I
A
M
N
C
H
A
R
A
C
T
E
R
I
N
C
A
R
S
O
N
M
C
C
U
L
L
E
R
S
’
T
H
E
G
N
I
D
D
E
W
E
H
T
F
O
R
E
B
M
E
M
S I S E H T E T A U D A R G R E D N U N A
s t n e m e ri u q e R e h t f o t n e m ll if l u F l a it r a P s a d e t n e s e r P
e h t r o
f degreeo fSajranaSasrta s r e tt e L h s il g n E n i
y
B
A
I
C
A
R
G
N
E
T
R
I
N
D
A
D
E
:
r
e
b
m
u
N
t
n
e
d
u
t
S
0
8
4
2
1
4
0
7
5
T
T
E
L
H
S
I
L
G
N
E
E
R
S
S
T
U
D
Y
P
R
O
G
R
A
M
M
E
S
R
E
T
T
E
L
H
S
I
L
G
N
E
F
O
T
N
E
M
T
R
A
P
E
D
R
E
T
T
E
L
F
O
Y
T
L
U
C
A
F
S
Y
T
I
S
R
E
V
I
N
U
A
M
R
A
H
D
A
T
A
N
A
S
A
T
R
A
K
A
Y
G
O
Y
i
I
A
M
N
C
H
A
R
A
C
T
E
R
I
N
C
A
R
S
O
N
M
CC
U
L
L
E
R
S
’
T
H
E
F
O
R
E
B
M
E
M
T
H
E
W
E
D
D
I
N
G
S I S E H T E T A U D A R G R E D N U N A
s t n e m e ri u q e R e h t f o t n e m ll if l u F l a it r a P s a d e t n e s e r P
e h t r o
f degreeo fSajranaSasrta s r e tt e L h s il g n E n i
y
B
E
D
A
D
N
I
R
T
A
I
C
A
R
G
N
E
:
r
e
b
m
u
N
t
n
e
d
u
t
S
0
8
4
2
1
4
0
7
5
T
T
E
L
H
S
I
L
G
N
E
E
R
S
S
T
U
D
Y
P
R
O
G
R
A
M
M
E
T
E
L
H
S
I
L
G
N
E
F
O
T
N
E
M
T
R
A
P
E
D
T
E
R
S
R
E
T
T
E
L
F
O
Y
T
L
U
C
A
F
S
Y
T
I
S
R
E
V
I
N
U
A
M
R
A
H
D
A
T
A
N
A
S
A
T
R
A
K
A
Y
G
O
Y
v i
S I M E D A K A N A G N I T N E P E K K U T N U
a d n a tr e b g n a
Y tangan id bawahin,is ayamahasiswaUniverstiasSanataDharma : a
m a
N :EngraciaT irndade a
w s i s a h a M r o m o
N :084214075
e
D m ikepenitngan li mu pengetahuan , saya membe irkan kepada Perpustakaan s
a ti s r e v i n
U SanataDharmakarya limiahsayayangbejrudu:l
n o s r a C n i r e t c a r a h C n i a M e h t f o t n e m p o l e v e D y ti l a n o s r e P e h t f o y d u t S e h T
’ s r e ll u C c
M TheMembe roft heWedding
e s e
B traperangka tyang dipe lrukan (blia aad .)Dengan demikian sayamembeirkan a
d a p e
k Perpustakan Sanata Dharma hak untuk menyimpan , mengailhkan dalam k
u t n u n i a l a i d e m k u t n e
b kepenitnganakademistanpapelrumeminta ni irij d ya s a a n
u p u a
m em mbeirkanroyatlykepadasayaselamatetapmencantumkannamasaya i
a g a b e
s penuils . n a i k i m e
D pernyataanin iyangs ayab uatdengansebenarnya. .
a tr a k a y g o Y i d t a u b i D
a d a
P tanggal :30November , 2012 ,
n a k a t a y n e m g n a Y
a i c a r g n E
v
o
G
y
l
n
O
d
k
n
o
w
s
w
h
y
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
]
k
c
o
R
d
i
K
[
I
d
e
d
ci
a
t
e
t
ih
s
u
n
d
e
gr
ar
d
u
a
t
e
t
h
e
s
si
t
o
st
n
e
ra
p
d
e
v
ol
e
b
y
M
s
r
e
h
t
or
b
d
n
a
s
r
e
ts
is
e
ni
n
y
M
yl
i
m
a
F
d
e
v
ol
e
b
y
M
i v o
t e k il d l u o w I , ll a f o t s ri
F thankmyl ordJ esusf o ral lHi sblessingi nevery f
o t n e m o m e l g n i
s myl fie .Theprecioust hinkt ha t Ihavei nmyl fiei smyl ordt ha t m
s d a e l s y a w l
a et o ifndHi sway. t
s e t a e r g y
M grattiudegoest omyadviso rN iLuhP utuRosiandani ,S.S,. .M i
, e c i v d a r e h r o f m u
H d ,ea suppo tr ,and paitence in reading and guiding my r
e d n
u graduatet hesi sw iritng . Iappreciatehe rwliilngnesst osharehe rknowledge e
m h ti
w to ifnish t hist hesis . Iwould ilket o t hank my co-adviso rDra .A .B .Sr i .
D . h P , . A . M i n a y l u
M Ialso would ilke to thank my academic adviso rLinda a
n it n e l a
V Budiman .S.S. ,M.A .fo rhe rguidance along my study in Engilsh .t
n e m tr a p e D s r e tt e L
s r e tt e L h s il g n E n i s e r u t c e l ll a o t n o it a i c e r p p a y m e v i g o t e k il d l u o w o s l a I
a h D a t a n a S t a t n e m tr a p e
D rma Universtiy ,to Mbak Ninik in the secretaira tand f
f a t s y r a r b il o s l
a s fort hei rassistancedu irngmys tudy . ti
t a r g t s e t e e w s y
M ude goe sto my beloved parents ,my father ,Candido z
u r C a d s e r a o
S andmymothe rEilsaT irndadef ort heril ove ,prayer sandpaitence i
u g o
t deme . Iwould ilketot hankmybeloveduncleJ oshTirndade,andPapaTom (Mr .Hyland )fort hei rsuppor tand help . Iwould ilke t o t hank my nine beloved
o w I . s r e y a r p d n a e v o l ri e h t r o f s r e h t o r b d n a s r e t s i
s uld ilke t o thank my darilng
r o p p u s s i h r o f l a r a m A s o t n a S s o D o n a i c r a
M t ,help ,and praye.r Ialso thank my e
m a D d n e ir
f Naptiupulu f orhe rsuppor tand helpdu irngacademicyears . Iwould o
t e k
ii v .t
r o p p u s
o h w e s o h t r o
F m Icanno tmeniton hi so rhe rname one by one ,you are d
n a t r a e h y m n i s y a w l
a my mind . I thank them fo r making my lfie more s
y a w l a s u s e J .l u f g n i n a e
m blessesyouall .
a i c a r g n
ii i v
k r o w e h t n i a t n o c t o n s e o d , n e tt ir w e v a h I h c i h w , s i s e h t s i h t t a h t e r a l c e d y lt s e n o h I
d n a s n o it a t o u q e h t n i d e ti c e s o h t t p e c x e , e l p o e p r e h t o f o k r o w e h t f o s tr a p r o
. d l u o h s r e p a p c if it n e i c s a s a , s e c n e r e f e r
e b m e v o N , a tr a k a y g o
Y r 03 2 , 0 12
a i c a r g n
x i
.. . … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … E G A P E L T I
T .. .. i
… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … E G A P L A V O R P P
A … .. ii
E G A P E C N A T P E C C
A ……………………………………………… . i ii
I S A K I L B U P N A U J U T E S R E P N A A T A Y N R E P R A B M E
L ………….. . iv
T O
M TO PAGE……………………………………………………… . . v …
… … … … … … … … … … … … … … S T N E M E G D E L W O N K C
A … . . vi
Y T I L A N I G I R O F O T N E M E T A T
S ………………………………….. v i ii
F O E L B A
T CONTENTS…………………………………………… . . i x …
… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … T C A R T S B
A .. . .... x
… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … K A R T S B
A . ... … . x ii
… … … … … … … N O I T C U D O R T N I : I R E T P A H
C …………….. .… . 1
.
A Backgroundo ftheStudy………………………………………. 1 .
B ProblemFormulaiton………………………………......... .... . .. 4 .
C Objecitveo ftheStudy…………………………………….. . ..... . 4 .
D Deifniitono fTerm………………………………………… .… . 4 E
R O E H T : I I R E T P A H
C TICALREVIEW………………………… 5
.
A Reviewo fRelated Study…………………………………. …. 5 .
B Reviewo fRelatedTheo ires……………………………… ... … 7 .
