• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Daniel_breaz. 44KB Jun 04 2011 12:08:35 AM

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "Daniel_breaz. 44KB Jun 04 2011 12:08:35 AM"

Copied!
6
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

TWO STARLIKENESS PROPERTIES FOR THE BERNARDI

OPERATORS

by

Daniel Breaz and Nicoleta Breaz

Abstract. It is well known that if

f

is starlike, then

F

is also starlike.In this paper we extend this result if

f

satisfies larger conditions and proving that

F

is starlike of order 2 3 and 13, where

F

is the Bernardi integral operator.

Introductions.

Let U =

{

z: z <1

}

the unit disc in the complex plane, and let H

( )

U the space of holomorphic functions in U.

Let An denote the class of functions

f

of the form

( )

z z a z a z z U

f n n

n

n + + ∈

+

= +

+ +

+ 2 2 ...,

1 1

wich are analytic in the unit disc U and A1 = A.

Let the class of univalent functions S =

{

f :fHu

( ) ( )

U ,f 0 = f

( )

0 −1=0

}

and let

( )

( )

( )

   

 ′ >

=

z U

z f

z f z f

S α :Re α,

be the class of the starlike functions of the order α,0≤α <1, in U. For α =0, denote S

( )

0 =S∗ the class of the starlike functions in U.

Consider the following integral operator

( )

= +

z f

( )

ttdt

z z F

0

1 , 0

1 γ

γ γ

γ ,

where fAn.

Lemma A.[1] Let q univalent in U and let θ and φ analytic functions in the domain

( )

U q
(2)

Let

( )

z nzq

( ) ( )

z

[ ]

q z

Q = ′ φ h

( )

z

[ ] ( )

q

( )

z +Q z

and suppose that next condition is satisfy:

i) Q is starlike and

ii)

( )

( )

Re

[ ]

[ ]

( )

( )

( )

( )

0

Re >

  

 ′ +

= ′

z Q

z Q z z q

z q z

Q z h z

φ

θ .

If p is analytic in U, with

( ) ( ) ( )

q p p( )

( )

p

( )

U D

p 0 = 0, ′0 =...= n−1 0 =0, ⊂

and

( )

[ ]

p z +zp

( ) ( )

zφ

[ ]

p z θ

[ ]

q

( )

z +zq

( ) ( )

zφ

[ ] ( )

q z =h z

θ p

then ppqand q is the best dominant.

Main results.

Theorem 1. Let

( )

( )(

z nz z

)

z z

h

γ γ − + − + − =

2 2 2

2 2

2

If fAn and

( )

( ) ( )

h z

z f

z f z

p

,

then

( )

( )

3

2 Re ′ >

z F

z F z

,

where

(3)

Proof. The relation (1) implies:

( )

z zF

( ) ( ) ( )

z f z

F + ′ = γ +1

γ (2)

Let

( )

zFF

( )

( )

zz z

p = ′ .

The relation (2) implies

( )

( )

( )

f

( )

( )

z z f z z p z

p z p

z

= + + ′

γ .

But

( )

( ) ( )

h z

z f

z f z

p

implies

( )

( )

p

( ) ( )

z h z z

p z p z

p

+ + ′

γ .

We apply the lemma A for proved that

( )

( )

3

2 Re ′ >

z F

z F z

.

If we let:

( )

z z

q

− =

2 2

( )

w =w

θ

( )

γ

φ

+ =

w

w 1

( )

[ ]

q z z

− =

2 2 θ

( )

[ ]

z z

z q

γ γ φ

− + − =

2 2

(4)

( )

( ) ( )

[ ] ( )(

z nz z

)

z q z q nz z Q γ γ φ − + − = ′ = 2 2 2 2 .

( )

[ ] ( )

( )

( )(

z nz z

)

z z Q z q z h γ γ θ − + − + − = + = 2 2 2 2 2 2 .

Since Q is starlike and Reφ

[ ]

q

( )

z >0, by lemma A we deduce

( )

( )

( )

( )

3

2 Re 2 2 > ′ ⇒ − ′ ⇔ z F z F z z z F z F z q

pp p .

Theorem 2. Let

( )

( )

z

(

nz

( )

z

)

z z z h γ γ + − + − + − + = 1 2 2 2 4 2 2 .

If fAn and

( )

( ) ( )

h z

z f z f z p ′ , then

( )

( )

3

1 Re ′ >

z F z F z , where

( )

= +

z f

( )

ttdt z z F 0 1 1 γ γγ .

Proof. We are

( )

z zF

( ) ( ) ( )

z f z

F + ′ = γ +1

γ (3)

Let

( )

zFF

( )

( )

zz z

p = ′ .

We deduce

( )

( )

( )

f

( )

( )

z z f z z p z p z p z ′ = + + ′ γ . But

( )

( ) ( )

z h z f

z

p

(5)

and obtained

( )

( )

p

( ) ( )

z h z

z p z p z p + + ′ γ .

In lemma we consider:

( )

zz

z q − + = 2 2

( )

w =w

θ

( )

γ φ + = w w 1

( )

[ ]

zz

z q − + = 2 2 θ

( )

[ ]

( )

z z

z q γ γ φ − + + − = 1 2 2 2 .

( )

( ) ( )

[ ] ( )

z

(

nz

( )

z

)

z q z q nz z Q γ γ φ − + + − = ′ = 1 2 2 2 2

( )

[ ] ( )

( )

( )

z

(

nz

( )

z

)

z z z Q z q z h γ γ θ − + + − + − + = + = 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 .

Sience Q is starlike and Reφ

[ ]

q

( )

z >0, by lemma A obtained

( )

( )

( )

( )

3

1 Re 1 1 > ′ ⇒ − + ′ ⇔ z F z F z z z z F z F z q

pp p

REFERENCES

[1].Miller, S.S. and Mocanu P.T., On some classes of first differential subordinations, Michigan Math. J. 32, pp. 185-195, 1985.

(6)

[3].Oros, Gh. On starlike images by an integral operator, Mathematica, Tome 42(65), No 1, 2000, pp. 71-74.

[4].Breaz, D., Breaz, N. Starlikeness conditions for the Bernardi operator, to be appear.

Authors:

Daniel Breaz- „1 Decembrie 1918” University of Alba Iulia, str. N. Iorga, No. 13, Departament of Mathematics and Computer Science, email: [email protected]

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Stanley, Enumerative Combinatorics, Volume 1, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics 49 , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997. 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification

[2] Pascu, N.N., An improvement of Becker’s univalence criterion, Proceed- ings of the Commemorative Session Simion Stoilow, Brasov, (1987), 43-48. [3] Singh, V., On class of

Rus, An abstract point of view for some integral equations from applied mathematics, Proceedings of the International Conference, University of the West, Timi¸soara, 1997, 256-270.

In this paper we will make a discussion on the conditions when a strongly collisionfree hash function is also one-way hash function and also some considerations about the security

China § School of Mathematics and Computational Science, Guilin University of Electronic Technology,.. Guilin

‡ Department of Mathematical Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, Hirosaki University,.. Hirosaki 036-8561,

Parallel and simulated tempering [ 4; 13; 5 ] are Markov chain simulation algorithms commonly used in statistics, statistical physics, and computer science for sampling from

University of Oregon and National University of Singapore, University of Science and Technology of China, Hong Kong Baptist