62 DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Akbar, R, Pilcher R and Perrin B. (2012). Performance Measurement In Indonesia: The Case Of Local Government. Pacific Accounting Review 24, No. 3: 262-291.
Barzelay, M. (1992). Breaking Through Bureaucracy. Berkeley: University Of California Press.
Bovens, M. (2010) Two Concepts of Accountability: Accountability as a Virtue and as a Mechanism. West European Politics, Vol. 33, No. 5, 946– 967, September 2010.
Braun, V,Victoria C. 2006. “Using thematic analysis in psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, no. 2: 77-10.
Brinkerhoff, R. O. (2003). The success case method. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Burns, J, Robert W. Scapens. 2000. “Conceptualizing Management Accounting Change: An Institutional Framework.” Management Accounting Research, 11: 3-35.
Caseley.J. (2006). Multiple Accountability Relationship And Inproved Service Deievery Performance In Heyderabad City, Southern India. International Review Of Administrative Sciences, 531-546.
Chong, S. S., Salleh, K., Ahmad, S. N.S., And Sharifudin, S.I. S. O. (2011). Km Impelementasi In A Public Sector Accounting Organization: An Empirical Investigation. Journal Of Knowledge Managemen. 15, 497-512.
Creswell, John W., dan Vicki L. P. Clark. 2011. Design and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (2nd Ed). United States of America: Sage Publications.
Coste, A., andTudor,A.T. (2013)Service Performance-Between Measurement And Information In The Public Sector. Procedia-Social And Behavioral Science. 92, 215-219.
63 Dessler, G. (1997) Manajemen Personalia. Edisi 3, Terjemahan Agus Dharma.
Erlangga. Jakarta.
DiMaggio, P, J., Walter W. Powell. 1983. “The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields.”American Sociological Review, 48, no. 2: 147-160.
Dubnick, M. (2005). Accountability andThePromise Of Performance: In Search Of The Mechanisms. Performance & Management Review, 28, No.3: 76-417.
Friel, B. (1998). Faith Healers. Government Executive 30 (4), 43-45.
Gibson, J. L., Ivancevich, J. M., Donnely, J. H., Konopaske, R. (2003). Organization, Behavior Structure Processes. Eleventh Edition: Mcgrraw Hill.
Gray, A. And B. Jenkins (1993), „Codes Of Accountability In The New Public Sector‟, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 6, No. 3, Pp. 52–67.
Hair, J F, Thomas, M, H. And Cristian M, R. (2014). A Primer On Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Los Angeles: Sage.
Hartley, J. 2005. “Innovation in governance and public services: Past and present.”Public Money and Management, 25,no. 1: 27-34.
Heinrich, CJ. (2002). Outcomes-Based Performance Management In The Public Sector: Implications For Government Accountability And Effectiveness. Public Administration Review, 62: 712-725.
Hood, C. (1991). A Public Management For All Seasons. Public Administration,6, No. 3: 3-19.
_________ 1995. ”The "new public management" in the 1980s: Variations on a theme.” Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20: 93-109.
Johnson, R. Burke, danAnthony J. Onwuegbuzie. 2004. “Mixed methods research: A research Paradigm whose time has come.”Educational Researcher, 33,no.7: 14-26.
Kim, S. E. (2005). Balacing Competing Accountability Requirements. Public Performance Management Review, 29, 145-163.
64 Kim, S. E., And Lee, J. W.(2005). Impact Of Competing Accountability Requirements On Perceived Work Performance.The American Reviw Of Public Dministration, 100-118.
Kloot, L. 1999. “Performance Measurement and Accountability in Victorian Local Government.”International Journal of Public Sector Management,12, no. 7: 565-584.
Kloot, L., And Martin,J. (2000). Strategic Performance Management: A Balance Approach To Performance Management Issues In Local Government. Management Accounting Research. 11, 231-251.
Krislov, S and David H. Rosenbloom (1981). Representative Bureau- cracy and the American Political System. New York: Praeger.
Koppell, J. GS. (2005). Pathologies of Accountability: ICANN and Challenge of “ MultileAccountabilitesDisorde”. Public Administration. Vol. 65, No. 1 (Jan-Feb, 2005), PP. 94-108.
Lembaga Administrasi Negara Republic Indonesia. (2004).
ModulSistemAkuntabilitasKinerjaInstansiPemerintah. Edisi Ke-2. Jakarta: LAN.
Local Governance Support Program (LGSP)-USAID (2008). Tantangan Dalam Penyelenggaraan Evaluasi Kinerja Berbasis Hasil. Www.Lgsp.Or.Id. Mahmudi. (2005). Manajemen Kinerja Sektor Publik, UPP AMP YKPN,
Yogyakarta.
Manafe, M and Rusdi Akbar. (2014) Accountability and Performance Evidene From Local Government. Journal Of Indonesia Economy and Business. Vol.29, No 1, 56-73.
McKevitt, D And Lawton, A. (1994). Public Sector Management: Theory. Critique And Practice. SAGE Publications Ltd. London.
Merton, R. K.(1997). Bureaucratic Structure And Personality. In J. M. Sharitz & A. C. Hyde (Eds), Classics Of Public Administration. New York. Mwita, I. J. (2000). Performance Management Model: A System-Based
Approach To Public Service Quality. The International Journal Of Public Sector Management. 13, 19-37.
Nurkhamid, M. (2008). Implementasi Inovasi Sistem Pengukuran Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah. Jurnal Akuntansi Pemerintah, 45-76.
