ASIAN HIGHWAY NETWORK IN INDONESIA

1

ASIAN HIGHWAY NETWORK IN

INDONESIA

The 4

The 4

th

th

_{Meeting of th Working Group on}

_{Meeting of th Working Group on}

the Asian Highway Priority Routes

the Asian Highway Priority Routes

2

Introduction:

Asian Highway (AH) Routes

Denpasar – Surabaya – Surakarta –Semarang –

Cikampek – Jakarta –Merak.

Ferry : Ketapang-Gilimanuk

AH-2 :

Banda Aceh – Medan – Dumai –Pekanbaru –

Jambi – Palembang –Bakauheni.

Ferry : Bakauheni – Merak.

AH-25 :

Non Toll Road

1,128 km.

Toll Road

409 km.

Ferry

8 km.

Non Toll Road

2,586 km

Toll Road

- km.

Ferry

26 km.

Notes : AH-2 ~ same alignment as AH-2 in Asean Highway .

AH-25 ~ same alignment as AH-25 in Asean Highway.

Banda Aceh Medan Dumai Pekanbaru Jambi Palembang Lampung Bakauheni Serang Merak Jakarta Bandung Cikampek Tegal _Semarang Surakarta Yogyakarta Surabaya Banyuwangi Denpasar Menggala Lhokseumawe Kisaran Rantauprapat Rengat To Singapore AH-25 AH-2 Ferry Route

Legend

(Road by AH-Code)

Sibolga Padang Batam Bengkulu Pangkalpinang

A

H

-25

AH - 2

3

Government Policy

on Development & Maintenance of AH Routes

Notes : AH-2 ~ same alignment as AH-2 in Asean Highway .

AH-25 ~ same alignment as AH-25 in Asean Highway.

Banda Aceh Medan Dumai Pekanbaru Jambi Palembang Lampung Bakauheni Serang Merak Jakarta Bandung Cikampek Tegal _Semarang Surakarta Yogyakarta Surabaya Banyuwangi Denpasar Menggala Lhokseumawe Kisaran Rantauprapat Rengat 14 m (4 lane) 7 m (2 lane) 6 m ( 2 lane)

Legend

(Road by Minimum

Width of Design)

Sibolga Padang Batam Bengkulu Pangkalpinang

A

H

-25

AH - 2

Strategy

•

The optimization of existing road network and its operation

•

Widening the links to reach the minimum standard

•

Quality improvement of the links to desirable service level

•

The priority will be according to the following order : crossing

border, provision of proper road signs and road marking, technical

standard adjustment, road safety and the development of missing

links.

Mid-Term National Development Plan

•

Capacity Expansion of Eastern Trunk Road of Sumatera (where the majority

of AH-25 laid on) with minimum width 7 m.

•

Capacity Expansion of North Coast Trunk Road of Java (where AH-2 laid on

from Jakarta to Semarang) with minimum width 14 m.

•

Capacity Expansion of Middle Trunk Road of Java (where AH-2 laid on from

Surakarta to Surabaya) and continue to Banyuwangi via North Coast Trunk

Road with minimum width 7m.

•

Capacity Expansion of Southern Trunk Road of Bali (where AH-2 laid on

from Gilimanuk to Denpasar) with minimum width 6 m.

New Policies

•

Stipulation of eastern trunk road of Sumatera, some parts of North Coast

Trunk road of Java and all parts of Southern Trunk Road of Bali as part of

Six Economic Corridor

z

z

z

z

z

#

z

z

z

z

z

z

z

z

z

z

z

z

z

z

z

~

~

~

~

~

›

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

Jambi

Medan

Padang

Serang

Bandung

JAKARTA

Mataram

Bengkulu

Denpasar

Semarang

Surabaya

Palembang

Pekanbaru

Pontianak

Sa

Banda Aceh

Yogyakarta

Banjarmasin

Palangkaraya

Pangkalpinang

Bandar Lampung

Tanjung Pinang

Current Status of AH Network

Condition on June 2011

•

In General, Road Condition of AH Route are relatively good. More

than 93 % are in stable condition which mean there shouldn’t be

any obstacle using the road anytime, any weather. The driver may

run up to 60 km/hr in flat terrain on uncongested traffic.

•

The Fewer bad condition laid on north Sumatera and

Pemalang-Tegal, while the other poor laid on Jambi, Southern Sumatera and

Cirebon-Brebes.

Notes : AH-2 ~ same alignment as AH-2 in Asean Highway .

AH-25 ~ same alignment as AH-25 in Asean Highway.