1 TheoryonCharacte randCharacteirzaiton……….................. 7 .
2 TheoryonPersonaltiyDevelopment………………………….. 9 .
C Theoreitca lFramework…………………………………… ..… 1 1 O
L O D O H T E M : I I I R E T P A H
C GY………………………………… 12
.
A Objec toft heStudy………………………………………… .… 1 2 .
B Approachoft heStudy……………………………………… … 1 3 .
C Methodoft heStudy……………………………………..... ….. 1 4 S
I S Y L A N A : V I R E T P A H
C ………………………………………….. 1 6
.
A TheDescirpitonoft heMainCharacter’si nt hes tory………… 1 6 .
B T Fhe actorst hatI n lfuencet heMainCharacter’ sPersonaltiy p
o l e v e
D men t…………………………………………………… 2 6 .
C TheMainCharacter’ sPersonaltiyDevelopmen t………………. 31 . … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … N O I S U L C N O C : V R E T P A H
C . 45
… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … Y H P A R G O I L B I
B … 49
… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … X I D N E P P
x , E D A D N I R T A I C A R G N
E A Study o fthe Personaltiy Developmen to fthe r e t c a r a h c n i a
M ni CarsonMcCullers’ sTheMembe rO fTheWedding .
a m r a h D a t a n a S , s r e tt e L f o y tl u c a F , s r e tt e L h s il g n E f o t n e m tr a p e D : a tr a k a y g o Y . 2 1 0 2 , y ti s r e v i n U
Thi sundergraduate thesi sdiscuses Carson McCullers’ sThe Membe rO f . g n i d d e W e h
T hT i snovelt ell saboutFrankie’ ssrtugglet o ifnd he ridenttiy in he r . e m it t n e c s e l o d
a Through Frankie’ ssrtuggle, t hewrtie rwantst o study Frankie’ s h w t n e m p o l e v e d y ti l a n o s r e
p ichisi n lfuencedbyhe renvrionmen.t
. t n e m p o l e v e d y ti l a n o s r e p s ’ e i k n a r F g n i n r e c n o c s n o it s e u q e e r h t e r a e r e h T t u o b a s i n o it s e u q t s ri f e h
T how i s t he main characte rdescirbed i n t he story.The t u o b a s i n o it s e u q d n o c e
s wha tarethe factorst hat i n lfuence t hemain character’ s e v e d y ti l a n o s r e
p lopmen t and t he th rid quesiton i s abou t how i s the main . d e p o l e v e d y ti l a n o s r e p s ’ r e t c a r a h c d e t a l e r a t a d t c e ll o c o t h c r a e s e r y r a r b il s e s u r e ti r w e h t , a t a d e h t g n i z y l a n a n I r o e h t s e il p p a r e ti r w e h T . y d u t s e h t f o c i p o t e h t o
t y on character ,theory on
n o it a z ir e t c a r a h
c , t heory on personaltiy development .Thoserelevan ttheo ires are g o l o h c y s p s i y d u t s s i h t n i d e s u s i t a h t h c a o r p p a e h T . l e v o n e h t e z y l a n a o t d e s
u ica l
y d u t s o t h c a o r p p a e t a ir p o r p p a e h t s i t a h t e s u a c e b h c a o r p p
a personaltiy.
t a h t d n u o f s i t i , s i s y l a n a e h t n
I the main characte rha sthree name sthat e
v a
h dfiferent characte irsitc to each othe.r I tstatr sfrom Frankie Addams ,to F . e h t e n i m s a
J n ifnally i sFrance .s Frankie Addam sis t he fris t ifgure in t he novel . s
i e h
S at omboy,i mmature ,unsociable ,dependent ,andlacko fcon ifdenceperson . s ’ r e t c a r a h c n i a m e h t f o m r o f t s ri f e h t s a d e r e d i s n o c e r a s e it il a n o s r e p e s e h T . l e v o n e h t n i y ti l a n o s r e
p WhlieF .Jasmineisthesecond ifgure .Sheisa feminine , e
r o
m -mature and sociable person .Thesepersonailitesare considered as t he fris t y ti l a n o s r e p m r o
f developmentt hatarein lfuenced by t he grown gilrs .Fu trhermore , s e c n a r
F i sthe las t ifgure .She i ans independe tn person and a con ifden tperson. o w t e s e h
T personailites areconsidered ast hesecond personaltiy developmen to f n I . n h o j e lt ti L y r a M f o e c n e u lf n i e h t r e tf a r e t c a r a h c n i a m e h
t thestory, t hereare
s ’ r e t c a r a h c n i a m e h t e c n e u lf n i e m o h e h t e d i s t u o t a h t e l p o e p t n a c if i n g i s o w t L y r a M d n a s lr i g n w o r g e h t s a h c u s , y ti l a n o s r e
p tiltejohn .The grown gi lr sare
t s ri f s ’ e i k n a r F d e p a h s r o i v a h e b r i e h T . n o s r e p e l b a i c o s d n a e n i n i m e f , e l p o e p n w o r g t n e d if n o c d n a , t n e d n e p e d n i , y l d n e ir f a s i y r a M d n a t n e m p o l e v e d y ti l a n o s r e p n e e s e b n a c t i , y ll a n i F . y ti l a n o s r e p d n o c e s s ’ e i k n a r F d e p a h s r o i v a h e b r e H . n o s r e p e l p o e p f o e c n e u lf n i e h t f o e s u a c e b s p o l e v e d y ti l a n o s r e p r e t c a r a h c n i a m e h t t a h t . e m o h e h t e d i s t u
o The people outside the home in lfuence the main character’ s d n a t c e ri d e t a ti m i o t r e t c a r a h c n i a m e h t o t s l e d o m e h t g n i v i g y b y ti l a n o s r e p o e p e h T . y a w t c e ri d n
-i x S
. n o s r e p t n e d n e p e d n i o t n i n o s r e
p healso changesf romlacko fcon ifdenceperson .
ii x .
E D A D N I R T A I C A R G N
E A Study o fPersonaltiy Developmen to fthe Main r
e t c a r a h
c inCarsonMcCullers’ sTheMembe rO fThewedding .
Yogyakatra :Jurusan Sarta Ingg irs ,Faku tlas Sarta ,Universtias Sanata Dharma .
2 1 0 2
i s p ir k
S ii n mendiskusikan nove lbejrudul The Membe rO fThe Wedding i
n i l e v o N . s r e ll u C c M n o s r a C a y r a
k bercertia tentang pejruangan Frankie untuk h
e l o r e p m e
m identtiasnya yang sebenarnya keitka d ia dalam m asa y
n a j a m e
r a.Melaluipejruangan Frankie ,penu ils ingin mempelaja ir perkembanga a
y e i k n a r F n a i d a b ir p e k
n ngdipengaruhi ho le ilngkungan. m
a l a
D sk irpsi ii n terdapat it ga petranyaan yang berkatian dengan n
a g n a b m e k r e
p kep irbadian tokoh utama.Petranyaan pe trama yatiu tentan g a
n a m i a g a
b idsk irpsi tokoh utama dalam certia. Petranyaan kedua yatiu tentang r
o t k a
f -faktor apa yang mempengaruhi perkembangan kep irbadian tokoh utama . n
a a y n a tr e
P yang keitga yatiu tentang bagaimana kep irbadian tokoh utama uti .
g n a b m e k r e b
m a l a
D menganalisadata ,penuilsmenggunakanmetodepeneilitanpustaka k
u t n
u menggumpulkan data yang berkatian dengan topic d air peneilitan i n.i s
il u n e
P mengapilkasikan teo ir karakter , teo ir karakteirsitk , teo ir-teor i n
a g n a b m e k r e
p kep irbadian.Teo ir-teor i yang sesuai terse but digunakan untuk n
a k a n u g i d g n a y n a t a k e d n e P .l e v o n a s il a n a g n e
m dalam peneilitan ii n adalah
n a t a k e d n e
p psikolgi karena pendekatan ii n sesuai untuk mempelajair tentang .
n a i d a b ir p e k
m a l a d i
D anailsa ,dtiemukan bahwa tokoh utama mempunya i ait g nama r
e b g n a
y bedakarakteirsitkantara us at samayangl ain .Mulaidar iFrankieAddam s .
