• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Analisis Determinan Pertumbuhan Ekonomi di Kota Medan Provinsi Sumatera Utara

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "Analisis Determinan Pertumbuhan Ekonomi di Kota Medan Provinsi Sumatera Utara"

Copied!
7
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Lampiran 1 : Data Penelitian

Tahun PDRB PDRB Laju Pertumbuhan PDRB PMA PMDN Angkatan Kerja LN Angkatan Kerja Unstandardized

HB (Milyar Rp) HK Thn 2000 HK Thn 2000 (%) Realisasi (Juta Rp) Realisasi (Juta Rp) yg Bekerja (jiwa) LN ∆Y LN PMA LN PMDN yang Bekerja Residual

2001 21.806,48 19.628,08 4,58% 62.650,00 119.250,00 351.635,00 -3,08 11,04 11,68 12,77 -0,01088

2002 25.005,49 20.652,67 5,22% 111.760,00 122.100,00 406.215,00 -2,95 11,62 11,71 12,91 -0,00089

2003 28.671,30 21.829,87 5,70% 276.340,00 201.760,00 450.426,00 -2,86 12,52 12,21 13,01 -0,06371

2004 33.115,35 23.421,27 7,29% 387.670,00 297.120,00 632.380,00 -2,61 12,86 12,6 13,35 0,10658

2005 42.792,45 25.056,07 6,98% 423.490,00 235.890,00 819.161,00 -2,66 12,95 12,37 13,61 0,00222

2006 48.849,95 27.000,43 7,76% 587.900,00 473.340,00 755.882,00 -2,56 13,28 13,06 13,53 0,08202

2007 55.542,51 29.101,06 7,78% 691.450,00 504.450,00 729.892,00 -2,55 13,44 13,13 13,5 0,06893

2008 65.277,87 31.106,12 6,89% 783.760,00 593.870,00 833.832,00 -2,68 13,57 13,29 13,63 -0,09104

2009 72.630,21 33.143,57 6,55% 467.350,00 890.050,00 824.250,00 -2,73 13,05 13,69 13,62 -0,02547

2010 90.615,46 35.516,65 7,16% 689.344,02 511.309,06 866.815,00 -2,63 13,44 13,14 13,67 -0,02826

2011 104.059,43 38.283,40 7,79% 861.081,64 332.364,50 902.097,00 -2,55 13,66 12,71 13,71 -0,01308

(2)

Lampiran 2. Hasil Regresi

N Range Minimum Maximum Sum Std. Deviation Variance

Statistic Statistic Statistic Statistic Statistic Statistic Std. Error Statistic Statistic Statistic Std. Error Statistic Std. Error

PDRB_HB (Milyar Rp)

12 95680,73 21806,48 117487,21 705853,71 58821,1425 9203,89653 31883,23283 1016540535,581 ,642 ,637 -,737 1,232

PDRB_HK 2000 (Milyar Rp)

12 21942,43 19628,08 41570,51 348554,42 29046,2013 2084,95589 7222,49906 52164492,719 ,360 ,637 -1,039 1,232

Laju Pertumbuhan PDRB_HK (y)

12 3,21 4,58 7,79 81,36 6,7800 ,31023 1,07468 1,155 -1,043 ,637 ,026 1,232

Realisasi PMA (x1) 12 798431,64 62650,00 861081,64 6196225,29 516352,1075 79028,24161 273761,85940 74945555661,863 -,357 ,637 -1,036 1,232 Realisasi PMDN

(x2)

12 770800,00 119250,00 890050,00 4604793,10 383732,7583 64347,59294 222906,60063 49687352604,950 ,955 ,637 1,037 1,232

Angkatan Kerja yg Bekerja (x3)

12 550462,00 351635,00 902097,00 8424227,00 702018,9167 56253,55282 194868,02319 37973546460,265 -,935 ,637 -,720 1,232

LN_Y 12 ,53 -3,08 -2,55 -32,43 -2,7025 ,04999 ,17316 ,030 -1,246 ,637 ,626 1,232

LN_PMA 12 2,62 11,04 13,66 155,08 12,9233 ,23962 ,83006 ,689 -1,446 ,637 1,410 1,232

LN_PMDN 12 2,01 11,68 13,69 152,27 12,6892 ,17869 ,61901 ,383 -,305 ,637 -,544 1,232

LN_Yg Bekerja 12 ,94 12,77 13,71 160,96 13,4133 ,09508 ,32936 ,108 -1,144 ,637 -,245 1,232

Unstandardized Residual

12 ,19762 -,09104 ,10658 ,00000 ,0000000 ,01688280 ,05848372 ,003 ,554 ,637 -,213 1,232

Valid N (listwise) 12

Descriptive Statistics

(3)

