rd
THE 3 ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR ON TRANSFORMATIVE EDUCATION
AISTEEL
AND
EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Supported and Coordinated by:
Postgraduate School
State University of Medan
North Sumatera, Indonesia
Organized by:
Indexing By :
PROCEEDINGS
Emerald Garden Hotel, Medan - Indonesia
03-04 October 2018
Vol. 3, December 2018
Vol. 3, December 2018
2018
i
Proceedings of The 3
rdAnnual International Seminar on
Transformative
Education
and
Educational
Leadership
(AISTEEL 2018)
“
Education, Learning, and Leadership Innovation
”
Emerald Garden Hotel, Medan City, North Sumatera, Indonesia
October 3-4, 2018
Editorial Board
Editorial-in-Chief
Dr. Juniastel Rajagukguk, M.Si (State University of Medan, Unimed)
Deputy Editor
Dr. Saronom Silaban, M.Pd (State University of Medan, Unimed)
International Advisory Board / Scientific Committee
Prof. Dr. Kala Saravanamuthu (University of Newcastle, Australia)
Prof. Arjen EJ Wals (University of Gothenburg, Sweden)
Prof. Dr. Bornok Sinaga, M.Pd (Unimed, Indonesia)
Prof. Dr. Aytekin Isman (Sakarya University, Turkey)
Prof. Peter Charles Taylor, Ph.D., Med., B.Sc., Dip.Ed (Murdoch University, Australia)
Prof. Dr. Mukhlas Samani, Ph.D (Indonesia)
Prof. Dr. Jailani bin Md. Yunos (University Tun Hussein on Malaysia)
Prof. Dr. Nurahimah Mohd. Yusuf (UTM, Malaysia)
Assoc. Prof. Dr Pedro Isaias (University of Queensland, Australia)
Assoc. Prof. Elisabeth Taylor, Ph.D (Murdoch University, Australia)
Dr. Bambang Sumintono, M.Ed (Universiti Malaya, Malaysia)
Dr. Isma Widyaty, M.Pd (UPI, Indonesia)
Prof. Dr. Syahrul R, M.Pd (UNP, Indonesia)
Prof. Amrin Saragih, MA., Ph.D (Unimed, Indonesia)
Assoc. Prof. Ade Gafar Abdullah, M.Si (Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia)
Eng. Asep Bayu Dani Nandiyanto (Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia)
Prof. Dr. Hartono, M.Pd (Universitas Negeri Semarang)
ii
Proceedings of the 3
rdAnnual International Seminar on Transformative Education
and Educational Leadership (AISTEEL 2018)
Preface
The 3
rdAnnual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership
(AISTEEL 2018) was held in Emerald Garden Hotel, Medan City-Indonesia on 3-4 October 2018.
This seminar is organized by Postgraduate School, Univesitas Negeri Medan and become a routine
agenda at Postgraduate program of Unimed now.
The AISTEEL is realized this year with various presenters, lecturers, researchers and students from
universities both in and out of Indonesia participating in, the seminar with
theme “Education,
Learning and Leadership Innovation.”
The plenary speakers coming from various provinces in Indonesia have been present topics covering
multi disciplines. They have contributed many inspiring inputs on current trending educational
research topics all over the world. The expectation is that all potential lecturers and students have
shared their research findings for improving their teaching process and quality, and leadership.
The third AISTEEL presents a keynote speaker and 4 distinguised invited speakers from Australia,
Singapore, Taiwan, and Malaysia. In addition, presenters come from various Government and Private
Universities, Institutions, Academy, and Schools. Some of them are those who have sat and will sit in
the oral defence examination.
There are 326 articles submitted to committee, some of which are presented orally in parallel sessions,
and others are presented through posters. The articles have been reviewed by double blind reviewer
and 198 of them were accepted for published by Atlantis Press indexed by International Indexation.
Meanwhile 83 papers were published in online International Proceedings indexed by Google Scholar.
The Committees of AISTEEL invest great efforts in reviewing the papers submitted to the
conference and organizing the sessions to enable the participants to gain maximum benefit.
