• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Hubungan antara Leverage Keuangan dengan Profitabilitas Perusahaan (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2011-2013)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "Hubungan antara Leverage Keuangan dengan Profitabilitas Perusahaan (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2011-2013)"

Copied!
14
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Lampiran 1

Pemilihan Sampel Penelitian

NO

 

Kode

  

Perusahaan

 

Populasi

Kriteria

 

Sampel

 

(2)
(3)
(4)

120 STTP

120

Ai

Ai

Ai

Ai

26

121 SULI

121

Ai

Ai

122 TBMS

122

Ai

Ai

123 TCID

123

Ai

Ai

Ai

124 TIRT

124

Ai

Ai

125 TKIM

125

Ai

Ai

Ai

126 TOTO

126

Ai

Ai

Ai

Ai

27

127 TPIA

127

Ai

Ai

Ai

128 TRIS

128

129 TRST

129

Ai

Ai

Ai

Ai

28

130 TSPC

130

Ai

Ai

Ai

Ai

29

131 ULTJ

131

Ai

Ai

Ai

132 UNIC

132

Ai

Ai

Ai

Ai

30

133 UNIT

133

Ai

Ai

Ai

Ai

31

134 UNTX

134

Ai

Ai

135 UNVR 135

Ai

Ai

Ai

136 VOKS

136

Ai Ai Ai

137 WIIM

137

Ai

Ai

Ai

Ai

32

138 Y

PAS

138

Ai

Ai

Ai

(5)

Lampiran 2

Jadwal Penelitian

Tahapan Penelitian

Okt'

15

Okt'

15

Nov'

15

Des'

15

Jan'

16

(6)

Lampiran 3

BOXPLOT Sebelum dan Sesudah Penghapusan

(7)
(8)

Lampiran 4

Curve Fit

LnDAR-LnROA

Model Summa

Model R R Square Adjusted R

Square

Std. Error of the

Estimate

1 ,146a ,021 ,005 ,88725

a. Predictors: (Constant), LnDAR

LnLDER-LnROA

Model Summary

Model R R Square Adjusted R

Square

Std. Error of the

Estimate

1 ,249a ,062 ,047 ,86859

a. Predictors: (Constant), LnLDER

LnTIER-LnROA

Model Summa

Model R R Square Adjusted R Square

Std. Error of the

Estimate

1 ,707a ,500 ,492 ,63411

a. Predictors: (Constant), LnTIER

LnDAR-LnROE

Model Summa

Model R R Square Adjusted R Square

Std. Error of the

Estimate

1 ,248a ,061 ,046 ,95534

a. Predictors: (Constant), LnDAR

LnLDER- LnROE

Model Summa

Model R R Square Adjusted R

Square

Std. Error of the

Estimate

1 ,327a ,107 ,092 ,93183

(9)

LnTIER- LnROE

Model Summary

Model R R Square Adjusted R

Square

Std. Error of the

Estimate

1 ,708a ,501 ,492 ,69685

a. Predictors: (Constant), LnTIER

LnDAR-LnNPM

Model Summary

Model R R Square Adjusted R

Square

Std. Error of the

Estimate

1 ,103a ,011 -,006 ,85783

a. Predictors: (Constant), LnDAR

LnLDER- LnNPM

Model Summary

Model R R Square Adjusted R

Square

Std. Error of the

Estimate

1 ,219a ,048 ,032 ,84141

a. Predictors: (Constant), LnLDER

LnTIER- LnNPM

Model Summa

Model R R Square Adjusted R

Square

Std. Error of the

Estimate

1 ,642a ,412 ,403 ,66105

(10)

Lampiran 5

Manova

[DataSet1]

The default error term in MANOVA has been changed from WITHIN CELLS to WITHIN+RESIDUAL. Note that these are the same for all full factorial designs.

* * * * * * * * A n a l y s i s o f V a r i a n c e * * * * * * * * *

63 cases accepted.

0 cases rejected because of out-of-range factor values. 0 cases rejected because of missing data.

1 non-empty cell.

1 design will be processed.

Adjusted WITHIN CELLS Correlations with Std. Devs. on Diagonal

LnROA LnROE LnNPM

LnROA ,60917

LnROE ,97796 ,62681

LnNPM ,85350 ,84662 ,64930

Statistics for ADJUSTED WITHIN CELLS correlations

Log(Determinant) = -4,44864

Bartlett test of sphericity = 254,31364 with 3 D. F.

