• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

T1__Full text Institutional Repository | Satya Wacana Christian University: The of Effective English Language Teacher as Perceived by Senior High School Students T1 Full text

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Membagikan "T1__Full text Institutional Repository | Satya Wacana Christian University: The of Effective English Language Teacher as Perceived by Senior High School Students T1 Full text"

Copied!
35
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

THE CHARACTERISTICS OF EFFECTIVE ENGLISH

LANGUAGE TEACHER AS PERCEIVED BY SENIOR HIGH

SCHOOL STUDENTS

THESIS

Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of

the Requirements for the Degree of

Sarjana Pendidikan

Yemima Rossiandy 112012153

ENGLISH LANGUAGE EDUCATION PROGRAM

FACULTY OF LANGUAGE & ARTS

UNIVERSITAS KRISTEN SATYA WACANA

SALATIGA

(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

This thesis contains no such material as has been submitted for examination in any course or accepted for the fulfillment of any degree or diploma in any university. To the best of my knowledge and my belief, this contains no material previously published or written by any other person except where due reference is made in the text.

Copyright@ 2016. Yemima Rossiandy and Victoria Usadya Palupi, M. A-ELT.

All rights reserved. No part of this thesis may be reproduced by any means without the permission of at least one of the copyright owners or the Faculty of Language and Arts, Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana, Salatiga.

(6)
(7)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Cover Page ... i

Pernyataan Tidak Plagiat...ii

Pernyataan Persetujuan Akses...iii

Approval Page ... iv

Copyright Statement ... v

Publication Agreement Declaration ... vi

Table of Contents...vii

Introduction ... 1

Literature Review... 4

Four competencies of an Effective English Language Teacher ... 5

The Study ... 8

Context of The Study ... 8

Participants ... 9

The Instrument ... .9

Data Collection Procedures ... 10

Data Analysis Procedures ... 10

Findings and Discussions ... 11

The Average Scores of The Four Competencies of EELT ... 11

The Average Scores of Each The Four Competencies of EELT ... 12

The Top Ten Characteristics of EELT ... 17

Conclusion ... 19

Acknowledgement ... 21

References ... 22

Appendices ... 25

(8)

A. INTRODUCTION

Teacher is one of the factors that influence student achievement during

learning process. According to Ministerial Decree Number 14 Year 2005 about teacher and lecturer “teachers are professional educators with the primary task of

educating, teaching, guiding, directing, training, assessing and evaluating students

on early childhood education, formal education, primary education and secondary

education”. To be a good teacher (Beishuizen, E. Hof, Van Putten, Bouwmeester

and Asscher, 2001) they should have the qualities in personality and ability. In

this case, to be an English teacher certainly different to other teachers because

English is a course that concern with a foreign language and culture. So that, in

deliver the materials are needed some competencies. Therefore, good English

teachers have to be able to handle the complex nature of the subject matter, the

teaching content, teaching approach and how teacher personality affects the

learning process (Lee, 2010).

Many studies have been conducted to determine students’ perception of

effective teaching, create instruments to measure these perceptions, and establish

criteria by which an instructor’s effectiveness is judged (Beran, Violato, Kline &

Fridere, 2005). Of course teachers play important roles in the quality of teaching

and helping learners to succeed in learning a target language (Dincer, Ali,

Aysegul & Mine, 2013). In the context of English language teaching, teacher has

a special role. It is because English is a foreign language in Indonesia and yet

(9)

There are four main competencies of an effective English language

teacher, socio-affective skills, pedagogical knowledge, subject matter knowledge

and personal qualities (Dincer, Ali, Aysegul & Mine, 2013). Socio-affective skill

includes teachers’ ability to build and maintain good relationship between teacher

and students, always care for students’ need about English, motivate students in

learning, build enthusiasm in teaching English. Pedagogical knowledge is related

to how teacher guides students with informational feedback, ability to organize

and explain the course, use various approaches in language teaching, integrating

technology and have manage an effective classroom. Subject matter knowledge

covers teacher’s competence among others in English, integrating lesson with

students’ backgrounds. Personal qualities of an English teacher concerned about

teacher’s sense of humor, enthusiasm and creativity, tolerance, patience, kindness,

optimism and positive attitude about students and their ideas.

