• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Paper16-Acta25-2011. 104KB Jun 04 2011 12:03:15 AM

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "Paper16-Acta25-2011. 104KB Jun 04 2011 12:03:15 AM"

Copied!
6
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

UNIVALENCE CRITERIONS FOR SOME INTEGRAL OPERATORS

Virgil Pescar, Daniel Breaz

Abstract. We consider the integral operatorsD|α|,G|α|,γ,Kα1,α2,...,αn,|γ|,n and for the functionsf ∈ Awe obtain sufficient conditions for univalence of these integral operators.

2000Mathematics Subject Classification: 30C45.

Keywords: Integral operator, univalence.

1. Introduction

LetA be the class of functionsf of the form

f(z) =z+

X

k=2

akzk,

which are analityc in the open unit disk U = {z∈C:|z|<1}. Let S denote the

subclass of Aconsisting of all univalent functions f inU. Forf ∈ A, the integral operator D|α| is defined by

D|α|(z) =  |α|

z

Z

0

u|α|−1f′(u)du   1 |α|

, (1.1)

for some complex numbers α(α6= 0).

Also, the integral operatorG|α|,γ forf ∈ Ais given by

G|α|,γ(z) =  |α|

z

Z

0

u|α|−1

h(u) u

γ du

  1 |α|

, (1.2)

(2)

Kα1,α2,...,αn,|γ|,n(z) =  |γ|

z

Z

0

u|γ|−1

f1(u)

u α1

1 ...

fn(u)

u 1

αn

du   1 |γ|

(1.3)

for some complex numbers γ, α1, ..., αn, γ 6= 0; αj 6= 0;j= 1, n

. We need the following lemmas.

Lemma. 1.1. [2]. Let β be a complex number, Reβ >0 and f ∈ A. If

1− |z|2β β

zf′′(z) f′(z)

≤1, (1.4)

for all z∈ U, then the function

Fβ(z) =

 β

z

Z

0

uβ−1f′(u)du   1

β

(1.5)

is regular and univalent in U.

Lemma 1.2. (Schwarz [1]). Let f be the function regular in the disk UR =

{z∈C:|z|< R} with |f(z)| < M, M fixed. If f(z) has in z = 0 one zero with multiply ≥m, then

|f(z)| ≤ M Rm|z|

m

, (z∈ UR), (1.6)

the equality (in the inequality (1.6) for z6= 0) can hold only if

f(z) =eiθ M Rmz

m,

where θ is constant.

2. Main results

Theorem 1.Letα be a complex number,Reα >0 andf ∈ A,f(z) =z+a2z2+

(3)

If

1− |z|2Reα Reα

zf′′(z) f′(z)

≤1, (2.1)

for all z∈ U, then the function

D|α|(z) =  |α|

z

Z

0

u|α|−1f′(u)du   1 |α|

(2.2)

is in the class S.

Proof. Let us consider the function ϕ: (0,∞)→R,ϕ(x) = 1−a2x

x , 0< a <1.

The function ϕis decreasing and hence, since|α| ≥Reα >0, we obtain 1− |z|2|α|

|α| ≤

1− |z|2Reα

Reα , (z∈ U). (2.3)

From (2.3) we have 1− |z|2|α|

|α|

zf′′(z) f′(z)

≤ 1− |z|

2Reα

Reα

zf′′(z) f′(z)

, (2.4)

for all z∈ U. Using (2.1) and (2.4) we get 1− |z|2|α|

|α|

zf′′(z) f′(z)

≤1. (2.5)

From (2.5) and by Lemma 1.1, forβ =|α|it results that the function D|α| is in the class S.

Theorem 2.Let α, γ be complex numbers, Reα > 0, γ 6= 0 and the function

h∈ A. If

zh′(z) h(z) −1

≤ (2Reα+ 1) 2Reα+1

2Reα

2|γ| , (2.6)

for all z∈ U, then the function

G|α|,γ(z) =  |α|

z

Z

0

u|α|−1

h(u) u

γ du

  1 |α|

(4)

Proof. Let us consider the function

p(z) =

z

Z

0

h(u)

u γ

du, (2.8)

which is regular in U. We have

zp′′(z) p′(z)

zh′(z)

h(z) −1

,(z∈ U). (2.9)

The function g(z) = zhh(z(z)) −1, z ∈ U is regular in U, g(0) = 0 and from (2.6), by Lemma 1.2, we obtain

zh′(z) h(z) −1

≤ (2Reα+ 1) 2Reα+1

2Reα

2|γ| |z|, (2.10)

for all z∈ U.

