• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Pemanfaatan Pelepah Kelapa Sawit Terolah Secara Fermentasi dan Amoniasi Terhadap Kecernaan Bahan Kering dan Bahan Organik Pada Sapi Aceh

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "Pemanfaatan Pelepah Kelapa Sawit Terolah Secara Fermentasi dan Amoniasi Terhadap Kecernaan Bahan Kering dan Bahan Organik Pada Sapi Aceh"

Copied!
12
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

LAMPIRAN

Lampiran 1.Tabel. Analisis Sidik Ragam Konsumsi Bahan Kering

analisis sidik ragam

Sk Db JK KT Fhit Ftabel

0.05 0.01 Periode 3 4483.91 1494.63 61.23tn 3.86 6.99

Sapi 3 15.66 5.22 0.21tn 3.86 6.99

Perlakuan 3 30.92 10.31 0.42tn 3.86 6.99

Galat 9 219.68 24.41

Total 18

Ket. tn = tidak berbeda nyata

Lampiran 2.Tabel. Analisis Konsumsi Bahan Organik

analisis sidik ragam

Sk Db JK KT Fhit Ftabel

0.05 0.01 Periode 3 2499.11 833.03 26.86tn 3.86 6.99

Sapi 3 23.40 7.80 0.25tn 3.86 6.99

Perlakuan 3 15.32 5.11 0.35tn 3.86 6.99

Galat 9 130.72 14.52

Total 18

Ket. tn = tidak berbeda nyata

Lampiran 3.Tabel. Analisis Sidik Ragam Kecernaan Bahan Kering

analisis sidik ragam

Sk Db JK KT Fhit Ftabel

0.05 0.01 Periode 3 450.8162 150.2721 21.28777 3.86 6.99 Sapi 3 15.81585 5.271951 0.746833 3.86 6.99 Perlakuan 3 100.3931 33.46436 4.74061* 3.86 6.99

Galat 9 450.8162 150.2721 21.28777

Total 18

(2)

Lampiran 4.Tabel. Analisis Sidik Ragam Kecernaan Bahan Organik

analisis sidik ragam

Sk Db JK KT Fhit Ftabel

0.05 0.01 Periode 3 1270.359 423.453 105.6227 3.86 6.99 Sapi 3 32.76465 10.92155 2.724184 3.86 6.99 Perlakuan 3 71.74041 23.91347 5.96478* 3.86 6.99

Galat 9 36.08197 4.009108

Total 18

Ket.* = Berbeda nyata

Analisis Sidik Ragam Kecernaan Bahan Kering (SAS System)

Thursday, October 5, 2015 1

The GLM Procedure Class Level Information Class Levels

Values

PERLAKUAN 4 P0 P1 P2 P3

Number of Observations Read 16

Number of Observations Used 16

The SAS System 12:03 Thursday, October 5, 2015 2

The GLM Procedure Dependent Variable: KCBK

Sum of Source DF Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F

Model 3 100.2379500 33.4126500 0.76 0.5386

Error 12 528.6501500 44.0541792

(3)

R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE KCBK Mean

0.159389 12.94900 6.637332 51.25750

Source DF Type I SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F

PERLAKUAN 3 100.2379500 33.4126500 0.76 0.5386

Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F

PERLAKUAN 3 100.2379500 33.4126500 0.76 0.5386

The SAS System 12:03 Thursday, October 5, 2015 3

The GLM Procedure t Tests (LSD) for KCBK NOTE: This test controls the Type I comparisonwise error rate, not the experimentwise error rate.

Alpha 0.05

Error Degrees of Freedom 12

Error Mean Square 44.05418

Critical Value of t 2.17881

Least Significant Difference 10.226

Means with the same letter are not significantly different.

t Grouping Mean N PERLAKUAN

A 56.650 4 P1 A

A 55.341 4 P3

(4)

B 51.487 4 P2 The SAS System 12:03 Thursday, October 5, 2015 4

The GLM Procedure Duncan's Multiple Range Test for KCBK

NOTE: This test controls the Type I comparisonwise error rate, not the experimentwise error rate.

Alpha 0.05

Error Degrees of Freedom 12

Error Mean Square 44.05418

Number of Means 2 3 4

Critical Range 10.23 10.70 10.99

Means with the same letter are not significantly different.

Duncan Grouping Mean N PERLAKUAN

A 56.650 4 P1 A

A 55.341 4 P3

B 51.542 4 P0 B

B 51.487 4 P2 The SAS System 12:03 Thursday, October 5, 2015 5

The GLM Procedure Tukey's Studentized Range (HSD) Test for KCBK

NOTE: This test controls the Type I experimentwise error rate, but it generally has a higher Type II

error rate than REGWQ.

