• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Dubnick, Melvin Accountability and the Promise of Performance: In Search of the Mechanisms. Performance & Management Review, 28, no.3:

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Membagikan "Dubnick, Melvin Accountability and the Promise of Performance: In Search of the Mechanisms. Performance & Management Review, 28, no.3:"

Copied!
5
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

103 DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Akbar, Rusdi, Pilcher Robyn and Perrin Brian. 2012. “Performance Measurement in Indonesia: The Case of Local Government.” Pacific Accounting Review 24, no. 3: 262-291

Akbar, Rusdi, Pilcher Robyn and Perrin Brian. 2015. “Implementing Performance Measurement Systems: Indonesian Local Government Under Pressure.” Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management vol 12, Iss 1 pp: 3-33 Argyris, C. dan Schon, D. (1996). Organisational Learning II: Theory, Method, and

Practice. New York: Addison-Wesley.

Ashworth, R. B. 2007. “Escape from the iron cage? Organizational change and isomorphic pressures in the public sector”. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory.

Aucoin, P., & Heintzman, R. 2000. “The Dialetics of Accountability for Performance in Public Management Reform”. International Review if Administration Science, 66, 45-55.

Bass, B.M. and Avolio, B.J. 1994. Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.

Caseley, J. 2006. “Multiple Accountability Relationship and Improved Service Delivery Performance in Hyderabad City, Southern India”. International Review of Admnistrative Sciences, 531-546.

Cavalluzzo, Ken S., Christopher D. Ittner. 2004. “Implementing performance measurement innovations: Evidence from government.” Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29, no. 3-4: 243-267.

Creswell, John W., dan Vicki L. P. Clark. 2012. Design and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (2nd Ed). United States of America: Sage Publications.

DiMaggio, Paul J., Walter W. Powell. 1983. “The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields.” American Sociological Review, 48, no. 2: 147-160.

(2)

104 Dubnick, Melvin. 2005. “Accountability and the Promise of Performance: In Search

of the Mechanisms.” Performance & Management Review, 28, no.3: 76-417. Dubnick, M. J., & Yang, K. 2011. The Pursuit of Accountability. In D. C. Menzel &

H. L. White (Eds.), The state of public administration: issues, challenges, and opportunities (pp. 171-186). New York: M.E. Sharpe, Inc.

Ebrahim, A. 2003. “Making sense of accountability: Conceptual perspectives for Northern and Southern nonprofits.” The American Review of Public Adminstration.

Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M. & Sarstedt, M., 2013. PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), pp. 139-151.

Hartono, J. M., 2011. Konsep dan Aplikasi Structural Equation Modeling Berbasis Varian dalam Penelitian Bisnis. Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN.

Hersey, P., Blanchard, K., and Johnson, D. 1996. Management Of Organizational Behavior, Utilizing Human Resources. California: Prentice Hall International, Inc. Hutapea, Parulian dan Nurianna Thoha. 2008. Kompetensi Plus. PT. Gramedia

Pustaka Utama: Jakarta.

Ho, Alfred T. 2006. “Accounting for the value of performance measurement from the perspective of midwestern mayors.”Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16: 217-237.

Hwang, Kwangseon. 2013. “The Impact of Accountability and Accountability Management on Performance at the Street Level.” Disertasi diterbitkan. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Kanigel, R. 1997. The One Best Way: Frederick Winslow Taylor and the Enigma of Efficiency. Sloan Technology Series, New York: Viking.

Kartono Kartini. 2006. Pemimpin dan Kepemimpinan. Penerbit PT. Rajagrafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Kim, S. E., & Lee, J. W. 2009. “Impact of Competing Accountability Requirements on Perceived Work Performance.” The American Review of Public Administration, 100-118.

(3)

105 Kolbe, R. H. & Burnett, M. S., 1991. “Content-Analysis Research: An Examination of Applications with Directives for Improving Research Reliability and Objectivity.” Journal of Consumer Research, 18(2), pp. 243-250.

Kravchuk, R.S. dan R.W. Schack, 1996, ”Designing effective performance measurement systems under the government performance and results act of 1993”, Public Administration Review, Vol.56 No.4, pp. 348-358.

Leavitt, H.J. 1978. Psikologi Manajemen. Jakarta. Penerbit Erlangga.

Legino, S, 2006. “Public Sector Leadership Perspectives on the Lateral Capability of Public Sector Organizations,” Disertasi dipublikasikan. School of Business and Technology. Webster University.

Lestyowaty, 2014. Akuntabilitas Anggaran Pendidikan. [Online]. Available at: http://www.bppk.kemenkeu.go.id/publikasi/artikel/147-artikel-anggaran-dan-perbendaharaan/14690-akuntabilitas-anggaran-pendidikan.[Diakses 17 November 2014].

Locke, E. A., and Latham, G. P. 1990. A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. 2002. “Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation.” American Psychologist, 57(9), 705-717.

Luthans, Fred. 2006. Perilaku Organisasi. Alih Bahasa V.A Yuwono. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi.

