DEVELOPING STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY THROUGH GENRE-BASED TEACHING :Action Research with the First Year Students in a Senior High School.

(1)

3.5 Instruments ... 3.5.1 Spoken Test Instrument... 3.5.2 Observation Sheet ... 3.5.3 Questionnaire Instrument ... 3.6 The Action Research Cycles ... 3.6.1 Research Cycle One... 3.6.1.1 Phase 1: Look…… ………... 3.6.1.2 Phase 2: Think ………... 3.6.1.3 Phase 3: Act………. ………... 3.6.2 Research Cycle Two... 3.6.2.1 Phase 1: Look ………... 3.6.2.2 Phase 2: Think ………... 3.6.2.3 Phase 3: Act ………... 3.7 The Techniques of Data Analysis... 43 43 44 45 46 46 46 47 47 48 48 48 49 49 3.7.1 Analyzing the Students’ Speaking Tests………... 50

3.7.2 Analyzing the Data from Classroom Observation... 54

3.7.3 Analyzing the Data from Questionnaire………... 55

3.8 Concluding Remark... 56

CHAPTER IV: RSEARCH FINDINGS AND DISCUSSIONS 57 4.1 Findings …... 57 4.1.1 Cycle One………....

(4)

4.1.1.1.1 The Pretest Scores………….……….... 4.1.1.1.2 The Test of Normality Distribution………... 4.1.1.2 Phase 2: Think ………... 4.1.1.3 Phase 3: Act…..……… 4.1.1.3.1 Instruction………….……….. 4.1.1.3.1.1 Speaking Activities in BKoF Stage….……… 4.1.1.3.1.2 Speaking Activities in Modeling Stage….……… 4.1.1.3.1.3 Speaking Activities in Joint Construction Stage… 4.1.1.3.1.4Speaking Activities in Independent Stage………... 4.1.1.3.2 Observation……… 4.1.1.3.3 Evaluation………...

(5)

4.1.2.3.3 Evaluation………... 4.1.1.3.3.1 The Calculation Test Scores in Cycle One…… 4.1.3.1.3.2 The Test of Normality Distribution…………... 4.2 Discussion …...

84 86 88 88 4.2.1 The Genre-Based Approach Can Help Develop Students’ Speaking

Ability……….

88

4.2.1.1 Cycle One…... 89

4.2.1.2 Cycle Two…... 93

4.2.2 The Students’ Responses towards the Implementation of the Genre-Based Teaching………...………… 4.3 Concluding Remark………. 95 99 CHAPTER V: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS……. 100

5.1 Conclusions…... 100

5.2 Recommendations…... 101

REFFERENCES…... 103

APPENDICES…... 110 Appendix 1 : Research Schedule...

Appendix 2 : Appendix 3: Appendix 4: Appendix 5: Appendix 6:

(6)

Appendix 7: Appendix 8: Appendix 9: Appendix 10: Appendix 11: Appendix 12: Appendix 13: Appendix 14: Appendix 15: Appendix 16: Appendix 17: Appendix 18:

Scoring Rubric for Speaking... Scoring Rubric for Recount Genre... Students’ Pre-test Scores... Students’ Scores of Test in Cycle One... Students’ Post-test Scores in Cycle Two... Tests of Normality Data... Paired Sample-T Test (Pre-test & Test in Cycle One) ... Paired Sample-T Test (Test in Cycle One & Post-test)... Table of Critical Values of the Pearson Product-M... Table of Critical Values of t...

The Index Gain (Pretest – Test in Cycle One)... The Index Gain (Test in Cycle One – Posttest)...

(7)

LIST OF TABLES

Table 2.1 Table 3.1

Schematic Structures of Recount Text………... The Test Scoring Categories for Speaking………

(8)

LIST OF CHARTS

Chart 4.1 Chart 4.2

Index Gain of students in Cycle One………. Index Gain of students in Cycle Two………

(9)

LIST OF FIGURE

(10)

1 CHAPTER I

INTRODUCTION

This chapter presents the general issues related to the present study. The first section started with thebackground of the study that mainly deals with the issue for conducting this study. This section is followed by research questions and the

purpose of the study. The next sections present the significance of the study, the scope of the study, and the organization of the thesis.

1.1 Background of the Study

The teaching of English in Indonesia today has been underpinned by the genre

based-approach initially developed in Australia. According to genre-based approach, students learn text types. This approach with its teaching cycles focuses

on language skills whether in listening, speaking, reading, and writing.

In learning language, it is often thatstudents use language and develop a relatively

unconscious, implicit understanding of how it works (Derewianka, 2004: 3). One of matters in teaching is that whether teacher should teach implicitly or explicitly

related to certain language events in social context and the purpose of the events. In line with the importance of whether language teaching should beundertaken implicitly or explicitly, there is an approach that represents these needs.

(11)

Genre-based approach is a response to previous approaches that favors an implicit

approach to instruction. It is believed that when learners need clear and explicit model of the language behaviors they are going to encounter, teacher’s role

become important (Thornburry, 2008: 121). Hence, the genre-based approach attempts to redress lack of explicitness in teaching by providing direct instruction in the way language events are typically realized, and by relating these features to

the social context and purpose of the event while also to make commonsense understandings explicit (Thornburry, 2008: 121; Derewianka. 2004: 3).

