REFERENCES
Al Bakaa, A. J. (2014). Investigating the Manifestation of Textual Themes in Argument English Assignment Writing by Iragqi and Australian Postgraduate Students. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature, 3 (6) , 205-211.
Alonso , I., & McCabe, A. M. (2003). Improving Text Flow in ESL Learner Compositions. The Inetrnet TESL Journal, 9 (2) , 1-10.
Alonso, I., & McCabe, A. M. (2003). Improving Text Flow in ESL Learner Compositions. The Inetrnet TESL Journal, 9 (2) , 1-10.
Alwasilah, A. C. (2007). Language, Culture, and Education: A Potrait of Contemporary Indonesia. Bandung: Andira.
Alwasilah, A. C. (2008). Pokoknya Kualitatif. Dasar-Dasar Merancang dan Melakukan Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta : Pustaka Jaya .
Alwasilah, A. C., & Alwasilah, S. S. (2005). Pokoknya Menulis. Bandung: PT Kiblat Utama Buku.
Anderson, M., & Anderson, K. (2003). Text Types in English 1 (2nd ed.). South Yara: McMillan Education Australia Pty Ltd.
Arunsirot, S. (2013). An Analysis of Textual Metafunction in Thai EFL Students' Writing. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Young and Language), 7 (2) , 160-174.
Badger, R., & White, G. (2000). A Process Genre Approach to Teaching Writing.
ELT Journal, 54 (2) , 153-160.
Belmonte, I. A., & HIdalgo, A. M. (1998). Theme-rheme Pattern in L2 Writing.
Servicio de Publicationes UCM, 10, 13-31.
Bloor, M., & Bloor, T. (1992). Given and New Information in the Thematic Organization of Text: An Aplication to the Teaching of Academic Writing. Occasional Papers in Systemic Linguistics, 6, 33-44.
Bloor, T., & Bloor, M. (2004). The Functional Analysis of English: A Hallidayan Approach (2nd ed.). London: Arnold.
Borjars, K., & Burridge, K. (2010). Introduding English Grammar (2nd ed.). London: Hodder Education.
Bowen, N. (2013). Exploring Thematic Choice in 1st and 3rd Year Undergraduate Texts through SFL: Functions of Experential Theme and
Grammatical.
Butt, D., Feez, S., Spinks, S., & Yallop, C. (2000). Using Functional Grammar: An Explorer's Guide. Sydney: Centre for English Teaching and Research. Macquarie University.
Callaghan, M., & Rothery, J. (1988). Teaching Factual Writing. Sydney: Metropolitan East Disadvantaged Schools Program.
Canale, M. (1983). Langauge Communicative Competence to Communicative Language Pedagogy. In J.C Richards & R.W Schmidt (Eds). 2-27.
Charney, D. H., & Charlson, R. A. (1995). Learning to Write in a Genre: What Student Writers take from Model Texts. Research in the Teaching of English, 29(1), pp. 88-125.
Cheng, X. T. (2002). Cohesion and Coherence in English Composition. JOurnal of School of Foreign Languages Shandong Teachers' University, 2 (11) , 94-98.
Christie, F., & Derewianka, B. (2008). Schools Dicourse. London: Continuum. Christie, F., & Martin, J. R. (1997). Genre & Institutions Social Proces in the
Work Place on School. New York: Biddles Ltd.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, Mixed Method Approach (3rd ed.). California: SAGE Publication, Inc.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitaive, Qualitative Research (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson. Cumming, M. (2003). The role of Theme and Rheme in Contrasting Methods of
Organizationof Texts. In Butler, C (Ed.). Dynamic of Language use.
Functional and Contrastive Perspective, 129-154.
Dastejerdi, H. V., & Talebinezhad, R. M. (2006). Chainpreserving Deletion Procedure in Cloze: A Discoursal Perspective. Language Testing, 23 (1) , 58-72.