Grateful thanks to all of members of The 3rd Annual International Seminar on Transformative
Education and Educational Leadership (AISTEEL 2018) for their outstanding contributions. Thanks
also given to Universitas Negeri Medan for published this volume.
The Editors
iii
Table of Contents
Titles and Authors
page
Design of Physical Practicum Tools on Rotational Dynamics Matter with
Scientific Concept
1
Fretty Doharni Ritonga; Nurdin Bukit; Betty M.Turnip...
Analysis of the Leading Sector and Its Effect on the Economy in Pakpak Bharat
Regency
6
Dinar Melani Hutajulu; M. Nasir; Arwansyah
...Analyze the Characteristic and Factors Cause of Bullying Behaviours in Early
Childhood
12
Fadhilah Syam Nasution; Anita Yus; Aman Simaremare...
Play Finger Painting in Creative Art Model to Help Smooth Motoric
Development and Creativity of Group a in Kindergarten at Aek Loba Pekan
Village
18
Lola Wita Harahap; Sri Milfayetty; Rosmala Dewi...
Maintenance of Gayonese Kinship Terms by Gayonese Minority Migrants in
Jabodetabek
22
Desi Purnama Sari; Siti Aisyah Ginting; Berlin Sibarani...
Effect of Functional Training and TRX Suspension Training on Body
Composition member Golden Fitness and Spa
26
Rafliansyah; Nurhayati Simatupang; Albadi Sinulingga...
Interpersonal Metaphor Used in the Boss Baby Movie
29
Khairuni Syafitri; Siti Aisyah Ginting; Anni Holila Pulungan...
Speech Act in Indonesia Lawyers Club: KPK vs Novanto
32
Theresia Fransiska Sidabutar; Zainuddin; Busmin Gurning...
The Effect of Instructional Strategy and Style Ofthinking Secuential on Students
Outcome MAN Medan
36
Siti Aisyah Hanim; Tiur asih siburian; Darwin...
The Effect of Cooperative Learning Models and Self Efficacy on Student
Mathematics Learning Outcomes
39
Sabdo Puji Rahayu; Mukhtar; Keysar Panjaitan...
Ideational Grammatical Metahpor in Reading Texts for Senior High School
English Textbooks
43
Diemam Ferzhawana; Siti Aisyah Ginting; Zainuddin...
Effect of Soft Modification on Student Learning Results PAB 13 Kwala Begumit
Private Vocational School
47
Iskandar Fahmi...
Differences in Metacognitive Ability of Students Through Learning Realistic
Mathematics Education and Problem Based Learning in Pangkalan Susu Senior
High School
51
Chairi Mutia Lubis; Waminton Rajagukguk; Kms.M.Amin Fauzi...
Development of Interactive Learning Media Projection of Working Drawing on
Students of Class X TKR in SMK Markus 2 Medan
56
Irwan Panggabean; R. Mursid; Samsidar Tanjung...
Metaphor of Modality in Donald Trump’s Speech in
United Nation General Assembly 2017
60
Nursyah Handaya; Siti Aisyah Ginting...
Traditional Sport Of Silek Tuo In Minangkabau Community (a study of Silek tuo
iv
Prima Nanda; Sabaruddin Yunis; Agung Sunarn...
Improved Student’s Generic Science Skills With The Application of Cooperative
Learning Models Based on Batak Culture
66
Rika Sari Indah Harahap; Derlina; Rahmatsyah; Sahyar; Bornok...
Management Development Athletes of Shorinji Kempo North Sumatra Region
71
Arti Kurniaty Bangun...
Efforts to Improve Learning Results Free Basketball Shot (Free Throw) Through
The Application of Teaching Style Inclusion
75
Bob Rahmat Manalu... ...
Development of Egosan Engineering Extension Models with Straight Sticking in
Pencak Silat
77
William Filipus; Amir Supriadi; Tarsyad Nugraha...
The Development of Interactive Learning Media of Athletic on Physical
Education in SMP Negeri 15 Medan
81
Akhmad Khaidir; Budi Valianto; Tarsyad Nugraha...