F e
k jasmine dan akhrinya adalah Frances . Frankie Addam s adalah ifgure a
m a tr e
p dalamnove.l aD i adalahorangyangbersfiatkelakian ,itdakdewasa ,itdak a
s i
b rbesosial , itdak mandi ir dan orang yang kura ng percaya dri.iKep irbadian -e
k p irbadian ii n dianggap sebagai bentuk petramakep irbadian tokoh utamadalam .l
e v o
n Sedangkan ,F.Jasmineadalah ifgurekedua.Diabersfiatkeperempuaan,l ebih a
s a w e
d dan orang yang b eisa b r sso ia.lKep irbadian-kep irbadian ii n dianggap i
a g a b e
s eb n kt u petramaperkembangan kep irbadian tookh utamayang dipengaruh h
e l
o p ara perempuan dewasa.Selanjutnya ,France sadalah ifgure terakhri .Dia h
a l a d
a orang yang bersfiat mandiir d an percaya dri.iD ua kep irbadian ii n a
k a p u r e
m n bentuk perkembangan kep irbadian kedua d air tokoh utama setelah h
u r a g n e
p dar iMaryLtiltejohn .Dalamcertia ,adaduaorangpenitngdil uarrumah i
h u r a g n e p m e m g n a
y kep irbadian tokoh utama ,seperit p ara wan tia dewasa dan .
n h o j e lt ti L y r a
M Para wantia dewasa adalah orang yang bersfiat dewasa , n
a a u p m a r e p e
k dan orang yang b isa bersosia.l Perbuatan mereka membentuk n
a g n a b m e k r e
p pke irbadian petrama tokoh utama ,Mary adalah seorang yang h
a m a
r tamah ,mandi ir nd a percayadri.iPerbuatannya membentuk perkembangan a
b ir p e
ii i x g
n a r
o di l uarrumah mempengaruhkep irbadian tokoh utamadenganmembeirkan h
o t n o
c -contoh pada tokoh utama untuk menriu dengan c arasecara langsung nd a k
a d
it langsung .Orang-orang d iluar rumah mempengaruhi kep irbadian tokoh a
m a t
u ird a orangbesfiatkelaki-lakianmenjadiorangyangbersfiatkeperempuaan , ir
a
d seorang itdak dewasa menjadi lebih dewasa ,dair seorang t kida bersosi al i
d a j n e
m orangyangbisabersosial ,dairorangyang itdak nma d iirmenjadimandiir , h
o k o
t utama juga berubah dar iorang yang kurang percaya ird i menjadi percaya .
1 I R E T P A H C N O I T C U D O R T N I .
A Backgroundoft heStudy
d e p a h s s i e h s r o e h e c n i s t n e m p o l e v e d e c n e ir e p x e e r u t a n n i s g n i e b n a m u H . d lr o w e h t n i l a u d i v i d n i n a s
a One o fdevelopmen ti son hi so rhe rpersonaltiy .
s i t n e m p o l e v e d y ti l a n o s r e p s ’l a u d i v i d n i t u o b a g n i y d u t
S deailng wtih aproces so f
t c a e r , s k n i h t , s e v a h e b l a u d i v i d n i n a w o
h s and respond stoward sothe rpeople,
f l e s m i
h o r hersefl since in the beginning of hi so rhe rlfie unit lhe o rshe dies .
. fl e s s ti y b r u c c o t o n s e o d y ti l a n o s r e p s ’l a u d i v i d n i n o t n e m p o l e v e
D Manyaspect s
. y ti l a n o s r e p s ’l a u d i v i d n i e h t f o t n e m p o l e v e d e h t e c n e u lf n i n a c d e c n e u lf n i d n a d e p a h s o s l a s i y ti l a n o s r e p e n o , e c n e u lf n i s ’ y li m a f s e d i s e B m o h w h ti w n e r d li h c e h T . e v il l a u d i v i d n i e h t h c i h w n i t n e m n o ri v n e e h t y b e h t e c n e u lf n i t h g i m e t a i c o s s a y e h
t socia latttiudeand behavio ro fchlidren . ) 4 3 2 : 4 7 9 1 , k c o lr u H ( s ’l a u d i v i d n i e c n e u lf n i t a h t s t c e p s a n i a m o w t e r a e r e h t , ti o t g n i d r a g e R e h t h ti w s e c n e ir e p x e s ’l a u d i v i d n i e h t s i t c e p s a t s ri f e h T . t n e m p o l e v e d y ti l a n o s r e p l a c s i ti r o e m o h e h t e d i s n i y li m a
f led i nterna laspect ,andt hesecondaspecti st he
ll a c s i ti r o e m o h e h t e d i s t u o y t e i c o s e h t h ti w s e c n e ir e p x e s ’l a u d i v i d n
i edexterna l
k c o lr u H , r e v o e r o M . t c e p s
a adds
e d u ti tt a l a i c o s s ’ n e r d li h c g n u o y t c e f f a o s l a y a m e m o h e h t e d i s t u o t l u d A n e h W . r o i v a h e b d n
a the chlidren wtih people olde rthan them ,they wli l f o s n r e tt a p e r o m p o l e v e d , o s g n i o d y b d n a , m e h t h ti w p u p e e k o t e v ir t s r o i v a h e
b thent hei ragemuch( 1974:234) .
s ’l a u d i v i d n i e h t w o h s t a h t f o o r p g n o rt s e r a e v o b a s n o it a t o u q o w t e h T ll i w y ti l a n o s r e
p develop based on the in lfuence o f both aspect sfamliy and
y ti l a n o s r e p e h t n o d e s u c o f s i y d u t s s i h t , r e v e w o H . t n e m p o l e v e d h c u s s e o g r e d n u
s e h t y b d e c n e u lf n i s i h c i h w , t n e m p o l e v e
d ociety.
Ltierarywork ssucha snovel ,shor tstory ,drama ,poemandothe rwork so f
e b l li w e l p o e P . t n e m p o l e v e d r o i v a h e b n a m u h h c u s l a e v e r n a c , e r u t a r e ti l
s d a e r e h s r o e h n e h w s m e l b o r p s ti d n a e fi l f o s e u l a v e h t t u o b a e r a w a y ll a c it a m o t u a
. s k r o w y r a r e ti l
“Peoplewhor ead l tierary works ,canl earn no tonly l tierary tisel fbu talso
e b n a c t i , n o it a t o u q e h t m o r F . ) 3 : 4 7 9 1 , e n ir r e P ( ” . e fi l n a m u h f o e u s s i l a i c o s t u o b a
r i e h t g n i v o r p m i n i e g a t n a v d a t e g l li w e l p o e p s k r o w y r a r e ti l g n i n r a e l y b t a h t n e e s
n o C . e g d e l w o n
k cerning the human’ spersonaltiy development in ltierary work s
, l e v o n s ’ s r e ll u C c M t a h t t u o s e r u g if r e ti r w e h
t The Membe rof t he Wedding also e z y l a n a d n a e n i m a x e o t s e ir t r e ti r w e h t , y d u t s s i h t n i , e r o f e r e h T . s e u s s i h c u s s a h
h t f o t n e m p o l e v e d y ti l a n o s r e p e h
t emain characte ra sseen i nCarsonMcCullers’ s
. g n i d d e W e h t f o r e b m e M e h T
g n i d d e W e h t f o r e b m e M e h
T i soneofl tierary work swhich theme sabou t .
e fi l s ’ e c n e c s e l o d
a Thestoryi sabou tanadolescencenamedFrankiewhochange s
o t r e d r o n i y ti t n e d i r e
h beaccepted by t hesociety ,becausesheconfusedabouti n
. o t s g n o l e b e h s y t e i c o s d n a p u o r g h c i h w
McCuller sdescirbest hi sstoryclealry .Theautho roft hi snovelt irest ot el l
e h t n i d e d u l c n i t o n s i e h s t a h t e s a h p e h t n i e b o t s l e e f e i k n a r F w o h s r e d a e r e h t
c o
s iety . She also descirbe s Frankie’ s uninteresitng physica l appearance tha t
o t s r e d a e r e h t s w o ll a n o it p ir c s e d s i h T . e fi l l a i c o s e g a n e e t m o r f r e h s t n e v e r p
c e h t s e r u t c i p o s l a s r e ll u C c
M hange so fF .Jasmine’ spersonaltiy and Frances’ s
y ti l a n o s r e
P throught hepersonalti yo fFrankie.
e h t g n i n i m a x e n i d e t s e r e t n i r e ti r w e h t e k a m e v o b a s e u s s i e h t , e r o f e r e h T
i a m e h t f o t n e m p o l e v e d y ti l a n o s r e
p n characte ra sseen i n Carson McCullers ,The e
b m e
M r o f the Wedding . The wrtie r want s to explore more deepely abou t
. y r o t s e h t f o d n e e h t li t n u g n i n n i g e b e h t m o r f t n e m p o l e v e d y ti l a n o s r e p s ’ e i k n a r F
.
B ProblemFormula iton.
e b n a c t a h t s n o it s e u q e e r h t e r a e r e h t , e v o b a n o it a n a l p x e e h t m o r F
: w o ll o f s a d e t a l u m r o
f
.
1 Howi st hemaincharacte rdescirbedi nt hes tory?
.
2 Wha t are the factor s tha t in lfuence the main character’ s personaltiy
? t n e m p o l e v e d
.