In a previous study on affective characteristics and teaching skills of

English language teachers by Melek (2013) in Turkey, it showed that affective

characteristics were considered as a dominant feature of a good English language

teacher. In other study, in the Saudi, Al-Maqtri and Thabet (2012) found that more

than half of the participants 34 (57%) were concerned more with the

socio-affective qualities and also considered the qualities as the most important

characteristics of an English teacher. The result in Yemen’s students in semester one was similar to in Saudi’s students in semester four were very conscious about

the socio-affective qualities. The socio-affective qualities were like being punctual

(10)

to give advice to students, encouraging students to be creative, showing respect to

the students, being helpful and respecting students’ needs and being showing

kindness, care and love. However, the students in semester one in Yemeni were

conscious about the pedagogical knowledge of the teacher, namely explaining

lessons clearly and effectively.

This study is important especially for me is to have some pictures about

what makes a good English teacher and prepare myself to improve my teaching

skill to meet the characteristics of an EELT. Moreover, this study is helpful for

future English teachers, novice English teachers and English teachers to develop

their teaching skills. And for the English Language Education Program (ELEP)

student-teachers, particularly those who are taking the teaching practicum course

to be more aware about the characteristics of EELT. The aim of this paper is to explore what SHS students’ view and expectation with regards to an effective

English language teacher (EELT). Hopefully, this study gives benefit to English

language teachers; English student-teachers, novice English teachers and future

English teachers in a way of upgrading the teaching skills through the

characteristics of EELT, enrich the knowledge of teacher to constantly adjust the

needs of students in order to be able to present the materials and teaching become

an effective teaching and learning process and even give good impact for students

after knowing the result of this research. This study is aimed to answer the following research question “What are the characteristics of a good English

teacher as perceived by Senior High School students?’. And with the four

(11)

an effective English language teacher for students. Therefore, from the general

competencies, I would like to find whether those competencies determine an

EELT appropriate for students’ need or not. If any differences, I want to know

what students’ expectation that has not been written in four competencies above.

B. LITERATURE REVIEW

In this era, the development of English as an International language makes

schools in Indonesia need more qualified English teachers in order to have the

better quality of English subject (Anugerahwati, n.d). They need make the

students have English competency as International language (Wati, 2011).

Therefore, the Ministry of National Education has issued a regulation Number 16

Year 2007. It states that teacher's competencies consist of four categories:

professional, personal, pedagogic, and social competencies. Professional

competence includes mastery of the subject matter, mastery of grounding and

insightful appreciation of education and teacher training, and mastery of education

processes. Personal competence includes personality intact, virtuous, honest,

mature, faithful, have high moral standards, discipline, responsibility, sensitive,

objective, flexible, resourceful, be able to communicate with others, creative

thinking, critical, reflective, willing to learn throughout life and can take decision.

Pedagogic competence includes ability in learning or education such as

understanding the characteristics of the students and students’ development,

understanding some of the concepts of education that help students, mastery of

some teaching methodology that appropriate to the materials and students’

(12)

developmental progress of students’ ability. Social competence includes having

empathy, tolerance, attitude and positive personality and be able to cooperate with

others.

In this study, I am referring to Dincer, Ali, Aysegul & Mine (2013) who

said there are four competences of effective English language teacher,

socio-affective skills, pedagogical knowledge, subject matter knowledge and personal

qualities.

Four Competencies of an Effective English Language Teacher Socio-Affective Skills

English teachers need to have socio-affective skills, to be able to interact with

their students and manage the educational process learning effectively. This

characteristic refers to cases such as in establishing positive relations in

cooperation with the students and showing interest in learners. In addition, Walter

(2000) said that giving students more control over the learning process increases

students’ motivation. Therefore, socio-affective skills teachers are able to

motivate the students to reach their target language successfully. Another

important point is what the students experience, how they feel and how to

approach their related problems during process of teaching and learning in the

classroom. How they indicate their feelings such as fear, anxiety, and another

some negative emotions, these are part of the process. Socio-affective skills

provide teachers with the opportunity to deal with what their students feel and

experience in their learning process (Aydin, Bayram, Canidar, Cetin, Ergunay,

(13)

they are able to create the positive environment in which their students can

concentrate both cognitive and emotional levels on learning process.

Pedagogical Knowledge

In teaching a subject matter, English teachers need to know what the course they

are teaching during learning process. According to Aydin (2009), he stated that

pedagogical knowledge is related to what teachers know about teaching subjects,

and he also claimed that without pedagogical knowledge teachers are not able to

conduct what they know to their students. Shulman (1986) said that pedagogical

knowledge concerns to ideas, concepts, analogies, explanations, and

demonstrations used to make the course understandable to students. Therefore,

pedagogical knowledge of teachers is also important way in using approaches to students’ comprehension the course during learning process in classroom.