The Effect of Learning Model and Self-Reliance Learning toward Science
Learning Outcomes
84
Rohima; Mukhtar; Samsidar Tanjung...
The Effect of Learning Method and Kinesthetic Perception on The Learning
Outcomes of Lay Up Basketball
88
Saiful Adrian; N
urhayati Simatupang; Suprayitno………....
Analysis Of Physical Education Teacher Management Skills In State Elementary
School Sub-District Medan Tembung
91
Syahrul Effendi Nasution; Amir Supriadi; Albadi Sinulingga...
Innovation Of The Speed Model Using Running With The Ball Techniques In
Football
95
Julio Roberto; Amir Supriadi; Novita... ...
The Development of Penetration Drill Training Technique of Wrestling Sport
99
Ihsan Idris Silalahi; Jan Bobby Nesra Barus...
Speech Function of Anies Baswedan’s
Speech in Approval Ceremony as the
Governor of Jakarta in the Period of 2017-2022
102
Ahmad Rifa’i Ritonga; Sumarsih
... ...
Development of Web-Based Learning Media to Enhance Writing Capability of
Biography Text of Student Class X SMA
105
Rencus B. Sinabariba, Tiur Asi Siburian, Mutsyuhito Solin...
Implementing the Teaching Supervision by Principals in Improving the
Performance of Teachers in Aceh Besar
109
Said Ashlan... ... ...
Female Principal Leadership
115
Hendro Widodo; Hengkang Bara Saputra... ...
The Ways of Rohingya Teenagers in Medan Realized Their Language Attitude
120
I Wayan Dirgayasa; Rahmat Husein; Lonni NurIffah Nasution...
Metaphor in Umpasa of Saurmatua Toba Batak Ceremony
124
Heppy Yersin Digita Purba; Rahmad Husein; Anni Holila Pulungan...
The Influence of Part Method, Whole Method and Determination Exercise
Methods on Improving Exercise in the Sports Branch of Pencak Silat Single Art
Category of College Students SPDKK (Art of Kencana Kwitang Self Defense)
Deli Serdang Year 2018/2019
127
Mawar Sari... ... ...
v
Philosophy
of Rakut Sitelu
Desi Haryati Nianggolan...
Evaluation of Implementation of Sustainable Professional Development (PKB)
for Junior High School Physical Education Teachers to Increase Professionalism
in Tebing Tinggi City
135
Mhd Fazar Afandi...
Development of Innovative PJOK teaching materials on floor gymnastics
materials to improve learning outcomes of Grade Students at Junior Hight School
138
Bangun Saragih...
The Influence of the Discovery Learning Model assisted with Image Media and
Motivation Against Civics Learning Outcomes of Students in Class IV of Public
Elementary Schools 055980 Aman Damai 2017/2018
142
Heryansyah Ginting; Dede Ruslan; Reh Bungana Br.Perangin-angin...
Development of science teaching materials based on Science Technology Society
(STM) and its influence on learning outcomes of fourth grade students of MIN
Medan Tembung
149
Diah Hafizhotul Husna; Nuraini; Ramlan Silaban...
The Improvement of Cooperative Learning Model Application Skill in Numbered
Head Together Through Clinical Supervision of Art Teacher in SDN 060886
Medan Baru
154
Unita Vitta Omas Sianturi; Martua Manullang; Rosmala Dewi...
Gold of North Sumatera Program Coach Performance
159
Suyono; Hariadi; Supryetno...
Transitivity Systems Analysis of Bilingual Civic 3 Education Textbook for Grade
XII
163
Jusup Sitepu; Anni Holila Pulungan; I Wayan Dirgeyasa Tangkas...
The Lecturer Performance Development of the STKIP Bina Bangsa Getsempena
Banda Aceh
169
Saiful Bahri...
The Interference of Batak Mandailing Language to Indonesian (In The Interaction
At The Seventh
Grade Students Of Madrasah Tsanawiyah Swasta Al-Azhar
Kabupaten Tapanuli Selatan Padang Sidimpuan)
175
Siti Jahria Sitompul; Abdurrahman Adisaputera; Sumarsi...