3 Howi st hemaincharacter’ spersonaltiydeveloped?
.
C TheObjecitveoft heStudy
r e ti r w e h t , m e l b o r p e h t g n i y fi t n e d i r e tf
A goe sdrieclty t o t he objecitveo f
s n o it s e u q e h t f o r e b m u n e h t n o d e s a b e b l li w t I . h c r a e s e r s i h
t in the problem
h c i h w , n o it a l u m r o
f si arleady setlted previously .The fris tobjecitve i stha tthe
o o t e k il d l u o w r e ti r
w bserve closely to t he characteirsitcs fo the main character .
p l e h n a c t i t a h t o s y r o t s e h t n i ti e n i m a x e o t s d e e n r e ti r w e h t e s u a c e b e n o d s i s i h T
d n a t s r e d n u o t r e ti r w e h
t and ifgure soutt hecharacteirsitc so ft hemain character .
a f t a h w w o n k o t e k il d l u o w r e ti r w e h t t a h t s i e v it c e j b o d n o c e s e h
o t s i e v it c e j b o t s a l e h T . t n e m p o l e v e d y ti l a n o s r e p s ’ r e t c a r a h c n i a m e h t e c n e u lf n i
. y ti l a n o s r e p s ’r e t c a r a h c n i a m e h t f o t n e m p o l e v e d e h t d n a t s r e d n u
.
D Deifniitono fTerm
s i h t n i m r e t f o e s u e h t n i a l p x e o t e k il d l u o w r e ti r w e h t , y d u t s f o t r a p s i h t n I
. g n i d n a t s r e d n u s i m d i o v a o t r e d r o n i s i s e h t e t a u d a r g r e d n u
.
1 PersonaltiyDevelopment
n i h s il a K o t g n i d r o c c
A ThePsychologyo fHumanBehavior ,Personaltiyi s o t g n i d a e l s e d u ti tt a c it s ir e t c a r a h c e h t f o n o it a z i n a g r o c i m a n y d e h t s a d e n if e d
h s i u g n it s i d d n a r o i v a h e
b ing one i ndividua lfrom other i ndividual .I treferst o t he
, g n it s u j d a f o s d o h t e m d n a , s e v it o m , s d e e n s e d u l c n i d n a , l a u d i v i d n i l a t o t
fl e s , s e it il a u q t n e m a r e p m e
t -concep,t r olebehaviors ,atttiudes ,value sand abiilite s
. ) 2 5 : 1 7 9 1 (
p o l e v e d , e m m e L o t g n i d r o c c
A menti s“t hes ystemaitcchangesi nbehavio r
l a n r e t n i e h t d n a l a u d i v i d n i e h t n e e w t e b n o it c a r e t n i e h t m o r f t l u s e r t a h t e m it r e v o
s ’ e n o e m o s f o g n i g n a h c e h t s i t n e m p o l e v e d y ti l a n o s r e p e h t , o S ” t n e m n o ri v n e
t n e r e f fi d g n i m o c e b n i n a m u h t c e f r e p m i n a s a r e t c a r a h
c than before because o f
. ) 8 : 5 9 9 1 ( r e h r o m i h o t e m o c t a h t s e c n e u lf n i n i a tr e c
n a e r e h w s s e c o r p e h t s i t n e m p o l e v e d y ti l a n o s r e p , s d r o w r e h t o n
I individua l
s c it s ir e t c a r a h c d l o r e h r o s i h m o r f t n e r e f fi d s e m o c e
b becauseo fmaking relaiton
h ti
5
I I R E T P A H C
W E I V E R L A C I T E R O E H T
.
A Reviewo fRelatedStudy
l a r e v e s e r a e r e h
T studie stha thave been done previously by the othe r s
’ s r e ll u C c M n o s r e h c r a e s e
r The Membe ro fthe Wedding. Nan iA irifant iin he r y
d u t
s enitlted Frankie’ sIdenttiy Formaiton in he rAdolescence (2009:7) ,state s t
a h
t TheMembe roft heWedding i saboutt welveyear sold Frankie who ifghtst o s
e u rt r e h t e
g e -flconcept .A irifant ialso say stha tFrankiechanges i nto FJ.asmine s
c it s ir e t c a r a h c t n e r e f fi d s a h e n i m s a J . F d n
a fromFrankie’ scharacteirsitcs .Inothe r e
l p it l u m e h t t u o b a s i ti t a h t s y a s r e ti r w e h t ,s d r o
w behaviorstha ti sundergoneby .
e g a e c n e c s e l o d a n i s i e h s e c n i s y ti t n e d i n o it a m r o f r e h g n ir u d e i k n a r F
f o l e v o n e h t n o w e i v e r e h t o t g n i d r a g e
R The Membe ro fthe Wedding , m
a y i h s i N o k u s t
A ai nhert hesi senitltedHungaroundi nDoorways,s tatest ha t a s a e n i o r e h e h t f o n o it a i c e r p p a s ’ p u o r g s r e tt e l e h t y lf e ir b s ll i w y a s s e s i h T “
y b , r e v e w o H . t s i n i m e f y r o s l u p m o c e h t t s n i a g a n o it a l e r s a g n it h g if y o b m o t
d f o g n i d n a t s r e d n u n w o s r e ll u C c M g n it a l e
r evian tgende rwtih creaiton o f r
e d n e g r e h t o n a t e Y . r e t c a r a h c r e
h -related o fheroine become spossible .I t e h T . ” e r u t a n “ r e h s a s r e d n e g n e e w t e b r e v a w s ’ s e c n a r F e e s o t s u s w o ll a
? y r o t s e h t t a s r a e p p a o h W . n h o J e lt ti L y r r a M d n a s e c n a r F f o d e t n u o c c a
a x e e b l li
W mined in ilgh t o f thei r shared “nature” (1996:112), <www. lfe.tkeio.acj.p.pdf> .
a m a y a i h s i N o k u s t A t a h t s e d u l c n o c r e ti r w e h t , e v o b a n o it a t o u q e h t m o r F
f o k r o w e h t e s u a c e b k r o w s ’ r e ll u C c M e h t o t r o n o h n a s e v i
g The Membe rof t he
g n i d d e
W give snewi nspriaiton t o t hegilrst o makesuchsrtuggle fit heyundergo d
e y a rt r o p n e e b s a h t a h w e k il n o it a u ti s e h
t in t henovel i n ordert o ifnd t hei r rtue y
e h t y a w e h t s a f l e
, l e v o n s i h t o t d e t a l e r t a h t s w e i v e r r e h t o o s l a e r a e r e h
T TheMembe roft he
g n i d d e
W and the othe rwork so fMcCullers ,The Hear tI sLonely Hunter .A s s i s e h t s i h n i d e t a t s A . B , y e k s w o k r a B d r a h c i R d r a w d
E The Theme o fSpirtiua l
o W r o j a M e h t n i n o it a l o s
I rk so fCarsonMcCullers’ spriort o1962that :
a o t n i y ll u f s s e c c u s r e t n e t o n n a c e h e s u a c e b f l e s m i h d e t a l o s i y a m e n O r e t n u H y l e n o L a s i tr a e H e h T n i y ll e K k c i M t n e c s e l o d a e h t s a , p u o r g l a i c o s e r e c n e ir e p x e y a m r e h t o n A . l o o h c s h g i h r e h t a e c a l p a d n if t o n n a
c jeciton
n i s li a f s m a d d A e i k n a r F s a , d o o t s r e d n u f l e s m i h e k a m o t s li a f e h n e h
w The
g n i d d e w e h T f o r e b m e
M to make anyone know tha tshe so desperately e h t , e c n a t p e c c a g n i k c a L . y tr a p g n i d d e w s ’ r e h t o r b r e h o t g n o l e b o t s d e e n o t n i w a r d h ti w t s u
m a stateo fspritiual i solaiton (Barkowskey ,1968:5- ,6) <www.etd.ilb.edu.pdf> .