A number of studies have been conducted to investigate the implementation of this approach especially in teaching writing in Indonesia (Batubara 2009; Chayati

2009; Helmy 2008; Effendi 2007). Unfortunately, there is still lack of study which deals with this approach in teaching speaking; if any, some of them still

specifically focus on the implementation of the genre-based approach in teaching speaking (Endah, 2009; Purnomo 2008), not to focus on the students’ speaking development. This has led the researcher to conduct research on how genre-based

approach can develop students’ speaking ability.

Genre-based approach in teaching speaking is applicable. This is what Eggins and Slade (1997, cited in Lin 2006) discuss and demonstrate the ways in which this may be done. In terms of teaching conversation, Eggins and Slade (1997) cited in

(12)

3 In teaching conversation, casual conversation in English does follow schematic structures and generic patterns of openings and closings, turn taking, topic management and such, realized through particular grammatical features in the same way as written genres. Through using the Curriculum Cycle model, students may be helped in a similar way to manage particular genres of spoken conversation.

(Eggins and Slade: 1997 cited in Lin: 2006)

Genre-based approach offers students explicit and systematic explanations of the ways that language functions in social contexts (Hyland 2003 as cited in Shuhua,

et.al. 2009). Hyland notes that the goal of genre pedagogies is to guide students “toward a conscious understanding of target genres and the ways language creates

meanings in context”（Hyland 2003: 21 cited in Shuhua, et.al. 2009).

Hence, genre based approach is possibly applied in teaching other skills in general or teaching speaking in particular beside writing, as current trends usually focus

on it. Regarding this, then this study is aimed at investigating how genre-based approach can be applied in teaching speaking especially in recount texts and what

the students’ responses towards the implementation of the genre based approach (GBA) in speaking class.

1.2 ResearchQuestions

The research questions of this present study are as follow.

1. Can the genre-based approach (GBA) help develop students’ speaking ability? 2. What are the students’ responses towards the implementation of the genre

(13)

1.3 Purpose of the Study

Relevant to the research questions, the present study aims:

1. to investigate whether the genre-based approach (GBA) can help develop

students’ speaking ability;

2. to identify the students’ responses towards the implementation of the genre based approach (GBA).

1.4 Significance of the Study

The study is significant and valuable since so far studies related to the genre-based approach focused on writing and few studies related to the genre-genre-based approach focused in speaking, therefore this study as a study that focused on

speaking may potentially contribute to three aspects of education; theoretically, practically and professionally.

Theoretically, this study imparts some information as one study attempted to fill in the gap of related studies previously which are dominated by research on

writing skill. Additionally, the study which deals with this approach in teaching speaking is also still rare; if there is any, some of them still focus on its

implementation (Endah, 2009; Purnomo 2008). This study will contribute to add the repertoire of those previous related studies.

(14)

5 developing their spoken ability. Hence, this hopefully can help them to gain skill

in their speaking.

This study may also contribute to the teacher profession since this study also investigated students’ responses towards the activities done for developing their speaking throughout this study. It means that this study is a kind of teacher’s

efforts to find the appropriate approach in speaking class. Furthermore, regarding teaching policy, it can lead to the socialization of the genre-based teaching.

1.5 Scope of the Study

This study is action research of first graders in a state senior high school in

Subang, West Java Indonesia. This study was focused on the genre-based approach for developing students’ speaking skill. Particularly, the present study

was aimed at elaborating how the teaching stages in spoken cycle of the genre-based approach can help students to develop their speaking skill especially in recount text. And this study was also focused on investigating the students’

(15)

1.6 Organization of the Thesis

This thesis consists of five chapters. The first chapter is Introduction. The second one reviews the theoretical framework related to the study. The third chapter

(16)

35

CHAPTER III

RESEARCH METHOD

This chapter discusses aspects related to the methods of the study. It consists of eight

sections. The first section reviews the research purposes and research questions. Next

section presents the research design, the third relates to the population and sample,

followed by the explanation of the instruments, elaborations of the techniques of

collecting data, and the research procedure. The next section tells about techniques of

analyzing data and the last is a concluding remark.

3.1. Research Purpose and Research Questions

As mentioned in chapter one, this study aims to, firstly, investigate on how the

teaching by using genre based approach (GBA) can be applicable in teaching

speaking especially in recount texts. Secondly, this study aims to find out the

students’ responses towards the implementation of the genre based approach in

speaking class. Thus to meet these two purposes, two research questions are

proposed:

3.1.1 Can the genre-based approach (GBA) help develop students’ spoken

language ability?

3.1.2 What are the students’ responses towards the implementation of the genre

(17)

36

3.2. Research Design

This study employs action research. The reason for choosing action research as a

method in this study was based on the definition of action research itself as

‘self-reflective enquiry’ (Carr and Kemmis 1986 as cited in Burns, 2010: 5). This study is

also concerned with reflective inquiry to some extents, because teacher as researcher

looks and learns the teaching-learning process and then tries to make it better from

cycle to cycle. Furthermore, in action research a teacher can see gaps between what

is actually happening in teaching situation and what would ideally like to see

happening (Burns, 2010: 2).

Basic assumption that underlies action research is that those who do action research

assume that those involved, either singly or groups, are informed individuals who are

capable of identifying problems that need to be solved and of determining how to go

about solving them (Fraenkel and Wallen, 2007: 567).