The Influence of Microbiology Dictionary and Microbiology Textbook
Utilization in the Contextual Learning Framework on Biology Students Higher
Order Thinking Skills
177
Kiki Rizqi Sahara; Hasruddin; Ashar Hasairin...
The Differences of Learning Style and St
udents’ Creativity to Students’
Achievement in Dribbling the Ball in Playing Football of Seventh Grade Students
of SMP Ar
–
Rahman Percut
180
Muammar Afif Marpaung; Imran Akhmad; Rahma Dewi...
Development of Gobag Sodor Game Model to Increase Interest in Elementary
Students
184
Siska Nova Undari...
The Influence of Research-Based Learning with Portfolio Assessment on Science
Process Skills in Microbiology Course for Biology Program Students
187
Saudah Rahmayanti; Hasruddin; Tumiur Gultom...
The Influence of Teaching Style and Confident Against the Results of a Study of
Shooting in the Game of Football (Experiment Studies the Self Check Style and
vi
Tembung Sabilina)
Muhammad Syaiful; Ramadhan Harahap...
Development of Mirror Writing Teaching Materials Based on Class XI Media
Literation of Lolomatua 1 State High School
195
Yanida Bu'ulolo; Biner Ambarita; Marice...
The Development of Teaching Materials for Technology- Assisted Procedure
Text in Vocational High School
197
Nova Andarini; Biner Ambarita; Malan Lubis...
Development of Adobe Flash Based Floor Gymnastics Media Learning on Health
Sport Education Lesson
201
Hardiansyah...
The Effect of Learning Approach and Linguistic Competence Capability Reading
The English Narative Text of Student SMA Negeri 6 Padangsidimpuan.
206
Sukriyah Batubara; Keysar Panjaitan...
……….
Analysis Effect of Household Consumption, Investment and Labor to Economy
Growth In Sumatera Utara
209
Richna Handriyani; Arwansyah; Sahyar...
Idioms Translation Strategies in Pasung Jiwa Novel English Version
213
Hariyanto; Amrin Saragih; Sumarsih...
Code Mixing in Novel: A Case of Indonesian Literary Work
216
Nurul Hidayanti Hasibuan; Amrin Saragih; Sumarsih...
Logico-Semantic Relation in Presidential Debate Between Hillary Clinton and
Donald Trump
221
Annisa Risma Khairani Lubis; Della Fransiska Ginting; Jumino Suhadi...
Semiotic Meanings in Cigarette Advertisement Texts
227
Rodearta Purba; Zainuddin; Amrin Saragih...
Modality as Hedging Device in the US Presidential Election Debate
232
Roobby Hamdanur; Anni Holila Pulungan; Zainuddiin...
The Improving Mathematical Communication Ability Through Realistic
Mathematical Approach Based on Toba Batak Culture
235
Aman Sanusi Siregar...
Speech Functions of Doctors and Patients on Medical Consultation Process
239
Resti Citra Dewi; Anni Holila Pulungan, Sumarsih...
The Development of Venturimeter Instrumentation in Dynamic Fluid
243
Zahrani Dalimunthe; Rahmatsyah; Derlina...
Lexical Metaphors in Onang-onang of Bobby and Kahiyang Tortor Dance
246
Siti Rahma Ritonga; Anni Holila Pulungan; Didik Santoso...
The Discourse Markers in President Joko Widodo’s Speeches in KTT APEC
China in 2015
249
Syahbuddin Nasution1; Busmin Gurning; I Wayan Dirgayasa Tangkas...
Preparation of Papers in Two-Column Format for AISTEEL Conference
Proceedings
Translator’s Strategies in Transferring Cultural Values in Ratatouille
Film
254
Femy Septiani; Anni Holila Pulungan...
Lexical Metaphor In Printed Car Advertisements
258
Misdiana; Siti Aisyah Ginting; Amrin Saragih...