From (2.9) and (2.10) we get 1− |z|2Reα

Reα

zp′′(z) p′(z)

≤ 1− |z|

2Reα

Reα |z|

(2Reα+ 1)2Re2Reα+1α

2|γ| , (2.11)

for all z∈ U. Since

max

|z|<1

1− |z|2Reα Reα |z|

!

= 2

(2Reα+ 1)2Re2Reα+1α

,

from (2.11), we have

1− |z|2Reα Reα

zp′′(z) p′(z)

≤1, (z∈ U). (2.12) Because

1− |z|2|α| |α|

zp′′(z) p′(z)

≤ 1− |z|

2Reα

Reα

zp′′(z) p′(z)

(5)

1− |z|2|α| |α|

zp′′(z) p′(z)

≤1, (z∈ U). (2.13) From (2.8) we have p′(z) = h(zz)γ, z ∈ U and hence, by (2.13), Lemma 1.1, forβ =|α|, it result thatG|α|,γ ∈ S.

Theorem 3. Let αj, γ be complex numbers, αj 6= 0, Reγ > 0, j = 1, n, Mj

positive real numbers and fj ∈ A, fj(z) =z+a2z2+..., j= 1, n. If

zfj′(z) fj(z)

−1

≤Mj, z∈ U; j= 1, n

(2.14)

and

M1

|α1|

+ M2 |α2|

+...+ Mn |αn|

≤ (2Reγ+ 1) 2Reγ+1

2Reγ

2 , (2.15)

then the function

Kα1,α2,...,αn,|γ|,n(z) =  |γ|

z

Z

0

u|γ|−1

f1(u)

u α1

1 ...

fn(u)

u 1

αn

du   1 |γ|

(2.16)

is in the class S.

Proof. We consider the function

g(z) =

z

Z

0

f1(u)

u α1

1 ...

fn(u)

u 1

αn

du (2.17)

and we observe that g(0) =g′(0)−1 = 0. We have

p(z) = zg

′′(z)

g′(z) = n

X

j=1

1 αj

zf

j(z)

fj(z)

−1

, (z∈ U). (2.18) From (2.14), (2.18), by Lemma 1.2., we obtain

zg′′(z) g′(z)

≤ |z|

n

X

j=1

Mj

|αj|

(6)

1− |z|2Reγ Reγ

zg′′(z) g′(z)

≤ 1− |z|

2Reγ

Reγ |z|

n

X

j=1

Mj

|αj|

. (2.19)

Since

max

|z|<1

1− |z|2Reγ Reγ |z|

!

= 2

(2Reγ+ 1) 2Reγ+1

2Reγ

,

from (2.15) and (2.19) we obtain 1− |z|2Reγ

Reγ

zg′′(z) g′(z)

≤1, (2.20)

for all z∈ U. We have

1− |z|2|γ| |γ|

zg′′(z) g′(z)

≤ 1− |z|

2Reγ

Reγ

zg′′(z) g′(z)

≤1, (z∈ U), (2.21) and by Lemma 1.1, we obtain that the function Kα1,α2...,αn,|γ|,n defined by (2.16) is in the class S.

References

[1] O. Mayer, The Functions Theory of One Variable Complex, Bucure¸sti, 1981. [2] N.N. Pascu,An improvement of Becker’s Univalence Criterion, Proceedings of the Commemorative Session Simion Stoilow, University of Bra¸sov, 1987, 43-48. Virgil Pescar

Department of Mathematics

”Transilvania” University of Bra¸sov

Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science 500091 Bra¸sov, Romania.

E-mail: [email protected]

Daniel Breaz

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

The purpose of this paper is to generalize the definition of G n,α by means of the Al-Oboudi differential operator and investigate univalence condition of this generalized

We redefine (7) to any finite field Fp. To get this, we can give the following theorem... In fact, it is easily seen that this quadratic congruence has p − 1 integer solutions.

School of Mathematical Sciences Faculty of Science and Technology Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Bangi 43600

School of Mathematical Sciences Faculty of Science and Technology Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Bangi 43600

If | N | = p, then by Proposition 2.1, the quotient graph XN of X corre- sponding to the orbits of N is a connected cubic symmetric graph of order 12, which is impossible by [2]..

So, it is worth to stress that the results given are also useful in statistical theory because of the fact that a symmetric tripotent matrix can be written as the difference of

Srivastava, A new class of analytic functions de- fined by means of a convolution operator involving the Hurwitz-Lerch Zeta function,..

In recent years, the Cauchy problems associated with the Helmholtz equation have been studied by using different numerical methods, such as the Landweber method with boundary