101
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Abdullah, S. and Shariff, A. (2008). “The Effects of Inquiry-Based Computer Simulation with Cooperative Learning on Scientific Thinking and Conceptual Understanding of Gas Law”. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education. volume 4. No.4. pp 387-398.
Anderson, L.W. and Krathwohl, D.R. (Ed). (2001). Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Blom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectivies. New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Arikunto, S. (2009). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan: Edisi Revisi. Cetakan ke-10. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Bilgin Ibrahim. (2009). The Effect of Guided inquiry Instruction Incorporating a Cooperative learning Approach an University Student Achievement of Acid and Bases Concepts and Attitude toward Guided inquiry Instruction, Scientific Reasearch and Essay. volume 4. No.10. pp 1038-1046. Turki.
Blonder R., et al. (2008). Analyzing Inquiry Question of High-School Students in a Gas Chromatography Open-Ended Laboratory Experiment. Chemistry Education Research and Practice The Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC). volume 9. pp 250-258.
Brady, James E. (1998). General Chemistry Principles and Structure. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Brotosiswoyo, B.S. (2001). Hakikat Pembelajaran Fisika di Perguruan Tinggi, Jakarta: Proyek Pengembangan Universitas Terbuka. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
BSNP. (2006). Panduan Penyusunan KTSP. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Chang, R. (2003). Kimia Dasar. Konsep-Konsep Inti. Jilid dua. Edisi ketiga. Penerjemah: Suminar S. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Cheung D., (2007). Facilitating Chemistry Teachers to Implement Inquiry-Based Laboratory Work. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. volume 6. pp 107-130. Hongkong.
Dahar, R.W. (1978). Metodologi Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam dan Matematika. Makalah IKIP Bandung. Tidak diterbitkan.
102
Fay, et al. (2007). A Rubric to Characterize Inquiry in The Undergraduate Chemistry Laboratory. Chemistry Education Research and Practice The Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC). volume 8. pp 212-219.
Fraenkel, J. R. & Wallen, N. E. (2007). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (Sixth ed). New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.
Gallagher, J.J. (2007). Teaching Science for Understanding: A Practical Guide for School Teacher. New jersey: Pearson merill Prentice.
Hanson D.M. (2006). Instructor´s Guide to Process Oriented Guided inquiry Learning. Faculty Guidebook. Stony Brook University.
Hofstein, et al. (2001). Assessment of The Learning Environment of Inquiry-Type Laboratories in High School Chemistry. Learning Environment Research. volume 4, pp193-207. Israel.
Hofstein, et al. (2005). Developing Students Ability to Ask More and Better Questions Resulting from Inquiry Type Chemistry Laboratories. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. volume 42. No.7. pp791-806, DOI 10.1002/tea.20072. Israel.
Hofstein, et al. (2008). Evidence for Teachers’Change While Participating in a Continuous Professional Development Programme and Implementing the Inquiry Approach in the Chemistry Laboratory. International Journal of Science Education. volume 30. pp593-617. Israel.
Hofstein, Ari and Lunetta. Vincent N. (1982). “The Role of Laboratory in Science Teaching: Negleted Aspect of Research”. Review of Educational Research.
Joyce et al. (2000). Models of Teaching, Sixth Edition. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Kaberman, Z. (2007). Question Posing, Inquiry, And Modeling Skills of
Chemistry Students In The Case-Based Computerized Laboratory Environment. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. voume 7. pp593-617.
Liliasari. (2007). Scientific Concept and generic Science Skills Relationship in the 21th century Science Education. Bandung: Science Education Facing Againts Challenges of the 21th Century. Paper.
103
Moerwani et al. (2001). Hakikat Pembelajaran MIPA dan Kiat Pembelajaran Kimia di Perguruan Tinggi. PAU-PPAI. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Mulyasa, E.(2009). Menjadi guru Profesional: menciptakan Pembelajaran Kreatif dan Menyenangkan. Cetakan ke-8. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
NRC (National Research Council). (1999). Inquiry and The National Science Education Standar: Guide for Teaching and Learning. Washington: National Academic Press.
Nur M. (1998). Psikologi Pendidikan: Fondasi untuk Pengajaran, Surabaya: IKIP. NCVER. (2003). Defining Generic Skills. Australian National Training Authority. Ramsey,J. (1993). Developing Conceptual Story Lines With The Learning Cycle.
Jounal of Elementary Science Education. volume 5. No 2. pp1-20.
Ruseffendi, E.T. (1998). Statistika Dasar untuk Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: IKIP Bandung Press.
Rumansyah dan Yudha Irhasyuarna. (2002). Penerapan Metode Latihan Berstruktur dalam Meningkatkan Pemahaman Siswa terhadap Konsep Persamaan Kimia. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. No. 035. Tahun ke-8. hal. 172.
Rustaman, (2005). Pembelajaran Berbasis Inkuiri.Makalah. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Sadeh, I., M. Zion. (2009). The Development of Dynamic Inquiry Performances within an Open Inquiry Setting: A Comparison to Guided Inquiry Setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Volume 46. No.10. pp1137-1160.DOI: 10.1002/tea. Israel.
Sanjaya, W. (2009). Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standard dan Proses Pendidikan. edisi ke-6. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Stasz Chatleen, et al. (2001). Classroom at Work: Teaching Generic Skills in Academic and Vocational Setting, on-line tersedia
http://www.rand.org/pubsh.
Straumanis Andrei. (2010). Process Oriented Guided Learning, A Practical Guide for Instructor. Organic Chemistry Guided Inquiry. 2ndedition. United Stated.
Sudjana. (2005). Metoda Statistika. Edisi ke-6, Bandung: IKAPI.
104
Sund, R.B, dan Trowbridge, Leslie W. (1973). Teaching Science By Inquiry In The Secondary School. Second Edition. Columbus: Charles E.Merill Publishing Company.
Sunyono. (2009). Keterampilan Generik. FK-IP Unila
Trianto,S.,(2007).Model-Model Pembelajaran Inovatif Berorientasi Konstruktivistik. cetakan ke-1. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka.
.
