• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

An Analysis on Modalities in Hillary Clinton's Speech

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "An Analysis on Modalities in Hillary Clinton's Speech"

Copied!
3
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

80 REFERENCES

Adawiah, Rabiatul. 2014. Modalities In Political Debate Discourse. Post Graduate

Program. Hasanuddin University. Makassar.

Bungin, Burhan. 2001. Metodologi Penelitian Sosial: Format - Format Kuantitatif

dan Kualitatif. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press.

Bungin, Burhan. 2007. Penelitian Kualitatif: Komunikasi, Ekonomi, Kebijakan

Publik, dan Ilmu Sosial lainnya. Edisi pertama, Cetakan ke- 2. Jakarta:

Kencana.

Creswell, John W. 2009. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed

Methods Approaches Third edition.USA: Sage publications, Inc.

Dixon, R.M.W. 2005.A Semantic Approach to English Grammar. Oxford University

Press. Oxford.

Eggins, Suzanne. 2004. An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistic. Great

Britain: Continuum Publisher.

Fairclough, Norman. 1989. Language and Power. USA: Longman Inc, New York.

Fairclough, Norman. 2003. Analysing Discourse- Textual Analysis for Social

Research Norman Fairclough. USA and Canada: Routledge.

Fontaine, Lise. 2013. Analysing English Grammar- A Systemic Functional

Introduction. USA: Cambridge University Press, New York.

Halliday, M.A.K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Second edition.

Edward Arnold Ltd. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

(2)

81

Halliday, M.A.K. 2002. Linguistic Studies of Text and Discourse. Volume 2.New

York: Continuum.

Halliday, M.A.K. 2003.On Language and Linguistics edited by J. Webster. Volume

three. London: Continuum.

Halliday, M.A.K and Matthiessen, C. 1999. Construing Experience Through

Meaning – A language – based Approach to Cognition. London: Continuum.

Halliday, M.A.K and Matthiessen, C. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar.

Third edition. Hodder Arnold. London.

Halliday, M.A.K. 2014. Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar revised by

Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen. Fourth edition. Hodder Education: Routledge.

Hatch, Evelyn Marcussen and I. Farhady. 1982. Research Design and Statistics for

Applied Linguistics.USA: Newbury House Publishers, Inc.

Holmes, Mohammad Dahan, et al. 2006. A Guide to Research in the Social Science.

Selangor, Malaysia: Prentice Hall.

July, 2016. PewResearch – Voter’s Perceptions of the Candidates: Traits, Ideology

and Impact on issues. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org. (14 July

2016).

Maanen, John Van. 1983. Qualitative Methodology. United States of America:

SAGE Publications Ltd.

Machin, David and Mayr, Andrea. 2012. How to Critical Discourse Analysis A

Multimodal Introduction. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

(3)

82

Mann, William. C and Thompson, Sandra. A. 1992. Discourse Description

Diverse Linguistic Analyses of A Fund-Raising Text. Amsterdam/Philadephia:

John Benjamins Publishing Company.

McCarthy, Michael. 1991. Discourse Analysis for Language Teachers. UK:

University Press, Cambridge.

Miles, Huberman and Saldana. 2014. Qualitative Data Analysis – A Methods

Sourcebook. Third Edition.USA: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Moleong, Lexy. 2002. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja

Rosdakarya.

October 2016. Aaron Blake. The final Trump-Clinton debate transcript, annotated 19

October 2016. Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump in Las Vegas. Retrieved

from http://www.uspresidentialelectionnews.com. (19 October 2016).

Siti Aisyah, Santi. 2012. Expression of Modality and Evaluation in Hillary Clinton’s

Speech. University of Pendidikan Indonesia. Bandung. repository.upi.edu.

Saragih, Amrin. 2006. Bahasa dalam Konteks Sosial. Program Pascasarjana

Universitas Negeri Medan.

Renkema, Jan. 2009. Discourse, of Course – An Overview of Research in Discourse

Studies. Amsterdam/Philadephia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Webster, Jonathan. 2015. Understanding Verbal Art – A Functional Linguistic

Approach. Springer-Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Having done a thorough analysis of Barrack Obama’s speech by using systemic functional grammar, I come to realize that the use of both textual meaning and ideational meaning is

This study employed a descriptive qualitative method especially textual analysis.The present study adopted Halliday’s (1994) theory of Systemic Functional Grammar as a

CHAPTER THREE: A TEXT ANALYSIS OF PRESIDENT BUSH’S SPEECH BY THE APPLICATION OF SYSTEMIC FUNCTIONAL GRAMMAR 3.1 Textual Meaning

This paper entitled Analysis of Prabowo’s Speech (A Study of Systemic Functional Grammar on Textual Metafunction) This paper is about Theme rheme and Thematic progression in Prabowo

Macquarie University: National Center for English Language and Research.. An Introduction to Systemic

English Education Department, Teacher Training and Education Faculty, Muria Kudus University.. Key words: Functional Grammar, Interpersonal Meaning, Mood, Speech

194 process of the Hallidayan Systemic Functional Grammar, which consisted of six types of processes; material, mental, relational, verbal, behavioural, and existential process.. The

1994 An introduction to Systemic Functional Grammar, London and New York: Continuum Halliday, M.A.K.. 1994 An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd