THESIS
THE ANALYSIS OF SEVENTH GRADE ENGLISH FINAL TEST BASED ON NATIONAL CURRICULUM IN SOUTH DISTRICT GRESIK
DIANA REMITA SARI NIM. 20131111069
THE ADVISORS
Gusti Nur Hafifah, S.Pd., M.Pd. Sulton Dhedi Wijaya, M.Pd.
ENGLISH EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
FACULTY OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURABAYA 2017
umsurabaya
THE ANALYSIS OF SEVENTH GRADE ENGLISH FINAL TEST BASED ON NATIONAL CURRICULUM IN SOUTH DISTRICT GRESIK
THESIS
Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of Requirement for Bachelor of Education Degree in English Education
By
DIANA REMITA SARI NIM: 20131111069
ENGLISH EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
FACULTY OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURABAYA
i
Motto :
“Never give up, believe that Allah always with us because never impossible for He if He say Yes or Not for us is possible, KUN FAYAKUN!”
Dedication :
Halaman Persetujuan Pembimbing
Skripsi yang ditulis oleh Diana Remita Sari ini telah disetujui oleh dosen pembimbing untuk diujikan tanggal 04 Agustus 2017.
Dosen Pembimbing Tanda Tangan Tanggal
I. Gusti Nur Hafifah, S.Pd., M.Pd ………. 28 Juli 2017
II. Sulton Dedi Wijaya, M.Pd ………. 30 Juli 2017
Mengetahui:
Ketua Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris,
iii
Halaman Pengesahan Panitia Ujian
Skripsi ini yang ditulis oleh Diana Remita Sari telah diuji dan dinyatakan sah oleh Panitia Ujian Tingkat Sarjana (S1) Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya sebagai salah satu syarat memperoleh gelar Sarjana Pendidikan pada tanggal 04 Agustus 2017.
Dosen Penguji Tanda Tangan Tanggal
I. Gusti Nur Hafifah, S.Pd., M.Pd. ……… 04 Agustus 2017
II. Waode Hamsia, S.Pd., M.Pd. ……… 04 Agustus 2017
III. Sofi Yuniarti, SS., M.Pd. ……… 04 Agustus 2017
Mengetahui,
Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya,
Dekan,
Pernyataan Tidak Melakukan Plagiat
Saya yang bertanda tangan dibawah ini:
Nama : Diana Remita Sari
NIM : 20131111069
Program Studi : Bahasa Inggris
Fakultas : FKIP
Menyatakan bahwa Skripsi yang saya tulis ini benar – benar tulisan karya sendiri, bukan hasil plagiasi, baik sebagaian maupun keseluruhan. Bila dikemudian hari terbukti hasil plagiasi maka saya bersedia menerima sanksi akademik sesuai ketentuan yang berlaku di Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya.
Surabaya, 31 Juli 2017 Yang membuat pernyataan,
Materai
Diana Remita Sari NIM.20131111069
vii
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The first of all, I would address all the praise and gratitude to the God Almighty, Allah SWT, for the greatest blessing, grace and guidance into me, hence this thesis can be accomplished.
This thesis is present to English Department, the Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Muhammadiyah University of Surabaya as a partial fulfillment for the Degree of Strata 1 (S1), titled “The Analysis of English Final Test of Seventh Grade Students Based on National Curriculum in South District Gresik”. I express my deep gratitude to all the people who have great merit in helping and guiding me through all difficulties in the process of my study and completion of this thesis. With very great respect, I would like to thank:
1. Dr. dr. Sukadiono, MM., as the Rector of Muhammadiyah University of Surabaya;
2. Endah Hendarwati, SE., M.Pd., as the Dean of faculty of teacher training and education;
3. Drs. Wijayadi, M.Pd., as the Head of English Department;
4. Mrs. Gusti Nur Hafifah, S.Pd., M.Pd. and Mr. Sulton Dedi Wijaya, S.Pd., M.Pd, as my advisors for the patience, advice and valuable guidance during my study and upon completion of my thesis;
5. My mother for all the affection and sincere love for me;
6. My dearest Sister and brother, almarhuma Yuliana Dwi Indah Sari and M. Firmansyah;
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Motto and Dedication ... i
Halaman Persetujuan Pembimbing ... ii
Halaman Pengesahan Panitia Ujian ... iii
Pernyataan Keaslian Tulisan ... iv
ABSTRACT ... v
ACKNOWLEDGMENT ... vii
TABLE OF CONTENTS ... viii
THE LISTS OF TABLES ... xi
