Lampiran 1
Data Pasien No
Nama
:
Umur
:
Alamat
:
MR
:
Paritas
:
Diagnosa
:
Hasil Histopatologi :
Jenis Tindakan
:
Lama Operasi
:
Komplikasi Operasi :
Intraoperative
o
Saluran pencernaan
o
Saluran kemih
o
Trauma Vesica urinaria
o
Trauma ureter
o
Perdarahan
Post operative
o
Demam
o
Wound Dehiscense
o
Inkontinensia urine
o
Vesico-Vaginal fistel
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Jenis Histerektomi * Kelompok Umur
152 100.0% 0 .0% 152 100.0%
Jenis Histerektomi * Kelompok Umur Crosstabulation Kelompok Umur
Total
20-40 41-50 >50
Jenis Histerektomi
Abdominal Histerektomi
Count 32 73 30 135
% within Jenis Histerektomi
23.7% 54.1% 22.2% 100.0%
Vaginal Histerektomi
Count 1 4 12 17
% within Jenis Histerektomi
5.9% 23.5% 70.6% 100.0%
Total Count 33 77 42 152
% within Jenis Histerektomi
21.7% 50.7% 27.6% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 17.772a 2 .000
Likelihood Ratio 15.841 2 .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 13.412 1 .000
N of Valid Cases 152
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Tes
Frequencies
Jenis Histerektomi N
Kelompok Umur Abdominal Histerektomi 135
Vaginal Histerektomi 17
Total 152
Test Statisticsa
Kelompok Umur
Most Extreme Differences Absolute .484
Positive .484
Negative .000
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z 1.879
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .002
a. Grouping Variable: Jenis Histerektomi
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid
Missing
Total
N
Percent
N
Percent
N
Percent
Jenis Histerektomi *
Kelompok Paritas
152
100.0%
0
.0%
152
100.0%
Jenis Histerektomi * Kelompok Paritas Crosstabulation Kelompok Paritas
Total Nullipara Primipara Multipara Jenis
Histerektomi
Abdominal Histerektomi
Count 28 13 94 135
% within Jenis Histerektomi
20.7% 9.6% 69.6% 100.0%
Vaginal Histerektomi
Count 0 2 15 17
% within Jenis Histerektomi
.0% 11.8% 88.2% 100.0%
Total Count 28 15 109 152
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 4.325a 2 .115
Likelihood Ratio 7.393 2 .025
Linear-by-Linear Association 3.761 1 .052
N of Valid Cases 152
a. 2 cells (33,3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1,68.
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
FrequenciesJenis Histerektomi N
Kelompok Paritas Abdominal Histerektomi 135
Vaginal Histerektomi 17
Total 152
Test Statisticsa
Kelompok Paritas
Most Extreme Differences Absolute .207
Positive .207
Negative .000
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z .806
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .535
a. Grouping Variable: Jenis Histerektomi
Case Processing Summary Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Jenis Histerektomi * Indikasi Tindakan Operasi
Jenis Histerektomi * Indikasi Tindakan Operasi Crosstabulation Indikasi Tindakan Operasi
Total
Hiperplasia Endometriu
Abdominal Histerekto
Vaginal Histerekto
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 124.117a 3 .000
Likelihood Ratio 82.316 3 .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 16.310 1 .000
N of Valid Cases 152
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Frequencies
Jenis Histerektomi N
Indikasi Tindakan Operasi Abdominal Histerektomi 135
Vaginal Histerektomi 17
Total 152
Test Statisticsa
Indikasi Tindakan Operasi
Most Extreme Differences Absolute .852
Positive .852
Negative -.074
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z 3.312
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .000
a. Grouping Variable: Jenis Histerektomi
Case Processing Summary Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Tehnik Histerektomi * Kelompok Umur
152 100.0% 0 .0% 152 100.0%
Tehnik Histerektomi * Kelompok Umur Crosstabulation Kelompok Umur
Total
20-40 41-50 >50
Tehnik Histerektomi
Total Histerektomi
Count 30 64 39 133
% within Tehnik Histerektomi
22.6% 48.1% 29.3% 100.0%
Subtotal Histerektomi
Count 3 13 3 19
% within Tehnik Histerektomi
15.8% 68.4% 15.8% 100.0%
Total Count 33 77 42 152
% within Tehnik Histerektomi
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 2.805a 2 .246
Likelihood Ratio 2.897 2 .235
Linear-by-Linear Association .154 1 .694
N of Valid Cases 152
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Frequencies
Tehnik Histerektomi N
Kelompok Umur Total Histerektomi 133
Subtotal Histerektomi 19
Total 152
Test Statisticsa
Kelompok Umur
Most Extreme Differences Absolute .135
Positive .068
Negative -.135
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z .552
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .921
a. Grouping Variable: Tehnik Histerektomi
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Tehnik Histerektomi * Kelompok Paritas
Tehnik Histerektomi * Kelompok Paritas Crosstabulation Kelompok Paritas
Total Nullipara Primipara Multipara Tehnik
Histerektomi
Total Histerektomi
Count 21 15 97 133
% within Tehnik Histerektomi
15.8% 11.3% 72.9% 100.0%
Subtotal Histerektomi
Count 7 0 12 19
% within Tehnik Histerektomi
36.8% .0% 63.2% 100.0%
Total Count 28 15 109 152
% within Tehnik Histerektomi
18.4% 9.9% 71.7% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 6.364a 2 .041
Likelihood Ratio 7.465 2 .024
Linear-by-Linear Association 2.542 1 .111
N of Valid Cases 152
a. 2 cells (33,3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1,88.