n i s e s o p r u p s ’ y e k s w o k r a B t a h t y a s o t e k il d l u o w o s l a r e ti r w e h T s e it ir a li m i s f o n o s ir a p m o c a e v i g o t t s u j s i s r e ll u C c M f o s k r o w o w t e h t g n i n i b m o c o b n
i th novel saboutt hesrtuggleoft hemain charactersi ni .tI tcan beseen f rom n i y ll e K k c i M e c n e c s e l o d a e h t s a t a h t s n i a l p x e e h y a w e h
t TheHearti sa Lonely
c r e t n u
H anno t ifnd a place a the rhigh schoo land a sFrankie’ sAddam sfalis i n e h t f o r e b m e M e h
T Wedding . eH deifntiely give sa compa irson o fsimliairites i n .s a e d i e m a s e h t g n ir a h s e r a t a h t s l e v o n h t o b w e h t t a h t w e i v e r t s a l e h t , e r o m r e h tr u
F rtie rtakes i sMeilssa Metz in s
k a e r
F ,The Grotesque and othe rsideshow attraciton in the ifciton o fCarson C
c
M ullers. Theys tatetha:t
s ’ s r e ll u C c M n i e r e h d e n i m a x e n e e b e v a h e u q s e t o r g e h t d n a k a e r f e h T “ , y d o b e h t f o s e it il i b i s s o p e h t d n a s t e m m il e h t s n o it s e u q e h s s a n o it c if . k a e r f f o s e r u g if e h t h ti w s t n e c s e l o d a e h t f o e r u g if e h t g n i s o p a t x u j s i n o it c if ’ s r e ll u C c
M populated by f reak swho t hei mposiiton o f“normal” e u q s e t o r g d n a k a e r f e h t f o n o it c e s r e t n i s i h t s i tI . r e d n e g f o s e ir o g e t a
c wtih
a gende rand sexua lanomaly .Especially regarding t he body and i denttiy l a n a r o f e p ir s i t a h t n o it c u rt s n o
n o w e i v e R s ’ z t e M d n a a s s il e
M TheMembe roft heweddingtha t tii sonly e c n e t s i x e s i h T . e i k n a r F f o e c n e t s i x e e h t o t s n r e c n o c h c i h w k r o w f o n o it a n i g a m i n a
n i e b s a n e m o w f o e r u t a n e h t t s n i a g a r o n w o d t u p o t t s u j s
i gagilr ,asi tcanbes een
. l e v o n e h t n i e i k n a r F f o e c n a r a e p p a l a c i s y h p e h t m o r f
n o s e i d u t s d n a s g n i d n if n w o r i e h t e v a h s r e w e i v e r e e r h t h g u o h tl
A The
. g n i d d e w e h T f o r e b m e
M However ,in thi sundergraduate thesi sthe wrtie rwli l
t m o r f a e d i t n e r e f fi d l a e v e
r heaboves tudie sduetot hiss tudyconcerns ot thes tudy r
e t c a r a h c n i a m e h t f o t n e m p o l e v e d y ti l a n o s r e p f
o whichi smosti n lfuenced byt he s
e it e i c o
s inCarsonMcCu llers ’TheMembe ro fTheWedding.
.
B Reviewo fRelatedTheory
a t a h t s e ir o e h t e m o s e r a e r e h
T re used t o analyze t he problems i n Carson ’
s r e ll u C c
M theMembe roft heWedding. .
1 TheoryonCharacterandCharacteriza iton
s i r e t c a r a h c n i a m e h t w o h n i a l p x e o t d e s u s i r e t c a r a h c n o y r o e h t e h T
d n a y r o t s e h t n i d e b ir c s e
d wha ttype o fthe main characte ris .Theory on the f o s c it s ir e t c a r a h c e h t d n e h e r p m o c o t y a w e h t n i a l p x e o t d e s u s i n o it a z ir e t c a r a h c
.r e t c a r a h c n i a m e h t
.
a Theoryoncharacter
l a n a e b n a c t a h t s t n e m e l e c i s n ir t n i y n a m e r a e r e h
T yze i n a novel ,one o f
c s i m e h
t haracter .Thecharacter sare descirbed t hrough t hei rbehavior ,dialogue , s
e n if e d s m a r b A . s t h g u o h t d n
a that :
y e h t t a h w n i d e s s e r p x e e r a t a h t y ti l a u
q say (through dialogue) ,and by )
n o it c a h g u o r h t ( o d y e h t t a h
w (1981:20).
t o N “ , s e t a t s n a g il li
M al lcharacter splay an impo tran trole .A tleas tone y
r o t s e h t f o r e t n e c e h t e b o t s r a e p p a r e t c a r a h
c ” (1983:155) .
e s o h
T quotaiton saboveshowtha tnomatte rhow manycharacter sareina n
e k a t e b l li w t a h t m e h t f o e n o t s a e l t a t u b l e v o n r o y a l
p a sthe core o fthe
r e t c a r a h
c .
.
b TheoryonCharacteriza iton
.
M J .Murphy (1972:161-173 )in hi sbook Understanding Unseen :An O
r o f s l e v o N d n a y r t e o P h s il g n E o t n o it c u d o r t n
I versea sStudent sdescirbe snine e v il a e m o c d n a o t e l b a d n a t s r e d n u r e t c a r a h c s i h e k a m o t t p m e tt a r o h t u a n a n i s y a w
.r e d a e r r o f
r o h t u a y e h t t a h t s n a e m n o it p ir c s e d l a n o s r e P . n o it p ir c s e d l a n o s r e p s i t s ri F
p p a l a c i s y h p s i h h g u o r h t r e t c a r a h c e h t e b ir c s e d o t s e ir
t earances .The autho rcan
s i h s a h c u s d n a s e h t o l c d n a e c n a r a e p p a s ’ n o s r e p a e b ir c s e
d -skin color ,hi shai ro r
. e c a f s i h
o t s e ir t r o h t u a e h t , y a w s i h t n I . r e h t o n a y b n e e s s a r e t c a r a h c s i d n o c e S
e h t o e h t f o s n o i n i p o d n a s e y e e h t h g u o r h t r e t c a r a h c e h t e b ir c s e
d rs . Thei r
d n a t s r e d n u n a c s r e d a e r e h t p l e h n a c r e t c a r a h c e h t t u o b a s n o i n i p o d n a s t n e m m o c
. r e t c a r a h c e h t
f o r e t c a r a h c e h t o t n i t h g i s n i r e d a e r e h t e v i g n a c r o h t u a e h T . h c e e p s s i d ri h T
a r e v e n e h W . s y a s r e t c a r a h c e h t t a h w h g u o r h t k o o b e h t n i n o s r e p e h t f o e n
o person
s a h t a h t e u l c a s r e d a e r e h t e v i g n a c r o h t u a e h T . e fi l t s a p s i y a w h tr u o F s i h T . e fi l t s a p s ’ n o s r e p a t u o b a g n i n r a e l y b r e t c a r a h c s ’ n o s r e p a e p a h s o t d e p l e h e m m o c t c e ri d y b e n o d e b n a
c n tby the author ,through the person’ sthought , . n o s r e p r e h t o n a f o m u i d e m e h t h g u o r h t r o n o it a s r e v n o c e h t h g u o r h t s r e d a e r e h t s e v i g r e ti r w e h t , y a w e h t n I . s r e h t o f o n o it a s r e v n o c s i h tf i F y e h t s g n i h t d n a n o it a s r e v n o c h g u o r h t r e t c a r a h c s ’ n o s r e p a o t s e u l
c sayabou thim.
g n i e e s y b r e t c a r a h c s ’ n o s r e p a w o n k l li w s r e d a e r e h T . n o it c a e r s i h t x i S . s t n e v e r o n o it a u ti s s u o ir a v o t s t c a e r e h w o h t a h w f o e g d e l w o n k t c e ri d s r e d a e r e h t s e v i g r o h t u a e h T . t h g u o h t s i h t n e v e S e h , t c e p s e r s i h t n I .t u o b a g n i k n i h t s i n o s r e
p i sablet odo wha twecanno tdoi nt he e w , l e v o n e h t n I . g n i k n i h t e r a e l p o e p t n e r e f fi d t a h w r e d a e r e h t ll e t n a c e H . e fi l l a e r t e r c e s a , e r e w t i s a s a h e h ; n o it i s o p d e g e li v ir p n i s i n e h t r e d a e r e h T . s i h t t p e c c a s t h g u o h t t s o m e h t n i d e g g u l p e c i v e d g n i n e t s
il o fapersoni nanovel.
r o m s ir e n n a m s ’ n o s r e p a e b ir c s e d y a m r o h t u a e h T . m s ir e n n a m s i t s a l e h T .r e t c a r a h c s i h t u o b a g n i h t e m o s r e d a e r e h t ll e t o s l a y a m t a h t s ti b a h .