Political Discourse Analysis of Donald Trump Political Speech
263
Elisa Silviani Siregar; Prof. Dr.Zainuddin, M.Hum; Prof.Dr. Sri MindaMurni,
MS... ...
vii
Nurliana Harahap; Mahendra Ginting Manik; Indah Listiana...
Appraisal of Healthy Product Advertisement on Television
274
Nurun Nazipah Harahap; Siti Aisyah Ginting; Rahmad Husein Napitupuluh...
Lexical Metaphor in Andrea Hirata’s “The Dreamer” Novel
277
Nurul Sa’adah; I Wy. Dirgeyasa; Siti Aisyah Ginting
...
Impoliteness Strategies Used by Governor Candidates of DKI Jakarta in Governor
Election Debate 2017
281
Sri Minda Murni; Busmin Gurning
……
...
Intertextuality in Travel Umroh Advertisement
287
Afifah Nurul Khoirot Nasution; Anni Holila Pulungan; Eddy Setia...
Intertextuality on Oral Discourse in Sari Matua Batak Toba Ceremony
290
Dyan Yosephin Hutagalung; Anni Holila Pulungan; Rahmad Husein...
The Effect of Mangosteen (Garcinia mangostana L.) Peel to Creatine Kinase
Serum in Male Rats (Rattus norvegicus) with Fatigue from Swimming
293
Rika Nailuvar Sinaga; Jumadin IP; Zulaini...
Analysis of Technology Utilization to Measure The Throw Distance of The Ball
on Hammer Throw
296
Riki Prastian; Agung Sunarno; Sabaruddin Yunis Bangun...
The Interactions of Social Stratification and Karonese Register in Giving Pedah
Pedah Perjabun
300
Elkana Putra Tarigan; Amrin Saragih; Siti Aisyah Ginting...
Implementation Management Training Volleyball Club of Pertamina Year 2017
305
Reza Wibowo; Sanusi Hasibuan; Budi Valianto...
Lexical Metaphor in Printed Car Advertisements
308
Misdiana; Siti Aisyah Ginting; Amrin Saragih...
Improving Students’ Reading Comprehension
Ability In Descriptive Text
Through Flashcard
309
Aisya Hartati...
The Role of Teacher’s Training Model and Technological Approach to the
Improvement of Teachers’ Professionalis
312
Intan Sufiah Batubara...
The Difficulties of Students at the Second Year of St.Thomas 3 Senior High
School Medan in Translating English Idioms into Indonesian
315
Fitri Susi Sinurat...
The Effect Of Applying The Great Wind Blows Strategy On The Students’
Vocabulary Mastery
321
Gisca Irdayana Lubis...
Attitude of Examiners in Thesis Convocation
325
Mara Sutan Siregar...
Politeness Strategies in Mandailing Wedding Ceremony
329
39
The Effect of Cooperative Learning Models and Self
Efficacy on Student Mathematics Learning
Outcomes
Mathematics learning outcomes whose taught using STAD learning model with TPS learning model, how students’ Mathematics learning outcomes who have high self efficacy and low self efficacy, is there interaction between learning model and self efficacy to the students’ Mathematics learning outcomes. The population consisted of 314 students in the X MIPA grade of Medan 3 Senior High School in the second semester of 2017/2018 academic year and sample consisted of 74 students. The research method was quasi-experimental study using factorial 2x2 designs. The instrument used was Mathematics test which consist 35 multiple choices and instrument used was self efficacy which consist 30 questionnaire statements. The technique of data analysis using ANOVA two ways. The conclusion of the research are as follows: Students’ Mathematics learning outcomes whose taught using STAD learning model is higher than with students’ Mathematics learning outcomes taught using TPS learning model, Students’ Mathematics learning outcomes who have high self efficacy is higher than low self efficacy, There is learning between the use of learning model and self efficacy on learning outcomes.Keywords: Cooperative Learning Model, Learning Outcomes, Self Efficacy
1. INTRODUCTION
Education in schools is one very important path in order to improve the quality of Indonesian human resources. This was reinforced by the National Education System Law No. 20 of 2003 Chapter I general provisions of article I paragraph 1, stated that education is a conscious and planned effort to realize a learning atmosphere and learning process so that students actively develop their potential to have religious spiritual strength, self-control, personality, intelligence, noble character and the skills needed by him, the people of the nation
and the state. One of the educational problems faced in Indonesia is the low quality of education in secondary schools.