Significance = ,000

F(max) criterion = 1,13609 with (3;59) D. F.

Adjusted WITHIN CELLS Variances and Covariances

LnROA LnROE LnNPM

LnROA ,37109

LnROE ,37342 ,39288

LnNPM ,33759 ,34456 ,42159

Adjusted WITHIN CELLS Sum-of-Squares and Cross-Products

LnROA LnROE LnNPM

LnROA 21,89418

LnROE 22,03153 23,18021

(11)

*** * * * A n a l y s i s o f V a r i a n c e --Design 1 * * * * *

EFFECT .. WITHIN CELLS Regression

Adjusted Hypothesis Sum-of-Squares and Cross-Products

LnROA LnROE LnNPM

LnROA 27,17372

LnROE 31,05869 36,13562

LnNPM 23,57389 26,80643 20,49338

Multivariate Tests of Significance (S = 3, M = -1/2, N = 27 1/2)

Test Name Value Approx. F Hypoth. DF Error DF Sig. of F

Pillais ,95742 9,21835 9,00 177,00 ,000

Hotellings 2,42599 15,00523 9,00 167,00 ,000

Wilks ,23564 12,51538 9,00 138,87 ,000

Roys ,66918

Eigenvalues and Canonical Correlations

Root No. Eigenvalue Pct. Cum.Pct. Canon Cor. Sq. Cor

12,02279 83,37971 83,37971 ,81803 ,66918 2,40139 16,54520 99,92491 ,53518 ,28642

3,00182 ,07509 100,00000 ,04264 ,00182

Dimension Reduction Analysis

Roots Wilks L F Hypoth. DF Error DF Sig. of F

1 TO 3 ,235612,51538 9,00 138,87 ,000 2 TO 3 ,712285,36149 4,00 116,00 ,001 3 TO 3 ,99818,10748 1,00 59,00 ,744

EFFECT .. WITHIN CELLS Regression (Cont.) Univariate F-tests with (3;59) D. F.

Variable Sq.Mul.R Adj.R-sq. Hypoth.MS Error MS F Sig. of F

LnROA ,55380 ,53111 9,05791 ,3710924,40906 ,000 LnROE ,60921 ,58934 12,04521 ,3928830,65836 ,000 LnNPM ,45172 ,42385 6,83113 ,4215916,20334 ,000

Raw canonical coefficients for DEPENDENT variables Function No.

Variable 1 2 3

LnROA 2,21531 5,51343 -3,33619

LnROE -3,12920 -4,78464 ,65077

(12)

Standardized canonical coefficients for DEPENDENT variables Function No.

Variable 1 2 3

LnROA ,97077 4,90484 -2,96793

LnROE -,86072 -4,67992 ,63653

LnNPM ,22274 ,27042 2,55623

Correlations between DEPENDENT and canonical variables Function No.

Variable 1 2 3

LnROA ,83589 ,54869 ,01479

LnROE -,91892 ,39255 ,03854

LnNPM ,74170 ,53932 ,39878

Variance in dependent variables explained by canonical variables

CAN.VAR. Pct Var DEP Cum Pct DEP Pct Var COV Cum Pct COV

1 69,77506 69,77506 46,69204 46,69204

2 24,86737 94,64243 7,12253 53,81457

3 5,35757 100,00000 ,00974 53,82431

Raw canonical

COVARIATE

LnDAR LnLDER LnTIER

coefficients for COVARIATES

Function No.

1 2 3

-,83178 -2,54638 -2,92670 -,43463 -,20767 1,26715 -,77265 ,62970 -,20866

Standardized canonical coefficients for COVARIATES CAN. VAR.

COVARIATE 1 2 3

LnDAR -,38911 -,69202 -,79538

LnLDER -,36051 -,17225 1,05106

LnTIER -,75945 ,61894 -,20509

Correlations between COVARIATES and canonical Variables CAN. VAR.