In line with the main aim of action research that is to identify a ‘problematic’

situation or issue of the participants involved – who may include teachers, students,

or even parents (Burns, 2010: 44), this action research involved another English

teacher to be co-researcher to work collaboratively with the researcher . The

(18)

37

on researcher behalf and then provided a complementary perspective for sharing

ideas (Burns, 2010: 44; Baumfield et al, 2009: 10).

The process of action research can be described as a continuous cycle of planning,

action and review of the action (Cherry, 1999: 1). Actually there are some theories

illustrate similar things about the process of action research as purposed by Koshy

(2005); Whitehead and McNiff (2006) ); Fraenkel and Wallen (2007: 570-573);

Baumfield et.al. (2008); Norton (2009); Burns (2010); (Stringer et al, 2010);

Alwasilah (2011: 85). This study specifically followed theory illustrated by Stringer

et. al. (2010) because it was the most suitable one for this study.

Steps in this action research require three broad phases in a cycle of research namely:

Look, Think, and Act (Stringer et al, 2010: 1).

1. Planning 2. Instruction 3. Evaluation

Figure 3.1 Action research cycles (From Stringer et al, 2010: 12)

(19)

38

The figure above illustrates the model of action research that shows its iterative or

recursive nature. The cyclical Look–Think–Act steps of action research are

incorporated into phase of lesson planning and preparation, instruction and

assessment and evaluation. Furthermore, Stringer et.al. (2010) explain the steps as

summarized below.

• Phase 1—Lesson planning and preparation is the phase to review information

and resources (Look); select, sort, and organize information (Think); and formulate

lesson plan (Act).

• Phase 2—Instruction is the phase for initiating activity and observing student

responses (Look); reflecting on their learning processes and performances (Think);

providing feedback and information (Act).

• Phase 3—Assessment and Evaluation is the phase where researcher can review

lesson outcomes, review student performance (Look); identify successes and

strengths; identify weaknesses and gaps (Think); Plan remedial actions; plan ways of

improving instruction and learning (Act).

3.3. Site and Participants

This study was conducted in a state senior high school in Subang West Java. Reasons

that underlie the choosing of the site are because; it was chosen because of its

feasibility. The site was placed in a feasible area that can help the researcher to get

(20)

39 teachers there; hence it helps the researcher to learn students’ prior ability in

speaking.

Students participating in this study were students of a first grade in a state senior high

school in Subang. The students involved in this study were chosen by using

convenience sampling. A convenience sample is a group of individuals who

(conveniently) are available for study (Fraenkel and wallen, 2007: 100). There were

three reasons for choosing the students by using convenience sampling. First, the

students involved in this study were available for this study whether in a matter of

time and their willingness to be involved in this study. Second, the participants in this

study represent mostly students’ speaking ability in this research site that varies from

poor, medium and good. The categorization of the students’ ability were based on

their speaking scores in Pretest. And another reason relates to material suggested in

the curriculum in this grade, since this study was focused on the recount genre, then it

was appropriate with what should they learn in this grade. Furthermore, the study

involved 38 students of the 1st grade students. Officially there were 42 students in this

class. But there were only 38 to 40 students that often attended the class. Hence this

study just focused on the 38 students as the participants for gaining the complete and

(21)

40 The researcher, as a main instrument in this study, acted as a teacher in

teaching-learning process. There was also a co-researcher that helped especially in observing

whether the students and also the teacher in the teaching-learning process.

3.4. The Techniques of Collecting Data

There were three data collection techniques used in the study. These include:

3.4.1. Oral Test

The students had Pretest and Posttest in speaking related to recount text (see

Appendix 9, 10 and 11). The tests were recorded then scored by considering the test

scoring categories for speaking such as; fluency, pronunciation, grammar and

comprehension as what has been categorized by Brown (2001: 406-407) and also by

considering scoring rubric for recount text proposed by Hyland (2004: 174) such as:

content, structure, and language. Since the scoring criteria for speaking can be

modified depending on the expected performance criteria (Brown, 2004: 157), hence

the tests were scored by considering fluency; how the spoken language flows,

pronunciation; whether any errors or not in pronunciation, grammar; how the control

of grammar is, and comprehension; accomplishing objective of elicited task.

The data were collected by gaining the pretest posttest scores in each cycle. The

(22)

41

ability, and it is in a kind of students’ speaking scores (see Appendix 9, 10 and 11 for

the Pretest, Test 1 and Posttest Scores). The scores were gained by following the

speaking test criteria.

3.4.2. Classroom Observation

Observation was conducted in this study to encourage phases for reflection of this

action research. It was to obtain data on the teaching practices and the students’

learning activities. The students’ responses towards the teaching-learning process

also can be seen in the classroom observation. How they got involved in the activities

and how they reacted during the teaching learning process (see Appendix 3, 4 and 5).

Observation as the conscious noticing and detailed examinations of participants’

behavior in natural setting (Cowie as in Croker and Heigham, 2009: 166) was done

both by the researcher and the co-researcher. Acting as “participant observer”, the

researcher participated in the teaching situation or setting in the classroom. While

teaching, the researcher was also observing and immediately doing field note after

the teaching ended. “Field note was done to record teaching practical details,

methodological issues, students’ thoughts, and preliminary analyses” (Dawson,

2009:112). The observation was done in each teaching practice by the researcher.