Davies, N. F. (2011). Receptive Versus Productive Skills in Foreign Lanuage Learning. The Modern language Learning, 6 (8) , 440-443.
Derewianka, B. (1995). Language Development in Transition from Childhood to Adolescence: the Role of Grammatical Metaphor. Melbourne: Macquarie University.
Derewianka, B. (2004). Exploring How Texts Work (2nd ed.). Newton: PETA. Downing, A. (2001). The Theme-Topic Interface: Evidance from English.
Amsterdam: Lohnnswert.
Duff, P. A. (2008). Case Study Research in Applied Linguistics. New York: Lawrence Elbraum.
Ebrahimi, S. F., & Ebrahimi , S. J. (2012a). Textaulity in Academic Reading Text: A Case of Native and Non-Native Writers. Advances in Asian Social Science, 1 (3) , 258-261.
Ebrahimi, S. F., & Ebrahimi, S. J. (2012). Interpersonal Theme in EFL Students Composition Writing. Advances in Asian Social Science, Vol.2, 232-37. Ebrahimi, S. F., & Ebrahimi, S. J. (2012b). Information Development in EFL
Students Composition Writing. Advances in Asian Social Science, 1 (2), 212-217.
Ebrahimi, S. F., & Khedri, M. (2012). The Importance of Thematic Structure in Students Writing. Language in India, 12, 64-79.
Ebrahimi, S. J. (2012). Interpersonal Theme in Reading Comprehension Texts.
Retrieved June 9th, 2012, from
http://www.languageinindia.com/may2012/ebrahimireadingtheme.html Eggins, S. (2004). An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics (2nd ed.).
New York: Continuum.
Emilia, E. (2005). A Critical Genre-Based Approach to Teaching Academic Writing in a Tertiary EFL Context in Indonesia. (A Dissertation). The University of Melbourne, Melbourne.
Emilia, E. (2010). Teaching Writing, Developing Critical Learners. Bandung: Rizqi Press.
Emilia, E. (2011). Pendekatan Genre-based dalam Pengajaran Bahasa Ingriis: Petunjuk untuk Guru. Bandung: Rizqi Press.
Emilia, E. (2014). Intoducing Functional Grammar. Bandung: PT Dunia Pustaka Jaya.
Feez, S., & Joyce, d. S. (2006). Text-based Language Education: Programming and Methodology. Putney, NSW: Phoenix Education.
Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (4th ed.). Boston: McGraw Hill.
Fries, P. (1994). On Theme, Rheme, and Discourse Goal. In M. Coulthard,
Advances in Written Texts Analysis. New York: Routledge.
Fries, P. (1995b). Themes, Methods of Development, and Texts. In R. Hasan, & P. Fries, On Subject and Theme: A Discourse Functional Perspective (2nd ed.). Amsterdam: John Benjamin B.V.
Gee, S. (1997). Teaching writing: a genre-based approach. Review of English Language Teaching, 62, 24-40.
Gerot, L., & Wignell, P. (1994). Making Sense of Functional Grammar. New South Wales: Antipodean Educational Enterprises.
Grabe, & Kaplan . (1996). Theory of Practice of Writing: An Aplied Linguistic Perspective. London : Longman .
Green, C. F., Christopher, E. R., & Lam, K. M. (2000). The Incidence and Effects on Coherence of Marked Themes in Interlangauge Texts: A Corpus-based Inquiry. English for Specific Purposes, 19, 99-113.
Halliday. (1994). An Introduction Functional Grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A., & Matthiessen, C. M. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.
Halliday, M. A., & Matthiessen, C. M. (2014). Halliday's Introduction to Functional Grammar. Oxon: Routledge.
Hammond, J., & Derewianka, B. (2001). Genre . In D. &. Nunan, The Cambridge Guide to Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing Qualitative Research. New York: State University of New York Press.