2 TheoryonPersonaltiyDevelopment
4 3 2 : 4 7 9 1 ( k c o lr u
H -352)i nPersonaltiyDevelopmentstatest h at
l a i c o s d n a l a u d i v i d n i e r a h c i h w , s t c e p s a o w t f o s t s i s n o c e fi l n a m u H d n a s e g n a h c l a c i s y h p h ti w n r e c n o c s i ti , t c e p s a l a u d i v i d n i e h t r o F . s t c e p s a s i fl e s ti t n e m p o l e v e d y ti l a n o s r e p n a m u H . t n e m p o l e v e d y ti l a n o s r e p s n a m u h s i t s ri F . s r o t c a f o w t y b d e c n e u lf n
i human’ sexpeirencewtihin f amliy .The .t n e m n o ri v n e s i r o t c a f d n o c e s e c n e u lf n i t a h t s t n e m e l e o w t e r a e r e h t t a h t s n a e m e v o b a n o it a t o u q e h T s i t n e m e l e t s ri f e h T . l a u d i v i d n i t u o b a s k l a t ti e c n i s , t n e m p o l e v e d y ti l a n o s r e p s ’ e n o f e h t m o r f s e m o c h c i h w t n e m e l
t n a tr o p m i t s o m e h t e r a s t n e m e l e o w t e s e h t f o h t o B . y t e i c o s e h t m o r f s e m o c
. t n e m p o l e v e d y ti l a n o s r e p s ’ e n o n o e c n e u lf n i
.
a TheI n lfuenceo fEnvironment
e c n e u lf n i r e h t o n a s i e r e h t , y li m a f f o e c n e u lf n i e h t s e d i s e
B which i scalled
.t n e m n o ri v n
e Hu lrock states ,“Beside sfamliy in lfuence ,one personaltiy i salso s n a e m s i h T . s e v il l a u d i v i d n i e h t h c i h w n i t n e m n o ri v n e y b d e c n e u lf n i d n a d e p a h s
a e v a h y a m e m o h e h t e d i s t u o e l p o e p t a h
t role to shape one’ spersonaltiy” 2
1 : 4 7 9 1
( 3 ) .
y a m l a u d i v i d n i e h t s d n u o r r u s o h w n o s r e p e h t t a h t s n a e m e v o b a n o it a t o u q e h T
. y ti l a n o s r e p n i a tr e c a n i e v a h e b o t l a u d i v i d n i e h t e c n e u lf n i
s ’l a u d i v i d n i e c n e u lf n i t a h t s t n e m e l e o w t e r a e r e h t s y a s k c o lr u H , h g u o h tl A
e h t y d u t s s i h t n i ,r e v e w o H . y ti l a n o s r e
p wrtierj us tusest het heoryoft hei n lfuence
.t n e m n o ri v n e f o
.
b HowEnvironmentI n lfuenceOne’ sPersonaltiy
3 8 : 4 7 9 1 ( k c o lr u
H -84 )state stha tthere are two way so fenvrionmen t .
y ti l a n o s r e p s ’ e n o d r a w o t e c n e u lf n i
.i Studie so fModel s
n i d i v o r p y b e n o d s i s i h
T g model sfo rthe individual sto fo llow .I tmay y
lt c e ri d n i r o y lt c e ri d r u c c
o .Thedriec twayi sdonebyprovidingt heoppo truniite s f o g n i n r a e l e h t g n it n e v e r p y b d n a r o i v a h e b f o n r e tt a p d e v o r p p a e h t g n i n r a e l r o f
, y lt c e ri d n I . r o i v a h e b f o n r e tt a p d e v o r p p a s i
d the envrionmen t in lfuence the s l e d o m e h t g n i k a m y b d n a e t a ti m i o t m i h r o f s l e d o m e h t g n it t e s y b l a u d i v i d n i
.i
i Studie so fLearningOppo truniite s
e m o c n a c t n e m n o ri v n e f o n r e tt a p g n it t e s e h
T from learning the learning r
e n n i e b y a
m -d riecte d o router-driected .In inner-driecte d learning ,the learne r s
e k a
t “iniitaitvesin putitng f o trh t heeffor tneeded t o achieveanend r esu tlt hehe r
e t u o e li h W . m i h o t e l b a u l a v l e e
f -driected l earning isi nsrtuct edby someoneelse e
t a v it o m o
t the l earne rto conitnue hi spracitce unit lhe ha smastered t he desrie r
o i v a h e b f o n r e tt a
p ” .
.
C Theoreitca lFramework
r e w s n a o
T the three quesiton stha tstated in the fris tchapter ,the wrtie r l
a r e v e s s d e e
n theo irest o suppo trt hem .Therearet hree theo irestha twli lbeused s
i s y l a n a s i h t n
i .Frislty,t hewrtie rusest hetheory on characte rby M .H .Abrams . f o y r o e h t , y l d n o c e S . r e t c a r a h c n i a m e h t n o e z y l a n a o t d e s u s i y r o e h t s i h T
d e il p p a s i y h p r u M . J . M y b n o it a z ir e t c a r a h
c toge tdeepe runderstandingaboutt he n o y r o e h t s e s u r e ti r w e h t , y l d ri h T . l e v o n e h t n i s c it s ir e t c a r a h c s ’ r e t c a r a h c n i a m
e z y l a n a o t d e s u s i y r o e h t s i h T k c o lr u H . B h t e b a z il E y b t n e m p o l e v e d y ti l a n o s r e p
l a n o s r e p s ’ r e t c a r a h c n i a m e h t e c n e u lf n i t a h t s r o t c a f e h
t itydevelopmenti nquesiton B
. o w
t eside ,s t hewrtie ralso uses t heory o fcharacteirzaiton by M .J .Murphy t o s
lr i g n w o r g e h t f o s c it s ir e t c a r a h c e h t t u o b a g n i d n a t s r e d n u r e p e e d t e
g and Mary
. l e v o n e h t n i n h o j e lt ti
L Laslty ,the wrtie ralso use sthe theory on personaltiy r
e w s n a o t k c o lr u H . B h t e b a z il E y b t n e m p o l e v e
2 1
I I I R E T P A H C
Y G O L O D O H T E M
.
A Objec toft heStudy
t c e j b o e h
T o rdataoft hi sstudyi sCarsonMcCullers’ snovelenitlted“The g
n i d d e W e h t f o r e b m e
M ” . tIi spubilshedi n1946byHoughtonMfiifnCompanyi n o
s l a s i tI . a c ir e m A f o s e t a t S d e ti n U e h
t avaliablei n thePenguin ModernClassics .
h tf if e h t s e s u r e ti r w e h T . 2 6 9 1 n i s k o o B n i u g n e P n i s i r e h s il b u p t s ri
F ediiton
t s ri f e h T . s tr a p e e r h t o t n i d e d i v i d s i d n a s e g a p 0 9 1 f o s t s i s n o c t I . 2 7 9 1 n i d e t n ir p
s t s i s n o c d n o c e s e h t , r e t p a h c e n o f o s t s i s n o c t r a
p o fthree chapters and the thrid
. r e t p a h c e n o f o s t s i s n o c s tr a p
t a d e g a t s s a w d n a 0 5 9 1 n i d r a w A s c it ir C k r o W w e N e h t n o w l e v o n s i h T
e h t f o w o ll e f e h t s a w s r e ll u C c M n o s r a C . n o d n o L , r e t a e h T t r u o C l a y o R e h t
. s r e tt e l d n a s tr a f o y m e d a c A n a c ir e m
A Thenovel ,"TheMembe roft heWedding" m e l b o r p a s a h e h S . d l o s r a e y 2 1 s i e h S . e i k n a r F d e m a n l ri g a f o e fi l e h t t u o b a s ll e t
g i b g n i e b f o e s u a c e B . k a e r f t s o m l a d n a l l a t , g i b s i h c i h w w o r g l a c i s y h p r e h h ti w
.r e h d n u o r a e l p o e p m o r f t n e r e f fi d r e h s e k a m l l a t d n a
r o t s e h t f o t r a p t s ri f e h t n
I y ,Frankieha sno ifgureo fmothe rwhen shei s
. n r o b s a w e h s e c n i s r e h t o m o n s a h e h s s n a e m n r o
b Sincet hedeatho fhe rmother ,
n i s k r o w y ll a u s u o h w s m a d d A . r M f o t n a v r e s a s i e c i n e r e B . r e h f o s e k a t e c i n e r e B
p i h s n o it a l e r s ’ e i k n a r F , t a h t s e d i s e B . n e h c ti k e h
t wtih he rfathe rand he rbrothe r
n o it c e f f a e v i g t o n o d r e h t o r b r e h d n a r e h t a f r e H . y li m a f e n o s a y l h t o o m s t o n s n u r
s i e h s e s u a c e b m e h t h ti w n o it a l e r o n s a h o s l a e i k n a r F , y t e i c o
s too young to be
y r o t s e h t n i , e s u a c e b s i tI . m e h t h ti w t r a p
a , t hesociety i sdescirbed as t heuntiy
e l p o e
p mean salway sbeingt ogethe rand have somebody o rsomething t o belong
o
t whlieFrankiei salones heha snof irendsevennohast hingst obelongt o . hT ese
e i k n a r F e k a m s n o it i d n o
c srtuggle t o ifnd her rtuesefli n order t o beaccepted by
o t e l g g u rt s a e k a m o t s n i g e b e i k n a r F , y r o t s e h t f o t r a p d n o c e s e h t n I . y t e i c o s e h t
g n o l e b o t p u o r g a d n if o t r e d r o n i s s o r C d e R e h t n i o j o t g n i y rt y b f l e s e u rt r e h d n if
r e h e g n a h c o t s e ir t e h s , n e h T . r e h t p e c c a t o n o d y e h t e s u a c e b s li a f ti t u b m e h t o t
e h t d n a r e h t o r b r e h o t r a li m i s e b o t r e d r o n i e n i m s a J . F o t e i k n a r F m o r f e m a n
d n u o r a e l p o e p e h t m o r f e n o l a s l e e f e h s t l u s e r a s a n i a g a s li a f ti t u b e m a n s ’ e d ir b
d a s d n a r e
h becauseshei snoti ncluded i n t hewo lrd .Du irng he rsrtugglet o ifnd
. y ti l a n o s r e p r e h n o s e g n a h c l a r e v e s s e v i g f l e s e u rt r e h
a s t e g e h s , o t g n o l e b o t p u o r g a s d n if e i k n a r F , y r o t s e h t f o t r a p t s a l e h t n I
e m a n d n e ir f a s d n if e h s e s u a c e b e fi l y p p a h w e
n dMaryLtilte hnjo .MaryLtiltejoh n
y l d n e ir f a s
i person ,she accepts t heold Frankie a she rfirend .Thi srelaitonship
k n a r F d l o e h t s e k a
m iet urnsi ntoacon ifden tpersona nddependen tperson.