So, while experiencing what was going on in a research site, “researcher also

(23)

42

(Cowie as in Croker and Heigham, 2009: 167). It means the researcher and observed

the students’ activities and interactions in the teaching-learning process.

Observation was also done by the co-researcher to obtain data in instruction phase.

“The co-researcher as nonparticipant observer did not participate in the activity being

observed” (Fraenkel and Wallen, 2007: 450) he just observed the teaching practices

such teaching steps, teaching cycles, teacher’s performance in teaching, and students’

learning process in the classroom such as; students’ activities and involvement in

learning process. This was conducted once in each cycle to obtain data that could

support the reflection in Think phase.

3.4.3. Questionnaire

Lists of questions were given to the students to gain data of their response with the

implementation of genre-based teaching. This helped to find out the finding of the

study, whether the stages succeeded or not in achieving the goal. Type of questions in

the questionnaire was in closed questions. It means the actual answer categories are

provided to the respondents, and the respondent is expected to choose the answer

category which comes closest to or best represents his feelings, beliefs, attitudes,

opinions, behavior, or knowledge of a situation (Labaw, 1980: 131). Closed questions

(24)

43

in line with what Norton (2009: 93) explains. These types of questions were used also

for helping the students in answering the questions.

The questions were divided into three main categories; each represents students’

interest, ability and difficulties. The questionnaire consisted of 10 questions; three

questions related to students’ interest in the teaching-learning process, six questions

were about students’ ability, and one was about students’ difficulty. The reasons for

focusing on students’ interest, ability and difficulties were actually for affirming

about their responses whether what they had done so far in the teaching-learning

process with the genre-based approach were in line with their interest, ability and

difficulties they found.

3.5. Instruments

3.5.1. Spoken Test Instruments

A pretest and posttest were conducted orally in a structured interview to test the

subjects’ spoken language ability. The tests were done by asking the students to tell

about past events (Recount texts). In the pretest, the teacher asked the students to tell

about their past activities. In the speaking test of Cycle One, the students were asked

to tell about procedural recount “How to get to One Place”. And in the posttest they

must tell about their activities in holiday. The tests were in oral tests and they were

(25)

44

scoring categories adapted from Brown (2001: 406-407) that consists of grammar,

fluency, pronunciation and comprehension (See Appendix 7); and recount scoring

rubric adapted from Hyland (2004: 174) that consist of content, structure and

language (See Appendix 8).

Pictures and maps were used as instruments in this study. Those were initially taken

into account as main instruments in teaching-learning process. Since the study was

focused on the steps in Genre-Based Approach in speaking class, hence the pictures

were used as the instruments that support this study especially in the step of Building

Knowledge of Field. It means the pictures helped the students to construct their

background knowledge to learn further in teaching-learning process.

3.5.2. Observation Sheet

The observation done by the co-researcher as well as the researcher was crucial in

action research (Baumfield et.al., 2009: 107). The observations done by the

co-researcher were led by the observation sheets (see Appendix 3 and 4). The

observation sheets contained a list of activities done by each student in teaching

learning process and also a list of teacher’s practices in teaching. Observation sheet

for students’ activities contained students’ attendance, students’ involvement in

asking question, answering question, working in group, doing task, and paying

(26)

45

performance in teaching contained lists of activities for seeking on how teacher

opened the class, followed the stage in teaching such as in building knowledge of

field, modeling of text, joint construction of text and independent construction of

text, and how teacher used teaching media in the classroom.

3.5.3. Questionnaire Instrument

Questionnaire in this study was used to see the students’ responses by writing them in

a space that is provided (Croker and Heigham, 2009: 201) related to the

implementation of genre-base teaching. This study was applied to investigate the

students’ speaking development and also their responses with the genre-based

teaching. Students’ responses were reflected by answering the questionnaire. The

questions provided in the questionnaire were in closed questions. Closed questions

were used in this study to have some measurable count of respondents’ behavior

(Norton, 2009: 93). The questionnaire consisted of 10 questions; three questions

related to students’ interest in the teaching-learning process, six questions were about

students’ ability, and one was about students’ difficulties (See Appendix 6).

The questions in the questionnaire were proposed to gain the data related to the

research question, especially about the students’ responses towards the

implementation of the genre-based approach. Hence the data obtained through

(27)

46

related to the students’ speaking ability. In other words, the questionnaire was used to

gain and complete data.

3.6. The Action Research Cycles

The study was aimed at investigating the students’ development in their speaking

ability through genre-based teaching and the students’ responses of the

implementation of genre-based approach speaking class. The study was divided into

two cycles with five teaching sessions in each cycle. Each session provided 90

minutes in classroom teaching.

3.6.1. Research Cycle One

3.6.1.1. Phase 1: Look

In this phase the researcher focused on lesson planning by following an action

research Look–Think–Act routine to prepare lessons of study (Stringer et.al, 2010:

31). Thus researcher first reviewed instructional elements—student prior knowledge,

student characteristics, community context, state standards (Look). Researcher then

selected and organized appropriate instructional components (Think) and then

(28)

47

3.6.1.2. Phase 2: Think

Researcher in this phase was still assisted by the Look–Think–Act action research

routine to assist teacher to keep track of the complex processes of instruction

(Stringer et.al., 2010: 63). It was comprised of observing student activities and

performance—observing and talking (Look), checking student activities and

performance—analyzing and assessing (Think) and affirming or remediating student

learning through reinforcing comments, repeating instructions and demonstrations,

and celebrating success (Act).