Hawes, & Thomas. (2010). Thematic Progressin and Rhetoric in Sun and Time Editorials: 1992-2008. Rice Wrong Paper in Linguistics(Vol. 2), 39-50. Herriman, J. (2011). Themes and Thematic Progression in Swedish Advanced
Learners Writing in English. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 10, 1-28. Hewing, A. (2004). Developing Discipline-Specific Writing: An Analysis of
Undergraduate Geography Essays. In R. J. Ravelli, & R. A. Ellis,
Analysing Academic Writing. London: Continuum.
Hinkel, E. (2002). Second Language Writer's Text. Linguistics and Rethorical Features. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Ho, D. (2009). Systemic Text Analysis in the ESL Writing Classroom: Does It Work? RELC Journal: A Journal of Language Teaching and Research in Southeast Asia, 40 (3) , 333-359.
Hu, H. Y. (2009). Sytemic Text Analysis in the ESL Writing Classroom: Does it Work? RELC Journal, 40 (3) , 333-359.
Huda, N. (2008). Language Teaching and Learning: Issues and Trends. (An Undergraduate Thesis). IKIP, Malang.
Hyland, K. (2009). Teaching and Researching Writing (2nd ed.). Edinburgh: Pearson.
Ikaningrum, R. E. (2009). Developing Students' Ability to Write a Report Genre through Thematic Progession Approach. (An Undergraduate Thesis) State University of Semarang , Semarang.
Jing, W. (2014). Theme and Thematic Progression in Learner English: A Literature Review. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 16 (1) , 67-80. Jing, W. (2015). Theme and Thematic Progression in English Writing Teaching.
Journal of Education and Practice, 6 (21) , 178-187.
John, A. M. (1995). Genre and Peadagogical Purposes. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4 (2) , 181-190.
Jones, R. H., & Lock, G. (2011). Functional Grammar in ESL Classroom Noticing; Exploring & Practicing. United Kingdom: Polgrave McMillan. Knapp, P., & Watkins, M. (2005). Genre, Text, grammar. Technologies for
Teaching and assessing Writing. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.
Krisnawati, A. (2013). Applying Theme and Rheme in Indonesian EFL Students' Writing: An Attempt to Improve Cohesion and Coherence. The International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics
World, 2 (2) , 135-145.
Kvale, S. (1996). Inter Views: An Introductions to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publication Inc.
Lee, I. (1998). Enhancing ESL Students' Awareness of Coherence-Creating Mechanisms in Writing. TESL Canada Journal, 15 (2) , 36-49.
Leonard, D., & Hukari, T. (2005). Textual Organization of Academic Writing.
CATESOL State Conference, 1-7.
Li, J., & Fan, X. (2008). Application of Patterns of Thematic Progression to Literacy Text Analysis. Journal of Dalian University, 29 (4), 59-62.
Listyani, L. (2013). A Thematic Progression Analysis of Recount Texts Written by Tenth Grade Students of SMAN 1 Jekulo Kudus in Academic Year
Liu, J. X., & Liu , L. (2013). An Empirical Study on the Application of Theme Theory in the Field of Writing Pedagogy. English Language Teaching, 6 (5), 117-128.
Lock, G. (1996). Functional English Grammar: An Introduction for Second Language Teaches. Cambridge University Press: New York.
Lovejoy, K. B. (1998). An Analysis of Sentential Themes in Academic Writing: Implications for Teaching Sentence Style and Revision. Conference on College Composition and Communication, Chicago, II, 1-12.
Lu, A. (2013). A Functional Grammar Approach to Analysing Asian Students' Writing. American Journal of Educational Research, 1 (2), 49-57.
Ma, J. (2001). Thematic Progression, Cohesive Devise, and Coherence in English Writing. Analysis of CET-4 and CET6 writing papers. Foreign Language Education, 25 (5), 45-50.
Macken, M. (1990). A genre-based Approach to Teachingg Writing Years 3-6.
Australia: Common Ground.
Madjdi, A. (2009). Generic Structures of Texts in the Real World of Writing.
Artikel Mawas, 22, 1-22.