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Frequencies
Tehnik Histerektomi N
Kelompok Paritas Total Histerektomi 133
Subtotal Histerektomi 19
Test Statisticsa
Kelompok Paritas
Most Extreme Differences Absolute .211
Positive .000
Negative -.211
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z .858
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .453
a. Grouping Variable: Tehnik Histerektomi
Case Processing Summary Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Tehnik Histerektomi * Indikasi Tindakan Operasi
152 100.0% 0 .0% 152 100.0%
Tehnik Histerektomi * Indikasi Tindakan Operasi Crosstabulation Indikasi Tindakan Operasi
Total Mioma
Uteri
Proplapsu s Uteri
Hiperplasia Endometriu
m
Adenomiosi s Tehnik
Histerekto Tehnik Histerekto
mi
78.9% 13.5% 3.0% 4.5% 100.0
%
Subtotal Histerekto
mi
Count 19 0 0 0 19
% within Tehnik Histerekto Tehnik Histerekto
81.6% 11.8% 2.6% 3.9% 100.0
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 4.903a 3 .179
Likelihood Ratio 8.329 3 .040
Linear-by-Linear Association 3.651 1 .056
N of Valid Cases 152
a. 4 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,50.
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
FrequenciesTehnik Histerektomi N
Kelompok Paritas Total Histerektomi 133
Subtotal Histerektomi 19
Total 152
Test Statisticsa
Kelompok Paritas
Most Extreme Differences Absolute .211
Positive .000
Negative -.211
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z .858
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .453
a. Grouping Variable: Tehnik Histerektomi
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Jenis Histerektomi * Komplikasi Intra Operasi
Jenis Histerektomi * Komplikasi Intra Operasi Crosstabulation Komplikasi Intra Operasi
Total
Perdarah TAK
Trauma k
Trauma u Jenis
Histerektomi
Abdominal Histerektomi
Count 23 110 1 1 135
% within Jenis Histerektomi
17.0% 81.5% .7% .7% 100.0%
Vaginal Histerektomi
Count 0 17 0 0 17
% within Jenis Histerektomi
.0% 100.0% .0% .0% 100.0%
Total Count 23 127 1 1 152
% within Jenis Histerektomi
15.1% 83.6% .7% .7% 100.0%
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Jenis Histerektomi * Komplikasi Pasca Operasi
152 100.0% 0 .0% 152 100.0%
Jenis Histerektomi * Komplikasi Pasca Operasi Crosstabulation Komplikasi Pasca Operasi
Total
Retensi TAK
wound de Jenis
Histerektomi
Abdominal Histerektomi
Count 0 133 2 135
% within Jenis Histerektomi
.0% 98.5% 1.5% 100.0%
Vaginal Histerektomi
Count 1 16 0 17
% within Jenis Histerektomi
5.9% 94.1% .0% 100.0%
Total Count 1 149 2 152
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Tehnik Histerektomi * Komplikasi Intra Operasi
152 100.0% 0 .0% 152 100.0%
Tehnik Histerektomi * Komplikasi Intra Operasi Crosstabulation Komplikasi Intra Operasi
Total Perdarah TAK
Trauma k
Trauma u Tehnik
Histerektomi
Total Histerektomi
Count 19 112 1 1 133
% within Tehnik Histerektomi
14.3% 84.2% .8% .8% 100.0%
Subtotal Histerektomi
Count 4 15 0 0 19
% within Tehnik Histerektomi
21.1% 78.9% .0% .0% 100.0%
Total Count 23 127 1 1 152
% within Tehnik Histerektomi
15.1% 83.6% .7% .7% 100.0%
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Tehnik Histerektomi * Komplikasi Pasca Operasi
Tehnik Histerektomi * Komplikasi Pasca Operasi Crosstabulation Komplikasi Pasca Operasi
Total
Retensi TAK
wound de Tehnik
Histerektomi
Total Histerektomi
Count 1 130 2 133
% within Tehnik Histerektomi
.8% 97.7% 1.5% 100.0%
Subtotal Histerektomi
Count 0 19 0 19
% within Tehnik Histerektomi
.0% 100.0% .0% 100.0%
Total Count 1 149 2 152
% within Tehnik Histerektomi
.7% 98.0% 1.3% 100.0%