3.6.1.3. Phase 3: Act

In this phase researcher did action by giving the students treatments and evaluated

activities done in instruction. The evaluation was done by looking at the work that

had been done (Look), thinking about the quality of the work—what was right with it,

what needed improving or correcting (Think), and implementing solution to correct

or improve their performance (Act) (Stringer, 2010: 134). Furthermore, in this phase

the researcher did reflection to be suggested in the next cycle, especially in planning

(29)

48

3.6.2. Research Cycle Two

3.6.2.1. Phase 1: Look

In the second cycle, this phase was used for preparation for what should be done and

what to do in the second cycle based on the result of the Act Phase in Cycle One. The

results of previous cycle were from the students’ speaking scores and also from the

observation on lesson plans and instruments, and also from teaching learning

process.

Planning in the second cycle still provided preparation on lesson plans and

instruments (Stringer et.al, 2010: 31). Researcher identified students’ learning ability

in the classroom, to see whether there was improvement in their learning process

especially in their speaking ability and what strategies could be used to enhance

students’ learning. This phase was also still considering the Look-Think-Act

framework as in the first cycle.

3.6.2.2. Phase 2: Think

In the second cycle, this phase stilled followed what was done in Cycle one where the

detailed description will be provided in Chapter IV. Think Phase in Cycle Two

should take into account the results gained in the first Cycle, whether the students’

speaking scores and the data from observation.

(30)

49

3.6.2.3. Phase 3: Act

In this phase, the treatments were done by considering the data found in Cycle One.

The students still practiced in groups especially when they practiced in joint

construction stage, although at last they should perform their speaking ability

individually in independent construction. The Look-Think-Act framework was still

guided this phase as in the first cycle.

Assessment and evaluation phase in this cycle also considered what Stringer (2010:

134) proposed. The posttest in cycle two was conducted to find whether there is any

improvement or not in students speaking ability. Reflection was done to investigate

the data obtained.

3.7.The Techniques of Data Analysis

The obtained data then were analyzed in certain process by arranging the sequence of

data, organizing them into a certain pattern, category and certain sequence (Patton

cited in Moeleong, 2004: 103). The data gained were from oral speaking tests,

observations, and also from the questionnaire distributed to the students. Each data

(31)

50

3.7.1 Analyzing the Students’ Speaking Tests

First of all, the data of students’ speaking ability were collected by conducting the

oral pretest and posttest for each student. Then the tests were recorded and scored

following the criteria adapted from Brown (2001: 406-407) and also criteria for

recount text proposed by Hyland (2004: 174).

The tests were recorded and then scored by considering several aspects such as;

fluency, pronunciation, grammar and comprehension as what has been categorized by

Brown (2001: 406-407). Since the scoring criteria can be modified depending on the

expected performance criteria (Brown, 2004: 157), hence the tests were scored by

considering fluency; how the spoken language flows, pronunciation; whether any

errors or not in pronunciation, grammar; how the control of grammar is, and

comprehension; accomplishing objective of elicited task. Meanwhile the aspects of

recount genre were scored by considering the content, structure and language features

of recount genre (Hyland, 2004: 174).

The test scoring categories for speaking adapted from Brown (2001: 406-407) as

(32)

[image:32.595.108.520.222.721.2]

51

Table 3.1.

THE TEST SCORING CATEGORIES FOR SPEAKING

(Brown, 2001: 406-407)

Scores Fluency Pronunciation Grammar Comprehension

1 (No Specific fluency description. Refer to other to four language areas for implied level of fluency.)

Errors in pronunciation are frequent, but can be understood by a native speaker, used to dealing with for engineers attempting to speak his language.

Errors in grammar are frequent, but speaker can be understood by a native speaker used to dealing with foreigners attempting to speak his language.

Within the scope of his very limited language experience, can understand simple questions and statements if delivered with slowed speech, repetition, or paraphrase. 2 Can handle with

confidence but not with facility most social situations, including introductions and casual conversations about current events, as well as work, family, and autobiographical information.

Accent is intelligible though often faulty.

Can usually handle elementary constructions quite accurately but does not have thorough or confident control of the grammar.

Can get the gist of most conversations of non-technical subjects (i.e., topics that require no specialized knowledge).

3 Can discuss particular interests of competence with reasonable ease. Rarely has to grope for words.

Errors never interfere with understanding and rarely disturb the native speaker. Accent may be obviously foreign.

Control of grammar is good. Able to speak the language with sufficient structural accuracy to participate effectively in most formal and informal conversations on practical, social, and professional topics.

Comprehension is quite complete at a normal rate of speech.

4 Able to use language fluently on all levels normally pertinent to professional needs. Can participate in any conversation within the range oh this experience with a high degree of fluency.

Errors in pronunciation are quite rare.

Able to use the language accurately on all levels normally pertinent to professional needs. Errors in grammar are quite rare.

(33)

52

5 Has complete fluency in the language such that his speech is fully accepted by educated native speakers.

Equivalent to and fully accepted by educated native speakers.

Equivalent to that of an educated native speaker.

Equivalent to that of an educated native speaker

The total score of speaking for each student was counted by summing up the four

aspects of speaking (fluency, pronunciation, grammar & comprehension). And then

the total score was multiplied by 3. Hence if a student has a total score 20 (5 for each

aspect), then the students’ score for speaking aspect is 60 (for 20 was multiplied by

3).