Mardiasmo. 2009. Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Andi, Yogyakarta

Meyer, John W., Brian Rowan. 1977. “Institutional organizations: Formal structure as myths and ceremony.”American Journal of Sociology, 83, no. 2: 340-363.

Oshagbemi T. 2000. Correlates of Pay of Satisfaction in Higher Education. The International Journal of Educational Management. P 31-39.

Pondeville, Sophie., Swaen, Valérie., and Rongé YvesDe. 2013. “Environmental management control systems: The role of contextual and strategic factors.” Management Accounting Research 24: 317-332.

(4)

106 Posner, P. 2000. Accountability challenges of third-part government. Oxford, UK:

Oxford University Press.

Republik Indonesia, 2002. Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 Pasal 31 Ayat 4 Tentang APBN untuk dana Pendidikan.

---, 2012. Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 12 Tahun 2012 Tentang Pendidikan Tinggi.

Rivai, V, dan Mulyadi, D. 2009. Kepemimpinan dan Perilaku Organisasi. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Robbin, Stephen P, 2003. Perilaku Organisasi, Edisi Kesembilan, Jilid 2, PT.Indeks Kelompok Gramedia, Jakarta.

Robbins, Stephen P. dan Timothi A. Judge. 2008. Perilaku organisasi. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Rodgers, Robert; Hunter, John E. 1991. “Impact of management by objectives on organizational productivity.” Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol 76(2), 322-336. Spencer, Lyle M. And Signe M. Spencer. 1993. Competence Work: Model for

Superior Performance. John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

Schelenker, B. R., & Weigold, M. F. 1989. Self-Identification and Accountability. Impression Management in the Organization, 21-43.

Scott, W. R. 1987. The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(4), 493-511.

---, 2004. Institutional Theory: Contributing to a Theoretical Research Program. In: Great Minds in Management: The Process of Theory Development. s.l.:Oxford University Press, pp. 1-47.

Sholihin Mahfud, Dwi Ratmono. 2013. Analisi SEM-PLS dengan WarpPLS 3.0 Untuk Hubungan Nonlinear dalam Penelitian Sosial dan Bisnis. Andy Offset Yogyakarta.

Siegel, Garry & H. R. Marconi. 1989. Behavioral Accounting. Cincinnati, Ohio: South-Western Publishing Co.

(5)

107 Sim, K. L., and L. N. Killough. 1998. “The Performance effects of complementarities between manufacturing practices and management accounting systems.” Journal of Management Accounting Research 10:325-346.

Sunarto. 2005. Manajemen Karyawan.Yogyakarta:AMUS Yogyakarta & Aditya Media Yogyakarta.

Suranta, Sri. 2002. “Dampak Motivasi Karyawan Pada Hubungan Antara Gaya Kepemimpinan Dengan Kinerja Karyawan Perusahaan Bisnis.” Empirika.Vol 15. No 2. Hal: 116-138.

Spekle, Roland F. dan Frank H.M. Verbeeten. 2014. “The Use of Performance Measurement Systems in the Public Sector: Effects on Performance.” Management Acounting Research, 25: 131-146.

Tampubolon, Manahan P. 2004. Perilaku Keorganisasian. Jakarta: Penerbit Ghalia Indonesia.

Thoha, Miftah. 1983. Kepemimpinan Dalam Manajemen. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Verbeeten, F.H.M., 2008. “Performace management practice in public sector organizations: Impact on performace. Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability Journal 21. 427-454.

Wang, Xiahou. 2002. “Assesing Performance Measurement Impact: A study of US Local Government.” Public Performance and Management Review, 26: 26-43 Yang, K. 2012. “Further Understanding Accountability in Public Organization:

Actionable Knowledge and Structure-Agency Duality.” Administration & Society, 255-284.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Penemuan utama dari penelitian ini adalah bahwa pemberian suplemen kapsul serbuk daun torbangun sebanyak 750 mg per hari selama 14 hari dapat menurunkan keluhan

11 Tahun 2011 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak yang telah menggantikan Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 1997 tentang Pengadilan Anak, sedangkan tujuan diterapkannya diversi yaitu

Hal ini dikarenakan Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 200 tentang Desain Indsutri hanya memberikan ketentuan bahwa desain yang mendapat perlindungan adalah desain yang

Sosial ekonomi adalah sebagai suatu keadaan atau kedudukan yang diatur secara. sosial dan menetapkan seseorang dalam posisi tertentu dalam

The number of user sessions per day shows how often users are opening your app, while the median session length measures the length of sessions over time: half of your measured

Berikut adalah tabel hasil pengujian menggunakan beberapa jenis serangan yang sama dengan metode Hierarchical Clustering, K-Nearest Neighbor dan Fuzzy Neural

Karakteristik suatu pegas dinyatakan dengan konstanta pegas (k). Hukum Hooke menyatakan bahwa jika pada sebuah pegas bekerja sebuah gaya, maka pegas tersebut akan

This research aimed to analyze the effect of family control, profitability, firm growth, institutional ownership, firm size and leverage toward the value of manufacturing industrial