Marshall, S. (2001). A Genre-based Approach to the Teaching of Report-Writing.
English for Specific Purposes, 10 (1) , 3-13.
Martin, J. R. (1992). English Text, System, and Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamin;s Publishing Company .
Martin, J. R. (1997). Analysing Genre: Functional Parameters. London: Continuum.
Martin, J. R. (2000). Close Reading: Functional Linguistics as a Tool Critical Discourse Analysis. In L. Unsworth, Researching Language in Schools and Communities: Functional Linguistic Perspectives. London: Cassell. Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2008). Genre Relations. Mapping Culture. London:
Martin, J. R., Christie , F., & Rothery , J. (1987). Social Processes in Education: A Replay to Sawyer and Watson (and others) . In I. Reid, The Place of Genre in Learning: Current Debates (pp. 35-45). Geelong, Australia : Deakin University Press.
Martin, J. R., Matthiessen, C. M., & Painter, C. (1997). Working with Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.
Martinez-Prieto. (2014). Marked Theme in the Reading Comprehension. MSU Working Papers in SLS, 5, 32-42.
Matthiessen, C. M. (2010). Key Terms in Systemic Functional Linguistics.
London: Continuum.
Maxwell, J. A. (1996). Qualitative Research Design: An Intercative Approach.
London: SAGE Publication Inc.
McCabe, A. M. (1999). Theme and Thematic Pattern in Spanish and English History Texts (Vol 1). Aston University , 1, 1-304.
McCarthy, M. (1991). Discourse Analysis for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McMillan, J. H. (1992). Educational Research; Fundamentals for the Consumer.
New York: HarperCollin Publisher.
Meisuo , Z. (2000). Cohesive Features in the Expository Writing of Undergratduates in Two Chinese Universities. RELC Journal, 30 (1) , 61-95.
Meisuo, Z. (2000). Cohesive Features in the Expository Writing of Undergratduates in Two Chinese Universities. RELC Journal, 30 (1) , 61-95.
and Systemic Linguistics Approaches and use (2nd ed.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Ping, A. L. (2005). Talking Themes: The Thematic Structure of Talk. Discourse Studies , 7 (6), 701-732.
Priyatmojo, A. S. (2011). Cohesion and Coherence of the Students' Recount Text and its Implication for Teaching Writing of Text Types in English. Unnes Journal, 9-24.
Punch, K. F. (2014). Introduction to Social Research: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. London : SAGE Publications .
Qi, W. (2012). Systemic Functional Perspective: Functions of marked Theme in English. International Conference on Education Technology and management Egineering. Kecture Notes in International Technology, 16, 198-2-2.
Qing-Feng, L. (2009). Thematic Selection and Progression in EFL Writing. US-China Foreign Language, 7 (7) , 25-29.
Rafiei, K., & Modirkhamene, S. (2012). Thematicity in Published vs. Unpublished Iranian TEFL these. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2 (6) , 1206-1213.
Rakhman, A. N. (2012). An Analysis Thematic Progression in High School Students' Exposition Text. Passage 2013, 1 (1), 65-74.
Ren, S., Cao, Y., Gao, Y., & Li, Q. (2009). Thematic Oprational Approach and the Writing Teaching of College English. Asian Social Science, 5 (11), 141-46.
Rosa, R. N. (2007). Thematic Progression as a Means to Keep Cohesion in Exposition Texts. Retrieved September 11, 2014, from http://rusdinoorrosa.blogspot.com/.
Safitra, Z. (2013). Theme System of Systemic Functional Grammar in Students' Narrative Texts. (Thesis). Indonesia University of Education, Bandung . Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever Happened to Qualitative Description.
Research in Nursing & Health, Vol.23, 334-340.
Schleppegrell, M. J. (2004). The Language of Schooling: A Functional Linguistic Perspective. New Jersey: Lawrence Elbraum.
Schleppgrell, M. J. (2001). Linguistics Features of the Language of Schooling .
Linguistics and Education , 431-459.
