• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Articol 5.9-latex. 102KB Jun 04 2011 12:08:22 AM

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "Articol 5.9-latex. 102KB Jun 04 2011 12:08:22 AM"

Copied!
8
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

NEW UNIVALENCE CONDITIONS FOR AN INTEGRAL OPERATOR OF THE CLASS S(P) AND T2

Daniel Breaz and Nicoleta Breaz

Abstract.In this paper we present a few conditions of univalence for

the operator Fα,β on the classes of univalent functions S(p) and T2. These

are actually generalizations(extensions) of certain results published in the papers [1] and [2].

2000 Mathematics subject classification: 30C45.

Keywords and phrases:Integral operator, univalent function, unit disk, analytic function.

1.Introduction

We present a few aspects related to the classes of functions, S(p) and T2. Let be the class of analytical functions, A={f :f =z+a2z2+...}, z ∈ U, where U is the unit disk , U = {z :|z|<1}. We denote by S, the class of univalent functions on the unit disk.

Let pbe a real number with the property 0< p≤2. We define the class S(p) as the class of functions f ∈ A, which satisfy the conditions f(z) 6= 0 and (z/f (z))

′′

≤ p, z ∈ U. Also if f ∈ S(p) then the following property is true

z2f(z)

f2(z) −1

≤p|z|2, z ∈U, relation proved in [5].

We denote by T2 the class of the univalent functions that satisfy the condition

z2f(z)

f2(z) −1

(2)

These functions have the form f =z+a3z3+a4z4+....For 0< µ <1 we have a subclass of functions denoted byTµ,2, containing the functions f ∈T2

that satisfy the property

z2f(z)

f2(z) −1

< µ <1, z ∈U.

Next we present some well known results related to these classes, results on which we shall rely in this paper.

The Schwartz Lemma.Let the analytic functiong be a regular function

on the unit disk U and g(0) = 0. If |g(z)| ≤1,∀z ∈U, then

|g(z)| ≤ |z|,∀z ∈U (1)

and equality holds if and only if g(z) = εz, where |ε|= 1.

Theorem 1.[3]. Let αC,Reα >0 and f A. If 1− |z|2Reα

Reα

zf′′(z)

f′(z)

≤1,∀z ∈U (2) then ∀β ∈C,Reβ Reα, the function

Fβ(z) =

β

z

Z

0

tβ−1f′(t)dt 

 1/β

(3)

is univalent.

In his paper [4] Pescar proved the following result:

Theorem 2.Assume that g A satisfies the condition

z2g(z)

g2(z) −1 < 1, z ∈U, and α is a complex number with

|α−1| ≤ Reα

3 . (4)

If

(3)

then the function

Gα(z) =

α

z

Z

0

g(α−1)(t) dt 

 1

α

(6)

is univalent.

2.MAIN RESULTS

Theorem 3. Let begi∈T2, gi(z) =z+ai

3z3+ai4z4+...,∀i= 1, n, n∈N∗, which satisfy the properties

z2g

i(z)

g2

i (z)

−1

<1,∀z ∈U,∀i= 1, n. (7) If |gi(z)| ≤ 1, ∀z ∈ U, ∀i = 1, n, then for any complex number α,

satisfying the properties

Reα >0, Re (n(α−1) + 1)≥Reα, and |α−1| ≤ Reα

3n . (8) the function

Fα,n(z) =

(n(α−1) + 1)

z

Z

0

g1α−1(t). . . gnα−1(t) dt 

 1

n(α−1)+1

(9)

is univalent.

Proof. From (9), Fα,n can be written as

Fα,n(z) =

(n(α−1) + 1)

z

Z

0

tn(α−1)

g1(t) t

α−1 . . .

gn(t)

t

α−1 dt

 1

n(α−1)+1 .

(4)

f(z) =

z

Z

0

g1(t) t

α−1 . . .

gn(t)

t

α−1

dt. (11)

The function f is regular inU, and from (11) we obtain

f′(z) =

g1(z)

z

α−1 . . .

gn(z)

z

α−1

(12) and

f′′(z) =E1f′(z) z

g1(z)+· · ·+Enf

(z) z

g1(z) (13)

where, Ek = (α−1)zg

k(z)−gk(z)

z2 ,∀k = 1, n. Next we calculate the expression zff′′′.

zf′′(z)

f′(z) = (α−1)

zg′

1(z)−1

g1(z) +· · ·+ (α−1)

zg′

n(z)−1

gn(z)

. (14)

Then the expression

zf′′

f′

(15) can be evaluated as

zf′′(z)

f′(z)

=|α−1|

zg′

1(z)−1 g1(z)

+· · ·+|α−1|

zg′

n(z)−1

gn(z)

. (16)

By multiplying the first and the last term of (16) with 1−|Rez|2Reα α > 0, we obtain

1− |z|2Reα

Reα

zf′′(z)

f′(z)

≤AB1+· · ·+ABn ≤AC1+· · ·+ACn. (17)

where

A= 1− |z| 2Reα

(5)

Bk =

zg′

k(z)

gk(z)

+ 1

and

Ck=

z2g

k(z)

g2

k(z)

|gk(z)| |z| + 1

∀k = 1, n.