The low quality of education in secondary schools, especially mathematics learning due to learning has not been meaningful for students. Learning will be meaningful for students if the teacher is able to generate students' motivation for the lesson. Student motivation will grow if the teacher implements concepts in students can give more meaning to him. In mathematics learning, many students who are less interested in mathematics are caused by inappropriate mathematical characteristics. Therefore, teachers need to understand the characteristics of mathematics learning.
Based on interviews with teachers ofMedan 3 Senior High School that the basic mathematical abilities of students are still low, they often have difficulty in writing formulas that are appropriate to the problem, so that students also experience difficulties in communicating the completion process. In learning mathematics requires a good understanding of concepts, especially working on story problems in everyday life. This was supported by reports from the Third, which is currently the 2007 International Mathematics and Sciences Study Trends (TIMSS), Indonesia occupying 36 positions out of 49 countries.
In addition, it can also be seen in the implementation of the National Examination at the high school level of the Natural Sciences program in the last three years from TP 2012/2013 to 2014/2015 that the learning outcomes of mathematics at Medan 3 State Senior High School have not reached the Minimum Passing Criteria (KKM) which is 75. This problem has been attempted to be overcome, but the results have not been significant.
40 very influential on student learning outcomes. The use of
the right learning model will overcome the saturation of students in receiving mathematics lessons.
One effort to improve student learning outcomes and the quality of education is by applying innovative learning models. With innovative learning, it is expected that mathematics learning is not boring, involving the active role of students, creating a pleasant atmosphere and the interaction between students in learning. Learning models that demand active students in group form are cooperative learning models. According to Slavin (Isjoni 2011: 17) that cooperative learning is a learning model that has been known for a long time, at which time the teacher encourages students to work together in certain activities such as discussion or teaching by peers (peer teaching). In carrying out the teaching and learning process the teacher no longer dominates as usual at this time, so students are required to share information with other students and learn from each other and their fellow students.
Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) cooperative learning model is a cooperative learning model that emphasizes activities and interactions among students to motivate and help each other in mastering teacher learning material to achieve maximum results. According to Slavin (Trianto, 2014: 118) states that in the STAD model students this test they were not allowed to help each other.
In addition, the cooperative learning model type Think Pair Share (TPS). According to Trianto (2014: 129) is a type of cooperative learning designed to influence student interaction patterns. This learning model is not just working in groups but this model consists of three processes. The first is Think, in this process students will individually understand a material delivered by the teacher. Then Pair, in this process students pair up to share information about the material delivered by the teacher. Then the last is the Share stage, in this process students in groups consisting of 4 people do a collaboration.
In addition, teachers in teaching and learning activities in class emphasize the cognitive domain so that other skills are less developed. Based on PP No. 54 of 2013, to achieve graduation competency standards, students must have 3 dimensions, namely the dimensions of attitude, knowledge, and skills. In addition to the dimensions of knowledge there are also other dimensions that can affect the success of student learning, namely the attitude dimension in the form of self efficacy.
Self efficacy is the belief in an individual's ability to determine and carry out various actions needed to produce an achievement. Alwisol (2009: 287) defines self efficacy as an assessment, whether it can perform good and bad actions, right or wrong, can or does not work as required. Efficacy is different from aspirations (ideals), because ideals describe something ideal that should be achieved, while efficacy describes self-assessment. Self efficacy has an important
impact, even as the main motivator for one's success. By having self efficacy, someone will be more likely to do activities that he believes he can do rather than do work that they feel cannot be solved.