Variables Entered/Removedb

Model

Variables

Entered

Variables

Removed Method

1 LN_Yg Bekerja,

LN_PMDN,

LN_PMA

. Enter

a. All requested variables entered.

b. Dependent Variable: LN_Y

Model Summaryb

Change Statistics

Model R

the Estimate

R Square

a. Predictors: (Constant), LN_Yg Bekerja, LN_PMDN, LN_PMA

b. Dependent Variable: LN_Y

Coefficientsa

Unstandardized

Coefficients

Standardized

Coefficients Collinearity Statistics

Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig. Tolerance VIF

a. Dependent Variable: LN_Y

Collinearity Diagnosticsa

Variance Proportions

Model Dimension Eigenvalue Condition Index (Constant) LN_PMA LN_PMDN LN_Yg Bekerja

1 3,997 1,000 ,00 ,00 ,00 ,00

2 ,002 44,447 ,04 ,10 ,02 ,00

3 ,001 84,951 ,01 ,19 ,92 ,00

1

4 4,173E-5 309,506 ,96 ,71 ,06 ,99

(4)

Residuals Statisticsa

Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation N

Predicted Value -3,0691 -2,5369 -2,7025 ,16298 12

Residual -,09104 ,10658 ,00000 ,05848 12

Std. Predicted Value -2,249 1,016 ,000 1,000 12

Std. Residual -1,328 1,554 ,000 ,853 12

a. Dependent Variable: LN_Y

Runs Test

Unstandardized

Residual

Test Valuea -,01198

Cases < Test Value 6

Cases >= Test Value 6

Total Cases 12

Number of Runs 4

Z -1,514

Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) ,130

a. Median

DESCRIPTIVES VARIABLES=PDRB_HB PDRB_HK Laju_PDRB_HK PMA PMDN

Yg_Bekerja LN_Y LN_x1 LN_x2 LN_x3 RES_1

/STATISTICS=MEAN SUM STDDEV VARIANCE RANGE MIN MAX SE.MEAN KURTOSIS

SKEWNESS.

Estimated Distribution Parameters

LN_Y LN_PMA LN_PMDN LN_Yg Bekerja

Unstandardized

Residual

Location -2,7025000 12,9233333 12,6891667 13,4133333 ,0000000

Normal Distribution

Scale ,17315915 ,83006389 ,61900886 ,32936118 ,05848372

The cases are unweighted.

Case Processing Summary

LN_Y LN_PMA LN_PMDN

Number of Missing Values

(5)

Correlations

Unstandardized

Residual LN_PMA LN_PMDN LN_Yg Bekerja

Unstandardized Residual 1,000 ,000 ,000 ,000

LN_PMA ,000 1,000 ,793 ,936

LN_PMDN ,000 ,793 1,000 ,810

Pearson Correlation

LN_Yg Bekerja ,000 ,936 ,810 1,000

Unstandardized Residual . ,500 ,500 ,500

LN_PMA ,500 . ,001 ,000

LN_PMDN ,500 ,001 . ,001

Sig. (1-tailed)

LN_Yg Bekerja ,500 ,000 ,001 .

Unstandardized Residual 12 12 12 12

LN_PMA 12 12 12 12

LN_PMDN 12 12 12 12

N

(6)
(7)

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Hal ini membuktikan bahwa penggunaan apron hitung terbukti dapat meningkatkan kemampuan berhitung anak didik di TK Negeri Pembina 2 Kota Pekanbaru, peningkatan ini

Skripsi: Analisis Pengaruh Kompentensi Kerja dan Lingkungan Kerja Fisik Terhadap Kinerja pegawai (Studi Pada Tenaga Kerja Kabupateen Bekasi), Program Sarjana Fakultas

Effect of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus on the Clinical Severity and Treatment Outcome in Patients With Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Potential Role in the Emergence

Hasil penelitian ini yaitu (1) Faktor-faktor penyebab terjadinya perubahan peruntukan tanah wakaf di Desa Sengonbugel Kecamatan Mayong Kabupaten Jepara tanah

Pengar uh St r uktur Aktiva, Likuidit as, Ukur an Per usahaan Dan Pr ofit abil itas Ter hadap Str uktur Modal Pada Per usahaan Manufaktur Yang Ter daftar Di Bur

This research deals with analyzing errors of preposition of time used in the eight year students of SMPN 3 Salatiga in academic year of 2014/2015. This research

Tanaman pakan larva Jumlah telur Kaliandra 56,70 ± 32,69 a Ketepeng 53,10 ± 28,25 a Keterangan : angka yang di ikuti oleh huruf yang sama tidak berbeda nyata dengan uji T

resiko sedang ( Medium Risk ) yaitu variabel peralatan dan lingkungan kerja. 2) 4 sub variabel yang dikategorikan memiliki rengking risiko tinggi ( Hight Risk ) yaitu variabel