By applying the Schwartz Lemma and using (17), we obtain

1− |z|2Reα

Reα

zf′′(z)

f′(z)

≤AD1+· · ·+ADn, (18)

where Dk =

z2g′ k(z)

g2

k(z) −1

+ 2

∀k = 1, n. Since gi ∈T2, we have

z2g′ i(z)

g2

i(z) −1

<1,∀i= 1, n. Further, from (18), we obtain:

1− |z|2Reα

Reα

zf′′(z)

f′(z)

≤3nA≤ 3n|α−1|

Reα . (19)

But |α−1| ≤ Re3nα and from (19), we obtain that 1− |z|2Reα

Reα

zf′′(z)

f′(z)

≤1, (20)

for all z ∈ U. According to the Theorem 1 the function Fα,n is in the class

S.

Theorem 4. Let gi∈T2, gi(z) = z +ai

3z3 +ai4z4 +...,∀i = 1, n, n ∈ N∗, αC,Reα >0 so that

|α−1| ≤ Reα

(6)

Fα,n(z) =

(n(α−1) + 1)

z

Z

0 gα−1

1 (t). . . gαn−1(t) dt

 1

n(α−1)+1

∈S. (22)

Proof. Considering the same steps as in the above proof we obtain:

1− |z|2Reα

Reα

zh′′(z)

h′(z)

1− |z|2Reα

Reα |α−1|

n

X

i=1

z2g

i(z)

g2

i (z)

−1

+ 2

. (23) But f ∈T2,µ, which implies that

z2g(z)

g2(z) −1

< µ,∀z ∈U. In these conditions we obtain:

1− |z|2Reα

Reα

zh′′(z)

h′(z)

≤ |α−1|

n(µ+ 2)

Reα ,∀z ∈U. (24)

By applying the relation (21) we obtain that 1−|Rez|2Reγ γ

zh′′(z)

h′(z)

≤1,∀z ∈U. So according to the Theorem 1 the function Fα,β is univalent.

Theorem 5. Let gi∈S(p),0< p <2, gi(z) =z+ai

3z3+ai4z4+...,∀i= 1, n, n∈N∗, α C,Reα >0 so that

|α−1| ≤ Reα

n(p+ 2),Re (n(α−1) + 1)≥Reα. (25) If |gi(z)| ≤1,∀z ∈U, i= 1, n then we have

Fα,n(z) =

(n(α−1) + 1)

z

Z

0

1−1(t). . . gαn−1(t) dt 

 1

n(α−1)+1

∈S. (26)

(7)

1− |z|2Reα

Reα

zh′′(z)

h′(z)

1− |z|2Reα|α−1| |α|Reα

n

X

i=1

z2g

i(z)

g2

i (z)

−1

+ 2

. (27) But gi ∈S(p), i= 1, n so

z2g

i(z)

g2

i (z)

−1

≤p|z| 2

,∀z ∈U. (28)

By applying (28) in (27), we obtain that:

n

X

i=1

z2g

i(z)

g2

i (z)

−1

+ 2

≤ n

X

i=1

p|z|2+ 2

≤ n

X

i=1

(p+ 2) =n(p+ 2). (29)

In these conditions we obtain: 1− |z|2Reα

Reα

zh′′(z)

h′(z)

≤ |α−1|n(p+ 2)

Reα ,∀z ∈U. (30)

By applying the relation (25) we obtain that 1−|Rez|2Reγ γ

zh′′(z)

h′(z)

≤1,∀z ∈U. Thus, according to the Theorem 1, the function Fα,n is univalent.

References

[1] Breaz, D.,Breaz, N. Univalence conditions for integral operators on S(α)-class, Libertas Mathematica, ARA, USA, ISSN 0278-5307, tomus XXIV, 2004, pag. 211-214.

[2] Breaz, D.,Breaz N., Operatori integrali pe clasa T2, Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Conference of the Romanian Society of Mathematical Sciences, Sibiu, ISBN 973-651-634-2, 2003, pag. 348-352.

(8)

[4] Pescar, V., New criteria for univalence of certain integral operators, Demonstratio Mathematica, vol. XXXIII, 1 (2000), 51-54.

[5] Singh, V., On class of univalent functions, Internat. J. Math &Math. Sci. 23(2000), 12, 855-857.

[6] Yang, D., Liu, J.,On a class of univalent functions, Internat. J. Math &Math. Sci. 22(1999), 3, 605-610.

Authors:

Daniel Breaz

Department of Mathematics ”1 Decembrie 1918” University Alba Iulia, Romania

E-mail: [email protected]

Nicoleta Breaz

Department of Mathematics ”1 Decembrie 1918” University Alba Iulia, Romania

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Stanley, Enumerative Combinatorics, Volume 1, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics 49 , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997. 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification

For in- stance, the famous classes P and NP are the first two in the tower of com- plexity classes, if we consider the polynomial-time hierarchy.. And we know that the proof of

Department of Mathematics Texas A&amp;M University College Station, Texas 77843. E-mail

Christopher Pinner Department of Mathematics Kansas State University Manhattan, KS 66506, USA E-mail : [email protected]. URL

Department of Computing Macquarie University Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia. E-mail

Department of Mathematics, University of British Columbia 1984 Mathematics Road, Vancouver, Colombie-Britannique, Canada V6T 1Z2. E-mail

Universit´ e Claude Bernard Lyon 1 43, avenue du 11 novembre 1918 69622 Villeurbanne cedex, France E-mail

Department of Mathematics, Faculty and Science and Technology, Keio University, 3-14-1, Hiyoshi, Kohoku-ku, Yokohama 223-8522, Japan..