65 O‟Connell, L. (2006). Emergent Accountability in State- Local Relations: Same Lessons From Solid Waste Policy in Kentucky. Administration & Society, Vol. 38, No.4.
Osborne And Gaebler.(1998). Reinventing Government: How The Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming The Pulic Sector.
Patton, JM. (1993). Accountability And Governmental Financial Reporting. Financial Accountability & Management, 8, No. 3: 165–80.
Peteman, C. (1970). Participation And Democratic Theory. Cambridge, United Kingdom: University Of Cambridge Press.
Pollitt, C, and Geert Bouckaert. (1990)..Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Powell, Robert. (1991). Absolute And Relative Gains In International Relations Theory. Tha American Political Science Review, 85, No. 4: 1303-1320.
Prawirosentono, S, (1999). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia: Kebijakan Kinerja Karyawan, Bpfe Yogyakarta.
Proper, C., & Wilson D. (2003). The Use And Usefulness Of Performance Measurement In The Pulic Sector. Oxford Review Of Economic Policy. 19, 250-267.
Rivai, V & Basri. (2005). Performance Appraisal: Sistem Yang Tepat Untuk Menilai Kinerja Karyawan Dan Meningkatkan Daya Saing Perusahaan. Rajawali Press. Jakarta.
Romzek, B., & Ingraham, P. (2000). Cross Pressures Of Accountability: Initiative, Command, And Failure In The Ron Brown Plane Crash. Public Administrative Review, 60, 240-253.
Romzek, B.S., & Dubnick, M. (1987). Accountability In The Public Sector: Lessons From The Challenger Tragedy. PubliCadministrationRevie, 47, 2270238.
Romzek, B.S., & Dubnick, M. (1994). Issues Of Accountability In Flexible Personnel System. In P.W. Ingraham & B.S. Romzek (Eds), New Paradigms For Government: Issues For The Changing Public Service. 263-294.
66 Sakaran, U. (2003). Research Method for Businnes: A Skill Building Approach. 4th
Edition. Jhon Wiley.
Scapens, R. (1985). Accounting Systems And Systems Of Accountability -Understanding Accounting Practices In Their Organisational Contexts. Accounting, Organizations And Society. 443-456.
Schwartz, R., & Sulitzeanu-Kenan, R. (2004). Managerial Values And Accountability In Pressures: Challengs Of Crisis And Disaster. Journal Of Public Administration Research And Theory, 14, 79-102. Scott, W. R. (1987). “The AdolesceneOf Institutional Theory”. Administrative
Science Quarterly, 32, 493-511.
Scott, W. R. (1995). Istitutional and Organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Scott, W. R. (2008). Approaching adulthood: the maturing of institutional theory.
Sociology Department MC 2047, Stanford University, 37:427–442. Sholihin M, Dwi Ratmono. 2013. Analisi SEM-PLS dengan WarpPLS 3.0 Untuk
Hubungan Nonlinear dalam Penelitian Sosial dan Bisnis. Andy Offset Yogyakarta.
Sinclair. A. (1995). The Chameleon Of Accountanility: Forms And Disclousure. Accounting, Organization And Society, 219-237.
Solikin, A (2005). Accountability Reporting in Indonesia: When Self-Serving Attributions Exaggerate Perceived Performance. Jurnal Akuntansi Pemerintah, 21-33.
Spekle, R F. danFrank H.M. Verbeeten. 2014. “The Use of Performance Measurement Systems in the Public Sector: Effects on Performance.”Management Acounting Research, 25: 131-146.
Stoner, J. A., And Charles, W. (1986). Management. Third Edition, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall International, Inc.
Verbeeten, F H.M. (2008). Performance Management Practices In Public Sector Organizations: Impct On Performance. Accounting, Auditing And Accountability Journal, 21, Pp.427-454.
Wang, X. (2002). Assesing Performance Measurement Impact: A Study Of Us Local Government. Public Performance And Management Review, 26: 26-43.
67 Wang, X.(2002). Assessing Administrative Accountability: Result From A National Survey. American Review Of Public Administration. 32, 350-370.
Zuker, L G. (1987). Institutional Theories Of Organization. Annual Review Of Sociology Review, 42: 726-743.
Undang-Undang No. 22 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pemerintah Daerah.
Undang-Undang No. 25 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perimbangan Keuangan Antara Pemerintah Pusat Dan Daerah.
Intruksi Presiden No. 7 Tahun 1999 Tentang Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah.
Undang-Undang No. 17 Tahun 2003 TentangKeuangan Daerah. Undang-Undang No.1 Tahun 2004. TentangPembendaharaan Negara. Undang-Undang No. 15 Tahun 2004 TentangPengelolaanKeuangan Daerah. Keputusan Kepala Lan No.589/Ix/6/Y/1999 Tentang Laporan Tahunan
Akuntabilitas Kinerja Pemerintah.
Keputusan Kepala Lan No, 239/Ix/6//8/2003 Mengenai Laporan Tahunan Akuntabilitas Kinerja Pemerintah.
Peraturan Menteri Negara Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara No.
Per/09/M.Pan/2007 Tentang Pedoman Umum Penetapan Indikator Kinerja Utama Di Lingkungan Instansi Pemerintah.
Peraturan Pemerintah No. 58 Tahun 2005 Tentang Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah. Peratutan Pemerintah No. 8. Tahun 2006 Tentang Pelaporan Keuangan Dan
Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah.
Lembaga Administrasi Negara (LAN) Nomor 589/IX/6/Y/1999 Tentang Pedoman Penyusunan Pelaporan Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah.