THE LISTS OF FIGURES ... xiii
THE LIST OF APPENDICES ... xiv
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION ... 1
1.1 Background of the Study ... 1
1.2 Statement of the Problem ... 3
1.3 Objective of the Research... 4
1.4 Significance of the Research ... 4
1.5 Scope and Limitation of the Study ... 5
1.6 Definition of Key Terms ... 6
CHAPTER II LITERATURE REVIEWS ... 7
2.1 The Curriculum ... 7
2.2 Teachers Work Group ... 9
2.3 Language Testing and Assessment... 11
2.4 Type of Assessment and Testing ... 12
2.5 The Criteria of Good Assessment ... 13
2.5.1 Practicality ... 13
2.5.2 Reliability ... 14
2.5.3 Validity ... 14
2.5.4 Authenticity ... 14
ix
2.6 Items Analysis ... 15
2.6.1 The level of Difficulty ... 15
2.6.2 Discrimination Power... 16
2.7 The Previous Study ... 17
CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHODOLOGY ... 19
3.1 Research Design... 19
3.2 Place and Time of the Research ... 20
3.3 Population and Sample ... 20
3.4 Object of the Study ... 21
3.5 Research Instrument... 21
3.5.1 Curriculum Checklist ... 22
3.5.2 Characteristics and Criteria of Good Assessment Checklist ... 22
3.5.3 Ms. Excel of Analysis’s Application ... 22
3.5.4 SPSS Version 16.0 ... 23
3.6 Technique of Collecting Data ... 23
3.6.1 Observation ... 24
3.6.2 Paper Test Question ... 24
3.6.3 Students Answer Sheet ... 25
3.6.4 Students’ Score ... 25
3.6.5 Data and Source of Data ... 25
3.7 Research Procedure ... 25
3.8 Technique of Data Analysis ... 27
3.8.1 Qualitative Data Analysis ... 27
3.8.1.1. Analysis of the Appropriateness to Curriculum ... 27
3.8.1.2. Analysis of the Characteristics of a Good Test... 29
3.8.2 Quantitative Data Analysis ... 30
3.8.2.1 Items Difficulty Analysis ... 30
3.8.2.2 Discrimination Power Analysis ... 31
3.8.2.3 Analysis of Validity ... 34
CHAPTER IV RESULT AND DISCCUSION ... 37
4.1 The Result and Discussion of the Research ... 37
4.3 The Test Appropriateness toward Students Levels in ESL ... 46
4.4 Difficulty Levels of the Items Test... 47
4.5 Discrimination Power of the Items Test ... 56
4.6 Validity of the Test ... 68
4.7 Reliability of the Test ... 84
CHAPTER V CONCLUSION & SUGGESTION ... 87
5.1 CONCLUSION ... 87
5.2 SUGGESTION ... 89
xi
THE LISTS OF TABLES
Pages
Table 1 Table 3.7 the Research Procedure ... 26
Table 2 Table 3.8.1.1 The Curriculum Checklist ... 28
Table 3 Table 3.8.1.2 Good Assessment Checklist ... 29
Table 4 Table 3.8.2.1 Index of Difficulty Levels ... 31
Table 5 Table 3.8.2.2 Rose & Stanley of Items ... 32
Table 6 Table 3.8.2.2 the Items Test Discrimination Power of the Index (Ross & Stanley) ... 33
Table 10 Appendix 3 - Table 4.4 The Result of Difficulty Levels in the B Sample (BS) ... 51
Table 11 Table 4.4 The Result of Difficulty Levels in the C Sample (CS) ... 54
Table 12 Table 4.5 The Result Students' Group of the First Sample (AS) ... 57
Table 13 Table 4.5 The Result Discrimination Power of the A Sample
Table 17 Table 4.5.6 The Result Discrimination Power of The C Sample (CS) ... 66
Table 18 Table 4.6 The Result of Validity Test in The A Sample (CS) ... 69
Table 19 Table 4.6 The First Result Validity Test of the B Sample (BS)... 72
Table 20 Table 4.6 The Second Result Validity Test of the B Sample (BS) ... 74
Table 21 Table 4.6 The Third Result Validity Test of the B Sample (BS) ... 76
xiii
THE LISTS OF FIGURES
Pages
Figure 1 Figure 4.4 the Result of Difficulty Level in the A Sample (AS) ... 50
Figure 2 Figure 4.4 The Result of Difficulty Levels in the B Sample (BS) ... 53
Figure 3 Figure 4.4.3 The Result of Difficulty Levels in the C Sample (CS) ... 56
Figure 4 Figure 4.6 The Result of Validity Test in the A Sample (AS) ... 71
Figure 5 Figure 4.6 The First Result Validity Test of the B Sample (BS) ... 73
Figure 6 Figure 4.6 The Second Validity Test of the B Sample (BS) ... 75
Figure 7 Figure 4.6 The Third Validity Test of the B Sample (BS) ... 77
Figure 8 Figure 4.6 The Last Result Validity Test of the B Sample (BS) ... 78
Figure 9 Figure 4.6 The First Result Validity Test of the C Sample (CS) ... 81
Figure 10 Figure 4.6 The Second Result Validity Test of the C Sample (CS) .... 82