In the context of education, if students have self efficacy, they will be motivated to participate in learning activities so as to achieve learning goals and be able to survive when facing difficulties (assignments). According to Bandura (2008: 1) self efficacy will increase student success through two ways, namely, first, self-efficacy will foster an inner interest in activities that are considered attractive. Second, someone will manage themselves to achieve goals and be strongly committed.
But in reality, the importance of the role of self efficacy is not felt by some students. Sometimes students are considered that if they are smart they will always get good grades, and vice versa. In addition, when they will face challenges (tasks), some of them feel uncertain about their own abilities when facing the questions given by the teacher, they feel insecure if they have to compete with smarter friends, then they are not sure and not enthusiasm can work on increasingly difficult learning questions. Students tend to be shy and lack initiative to present their work because they are afraid of the wrong answers they say, they are not sure of the answers and the fear of getting bad grades if they are wrong in answering. The tendency to be ridiculed by classmates when one of the answers is also one of the causes.
In relation to the above, the purpose of this research is (1) to find out mathematics learning result student that is taught by Total Physical Response Method is higher than the result of learning English student which is taught by the Direct Method (2) to know the difference of mathematics learning result students who have visual learning style with English learning result of students who have auditory learning style (3) to know the interaction between learning method and student learning styles to English learning result.
II. METHOD
This research was conducted in Medan 3 State Senior High School having address at Jalan Budi Kemasyarakatan No. 54 in class Xth grade in the academic year 2017 / 2018. The population in this study is all students of class Xth grade Medan. The sampling technique in this research is by cluster random sampling technique, class Xth grade IPA 2 amounted to 36 students of the class given the learning with TPS Model and Xth grade IPA 8 amounted to 38 students of the class given the learning with STAD Model at Medan 3 State Senior High School.
41 with STAD cooperative learning model for students who have high self efficacy
A1B2 is the result of students' mathematics learning taught by TPS cooperative learning model for students who have high self efficacy
A2B1 is the result of students' mathematics learning taught with STAD cooperative learning model for students who have low self efficacy
A2B2 is the result of students' mathematics learning taught with TPS cooperative learning model for students who have low self efficacy
From the calculation of statistics above, the overall average mathematics learning outcomes of students taught by the STAD learning model (X ̅ = 29.7) are higher than the average
mathematics learning outcomes of students taught with TPS
learning model (X ̅ = 27.4). This shows that the STAD learning
model is proven to be more effective in improving students' overall mathematics learning outcomes both for groups of students with high self efficacy and low self efficacy. From these findings, it is shown that to teach mathematics is more effective using the STAD learning model than the TPS learning model.
If further noted that in the STAD learning model the average mathematics learning outcomes of students with high self-efficacy (X ,5 = 30.5) is better than the mathematics
learning outcomes of students with low self-efficacy (X ̅ =
27.4). Whereas in the TPS learning model, the average mathematics learning outcomes of students with high self
-efficacy (X ̅ = 28.7) were better than students' mathematics learning outcomes with low self-efficacy (X ̅ = 27.4). This shows that self efficacy is significant enough to distinguish student learning outcomes, where student learning outcomes with high self efficacy both taught with STAD learning models and TPS learning models (learning outcomes with high and low self efficacy without seeing the learning model) are better than student learning outcomes with low self efficacy.
The results showed that all the research hypotheses were: (1) students' mathematics learning outcomes taught by the STAD learning model were higher than students' learning outcomes taught by the TPS learning model, (2) students' mathematics learning outcomes with high self efficacy were higher than the results students 'mathematics learning with low self efficacy, and (3) there is an interaction between learning
models and self efficacy to influence the students' mathematics learning outcomes can be accepted by all three.