Subject Matter Knowledge

Another main factor that English teacher needed is the subject-matter knowledge

as (Borg, 2006; Park and Lee, 2006; Werbinska, 2009) stated that teachers should

have knowledge of the target language knowledge, concerning fluency, accuracy,

lexicon and pronunciation. The way English teachers speaking is not enough,

they also should have the mastery of the subject matter knowledge in their

specific field, especially English subject because this study concerns about

English teacher, and the more teachers have the subject-matter knowledge, the

more effectively they teach and the more successful results will be earned

(14)

teacher needs is not only the fluency of their spoken, but also the comprehensively

grasp basic principles of language learning and teaching and know through

experience what it is like to learn a foreign language.

However in fact, subject-matter knowledge that English teachers should have

really give is good influences in teaching and learning process. It will give profit

not for teachers itself, but also for students.

Personality Characteristics

Wichadee (n.d) said that an effective language teacher is not always by the factors

of knowledge or teaching skills, but also the communication skills and the

relationship between teacher and students. In addition, other studies such as

(Cheung, 2006; Shishavan and Sadeghi, 2009; Werbinska, 2009) have added

about being an effective teacher that being tolerant, patient, kind, sensible and

open-minded, flexible, optimistic, enthusiastic, having positive attitudes toward

new ideas, and caring for students. Clark and Walsh (2004) suggest that when

teachers combine all of these expected characteristics in the profession, they can

end up with a trusting relationship with their students. This study indicates that

effective English language teachers should have appropriate characteristics to help

in achieve successful language teaching and process learning the students.

Therefore, students’ perceptions concerning “the characteristics of effective

English teacher” might provide a deeper insight into the concept of the features of

the ideal language teacher.

The relationship of the four competencies of an effective teacher by the

(15)

Mine (2013). It can be seen that professional (Ministry of National Education) in

line with subject matter knowledge (Dincer, Ali, Aysegul & Mine, 2013),

personal (Ministry of National Education) in line with personal qualities (Dincer,

Ali, Aysegul & Mine, 2013), pedagogic (Ministry of National Education) in line

with pedagogical knowledge (Dincer, Ali, Aysegul & Mine, 2013) and social

(Ministry of National Education in line with socio-affective skill (Dincer, Ali,

Aysegul & Mine, 2013). From here we can know that four competencies which is

determined by the Ministry of National Education is in line with what has been

mention by (Dincer, Ali, Aysegul & Mine, 2013). Therefore, it means that those

competencies have required both in Indonesia and Internationally. In this case, it

is important for English teachers in Indonesia to be more aware of the four

competencies. So that, they can compete with other English teachers in

International scale in a way that English teachers should be able to upgrade the

quality of teaching skills with having the four competencies and can be applied in

learning process.

C. THE STUDY Context of the study

The setting of this study is a private senior high school in Salatiga. I choose this

school because SMA LAB also a part in my campus Universitas Kristen Satya

Wacana (UKSW). It is one of the best private schools in Salatiga and has an

extracurricular English debate. This activity provides students to improve their

(16)

Participants

The participants of this study were students of tenth (X) grade who were in

semester two of 2015/2016. The classes of grade X were divided into six classes,

there were three classes of science, two classes of social and one class of

language. Each class had 20-25 students and the total numbers of participants

were 120 students. The English language skills of each student was very good.

Teachers and students in the school had a very good relationship. I thought Senior

High School students were also mature enough to share their own perceptions

toward the issue about an Effective English Language Teacher (EELT).

The instrument

The instrument of this study was questionnaire. The questionnaire was adapted

from Al-Maqtri and Thabet (2012), Brown (2000), and Shishavan and Sadeghi

(2009). In part one of the questionnaire there were 30 statements about four

competencies (socio-affective skills, pedagogical knowledge, subject-matter

knowledge and personal qualities) of EELT and in part two was an open-ended

question as additional statement of EELT if any. The questionnaire was developed

in English and Indonesian and both versions were revised two times with the help

of lecturer and colleagues. Statement number 1-7 was socio-affective skills,

number 8-15 was pedagogical knowledge, number 16-23 was subject-matter

knowledge and number 24-30 was personal qualities. To express their agreement

or disagreement based on a four-point “degree of importance” scale. In all items 1

was assigned “strongly unimportant”, 2 “unimportant”, 3 “important” and 4

(17)

by giving one tick (√) in each statement of the characteristic of EELT. A

questionnaire was used in this study because it was considered the easiest way to

obtain data from senior high school students as they were just asked to. Overall, the questionnaire was purpose of students’ perceptions on the characteristics of

Effective English Language Teacher (EELT).

