CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK FOUND IN SPEAKING CLASS AT
THE ENGLISH DEPARTMENT OF MUHAMMADIYAH
UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA
RESEARCH PAPER
Submitted as a Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for A Bachelor Degree of Education
in English Department
by:
IPUNG ANGGORO A 320 080 221
SCHOOL OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION
MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA
MOTTO
People who feel good about themselves product good result
Talk less do more
DEDICATION
This thesis is dedicated to:
1. My beloved father and mother
2. My beloved wife
3. My beloved family
4. My beloved sister
Assalamu’ alaikumWr
her research paper entitled: CORRECTIVE
AKING CLASS AT THE ENGLISH DEPA
H UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA.The wri
finish the research paper without other people
ike to express appreciation to those who have
process of this thesis.
Anif, M. Si.as the dean of teacher training
ammadiyah University of Surakarta.
, S.Pd.M.Hum.,as the head of English departe
for her patience in giving gidance, advice,
sm during the writing process of this research p
gFauziati.who has patiently guided, encouraged
riter since the beginning until the end of this re
ini, M.Pd. as the Second Consultant who gives
es, suggestions, information, and corrections
search patiently and sincerely,
hout permission of
guidance, so the
IVE FEEDBACK
PARTMENT OF
writer realizes that
5. My beloved father and mother who are impatient to see me finishing this
thesis soon and also for their love, pray, support, motivation, and everything.
You are the best teachers in my life.
6. My beloved wife, for your spirit, pray, support, motivation and everything. I
love you so much.
7. For those whom I can not mention one by one.
The writer realizes that this thesis is not perfect yet, therefore she always
hopes suggestions and constructive criticism for the betterment of this
research paper. She also hopes this research paper can give contribution in
English Teaching especially in teaching composition.
Wassalamu’alaikumWr.Wb.
Surakarta, 29 January 2013
The writer
SUMMARY
IpungAnggoro. A 3200 80 221.CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK FOUND IN
SPEAKING CLASS AT THE ENGLISH DEPARTMENT OF
MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA. MUHAMMADIYAH
UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA. 2013.
The major issue of this study is the implementation of corrective feedback in speaking class at UMS focusing on the types of corrective feedback used by the teacher in UMS, what is the frequency of each type of corrective feedback used by the teacher in teaching speaking in UMS, what is the dominant type of corrective feedback used by the teacher in teaching speaking in UMS, and what is the pedagogical implication of corrective feedback used by the teacher in UMS.
The research is descriptive qualitative study. The subject of the study is teaching speaking I, II, III, IV in UMS. The object of the study is the first, second, third, and fourth year students’ ability in speaking. To collect the data, the researcher uses observation and documentation in speaking class at UMS.
The results of the study, show that there five types of corrective feedback used by the teachers in UMS, namely clarification request (59%), recast (19, 7%),metalinguistic feedback (14, 5%), explicit correction (3, 4%), and translation (3, 4%). The frequency of the use of clarification request found 69 data, recast 23 data, metalinguistic found 17 data, explicit correction found 4 data, and translation found 4 data. Therefore was the most dominant type of corrective feedback is clarification request where that was found 69 data. The implication of using corrective feedback on English speaking is that, the student will be brave in teaching learning activity especially on speaking. But, there are negative impactson student’s learning, where the students are dependent and passive by waiting for teacher feedback.
Keywords: Descriptive, Speaking, Corrective Feedback
Consultant I Consultant II
Prof. Dr. EndangFauziati AryatiPrasetyarini, M.Pd.
TABLE OF CONTENT
TITLE ... i
APPROVAL ... ii
ACCEPTANCE ... iii
TESTIMONY ... iv
MOTTO ... v
DEDICATION ... vi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ... vii
SUMMARY ... ix
TABLE OF CONTENT ... x
CHAPTER I : INTRODUCTION ... 1
A. Background of the Study ... 1
B. Limitation of the Study ... 4
C. Problem Statement ... 4
D. Objective of the Study ... 5
E. Benefit of the Study ... 5
CHAPTER II : UNDERLYING THEORY ... 7
A. Previews Studies ... 7
B. Corrective Feedback ... 10
1. Notion of Corrective Feedback ... 10
2. Types of Corrective Feedback ... 12
3. Guidelines for Corrective Feedback... 18
CHAPTER III : RESEARCH METHOD ... 23
A. Type of Research ... 23
B. Subject of the Study ... 24
C. Object of the Study ... 24
D. Method of Collecting Data ... 25
CHAPTER IV : RESEARCH FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION ... 27
A. Research Findings ... 27
1. The Types of Corrective Feedback Used by the Teacher in UMS ... 27
2. The Frequency and the Dominant of Each Type of Corrective Feedback Used by the Teacher in Teaching Speaking in UMS ... 35
B. Discussion of Finding ... 37
1. The Types of Corrective Feedback Used by the Teacher in UMS ... 37
2. The Frequency and the Dominant of Each Type of Corrective Feedback Used by the Teacher in Teaching Speaking in UMS ... 37
CHAPTER V : CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION ... 40
A. Conclusion ... 40
B. Suggestion ... 41
C. Pedagogical Implication ... 43