THE LIST OF APPENDICES
Pages
Appendix 1 The Paper Test Question ... 94
Appendix 2 The Keys Answer ... 97
Appendix 3 The Result of The Test appropriateness Regarding to Basic Competence... 98
Appendix 4 The Result of The Test appropriateness toward Students Levels 103 Appendix 5 DATA A SAMPLE (AS) ... 104
Appendix 6 The B Sample (BS) ... 113
Appendix 7 The C Sample (CS) ... 122
Appendix 8 The Result of Validity Test ... 131
Appendix 9 The Result of Reliability Test ... 143
Appendix 10 Berita Acara Bimbingan Skripsi ... 144
Appendix 11 Surat Keterangan Penelitian Sekolah 1 ... 145
Appendix 12 Surat Keterangan Penelitian Sekolah 2 ... 146
Appendix 13 Surat Keterangan Penelitian Sekolah 3 ... 147
Appendix 14 LATTICEWORK OF THE TEST ... 148
Appendix 15 R Table ... 153
Appendix 16 INDEX OF DIFFICULTY LEVELS IN ITEMS TEST (ROSS & STANLEY) ... 158
Appendix 17 ENDORSEMENT LETTER ... 159
91
REFERENCES
Brown, H. Douglas. 2004. Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom
Practices. San Francisco: Logman Inc.
Creswell, Jhon W. 2012. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and
Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. PEARSON.
Creswell, John W. 2014. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and
Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publication.
Cunningsworth, Alan. 2008. Choosing Your Coursebook. Thailand: Macmillan Publishers Limited
Darling-Hammond, et al. 2013. Criteria for High-Quality Assessment. June. Chicago: Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education, Stanford University.
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia. 2008. Standar Pengembangan Kelompok Kerja Guru (KKG) Musyawarah Guru
Mata Pelajaran (MGMP).
Fulcher, Glenn and Fred Davidsion. 2017. Language Testing and Assessment. London and New York: Routledge.
Heywood, John. 2005. Engineering Education Research and Development in
Curriculum and Instruction. The United States of America: IEEE
Press
Huges, Arthur. 2003. Testing for Language Teachers. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Junaidi. 2010. Table r (Koefisien Korelasi Sederhana) df = 1 – 200.
http://junaidichaniago.wordpress.com
KEMENDIKBUD. 2016. Silabus Mata Pelajaran Sekolah Menegah Pertama / Madrasah Tsanawiyah (SMP/MTs) Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Inggris.
Jakarta
Mertens, Donna M. 2010. Research and Evaluation in Education and
Psychology. UK: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Newble, David and Robbert Cannon. 2000. A Handbook for Medical
Teachers. UK: Kluwer Academic Publhisers.
Nunan, David. 1989. Designing Tasks for the Communicative Classroom. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pandey, Dr. Prabhat and Dr. Meenu Mishra Pandey. 2015. Research Methodology: Tools and Techniques. Romania: Bridge Center.
PERMENDIKBUD No. 23/2016
PERMENDIKBUD No. 53/2015
93
Primadani, Arin Eka and Gunadi H. Sulistyo. 2013. An Analysis of A Midterm English Test of The Seventh Grade Accelerated Class At SMPN 3
Malang. English Language Education. Vol. 3/1 (p: 1-11).
Priyanto, D. (2008). Mandiri Belanja SPSS (Statistical Product and Service Solution) untuk Analisa Data dan Uji Statistik. Yogyakarta: Mediakom
Richards, Jack. C. 1995. The Labuage Teaching Matrix. The United States of America: Cambridge University Press.
Saputra, Reza Wisnu. 2015. The Comparison between the Second Mid-term English Tests for the Seventh Grades Made By the State and Private
School Certified English Teachers. Journal of English Language
Teaching. August. Vol. 4/1 (p: 1-5).
Sindelar, Ph.D., Nancy W. 2015. Teaching and Testing: Steps for Using Test
Data as a Tool for Teaching and Learning. Appersontm.
Sudjana, DR. Nana. 2011. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, Pt.
Sugiyono, P. D. 2015. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Kuantitatif Dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Yoneda, Mitaka. 2012. Designing Assessment Tools: the Principles of
Language Assessment. Japan: Department of English Communication.