Data Collection Procedures

Before I collected the data for this study, at the first visit I asked for permission to

collect data from the head of English Language Education Program (ELEP), the

school minister, the head of curriculum Senior High School LAB and homeroom

teachers X grade. And I also asked for the permission from the participants to help

me fulfill the questionnaire. The second visit, I distributed the questionnaire to the

participants.

Data Analysis

The frequencies of each item in the questionnaire were calculated to find out

students’ perceptions toward the four competencies of characteristics of EELT.

Because this study used a quantitative data, Microsoft Excel was used to help

counting the frequency of the average all characteristics. After inputting the data, I

counted the average of each the four competencies and the average of all

characteristics of an EELT using average formula of Microsoft excel. This

formula used to get the highest score of all characteristics and the four

competencies of an EELT as perceived by SHS students. Then, teachers could

understand which competencies that had the highest score. Therefore, they were

(18)

After that, I counted the average of all characteristics of an EELT to get some of

characteristics that had the highest scores. In deciding the highest and lowest

scores using Maximum (MAX) average and Minimum (MIN) average formula of

Microsoft Excel. The characteristics with the highest score were really important

for the teacher based on the students’ perceptions. While the lowest score

considered not really important.

D. FINDINGS and DISCUSSIONS

The aim of this study was to explore what SHS students’ view and

expectation with regards to an effective English language teacher (EELT). The

result of the study would be presented under three main tables: 1) the average

scores of the four competencies (socio-affective skills, pedagogical knowledge,

subject matter knowledge and personal qualities) of EELT, 2) the average scores

of each the four competencies of EELT and 3) the top ten characteristics of EELT

that SHS students needed.

Table 1. The averages score of each the four competencies of an EELT as perceived by SHS students.

No. The competencies of EELT Average Scores

1. Socio-affective 3.67

2. Pedagogical knowledge 3.66

3. Subject knowledge matter 3.59

(19)

The findings revealed that students perceived the four competencies of an

EELT were very important. It was also in line with the Ministry of National

Education and Dincer, Ali, Aysegul & Mine (2013) said that an English good

teacher need to have the four competencies.

Table 2.1. The high score of socio-affective skills.

No. Socio Affective Skills Characteristics Scores

1. Ability to showing enthusiasm 3.58

2. Ability to having a good sense of humor 3.65

3. Ability to being able to create an entertaining atmosphere to carry out the class activity

3.87

4. Ability to being patient in working with students of lesser ability

3.87

5. Ability to offering challenges to students of exceptionally high

ability

3.06

6. Ability to appreciating students’ opinions and abilities 3.83

7. Ability to respecting the differences students’ cultural traditions 3.86

The findings about the socio-affective skills showed that what SHS

students needed the most was an EELT who were being able to create an

entertaining atmosphere to carry out the class activities. Because if an entertaining

atmosphere in the classroom created, it was be able to improve students learning

(20)

that one of features of a good language teacher who had the ability to being able

to carry out the class activities in an entertaining atmosphere. The findings above

showed that what students also needed was an EELT who were patient in working

with students of lesser ability. Because each student had their own learning style

in comprehend the materials, it stated they need more attention like a direct

teaching, guidance and correction by the teacher before they understand the

(21)

Table 2.2. The high score of pedagogical knowledge of an EELT.

No. Pedagogical Knowledge Characteristics Scores

8. Ability to explaining lessons clearly 3.90

9. Ability to using a wide variety of techniques 3.57

10. Ability to having his students participate in the lesson 3.42

11. Ability to effectively perceive students’ linguistic needs 3.70

12. Ability to having good presentation skills 3.73

13. Ability to being able to make an active class in interaction,

cooperation, and teamwork in the classroom

3.73

14. Ability to giving optimal feedback to students 3.72

15. Ability to creatively adapts textbook material and other audio,

visual, and mechanical tools

3.48

The findings about the pedagogical knowledge showed that what SHS

students needed the most was an EELT who should explain lessons clearly. This

was in line the result of Al-Maqtri and Thabet (2012) in Yemeni for level 1 where

students were more concerned about teacher’s competence in explaining the

lessons clearly and effectively. If the teacher could explain the lesson clearly, this case was able to create a learners’ motivation and had positive feelings in learning

(22)

Table 2.3. The high score of subject matter knowledge of an EELT.