The data of speaking test were also scored by considering the categories for scoring

[image:33.595.107.527.226.720.2]

recount genre proposed by Hyland (2007:174). The categories are as follows:

Table 3.2.

SCORING RUBRIC FOR RECOUNT GENRE

(Hyland, 2004: 174)

Scores Content Structure Language

31-40 •Even explicitly stated

•Clearly documents events

•Evaluates their significance

•Personal comment on events

• Orientation gives al essential information

• All necessary background provided

• Account in

chronological/other order Reiteration “round off” sequence

• Excellent control of language

• Excellent use of vocabulary

• Excellent choice of grammar

• Appropriate tone and style

21-30 •Even fairly clearly stated

•Includes most events

•Some evaluation of events

•Some personal comment

• Fairly well developed orientation

• Most actors and events mentioned

• Largely chronological and

•Good control of language

•Adequate vocabulary choices

(34)

53

coherent

• Reorientation “rounds off” sequence

grammar

•Mainly appropriate tone

11-20 •Event only sketchy

•Clearly documents events

•Little or weak evaluation

•Inadequate personal comment

• Orientation gives some information

• Some necessary background omitted

• Account partly coherent

• Some attempt to provide reorientation

•Inconsistent language control

•Lack of variety in choice of grammar & vocabulary

•Inconsistent tone and style

1-10 •Event not stated

•No recognizable events

•No or confused evaluation

•No or weak personal comment

• Missing or weak orientation

• No background provided haphazard and incoherent

• No reorientation or includes new matter

•Little language control

•Reader seriously distracted by grammar errors

•Poor vocabulary and tone

The score for recount text was also calculated by following the criteria mentioned

above. It means if a student has a total score for recount in 40. Then the total score for

students would be derived from both speaking and recount criteria. It was gained by

summing up the score of speaking (the total is 60) and the score of recount (the total

is 40). Hence the maximum score would be 100 for both speaking ability and recount

genre.

After all of the students’ speaking tests were scored by considering the criteria for

assessing speaking and also recount genre, then scores of all students were summed

up, whether the Pretest, the test in Cycle One and Posttest scores. The scores were

calculated by using SPSS 17.00. Firstly the students’ scores in each pretest, test in

Cycle One and posttest were tested to know whether the data were normally

(35)

54

computed through the paired-sample significant test (Hatch and Farhady, 1982;

Sugiono, 2007). The paired-sample significant test was done both for the pretest and

the 1st test in cycle one and also for the pretest and posttest in Cycle Two. Then the

result of both test were compared.

3.7.2. Analyzing the Data from Classroom Observations

Observations in this study was conducted to encourage phases for reflection of this

action research. It was to obtain data on the teaching practices and the students’

learning activities.

The researcher as participant observer participated in the teaching situation or setting

in the classroom (Fraenkel and Wallen, 2007: 450)n doing field note immediately

after the teaching-learning process. It was done to record practical details,

methodological issues, personal thoughts, preliminary analyses and working

hypotheses (Dawson, 2009:112). Observations were also done by the co-researcher

to obtain data in instruction phase. The co-researcher as nonparticipant observer did

not participate in the activity being observed (Fraenkel and Wallen, 2007: 450), he

just observed the teaching practices such as teaching steps, teaching cycles, teacher’s

performance in teaching, and students’ learning process in the classroom such as;

students’ activities and involvement in learning process. This was conducted once in

(36)

55

All the data gained whether from researcher’s field note and also from the

co-researcher’s observation were analyzed to fulfill the triangulation (Fraenkel and

Wallen, 2007: 443) of this study.

3.7.3. Analyzing the Data from Questionnaire

The questionnaire consisted of 10 questions; three questions related to the students’

interest in the teaching-learning process, six questions were about students’ ability

and understanding of the recount text, and one question was about students’

difficulties speaking class. The result of questionnaire is described by calculating it

[image:36.595.109.513.240.665.2]

into the following formula:

Table 3.3.

The Formula of Percentage

P = Number of Percentage

F = Frequency

R = Rank

P = F x 100%

(37)

56

After collecting all data, students’ recorded speaking tests, field notes from

observations, and also the result of questionnaire, then they were analized by

arranging, organizing, breaking into manageable units, synthesizing, searching for

patterns, discovering what was important and what was to be learned.

3.8. Concluding Remarks

This chapter has outlined the methodology of the study. It has discussed how this

study was conducted. This includes the research questions, the selection of site and

participant, research procedure, the techniques of collecting data, instruments, the

cycles of the research and the techniques of data analysis. The data presentation and

(38)

100 CHAPTER V

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

This chapter presents the conclusions of this study. It also spells out some recommendations for further study regarding the teaching of spoken genre. These conclusions of the study are built up based on the data analysis which is discussed

in previous chapter. Some recommendations are proposed here in order to give information as well as guidance to conduct further research concerning the same

field or issue.

5.1. Conclusions

This study is about developing students’ spoken language ability through

genre-based teaching in recount genre. Referring to the discussion in Chapter Four, the major conclusion of the study is that the students spoken language ability actually

improves from the pretest to the test in Cycle One and Posttest in Cycle Two. However, the increase is not really significant in the first test in Cycle One, but obviously it was found that students’ spoken language ability were better in

Posttest in Cycle Two. It was inevitably caused by the evaluation and feedback done in Cycle One to fix the weaknesses done in its cycle. Hence in Cycle Two,

the teaching learning processes were better.