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Indikasi Tindakan Operasi * Komplikasi Intra Operasi
152 100.0% 0 .0% 152 100.0%
Indikasi Tindakan Operasi * Komplikasi Intra Operasi Crosstabulation Komplikasi Intra Operasi
Total
Perdarah TAK
Trauma k
Trauma u Indikasi
Tindakan Operasi
Mioma Uteri Count 22 100 1 1 124
% within Indikasi Tindakan
Operasi
Uteri % within Indikasi Tindakan
Operasi
.0% 100.0% .0% .0% 100.0%
Hiperplasia Endometrium
Count 0 4 0 0 4
% within Indikasi Tindakan
Operasi
.0% 100.0% .0% .0% 100.0%
Adenomiosis Count 1 5 0 0 6
% within Indikasi Tindakan
Operasi
16.7% 83.3% .0% .0% 100.0%
Total Count 23 127 1 1 152
% within Indikasi Tindakan
Operasi
15.1% 83.6% .7% .7% 100.0%
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Indikasi Tindakan Operasi * Komplikasi Pasca Operasi
Indikasi Tindakan Operasi * Komplikasi Pasca Operasi Crosstabulation Komplikasi Pasca
Operasi
Total
Retensi TAK
wound de Indikasi Tindakan
Operasi
Mioma Uteri Count 0 122 2 124
% within Indikasi Tindakan Operasi
.0% 98.4% 1.6% 100.0%
Proplapsus Uteri Count 1 17 0 18
% within Indikasi Tindakan Operasi
5.6% 94.4% .0% 100.0%
Hiperplasia Endometrium
Count 0 4 0 4
% within Indikasi Tindakan Operasi
.0% 100.0% .0% 100.0%
Adenomiosis Count 0 6 0 6
% within Indikasi Tindakan Operasi
.0% 100.0% .0% 100.0%
Total Count 1 149 2 152
% within Indikasi Tindakan Operasi
.7% 98.0% 1.3% 100.0%
Means
Case Processing Summary Cases
Included Excluded Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Jumlah Perdarahan * Jenis Histerektomi
152 100.0% 0 .0% 152 100.0%
Report Jumlah Perdarahan
Jenis Histerektomi Mean N Std. Deviation
Abdominal Histerektomi 1038.96 135 521.609
Vaginal Histerektomi 292.65 17 144.353
ANOVA Table Sum of
Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Jumlah Perdarahan * Jenis Histerektomi
Between Groups
(Combined) 8409777.296 1 8409777.296 34.287 .000
Within Groups 3.679E7 150 245277.405
Total 4.520E7 151
Means
Case Processing Summary Cases
Included Excluded Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Jumlah Perdarahan * Tehnik Histerektomi
152 100.0% 0 .0% 152 100.0%
Report Jumlah Perdarahan
Tehnik Histerektomi Mean N Std. Deviation
Total Histerektomi 951.39 133 556.934
Subtotal Histerektomi 984.21 19 485.356
Total 955.49 152 547.126
ANOVA Table Sum of
Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Jumlah Perdarahan * Tehnik Histerektomi
Between Groups
(Combined) 17907.166 1 17907.166 .059 .808
Within Groups 4.518E7 150 301223.206
Means
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Included Excluded Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Lama Rawatan (Hari) * Jenis
Histerektomi 152 100,0% 0 0,0% 152 100,0%
Report Lama Rawatan (Hari)
Jenis Histerektomi Mean N Std. Deviation
Abdominal Histerektomi 5,24 135 1,379
Vaginal Histerektomi 5,65 17 ,862
Total 5,29 152 1,335
ANOVA Table
Sum of
Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Lama Rawatan (Hari) * Jenis
Histerektomi
Between
Groups (Combined) 2,447 1 2,447 1,376 ,243
Within Groups 266,816 150 1,779
Means
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Included Excluded Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Lama Rawatan (Hari) *
Tehnik Histerektomi 152 100,0% 0 0,0% 152 100,0%
Report Lama Rawatan (Hari)
Tehnik Histerektomi Mean N Std. Deviation
Total Histerektomi 5,29 133 1,401
Subtotal Histerektomi 5,32 19 ,749
Total 5,29 152 1,335
ANOVA Table
Sum of
Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Lama Rawatan (Hari) * Tehnik Histerektomi
Between
Groups (Combined) ,015 1 ,015 ,008 ,927
Within Groups 269,248 150 1,795