.
B Approachont heStudy
n i t n e m p o l e v e d s e o g r e d n u e i k n a r F , l e v o n e h t n
I he rpersonaltiy . The
n I . t n e m n o ri v n e f o e c n e u lf n i e h t y b d e s u a c s i y ti l a n o s r e p r e h f o t n e m p o l e v e d
d e il p p a r e ti r w e h t ,t n e m p o l e v e d y ti l a n o s r e p s ’ r e t c a r a h c n i a m e h t e z y l a n a o t r e d r o
. h c a o r p p a l a c i g o l o h c y s p
9 2 3 : 1 8 9 1 ( s e h c i a D d i v a
D -344)i n hi sbooken itlted Criitca lApproachest o e
r u t a r e ti
y r a r e ti l h c i h w f o t u o d n i m f o e t a t s f o n o i s s u c s i d a o t s e t a l e r l a c i g o l o h c y s P n o it a g it s e v n i e h t n i ,s y a w o w t n i m s i c it ir c a o t n o s e m o c t I .s e s ir c n o it a e r c f o y d u t s l a c i g o l o h c y s p e h t n i d n a n o it a e r c f o t c a e h t f
o theauthorst oshow
l a i c e p s e h t d n a d n i m f o s e t a t s d n a s e d u ti tt a r i e h t n e e w t e b n o it a l e r e h t t a h t k r o w a t e r p r e t n i o t d e s u e b n a c h c a o r p p a l a c i g o l o h c y s P . k r o w f o y ti l a u q y b y a l p a r o l e v o n a n i s r e t c a r a h c e h t f o r o i v a h e b s a h c u s e r u t a r e ti l f o c y s p g n i y l p p
a hologicalt heo ires.
f o m r e t n i t a h t d e t e r p r e t n i e b n a c e v o b a n o it a t o u q e h t , s d r o w r e h t o n I y s p , m s i c it ir c y r a r e ti
l chologyi sneededt ouse . tIi sbecausepsychologyi susedt o
n o it c a e h t h g u o r h t k r o w y r a r e ti l a n i s r e t c a r a h c e h t f o s c it s ir e t c a r a h c e h t e e
s sand
a e k a m n a c r o h t u a e h t t a h t o s f l e s ti r o h t u a e h t f o r o i v a h e b e h t s e d u l c n i ti , s t h g u o h t . k r o w a n i y ti l a u q n i a tr e c r e ti r w e h t e v o b a h c a o r p p a l a c i g o l o h c y s p f o g n i d n a t s r e d n u e h t n o d e s a B e k il d l u o w r e ti r w e h t e s u a c e b y d u t s s i h t n i h c a o r p p a s i h t s e il p p
a tor evealt hemain
. s e ir o e h t l a c i g o l o h c y s p e m o s g n i s u y b t n e m p o l e v e d y ti l a n o s r e p s ’ r e t c a r a h c .
C Methodoft heStudy
s i h t n i d e s u e r a t a h t s e c r u o s e h t e s u a c e b h c r a e s e r y r a r b il a s i y d u t s s i h T d e lt it n e l e v o n a s i e c r u o s n i a m e h T . s e c r u o s n e tt ir w e r a y d u t
s TheMembe rOft he
g n i d d e W
` byCarsonMcCullers .
s m a r b A . H . M e r a s k o o b e s o h T . s e c n e r e f e r e m o s s e s u o s l a r e ti r w e h T A s m r e T y r a r e ti L f o y r a s s o l
G .I an Mliilgan’ sThenoveli n Engilsh :AnI ntroduciton s t n e d u t S s a e s r e v O r o f h s il g n E e h t d n a y r t e o P h s il g n E o
t . M . J . Murphy’ s
r o f h s il g n E e h t d n a y r t e o P h s il g n E o t n o it c u d o r t n I n A : n e e s n U g n i d n a t s r e d n U .s t n e d u t S s a e s r e v
s ’ s r e ll u C c M h ti w n o it a l e r e h t n i t e n r e t n i m o r f n o it a m r o f n i e m o s s e s w o r b o s l a
, k r o
w T heMembe roft heWedding .
Inconducitngt heanalysi ,st hewrtie rusedsomeways .Thef ris,tf oundt he
s i h c i h w l e v o
n interested i n t aking as t he wrtie’r sundergraduate t hesis .Second ,
l a r e v e s r o f ti d a e
r itme satferr eadingt hen decidedt het opic ,whichbecameast he
h t f o e lt
it i s study . Th rid , the wrtie r used the theory on characte r and
d y ti l a n o s r e p n o y r o e h t , n o it a z ir e t c a r a h
c evelopment .Thent hewrtie rwentsrtaigh t
n e m p o l e v e d y ti l a n o s r e p s ’ r e t c a r a h c n i a m e h t f o n o it p ir c s e d e h t n o s u c o f o
t t .A tfe r
,t a h
t thewrtie rbeguntoanalyzet hechange so rdevelopmentst ha tareexpeirenced
i t n e m n o ri v n e e h t r e d n u s m a d d A e i k n a r F y
b n lfuence through the persona l
n e m e l e c i s n ir t n i r e h t o e h t d n a t h g u o h t , h c e e p s , m s ir e n n a m , n o it p ir c s e
d t so fthe
d e w o h s t a h t y ti l a n o s r e
p et h nature o fthe Frankie Addam sand the fou trh ,the
I . y ti l a n o s r e p s ’ r e t c a r a h c n i a m e h t f o t n e m p o l e v e d e h t s e s y l a n a r e ti r
w n t hi sstudy ,
d e s u r e ti r w e h
t psychologica lapproach duet o tif ocuse sonFrankie’ spersonaltiy
s a w t s a l e h T . t n e m p o l e v e
d the conclusion o fthe study .A tfe ranswe irng al lthe
h c i h w , y d u t s e h t f o n o i s u l c n o c a s w a r d r e ti r w e h t , n o it a m r o f m e l b o r p n i s n o it s e u q
6 1
V I R E T P A H C
S I S Y L A N A
d e d i v i d s i r e t p a h c s i h
T intot hreepatrs .Thef ris tpar,tt hewrtieri denitifes
T . y r o t s e h t n i r e t c a r a h c n i a m e h t f o n o it p ir c s e d e h
t he second patr ,the wrtie r
s e z y l a n
a the factors t ha tcauset he main character’ spersonaltiy and t hel as tpatr ,
r e ti r w e h
t analyzes the proces so f the personaltiy developmen t o fthe main .r
e t c a r a h c
.