Data obtained from different data collection techniques indicate that the students’

(39)

teaching in speaking class. The findings of this study show that genre-based

approach can help develop students’ speaking ability. The stages in genre-based approach can help the students to gain information step by step and then formulate

the information and idea in written and spoken texts. It was proved by the students’ speaking scores improved from one test to other ones.

Beside that, the students also gave positive responses towards the implementation of this approach in the class. They had interest to do activities and discuss in

groups and also to perform individually in independent construction of text. It was also important to let the students get involved in the various activities that were relevant with the teaching of recount text.

5.2. Recommendations

In line with the topic under discussion which is about developing students’ spoken language ability through genre-based approach in recount genre, the following recommendations which have to do with the teaching of speaking development

are worth trying especially in the site.

First, with regard to the speaking skill, it has been mentioned that students’ speaking ability is still relatively low and underdeveloped. In this case, the students’ speaking skills have not achieved. In response to this, teacher should

(40)

102 students should also be given more guidance and constructive feedback from the

teacher. Finally, it is also recommended that the teaching of speaking should be integrated with other macro skills e.g., reading, listening and writing. By this way,

students can be introduced with various texts and aspect of language that enable them to use language for different purposes and contexts especially in their writing.

Second, in order to help students to promote their speaking skill ability, it is

recommended that a certain program should be conducted in the site. Based on the students’ responses towards the use of genre-based approach in teaching speaking, it is suggested that teacher while following the steps in genre-based approach such

as; building knowledge of field, modeling or deconstructing, joint construction and independent construction, it will also be helpful if teacher involves the

students in certain activities to construct certain context. Hence the students can be helped to understand the context constructed in certain genre in speaking class. As what had been done in this study especially in cycle two, the students were

involved to understand certain context by asking, answering and drilling certain questions in groups. And then they retell what they had been discussed and done

(41)

REFERENCES

Allwright, D. 1993. Observation in the Language Classroom. London and New York: Longman.

Alwasilah, A. C. 2010. Pokoknya Action Research. Bandung: Kiblat.

Alwasilah, A. Chaedar. 2002. Pokoknya Kualitatif. Bandung: Kiblat.

Batubara,S. S. 2009. The Implementation of Genre-Based Appoach-A Case Study in Teaching Narrative Text in Second Grade Junior High SchoolStudents. Thesis: SPS UPI.

Baumfild,V., et.al. 2009. Action Research in the Classroom. Sage Pub: LA, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC.

Brown, H. D., 2004. Language Assessment. Principles and Classroom

Practice. NY: PearsonEducation, Inc.

Brown, H. D., 2001. Teaching by Principles. An Interactive Approach to language Pedagogy. Longman: New York.

Brown, J. D., 1990. Understanding Research in Second Language Learning. A teacher’s guide to statistics and research design. USA: Cambridge University Press.

Burns, A., 2010. Doing Action Research in English Language Teaching.

New York: Routledge.

Cambridge Advanced Learner’s Dictionary, Third Edition. 2008. Singapore: Cambridge University Press.

(42)

104 Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta. Available in http:[

etd.eprints.ums.ac.id/6552/1/A320050359.pdf]

Cherry, N., 2002. Action Research (A Pathway to Action, Knowledge and Learning). Melbourne: RMIT Publishing.

Christie, F and Derewianka, B. 2008. School Discourse : Learning to Write Across the Years of Schooling. United States: Continuum Publishing Corporation

Clark, H. H., 1997. Using Language. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.

Creswell, J. W., 1994. Research Design-Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. California: SAGEPublications Inc.

Croker, R. A. and Heigham, J. 2009. Qualitative Research in Applied Linguistics: A Practical Introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Dawson, C. 2009. Introduction to Research Methods (A Practical Guide for Anyone Undertaking A Research Project) Fourth Edition. United Kingdom: How to Book Ltd.

Depdiknas. 2006. Permen Depdiknas 22 Tahun 2006. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional Jakarta.

Derewianka, B. 2011. A New Grammar Companion for Teachers. Australia:

Primary English Teaching Association (PETA).

Derewianka, B. 1990. Exploring How Texts Work. Australia: Primary English Teaching Association (PETA).

(43)

Effendi, Y. 2007. Implementation of Genre-Based Appoach in EFLContext.

Thesis: SPS UPI.

Emilia, E. 2011.Pendekatan Genre-Based dalam Pengajaran Bahasa Inggris: Petunjuk untuk Guru.. Bandung: Rizqi Press.

Emilia, E. 2010. Teaching Writing Developing Critical Learners. Bandung: Rizqi Press.

Emilia, Emi. 2008. Menulis Tesis dan Disertas. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Endah, N. S. 2009. The Implementation of Genre-Based Appoach In Teaching Speaking at SMPN 2 Jatipurno Wonogiri. . Research Paper: Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta. Available in http:[etd.eprints.ums.ac.id/6526/1/A320050315.pdf]

Evans, D. and Gruba, P. 2009. How to Write a Better Thesis. Australia: Melbourne University Press.

Feez, S. 1998. Text-based Syllabus Design. Sidney: Macquarie University.

Fisher, D. and Frey, N. 2007. Checking for Understanding (Formative Assessment Technique for Your Classroom). USA: ASCD.