Covariate 1 2 3

LnDAR -,64712 -,77562 -,31477

LnLDER -,56402 -,46622 ,68156

(13)

Variance in covariates explained by canonical variables

CAN. VAR. Pct Var DEP Cum Pct DEP Pct Var COV Cum Pct COV

1 26,95292 26,95292 40,27756 40,27756 2 11,47346 38,42638 40,05811 80,33567

3 ,03576 38,46214 19,66433 100,00000

Regression analysis for WITHIN CELLS error term --- Individual Univariate ,9500 confidence intervals Dependent variable .. LnROA

COVARIATE B Beta Std.Err. t -Value Sig.of t Lower -95% CL- Upper

LnDAR ,2041163699 ,0623553374 ,31992 ,63803 ,526 -,43603 ,84427

LnLDER ,2108479553 ,1965921351 ,10488 2,01044 ,049 ,00099 ,42071 LnTIER ,6343950430 ,7009280723 ,07878 8,05225 ,000 ,47675 ,79204

Dependent variable .. LnROE

COVARIATE B Beta Std.Err. t-Value Sig.of t lower -95% CL- Upper

LnDAR ,5247766471 ,1458088052 ,32918 1,59421 ,116 -,133911 ,18346 LnLDER ,2789265693 ,2365375444 ,10791 2,58474 ,012 ,06299

,49486 LnTIER ,6971579040 ,7005808819 ,08107 8,59992 ,000 ,53495

,85937

Dependent variable .. LnNPM

COVARIATE B Beta Std.Err. t-Value Sig.of t Lower -95% CL- Upper

LnDAR ,0718328891 ,0228216802 ,34099 ,21066 ,834 -,61049 ,75415 LnLDER ,1927329590 ,1868879146 ,11179 1,72414 ,090 -,03095 ,41641 LnTIER ,5534482016 ,6359443845 ,08397 6,59066 ,000 ,38542 ,7214

* * * * * A n a l y s i s o f V a r i a n c e --Design 1 * * * * *

EFFECT .. CONSTANT

Adjusted Hypothesis Sum-of-Squares and Cross-Products

LnROA LnROE LnNPM

LnROA 33,44498

LnROE 26,00673 20,22277

LnNPM 34,54113 26,85909 35,67320

Multivariate Tests of Significance (S = 1, M = 1/2, N = 27 1/2)

Test Name Value Exact F Hypoth. DF Error DF Sig. of F

Pillais ,7745465,27120 3,00 57,00 ,000

Hotellings 3,43533 65,27120 3,00 57,00 ,000

Wilks ,2254665,27120 3,00 57,00 ,000

(14)

Eigenvalues and Canonical Correlations

Root No. Eigenvalue Pct. Cum. Pct. Canon Cor.

1 3,43533 100,00000 100,00000 ,88008

EFFECT .. CONSTANT (Cont.)

Univariate F-tests with (1;59) D. F.

Variable Hypoth.SS Error SS Hypoth. MS Error MS F Sig.of F

LnROA 33,44498 21,89418 33,44498 ,37109 90,12686 ,000 LnROE 20,22277 23,18021 20,22277 ,39288 51,47250 ,000 LnNPM 35,67320 24,87367 35,67320 ,42159 84,61636 ,000

EFFECT .. CONSTANT (Cont.)

Raw discriminant function coefficients Function No.

Variable 1

LnROA 6,13114 LnROE -5,61517 LnNPM ,67484

Standardized discriminant function coefficients Function No.

Variable 1

LnROA 3,73490 LnROE -3,51962 LnNPM ,43817

Estimates of effects for canonical variables Canonical Variable

Parameter 1

1 -8,54841

Correlations between DEPENDENT and canonical variables Canonical Variable

Variable 1

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

[r]

Skenario terbaik yang dapat diterapkan pada lapangan-X untuk mendapatkan produksi yang optimal dengan keuntungan lebih adalah scenario N yang menggunakan metode huff and puff

Surat dukungan untuk item barang/peralatan No. 2, 3 dan 4 tidak melampirkan brosur; Mengacu pada dokumen lelang BAB III;E;27.4:C Evaluasi Teknis c) identitas

Masih banyaknya perusahaan kecil (pedagang) yang menggunakan cara manual untuk mengolah data dan memperkenalkan produknya adalah inti dari permasalahan yang banyak dihadapi oleh

Brosur / katalog yang dilampirkan hanya berupa gambar dan spesifikasi yang dilampirkan hanya menyalin dari spesifikasi yang ada di RKS Teknis; Mengacu pada dokumen lelang

Belum adanya situs di internet yang berisikan informasi tentang budaya Lombok yang berisikan tentang sejarah, cerita rakyat, kesenian, obyek wisata dan hasil industri dari Pulau

Dalam rangka pelaksanaan pelelangan umum Pengadaan Peralatan Pelatihan Lembaga Pelatihan Kerja Swasta (LPKS) Kejuruan Otomotive Sepeda Motor Tahun Anggaran 2013,

[r]