(5)

Error Degrees of Freedom 12

Error Mean Square 44.05418

Critical Value of Studentized Range 4.19852

Minimum Significant Difference 13.933

Means with the same letter are not significantly different.

Tukey Grouping Mean N PERLAKUAN

A 56.650 4 P1 A

A 55.341 4 P3

B 51.542 4 P0 B

B 51.487 4 P2 The SAS System 12:03 Thursday, October 5, 2015 6

The GLM Procedure Least Squares Means

Standard LSMEAN

PERLAKUAN KCBK LSMEAN Error Pr > |t| Number

P0 51.542000 3.3186661 <.0001 1

P1 56.650000 3.3186661 <.0001 2

P2 51.487000 3.3186661 <.0001 3

P3 55.341000 3.3186661 <.0001 4

Least Squares Means for Effect PERLAKUAN

t for H0: LSMean(i)=LSMean(j) / Pr > |t|

Dependent Variable: KCBK

(6)

1 -0.9732 0.389385 -0.6456

0.3497 0.7038 0.5307

2 0.973195 1.36258 0.327594

0.3497 0.1980 0.7489

3 -0.38938 -1.36258 -1.03499

0.7038 0.1980 0.3211

4 0.645601 -0.32759 1.034985

0.5307 0.7489 0.3211

NOTE: To ensure overall protection level, only probabilities associated with pre-planned comparisons

should be used.

The SAS System 12:03 Thursday, October 5, 2015 1

The GLM Procedure Class Level Information Class Levels

Values

PERLAKUAN 4 P0 P1 P2 P3

Number of Observations Read 16

Number of Observations Used 16

The SAS System

12:03

Analisis Sidik Ragam Kecernaan Bahan Kering (SAS System)

Thursday, October 5, 2015 13

The GLM Procedure Class Level Information Class Levels

Values

(7)

Number of Observations Read 16

Number of Observations Used 16

The SAS System 12:03 Thursday, October 5, 2015 14

The GLM Procedure Dependent Variable: KCBO

Sum of Source DF Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F

Model 3 71.729625 23.909875 0.21 0.8846

Error 12 1339.087550 111.590629

Corrected Total 15 1410.817175

R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE KCBO Mean

0.050843 19.05463 10.56365 55.43875

Source DF Type I SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F

PERLAKUAN 3 71.72962500 23.90987500 0.21 0.8846

Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F

PERLAKUAN 3 71.72962500 23.90987500 0.21 0.8846

The SAS System 12:03 Thursday, October 5, 2015 15

(8)

Alpha 0.05

Error Degrees of Freedom 12

Error Mean Square 111.5906

Critical Value of t 2.17881

Least Significant Difference 16.275

Means with the same letter are not significantly different.

t Grouping Mean N PERLAKUAN

A 63.220 4 P1 A

A 63.058 4 P3 B

B 58.611 4 P0 B

B 57.284 4 P2 The SAS System 12:03 Thursday, October 5, 2015 16

The GLM Procedure Duncan's Multiple Range Test for KCBO

NOTE: This test controls the Type I comparisonwise error rate, not the experimentwise error rate.

Alpha 0.05

Error Degrees of Freedom 12

Error Mean Square 111.5906

Number of Means 2 3 4

Critical Range 16.27 17.04 17.50

(9)

Duncan Grouping Mean N PERLAKUAN

A 63.220 4 P1 A

A 63.058 4 P3 B

B 58.611 4 P0 B

B 57.284 4 P2 The SAS System 12:03 Thursday, October 5, 2015 17

The GLM Procedure Tukey's Studentized Range (HSD) Test for KCBO

NOTE: This test controls the Type I experimentwise error rate, but it generally has a higher Type II

error rate than REGWQ.

Alpha 0.05

Error Degrees of Freedom 12

Error Mean Square 111.5906

Critical Value of Studentized Range 4.19852

Minimum Significant Difference 22.176

Means with the same letter are not significantly different.