Fraenkel, J. R. and Wallen N. E. 2007. How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. Sixth Edition. NY: The McGraw-Hill Companies.

Freedman, A. and Medway, P. 1994. Learning and Teaching Genre.

Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook Publishers HEINEMANN.

(44)

106

Genre-based Approach. Available in

http:[lana-cometorich.blogspot.com/.../genre-based-approach.html]

Gerot, L. 1998. Making Sense of Text. Sidney: Southwood Press.

Hatch, E. and Lazaraton, A. 1991. The Research Manual. Design and Statistics for Applied Linguistics. Massachusetts: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.

Hatch, E. and Farhady H. 1982. Research Design and Statistics For Applied Linguistics. Massachusetts: Newbury House Publishers, Inc.

Harmer, J. 2007. How to Teach English New Edition. Longman: England.

Harmer, J. 2009. The Practice of English Language Teaching. Fourth Edition. Longman: England.

Harmer, J. 2002. The Practice of English Language Teaching. Third Edition. Longman: England.

Heigham, J. and Croker R. A. 2009. Qualitative Research in Applied Linguistics (A Practical Introduction. UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Helmy, J. 2008. The Implementation of Genre-Based Approach to Teaching Narrative Text (A Case Study). Thesis: SPS UPI.

Hughes, A. 2003. Testing for Language Tecahers. Second Edition. UK: Cambridge University Press.

Hughes, R. 2008. Spoken English TESOL and Applied Linguistics- Challenges for Theory and Practice. Great Britain: Palgrave Macmillan.

(45)

Hyland, K. 2004. Genre and Second Language Writing. USA: University of Michigan Press.

Johns, A. M. 2002. Genre in the Classroom. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.: USA.

Johnson, Keith. 2001. An Introduction to foreign Language Learning and Teaching. England: Pearson Education Limited.

Kaur,.S. and Chun, P.S. 2005. Towards a Process-genre Based Approach in the Teaching of Writing for Business English. [http:

www.esp-world.info/Articles_11/Sarjit-poon2.htm]

Klippel, F. 1994. Keep talking – Communicative Fluency Activities for Language Teaching. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.

Knapp, P. and Watkins, M. 2009. Genre, Text, Grammar. Unswpress: Australia.

Koshy, V. 2005. Action Research for Improving Practice (A Practical Guide). London: Paul Chapman Publishing.

Labaw, P. J. 1980. Advanced Questionnaire Design. Abt Books: Cambridge USA.

Lewis, G and Bedson, G. Games for Children. NY: Oxford University Press.

Lin, B.. 2006. Genre-based Teaching and Vygotskian Principles in EFL: The Case of a University Writing Course. Asian EFL Journal Volume 8. Issue 3Article 11. Available in

http:[www.asian-efl-journal.com/Sept_06_bl.php]

Lynch, B. K. 2003. Language Assessment and Programme Evaluation.

(46)

108 Martin, J.R. and Rose, D. 2008. Genre Relations (Mapping Culture).

Equinox: London

Mulyasa. 2006. Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Muslich, M. 2009. KTSP Pembelajaran Berbasis Kompetensi dan Kontekstual – Panduan bagi Guru, Kepala Sekolah dan Pengawas Sekolah .Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Norton, L. S. 2009. Action Research in Teaching & Learning. A Practical Guide to Conducting Pedagogical Research in Universities. London & New York: Routledge.

Nunan, D. 2000. Language Teaching Methodology. Edinburgh: Longman.

Pardiyono. 2009. Teaching Genre Based Speaking (Metode Pengajaran Speaking Berbasis Sentence Acquisition and Genre). Penerbit Andi: Yogyakarta.

Purnomo, B. (2008) Teaching Speaking Skills Through Genre-Based Approach. Humanity: Journal of Humanity studies, 9 (2). pp. 169-184. ISSN 1411-3589. Available in http:[ eprints.ums.ac.id/1275/]

Rachmawaty, N. and Hermagustiana, I. 2010. “Does Retelling Tecnique Improve Speaking Fluency?” TEFLIN JOURNAL Volume 21 Number 1 february 2010 ISSN 021573 X.Malang: TEFLIN Publication Division.

Reid, I. 1988. The Place of Genre in Learning: Current Debates. National Library of Australia: Deakin University.

Richard, J. c. and Rodgers T. S. 2006. Approaches and Methods in language Teaching. Second Edition.USA: Cambridge University Press.

(47)

Shuhua, T. et.al. 2009. Integrating Cooperative Learning into Genre-Based Teaching of EFL Writing. CELEA Journal (Bimonthly) Feb．2009

Vol．32 No.1. Retrived on 1 June 2010 on [http.

www.celea.org.cn/teic/83/83-99.pdf]

Silverman, D. 2005. Doing Qualitative Research. Second Edition. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Stringer, T. E. et.al. 2010. Integrating Teaching, Learning, and Action Research.California: SAGE Publications Inc.

Sugiyono, 2009. Statistika untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suryo, D. et.al. Bahasa Inggris untuk SMA Kelas X, Pendamping BSE (Buku Sekolah Elektronik). Solo: CV. Haka MJ

Swales, J. M.1990. Genre Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Thomas, R. M. 2003. Blending Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods in Theses and Dissertations. California: Corwin Press Inc.

Thornburry, S. 2005. How to Teach Speaking. Longman.