A TheDescrip iton oft heMainCharacterint heStory f
o e n
O theimpo tran telementsi nthestorysucha snoveli scharacters .The
h g u o r h t d e b ir c s e d e r a s r e t c a r a h
c the story by descirbing t hei rpsychologica lstate
. e l o r t n a tr o p m i n a y a l p y r o t s e h t n i s r e t c a r a h c e h t ll a t o N . e c n a r a e p p a l a c i s y h p d n a
t a , r e v e w o
H leas tonecharacte rbecome sacente rw ho play san i mpo trantr olei n .
y r o t s e h t
c s e d e h t e z y l a n a o t r e d r o n
I irpiton of t hemain characteri n t hestory, t he
J . M y b n o it a z ir e t c a r a h c f o y r o e h t d n a s m a r b A y b r e t c a r a h c f o y r o e h t s e s u r e ti r w
n i y h p r u
M Understanding Unseen .Then ,to ge treach to the descirpiton o fthe
a o t s d e e n r e ti r w e h t , y r o t s e h t n i r e t c a r a h c n i a
m nalyze persona ldescirpiton ,
. m s ir e n n a m d n a n o it c a e r , e fi l t s a p , h c e e p s
, y d u t s s i h t n
I the main characte rwho is discussed i sFrankie Addams ,
e h S . d l o s r a e y e v l e w t s i e i k n a r
F ilve swtih herf ather ,Mr .Roya lQuincyAddams ,
n i , e u n e v A t n o r F d e m a n n w o t a n
e m a n r e h t o r b a s a h e h S . n r o b s a w e h s e c n i s r e h t o
m dJ arvi sAddam sandJ arvisha s
d e m a n e d ir b
a Janis . Frankie also ha sa cousin named John Henry .Since the
r e h f o h t a e
d mother ,Frankiei st aken careby Berenice ,aservan to fMr .Addam s
. n e h c ti k e h t n i s k r o w y ll a u s u o h w
r e t c a r a h c n i a m e h t , y r o t s e h t n
I i sdescirbed wtih mulitple personaltiy ,
s a h e h s s n a e m h c i h
w threename scalled Frankie ,F .JasmineandFrancesi nevery
h t f o s tr a
p es tory ,andwtihdfiferen tcharacteirsitcsi nt hes tory.
.
1 FrankieAddam s
a r
F nkiei sdescirbeda sabiggilr .Shei st al landalmos tbig ,he rshoulder s
a n e r
a rrow ,shehast oo l ong l eg sboy .Thedescirpiton o fFrankie’ sappearancei s
t n i n e e s e b n a c t I .r u o b r a e h t n i s i e h s n e h w n w o h s o s l
a het ex:t
d a h e h s s a r u o b r a e h t h t a e n e b k l a w o t r e m m u s s i h t l l a t o o t s a w e i k n a r F
d n u o r a k l a w l li t s d l u o c e l p o e p d l o r a e y e v l e w t r e h t O . e r o f e b e n o d s y a w l a
o c s e i d a l n w o r g l l a m s n e v E . e m it d o o g a e v a h d n a s w o h s e v i g e d i s n
i uld
.r u o b r a e h t h t a e n r e d n u k r o
w AndarleadyFrankiewast oobig( p13 .)
.
a Tomboy
t a s a d e z ir e t c a r a h c s i e i k n a r
F omboy ,I tcan be seen from the way she
r e h d n a s r a e
w manneirsm ,which i sdeifned byM .J .Murphy ,ast hequotaiton i s
a e r o w e h S “ : n w o h
s pai ro fblue rtack short ,a B.V.D underves,t and she wa s
d a h r i a h r e H . d e t o o f e r a
b beencu tilkeaboy ,buti tha snotbeencutf o ral ong itme
s a w d n
a no teven patred” (p .9) .Thi squotaiton show sthe side o fFrankie’ s
s r a e w e h s s e h t o l c e h t m o r f n e e s e b n a c e d i s y o b m o t r e H . y o b m o
t . On t heothe r
n a
h d,i talsocanbeseenfromhe rharistyle“I tha sbeen cu t ilkeaboy”. Fromt hi s
. e i k n a r F f o e d i s y o b m o t e h t n w o h s s a h t i , e c n e d i v
e The othe revidence stha t
h t n i r e w o r h t e fi n k t s e b e h t m a
I i stown ,She said .Berenice who stood
i w d l u o w I , t s e t n o c a e v a h d l u o w y e h t f I . k a e p s t o n d i d r e h d n i h e
b n .
m o r f e fi n k e h t d e l o o p e i k n a r
F the doo rand laid i ton the k tichen table .
) 5 4 . p ( r e h t e g o t s d n a h r e h d e b b u r d n a m l a p r e h n o t a p s n e h
T .
e t e h
T x tabovemeanst ha tFrankiecan t hrowt heknfiei n agoodway ilke
e h
t one ,whichi susuallydoneby t heboys .From t heevidencest ha tareshown, i t
. y o b m o t a s i e i k n a r F t a h t d e d u l c n o c e b n a c
.
b Immature
o s l a s i e i k n a r
F characteirzeda san immatureperson .In t hestory ,Frankie
n w o r g t o n s i e h s s n a e m r e g n u o y h c u m s i o h w l ri g a s a d e r e d i s n o c s
i yet .I tcanbe
h c e e p s n o s r e p r e h t o d n a r e n n a m r e h h g u o r h t d e l a e v e
r which i s deifned by
r u
M phy’st heoryi nUnderstandingUnseen .A stii ss howni nt het ex tbelow:
“There wa sin the neighborhood a clubhouse ,and Frankie wa sno ta d n a n e e tr i h t e r e w o h w s lr i g e r e w b u l c e h t f o s r e b m e m e h T . r e b m e m
a e y n e e tf if n e v e d n a n e e tr u o
f r s old . They had parite s wtih boy s on
s i h t l it n u d n a , s r e b m e m s b u l c e h t f o l l a w e n k e i k n a r F . t h g i n y a d r u t a S
m u
s mer ,she had been ilke a younge rmembe ro fthei rcrowd .Bu tnow o o t s a w e h s d i a s d a h y e h T . r e b m e m a t o n s a w e h s d n a b u l c s i h t d a h y e h t
e h t d n i h e b y e ll a e h t o t d n u o r a t n e w e h s s e m it e m o S . n a e m d n a g n u o y
m e h t o t d e n e t s il d n a d e h c t a w e h s d n a e s u o h b u l
c ” (pp .17-1 8 .)
s n a e m , g n u o y l li t s s i e i k n a r F t a h t d e d u l c n o c e b n a c t i , n o it a t o u q s i h t m o r F
t e y n w o r g t o n s a h e h
s ,i tcan be proved from the grown gilr sspeech toward s
s ’ e i k n a r
F existence “they had said she wa stoo young and mean” From thi s
u d e d r e ti r w e h t e c n e d i v
e c es tha tFrankie i sstli limmature because she ha sno t
r a e y n e e tr u o f d n a n e e tr i h t e r a o h w l ri g r e h t o e h t e k il t e y n w o r
g s do .l Therefore,
. n o s r e p e r u t a m m i n a s a d e r e d i s n o c s i e i k n a r F
f o e d i s r e h t o e h
T Frankie’si mmaturtiy i salso seen from hert hough tand r
o i v a h e
e m d r a e h u o
Y ,F .Jasminesaid.I t oldyou Iwasn’ tcomingbackhereatfe r .
g n i d d e w e h
t Berenicesaid .Fools ’hill .Youhaveawholel otl es so fsense u
o y s e k a m t a h W . r o f ti d e r c u o y g n i v i g s a w I t a h
t think t hey wantt o t ake
e h t s i t a h t d n A . d w o r c s i e e r h t d n a y n a p m o c s i o w T ? m e h t h ti w g n o l a u o y
. F . d w o r c s i e e r h t d n a y n a p m o c s i o w T . g n i d d e w a t u o b a g n i h t n i a m
. ) 3 9 . p ( g n i y a s n w o n k a h ti w e u g r a o t d r a h t i d n u o f s y a w l a e n i m s a j
n a c e v o b a t x e t e h t m o r
F beseen t ha tFrankiewantst o go along wtih he r
t a h t s y a s d e e d n i e h s t a h t f o e s u a c e b , g n i d d e w e v a h y e h t r e tf a e d ir b e h t d n a r e h t o r b
. e m o h k c a b e m o c t o n l li w e h
s Whliet heevidenceshowst hatt woi scompany and
t o n s i e i k n a r F t a h t s n a e m t I . d w o r c s i e e r h
t allowed t o go t ogethe rwtih t heb irde
. m o o r g e h t d n
a From t hi sproo ,f i tcan beseen t ha tFrankiedoe sno tunderstand
r e h e r o f e r e h t g n i d d e w e h t f o g n i n a e m e h
t though tand behaviorareno tsensible ,
n e h
w shet hinks t ha tJarvi sand Jani swillt ake he ralong wtih t hem .Because o f
,t a h
t she i sconsidered a simmature person .From al lthe evidence sabove the
s i e r e h y ti r u t a m m i s ’ e i k n a r F t a h t s y a s r e ti r
w seen from he rage tha ti smuch
g n u o
y e r than the gi lr swho are thitreen and fou treen ,and also i sseen from he r
. g n i d d e w e h t t u o b a e l b i s n e s n i s i h c i h w t h g u o h t
.
c Unsociable
, y r o t s e h t n
I Frankie i sknown a sunsociableperson .I tcan be seen from
. s s e n il e n o l r e h
s r a e y e v l e w t s a w e i k n a r F n e h w , r e m m u s y z a r c d n a n e e r g t a h t d e n e p p a h t I
r o f n e h w r e m m u s e h t s a w s i h T . d l
o a long itme she had no tbeen a
a s a w d n a b u l c o n
