE 1 OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING & ASSESSMENT ACT, 1979
DECISION
The development application be approved subject to conditions in the report.
REASONS FOR THE DECISION
Section 4.15 (EP&A Act) – Satisfactory.
The Hills LEP 2012 – Satisfactory.
SEPP BASIX – Satisfactory.
SEPP No. 55 – Remediation of Land – Satisfactory.
DCP Part B Section 4 – Multi Dwelling Housing – Variation, see report.
DCP Part C Section 1 – Parking – Satisfactory.
DCP Part C Section 3 – Landscaping – Variation see report.
Section 7.12 Contribution: $21,275.85.
HOW COMMUNITY VIEWS WERE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT IN MAKING THE DECISION The development application was notified and two (2) submissions were received. The issues raised were discussed in the report.
END MINUTES P
PPP