Shieh , C. M., & Lin, K. S. (2015). Thematic Progression Patterns on the Texts of the Department Required English Texts. Retrieved August 9, 2015, from 140.127.82.166/retrieve/20777/13-15-34.pdf
Silverman, D. (2005). doing Qualitaive Research . New Delhi : SAGE Publication Inc .
Soepriatmadji, L. (2009). Thematic Progression in Thesis Abstract Written by English Students of FBIB Unisba Semarang. (An Undergraduate Thesis) Unisba Semarang , Semarang .
Sugijarto. (2010). Thematic progression in Students' Explanatory Texts: A Systemic Functional Linguistics Perspective. (A Thesis). Indonesia University of Education , Bandung .
Tan, J. H., & Sun, W. G. (2010). Enlightenment of Progression Patterns of Theme and Rheme in English teaching. Journal of Xuzhou Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition, 36 (1) , 140-143.
Thomas, S. (1994). Thematic Networks and Text Types. ASP (English Ligne), 23-26.
Travincek, F. (1962). Functional Sentence Perspective. Slavo a Slavenost, 22, 63-171.
Triyani. (2013). Theme and Thematic Progression of Reading Texts in English Learning Materials for Senior High School Grade X Written by MGMP
Team of Kudus Regency. (An Undergraduate Thesis). Muria Kudus University , Kudus.
Vasconcellos, M. (1992). The Theme as a Message Onset: Its Strcuture and Characteristics. Topic - From Grammar to Discourse Linguistica, 30 (1) , 147-163.
Wang, B. (2014). Theme in Translation: A Systemic Functional Linguistic Perspective. International Journal of Comparative Literature & Translation Studies, 2 (4) , 54-63.
Wang, L. (2007). Theme and Rheme in the Thematic Organization of Text: Implication for Teaching Academic Writing. The Asian EFL Journal, Vol.1, 164-76.
Wang, X. W. (2010). Thematic Progression Pattern and Coherence in English Writing. Analysis of TEM-4 Writing Paper. Foreign Language Research, 9 (1) , 164-176.
Wong, E. (2007). Developing Theme and Rheme in Expository Writing. A Case Study' Faculty of Communication and Modern Languages (ed). The Second Biennial Ineternational Cpnference on Teaching ang Learning of
English in Asia: Exploring New Frontiers (TELiA2), 1-8.
Wu, Y., & Dong, H. (2009). Applying SF-based Genre Approaches to English Writing Class. International Education Studies, 2 (3) , 77-81.
Yan, G. (2005). A Process Genre Model for Teaching Writing. Forum English Teaching, 43 (3), 18-27.
Yang, L., & Zhang , L. (2010). Exploring the Role of Reformations and A Model Text in EFL Students' Writing Performance. Language Teaching Research, 14 (4) , 464-484.
Yang, Q., Ramirez, A., & Harman, R. (2007). EFL Chinese Studentsand High Stakes Expository Writing: A Theme Analysis. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, Vol.1, 29-33.
Yang, X. (2008). Thematic Progression Analysis in Teaching Explanation Writing. English language Teaching Journals, Vol. 1 No. 1, 29-33.
Yin, R. K. (1994). Designing Single- and Multiple- Case Studies. In R. G. N. Benner, Improving Educational Managemennt through Research and Consultacy. London : Paul Chapman Publsihing in Association with the Open University .
Zhang , H., & Li , X. (2009). Contrast Studies on Thematic Progression in English Newspaper and Braodcasting News Texts. Jpurnal of XinJiang Education Institute, 25 (3) , 117-120.
Zhang, H., & Li, X. (2009). Contrast Studies on Thematic Progression in English Newspaper and Braodcasting News Texts. Journal of XinJiang Education Institute, 25 (3) , 117-120.
Zhang, W. P., & Wang , Z. L. (2001). Patterns of Thematic Progression and Genre. Journal of Zhuzhou Teachers College, 6 (6) , 68-71.