No. Subject Matter Knowledge Characteristics Scores

16. Ability to understanding the linguistic systems of English grammar well

3.83

17. Ability to speaking and pronounce English Well 3.73

18. Ability to reading and writing English well 3.71

19. Ability to having a high level of proficiency with English vocabulary

3.83

20. Ability to knowing English culture well 3.36

21. Ability to having the mastery of English course 3.80

22. Ability to speaking English fluently 3.51

23. Ability to using full English in the classroom 2.94

The findings about the subject matter knowledge showed that what SHS

perceived as important of an EELT were teachers understand the linguistic

systems of English, i.e English grammar and with English vocabulary. The

students perceived the teacher use of English as not as important as other

characteristics. This probably because the students level of proficiency was not

enough for them to understand teacher’s language. Therefore, this might mean

that English teachers need to be able to modify their English to suit the level of

the students’ English proficiency. Because if there was lack of communication in

classroom, it meant that the students would not understand and probably would do

(23)

Table 2.4. The high score of personal qualities of an EELT.

No. Personal Qualities Characteristics Scores

24. Ability to maintaining and giving an example of high ethical

and moral standards

3.64

25. Ability to being encourage students to be creative 3.67

26. Ability to being patient, relaxed; not get angry easily 3.72

27. Ability to being helpful and respects students’ need and be open to criticism

3.81

28. Ability to being fair, kind and friendly 3.76

29. Ability to being care, love and understand 3.78

30. Ability to being flexible when things not working correctly 3.62

The findings about the personal qualities showed that what SHS students

needed the most was an EELT was being helpful and respects students’ needs and

be open to criticism. This was in line the result of Al-Maqtri and Thabet (2012) in

Yemen’s students in semester one was similar to in Saudi’s students in semester

four where students were more concerned about teacher’s competence in being

helpful and respects students’ needs and be open to criticism. And it because

students need a teacher who was willing to work together and help them succeed

(24)

Table 3. The top ten of characteristics of EELT.

No. The top 10 characteristics of EELT Scores

1. Ability to explaining lessons clearly 3.90

2. Ability to being patient in working with students of lesser ability 3.87

3. Ability to being able to create an entertaining atmosphere to carry

out the class activities

3.87

4. Ability to respecting the differences students’ cultural traditions 3.86

5. Ability to appreciating students’ opinions and abilities 3.83

6. Ability to understanding the linguistic systems of English

grammar well

3.83

7. Ability to havinge a high level of proficiency with English

vocabulary

3.83

8. Ability to being helpful and respects students’ needs and be open

to criticism

3.81

9. Ability to having the mastery of English course 3.80

10. Ability to being care, love and understand 3.78

As can be seen from Table 3, ten characteristics were perceived by Senior

High School students as the most important characteristics of EELT. This case

becomes beneficial for the English teachers in order to know what students’

expectation, be more attention and be able to require the four competencies in

(25)

under the subject matter knowledge; these included characteristics (6, 7 and 9).

Two characteristics of EELT came under the personal qualities; these included

characteristics (8 and 10). And only one characteristic of EELT came under

pedagogical knowledge; this included item number 1 that had the highest score of

the characteristics of EELT.

Moreover, based on the result of the open-ended questions there are some

additional answers from SHS students toward an effective English language

teacher. They need an EELT who should have a good-looking, young, talented,

not force the students to speak in English, create the learning module by

themselves, teach the students in Indonesian or even mix language, not much give

the homework and give gifts or extra points for students who can answer the

questions well. According to Ibrahim, Shah and Armia (2013) the functions of

why teacher needs to use code-switching during learning process were because to

clarify, emphasize or promote understanding the teacher’s instruction and to

qualify a previously mentioned teacher’s statements. In addition, Ahmad (2009)

also stated that the use of code-switching give benefits to the learners, such as

make them enjoy their communication with teacher and class, they feel satisfied

and more comfortable with the lessons, help learners to enjoy their learning

toward their ability to understand the teacher’s input. Besides, teacher could not

force the students to speak in English because the students’ proficiency level is

still low enough for them to be able to handle English-only speaking in the

classroom (Johansson, 2013). And Bullock (2015) said that teacher should not

(26)

their other activities. Therefore, this is one of additional input for English teachers

to upgrade their teaching skills.

E. CONCLUSION

The study has shown that the participants perceived the four competencies

(socio-affective skills, pedagogical knowledge, subject matter knowledge and

personal qualities) as equally important for EELT. Therefore, the most

characteristics of an EELT that what SHS students expected were explaining

lessons clearly, being patient in working with students of lesser ability, being able

to create an entertaining atmosphere to carry out the class activity, respecting the

differences students’ cultural traditions, appreciating students’ opinions and

abilities, understanding the linguistic systems of English grammar well, having a

high level of proficiency with English vocabulary, being helpful and respects students’ needs and be open to criticism, having the mastery of English course and

caring, loving and understanding.