Fig 1. Data Analysis
The first hypothesis which states that mathematics learning outcomes between students taught with the STAD learning model gets an average score of 29.6 while the mathematics learning outcomes of students taught by the TPS learning model get an average score of 27.4. Students' mathematics learning outcomes that are taught by the STAD learning model are higher than the average scores of students who are taught by the TPS learning model. Which is strengthened by the results of the calculation of the Scheffe test. This shows that to teach mathematics lesson material it is better to use the STAD learning model compared to the TPS learning model. This is understandable because through the STAD learning model can encourage students to motivate and help each other in mastering the subject matter. Besides that the STAD learning model aims to instill mutual cooperation and help each other in solving problems, this mutual attitude is reflected in the learning process where in the STAD learning model students will compete with other students through the team. In the team, team members will try to help each other solve the problems presented, the mechanism for presenting material can be done with quizzes or presentation assignments. As stated by Gusniar (2013) states that learning models that are expected to foster collaboration, creative, critical thinking and the ability to help friends are STAD learning models.
The findings of this study are in line with the results of Wong's research, et al (2016) found that STAD cooperative learning techniques in mathematics learning can improve mathematics learning achievement. This study shows that STAD cooperative learning plays an important role as an active driver to improve mathematics learning achievement, then encourages students and teachers to be innovative and creative to improve teaching and learning mathematics in the classroom.
So it can be concluded that the use of the STAD learning model strongly encourages the improvement of mathematics learning outcomes and increases students' self-efficacy in independent learning in mathematics subjects.
The second hypothesis testing shows that students 'mathematics learning outcomes with high self efficacy are higher than students' mathematics learning outcomes with low self efficacy. This result proves that self efficacy is significant to distinguish mathematics learning outcomes. Self efficacy in
42 this study is categorized as high self efficacy and low self
efficacy. The results of the overall data analysis showed that the average mathematics learning outcomes of students with high self efficacy obtained an average score of 29.9 while the mathematics learning outcomes of students with low self efficacy obtained an average score of 27.2, so based on testing the second hypothesis it was proven that the low level of self efficacy has a significantly different effect on students' mathematics learning outcomes where Fcount>Ftable, so that for the research hypothesis the two Ha are accepted and H0 is rejected. This indicates that students with high self efficacy on average have mathematics learning outcomes good compared to students with low self efficacy. Thus students with high self efficacy better understand and master the subject matter of mathematics compared to students with low self efficacy.
From the third hypothesis testing there is an interaction between learning model and self efficacy in influencing students' mathematics learning outcomes. When viewed from the average learning outcomes of mathematics in the group of students with high self efficacy taught with STAD learning model is higher than the average learning outcomes of mathematics with a group of students with low self efficacy and taught with TPS learning models. Then the average of mathematics learning outcomes in the group of students with low self efficacy taught by the STAD learning model is lower than the average mathematics learning outcomes of students with low self efficacy who are taught by the TPS learning model. This means that for groups of students with high self efficacy it is better to use STAD learning models while students with low self efficacy are better taught using TPS learning models. This research is reinforced by previous research conducted by Yunianti, et al (2016) that there is an interaction between learning models and self efficacy towards students' mathematics learning outcomes.
Thus it can be concluded that the learning model and self efficacy significantly influence students' mathematics learning outcomes. Where students who have high self efficacy will tend to behave according to objects that can give high grades, therefore it can be said that students' mathematics learning outcomes are influenced by learning models and self efficacy, this shows that self efficacy factors are significant for differentiate student mathematics learning outcomes, where students 'mathematics learning outcomes with high self efficacy, both learned by applying STAD learning models and TPS learning models are higher than students' mathematics learning outcomes with low self efficacy.
III. CONCLUSION
First, Students 'mathematics learning outcomes that are taught by STAD learning models are higher than students' mathematics learning outcomes that are taught by the TPS learning model.
Secondly, Mathematics learning outcomes of students who have high self-efficacy are higher than the mathematics learning outcomes of students who have low self-efficacy.
Third, There is an interaction between learning models and self efficacy towards students' mathematics learning outcomes. Students who have high self efficacy are more appropriately taught by using the STAD learning model while for students who have low self efficacy are more appropriately taught by using the TPS learning model.
REFERENCES
[1] S. Arikunto. 2013. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
[2] Isjoni. 2009. Pembelajaran Kooperatif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. [3] W. Santrock. 2007. Psikologi Pendidikan.Jakarta: Kencana Prenada
Media Grup.
[4] Trianto. 2011. Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif-Progresif.