Tukey Grouping Mean N PERLAKUAN

A 63.220 4 P1 A

A 63.058 4 P3 B

B 58.611 4 P0 B

B 57.284 4 P2 The SAS System 12:03 Thursday, October 5, 2015 18

(10)

Standard LSMEAN

PERLAKUAN KCBO LSMEAN Error Pr > |t| Number

P0 63.2200000 5.2818233 <.0001 1

P1 63.0580000 5.2818233 <.0001 2

P2 58.6110000 5.2818233 <.0001 3

P3 57.2840000 5.2818233 <.0001 4

Least Squares Means for Effect PERLAKUAN

t for H0: LSMean(i)=LSMean(j) / Pr > |t|

Dependent Variable: KCBO

i/j 1 2 3 4

1 -0.495 0.136553 -0.48563

0.6295 0.8936 0.6360

2 0.495005 0.631558 0.009371

0.6295 0.5395 0.9927

3 -0.13655 -0.63156 -0.62219

0.8936 0.5395 0.5455

(11)

Lampiran 5.Tabel. Formula Ransum

Nama Bahan

Formulasi (%) Harga PK

SK

LK

TDN

Pelepah KS

Terolah Fisik

40

500

5.56

49.21

1.12

57.29

BIS

37

4000

21.51

10.5

2.4

72

Dedak

17

4000

13.8

11.2

8.2

64.3

Molases

3

2000

3.4

0.38

0.08

56.7

Ultra Mineral

1.5

4000

0

0

0

0

Garam

1

2000

0

0

0

0

Urea

0.5

4000

202

0

0

0

Total

100

Nama Bahan

Formulasi (%) Harga PK

SK

LK

TDN

Amoniasi

40

500

6.25

43.07

1.09

51.77

BIS

37

4000

21.51

10.5

2.4

72

Dedak

17

4000

13.8

11.2

8.2

64.3

Molases

3

2000

3.4

0.38

0.08

56.7

Ultra Mineral

1.5

4000

0

0

0

0

Garam

1

2000

0

0

0

0

Urea

0.5

4000

202

0

0

0

Total

100

Nama Bahan

Formulasi (%) Harga PK

SK

LK

TDN

FERMENTASI

40

500

6.29

36.52

1.07

43.12

BIS

37

4000

21.51

10.5

2.4

72

Dedak

17

4000

13.8

11.2

8.2

64.3

Molases

3

2000

3.4

0.38

0.08

56.7

Ultra Mineral

1.5

4000

0

0

0

0

Garam

1

2000

0

0

0

0

Urea

0.5

4000

202

0

0

0

Total

100

Nama Bahan

Formulasi (%) Harga

PK

SK

LK

TDN

Amoniasi +

Fermentasi

40

500

6.31

39.22

0.89 47.53

BIS

37

4000

21.51

10.5

2.4

72

Dedak

17

4000

13.8

11.2

8.2

64.3

Molases

3

2000

3.4

0.38

0.08

56.7

Ultra Mineral

1.5

4000

0

0

0

0

Garam

1

2000

0

0

0

0

Urea

0.5

4000

202

0

0

0

(12)

Lampiran 6. Pertumbuhan Bobot Badan Sapi(kg)

SAPI

PERIODE/BULAN/MINGGU

I

II

III

IV

BB

a

BB

ak

BB

a

BBa

k

BB

a

BB

ak

BB

a

BB

ak

1

100

108

111

117

122

129

131 136

2

88

95

99

104

108

114

117 124

3

105

111

114

118

123

131

132 141

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Dewasa ini pemerintah Indonesia sedang giat – giatnya melaksanakan pembangunan di segala bidang kehidupan. Pembangunan ini dimaksudkan untuk meningkatkan kesejahteraan

berbuat segala sesuatu , menerima relas-relas panggilan dan pemberitahuan- pemberitahuan, menyusun dan membuat surat jawaban/tangkisan atau eksepsi terhadap Surat Dakwaan

Muthmainnah (2008) mendapatkan pola pertumbuhan yang bersifat alometrik negatif untuk ikan janggutan ( Polynemus longipectoralis ) di estuari Sungai Musi, yang berarti

Penguasaan terhadap pengetahuan tersebut akan mempermudah seorang pemain drum dalam menginterpretasikan komposisi musik untuk drum sesuai dengan apa yang

Guna pembuktian kualifikasi, diharapkan saudara membawa semua data dan informasi yang sah dan Asli sesuai dengan Data I sian Kualifikasi yang diminta dan yang saudara sampaikan

Setelah guru mengetahui dengan pasti bahwa akar permasalahan yang menyebabkan siswa kurang mampu dalam menulis karangan narasi adalah guru tidak menggunakan media yang

Guna pembuktian kualifikasi, diharapkan saudara membawa semua data dan informasi yang sah dan Asli sesuai dengan Data I sian Kualifikasi yang diminta dan yang saudara sampaikan

Kasus diare pada balita juga masih tinggi dan dari hasil uji statistik tidak terdapat hubungan yang bermakna antara diare dengan status gizi balita usia 12-60 bulan