In summary, the evidence from this study suggests that English language

teachers; English student-teachers, novice English teachers and future English

teachers can know and be able to constantly adjust in line with the characteristics

of an effective English language teacher. It also suggests to the English Language

Education Program be able to increase the quality of teachers in teaching

grammar, vocabulary and soft skills. Since these things relate with the result that

teacher needs to understand the linguistic systems of English, such as English

grammar and vocabulary. Wang (2010) stated that grammar is an effective way to

(27)

because if the learners have the good knowledge of grammar, they can improve

their proficiency and promote overall levels of English. Moreover, Mukoroli

(2011) found that teacher should develop creative methods to show the learners to

learn the vocabulary in many ways, such as using technology, additional reading

text and games that related to listen for new words. Then, teacher should teach an

extensive reading as a component for acquiring sufficient vocabulary and teach

lexicon for academic purposes classroom. Overall, these things can influence learners’ competencies to upgrade their oral and written in English for academic

purposes.

For further research considering to the English student-teachers to require

four competencies of an EELT and also can do the research in a way interviewing

of English student-teachers. And for the limitation of this study is there are some

results that interesting to be discussed further by interviewing and only 120 SHS

(28)

Acknowledgement

This study would not be completed without any help and support from

many people. First of all, I would like to thank to my God Jesus Christ for his

guidance and blessing me in finishing this study. I would like to express my

sincere gratitude to my supervisor, Victoria Usadya Palupi, M.A-ELT. for her

guidance, suggestion, feedback, support, and help during the accomplishment of

my thesis. I also would like to express my gratitude to my examiner, Rindang

Widiningrum, M.Hum. for her guidance, suggestions, feedback and help to

examine my thesis.

Moreover, I would like to express my special gratitude due to my beloved

parents for their patient and a lot of support therefore I could finish this study as

well. Finally I also would like to say thank you so much to my beloved friends,

Theodorus Miraji, Julfiani Mangopang, Ester Carolina and Paulus Prayogi for the

support, help, togetherness, happiness and also thank you for inspiring me to

(29)

References

Ahmad, B.H. (2009). Teachers’ code-switching in classroom instructions for low English proficient learners. CCSE Journal, 2(2), 49-55.

Anugerahwati, M. (n.d). Professional Competence for Teachers of English in Indonesia: A Profile of an Examplary Teacher.

Aydin, B., Bayram, F., Canidar, B., Cetin, G., Ergunay, O., Ozdem, Z., & Tunc, B. (2009). Views of English language teachers on the affective domain of language teaching in Turkey. Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences, 9(1), 263-280.

Beishuizen, J.J., E, Hof., Van Putten, C.M., , Bouwmeester, S., & Asscher, J.J. ( 2001). Students’ and teachers’ cognitions about good teacher. British Journal of Educational Psychological Society, 71, 185-201.

Beran, T., Violato, C., Kline, D., & Fridere, J. (2005). The utility of student ratings of instruction of students, faculty, and administrators: A “consequential validity” study. The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 35(2), 49-59.

Borg, S. (2006). The distinctive characteristics of foreign language teachers. Language Teaching Research, 10(1), 3-31.

Bullock, M. (2015). What makes a good teacher? Exploring students and teachers beliefs on good teaching, 7, 1-30.

Cheung, H. Y. (2006). The measurement of teacher efficacy: Hong Kong primary in-service teachers. Journal of Education for Teaching: International research and pedagogy, 32(4), 435-451.

(30)

Deiter, Ron. (2000). The use of humor as a teaching tool in the college classroom. NACTA Journal, 20-28.

Dincer, A., Ali G., Aysegul T. & Mine Y. (2013). Common Characteristics of an Effective English Language Teacher. Educational Research Association the International Journal of Educational Researchers, 4(3): 1-8.

H, Douglas Brown. (2000). Teaching by Principles An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. San Fransisco State University: Longman.

Ibrahim, E.H.E., Shah, M.I.A., & Armia, N.T. (2013). Code-switching in English as a foreign language classroom: Teachers’ attitudes. English Language Teaching: Canadian Center of Science and Education, 6(7), 139-150.

Indonesia, Department of National Education. (2005). Ministerial Decree Number 14. Jakarta: Ministry of National Education.

Indonesia, Department of National Education. (2007). Regulation of Teacher Qualification and Competence Number 16/2007. Jakarta: Ministry of National Education.

Johansson, Sara. (2013). Code-switching in the English classroom: What teachers do and what their students wish they did. 1-22.

Lee, J. J. (2010). The uniqueness of EFL teachers: Perceptions of Japanese learners. TESOL Journal, 1(1), 23-48.

Macaro, E. 1997. Target Language, Collaborative Learning and Autonomy. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

(31)

Melek, E. (2012). Affective Characteristics and Teaching Skills of English Language Teachers: Comparing Perceptions of Elementary, Secondary and High School Students. Scientific Research Journal, 4(2), 117-123.

Mukoroli, Joseph. (2011). Effective vocabulary teaching strategies for the English for academic purposes ESL classroom. MA TESOL Collection, 1-22.

Park, G. & Hyo-Woong L. (2006). The Characteristics of Effective English Teachers As Perceived by High School Teachers and Students in Korea. Asia Pacific Education Review, 7(2), 236-248.

Rubio, C.M. (2010). Effective teachers-professional and personal skills. 35-46.

Shishavan, H. B., & Sadeghi, K. (2009). Characteristics of an effective English language teacher as perceived by Iranian teachers and learners of English. English Language Teaching, 2(4), 130-143.

Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4-14.

Walter, B. 2000. A participant-centred approach to INSET course design. English Language Teaching Journal 54, no. 4: 311–18.

Wang, Fengjuan. (2010). The necessity of grammar teaching. CCSE Journal, 3(2), 78-81.

Wati, H. (2011). The Effectiveness of Indonesian English Teachers Training Programs in Improving Confidence and Motivation. International Journal of Instruction, 4(1), 80-104.

Werbinska, D. (2009). A profile of effective teacher of English: A qualitative study from Poland. Haccetepe University Journal of Education, 36, 306-315.

(32)

APPENDIX

A Questionnaire on Qualities of an Effective English Language Teacher (It is not about assessment of your English teachers in the school, but your personal opinion concerns how should be an Effective English Language Teacher while teaching) Dear friends,

In order to complete this study about “The Characteristics of an Effective English Language Teacher (EELT) as Perceived by Senior High School Students”, I need your help to fill in this questionnaire honestly. This questionnaire is to answer the research question: “What are the characteristics of effective English language teacher as perceived by Senior High School Students?” Your responses to the questionnaire will be kept

For each of the statements below, please indicate the extent of your agreement or disagreement by ticking (√) the appropriate box. Where, SI: Strongly Important, I: Important, UI: Unimportant, SUI: Strongly Unimportant.

An effective English teacher is someone who should: SI I UI SUI 1. Shows enthusiasm

2. Have a good sense of humor

3. Be able to create an entertaining atmosphere to carry out the class activities

4. Patient in working with students of lesser ability

5. Offer challenges to students of exceptionally high ability 6. Appreciate students’ opinions and abilities

7. Respect the differences students’ cultural traditions. 8. Explain lessons clearly

9. Use a wide variety of techniques

10. Have his students participate in the lesson 11. Effectively perceive students’ linguistic needs 12. Clear presentation skills

(33)

14. Give optimal feedback to students

15. Creatively adapts textbook material and other audio, visual, and mechanical tools.

16. Understand the linguistic systems of English grammar well

17. Speak and pronounce English Well 18. Read and write English well

19. Have a high level of proficiency with English vocabulary 20. Know English culture well

21. Have the mastery of English course 22. Speak English fluently

23. Using full English in the classroom

24. Maintain and give an example of high ethical and moral standards

25. Encourage students to be creative 26. Be patient, relaxed; not get angry

27. Helpful and respects students’ needs and be open to criticism

28. Be fair, kind and friendly

29. Caring, loving and understanding

30. Be flexible when things not working correctly (*) Additional questions (open-ended questions)

Mention the Characteristics of an Effective English Language Teacher, what do you think is required by an English teacher, but has not been written in the characteristics above (points 1-30)

(34)

“Apakah Karakteristik Guru Bahasa Inggris yang Efektif?”

(Bukan tentang penilaian guru Bahasa Inggris anda di sekolah, melainkan pendapat anda pribadi, bagaimana seharusnya guru Bahasa Inggris yang efektif saat mengajar) Kepada Teman-Teman,

Untuk menyelesaikan Penelitian mengenai “Karakteristik Guru Bahasa Inggris yang Efektif Dalam Persepektif Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas (SMA)”. Saya membutuhkan bantuan anda untuk mengisi Kuesioner ini secara jujur. Kuesioner ini akan digunakan untuk menjawab “Apa karakteristik seorang Guru Bahasa Inggris yang Efektif menurut Siswa Sekolah menengah Atas (SMA) ?”. Jawaban anda akan menjadi rahasia dari

Sesuai dengan pernyataan di bawah ini, mohon berikan penilaian tentang

seberapa anda setuju dengan memberikan tanda (√) pada kotak yang tersedia.

Dimana :

2. Memiliki selera humor yang baik

3. Mampu menciptakan suasana belajar yang menyenangkan di dalam kelas

4. Sabar dalam membantu/mengajar siswa dengan kemampuan yang kurang

5. Memberikan tantangan kepada siswa dengan kemampuan lebih

6. Menghargai pendapat dan kemampuan siswa

7. Menghargai perbedaan latar belakang tradisi dan budaya para siswa di dalam kelas

8. Menjelaskan pelajaran dengan jelas

9. Menggunakan teknik mengajar yang bervariasi

10. Memberikan kesempatan kepada siswa untuk mengambil bagian dalam proses pembelajaran

(35)

pelafalan, pengejaan, tata bahasa/grammar) 12. Mempresentasikan materi dengan baik

13. Mampu menciptakan suasana kelas yang aktif, saling menghargai dan bekerja sama di dalam kelas

14. Memberikan tanggapan yang baik kepada siswa 15. Mampu menyesuaikan materi yang ada di buku

dengan alat bantu seperti audio/visual (elektronik) dalam kebutuhan pembelajaran di kelas secara kreatif 16. Mengerti tata bahasa Inggris dengan baik, seperti:

grammar, tenses, dll

17. Mempunyai pelafalan bahasa Inggris dengan baik 18. Menulis bahasa Inggris dengan baik

19. Memiliki penguasaan kosakata bahasa Inggris yang luas dan baik

20. Mengerti budaya negara-negara berbahasa Inggris dengan baik

21. Menguasai materi bahasa Inggris dengan baik 22. Berbicara bahasa Inggris dengan aktif

23. Menggunakan bahasa Inggris selama mengajar di dalam kelas

24. Menegakkan dan memberikan contoh prinsip-prinsip etika dan moral yang benar kepada siswa-siswa

25. Mendorong siswa untuk menjadi siswa yang kreatif 26. Sabar dan tidak suka marah-marah

27. Menolong dan mengerti dengan baik kebutuhan para siswa serta terbuka untuk setiap masukan

28. Adil, baik hati dan ramah

29. Peduli, penuh kasih dan pengertian 30. Menunjukkan fleksibilitas di dalam kelas (*) Pertanyaan Tambahan (Pertanyaan terbuka)

Sebutkan Karakteristik Guru Bahasa Inggris yang Efektif, yang menurut anda diperlukan oleh seorang guru bahasa Inggris, namun belum tertulis pada karakter karakter di atas (point 1 – 30)

Gambar

Table 1. The averages score of each the four competencies of an EELT as
Table 2.1. The high score of socio-affective skills.
Table 2.2. The high score of pedagogical knowledge of an EELT.
Table 2.3. The high score of subject matter knowledge of an EELT.
+3

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

[r]

Pada hari ini rabu tanggal Delapan belas bulan Mei tahun dua ribu enam belas (18 - 05 - 2016) telah dilakukan evaluasi administrasi dan teknis Pekerjaan Supervisi Peningkatan Jalan

Judul Skripsi : PerbedaanTingkat Regulasi Diri Mahasiswa Ditinjau Dari Keikutsertaan Dalam Organisasi

Mata kuliah ini terdiri dari 2 SKS teori yang membahas tentang dasar-dasar ilmu matematika, persamaan linier dengan satu dan dua variabel, fungsi linier, program linier,

Bahan tambahan makanan (BTM) didefinisikan sebagai bahan yang tidak lazin dikonsumsi sebagai makanan, dan biasanya bukan merupakan komposisi khas makanan, dapat

Transportasi darat ialah salah satu jenis angkutan yang menggunakan jalur darat atau jalan raya yang berfungsi juga untuk mengantarkan barang dan/atau penumpang dari satu

Add the total of all income tax instalments you have paid towards your 2014 Annual Income Tax liability. This total is subject to verification by the NDDR. companies, partnerships,

Skripsi ini tidak boleh diperbanyak seluruhnya atau sebagiandengan dicetak ulang, difoto kopi, atau cara lainnya tanpa izin dari penulis.