A

H

-25

AH - 2

Legend

(Road by Average of

Condition)

0.001 - 4

4.001 - 8

8.001 - 12

12.001 - 100

Good

Fair

Poor

Bad

Good

Fair

Bad

AH2

       

882.68

       

618.80

         

36.01

AH25

       

968.91

   

1,445.70

       

171.74

Grand Total

   

1,851.58

   

2,064.50

       

207.75

Good

Fair

Bad

AH2

57%

40%

2%

AH25

37%

56%

7%

Grand Total

45%

50%

5%

Condition (Km)

AH‐Route

AH‐Route

Condition (%)

z

z

z

z

z

#

z

z

z

z

z

z

z

z

z

z

z

z

z

z

z

~

~

~

~

~

›

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

Jambi

Medan

Padang

Serang

Bandung

JAKARTA

Mataram

Bengkulu

Denpasar

Semarang

Surabaya

Palembang

Pekanbaru

Pontianak

Sa

Banda Aceh

Yogyakarta

Banjarmasin

Palangkaraya

Pangkalpinang

Bandar Lampung

Tanjung Pinang

Current Status of AH Network

Width of Carriage Way on June 2011

•

The most advanced route by the capacity point of view, is AH

Route No.2 that laid from Merak to Semarang which almost all

the road already meet 14 m.

•

The Java Island itself, all the road already has minimum width

7 m.

•

In order to meet government policy where the eastern trunk

road of Sumatera should have minimum width 7 m, there are

still several homework which scattered along the route, but

the most are Riau and Lampung.

Notes : AH-2 ~ same alignment as AH-2 in Asean Highway .

AH-25 ~ same alignment as AH-25 in Asean Highway.

Legend

(Road by Average of

Width of Carriageway)

0.1 - 4.499

4.5 - 5.499

5.5 - 5.999

6 - 6.999

7 - 13.999

14 - 100

< 4.5 m

4.5 – 5.5 m

5.5 – 6 m

6 – 7 m

7 – 14 m

>= 14 m

A

H

-25

AH - 2

*) the data is only covered non-toll road

< 4.5 m

4.5 ‐ 6 m

6 ‐ 7 m

7 ‐ 14 m

>= 14 m

AH2

       

‐

       

10.57

       

59.07

       

600.83

       

867.01

AH25

       

1.50

      

‐

       

862.84

      

1,593.44

       

128.57

Grand Total

      

1.50

       

10.57

       

921.92

      

2,194.27

       

995.58

< 4.5 m

4.5 ‐ 6 m

6 ‐ 7 m

7 ‐ 14 m

>= 14 m

AH2

0%

1%

4%

39%

56%

AH25

0.1%

0%

33%

62%

5%

Grand Total

0%

0%

22%

53%

24%

Carriageway Width (Km)

Carriageway Width (%)

AH‐Route

AH‐Route

Current Status of AH Network

Major On-Going Projects 2011

z

z

z

z

z

#

z

z

z

z

z

z

z

z

z

z

z

z

z

z

z

z

z

z

~

~

~

~

~

›

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

Jambi Medan Mamuju Padang Serang Bandung JAKARTA Mataram Bengkulu Denpasar Makassar Semarang Surabaya Palembang Pekanbaru Pontianak Samarinda Banda Aceh Yogyakarta Banjarmasin Palangkaraya Pangkalpinang Bandar Lampung Tanjung Pinang - AH Code : AH-25 - AH No. : 5 - Link No. : 005.1

- Link Name : BTS. KOTA LHOKSEUMAWE - PANTON LABU/SIMPANG (KM 328) - Capacity Expansion Cost (mil Rp) : 45000000

- Betterment Cost (mil Rp) : 0 - Rehabillitation Cost (mil Rp) : 0

- AH Code : AH-25 - AH No. : 7 - Link No. : 006

- Link Name : BTS. KOTA LANGSA - BTS. PROV. SUMUT - Capacity Expansion Cost (mil Rp) : 45000000 - Betterment Cost (mil Rp) : 0

- Rehabillitation Cost (mil Rp) : 0

- AH Code : AH-25 - AH No. : 26 - Link No. : 021

- Link Name : PEMATANG REBA - SIBERIDA - Capacity Expansion Cost (mil Rp) : 27450000 - Betterment Cost (mil Rp) : 4021109 - Rehabillitation Cost (mil Rp) : 3958500

- AH Code : AH-25 - AH No. : 27 - Link No. : 028

- Link Name : BTS. PROV. RIAU - MERLUNG - Capacity Expansion Cost (mil Rp) : 200000000 - Betterment Cost (mil Rp) : 0

- Rehabillitation Cost (mil Rp) : 0

- AH Code : AH-25 - AH No. : 34 - Link No. : 015

- Link Name : SIMPANG INDRALAYA - MERANJAT - Capacity Expansion Cost (mil Rp) : 7890000 - Betterment Cost (mil Rp) : 0

- Rehabillitation Cost (mil Rp) : 0

- AH Code : AH-25 - AH No. : 36 - Link No. : 013.1

- Link Name : BUJUNG TENUK - TERBANGGI BESAR - Capacity Expansion Cost (mil Rp) : 56573430 - Betterment Cost (mil Rp) : 0

- Rehabillitation Cost (mil Rp) : 0

- AH Code : AH-2 - AH No. : 29 - Link No. : 013

- Link Name : BTS. KOTA CIREBON - LOSARI (BTS. PROV. JATENG) - Capacity Expansion Cost (mil Rp) : 0

- Betterment Cost (mil Rp) : 51569964 - Rehabillitation Cost (mil Rp) : 0

Vol (Km)

Cost (mil. Rp)

Vol (Km)

Cost (mil. Rp)

Vol (Km)

Cost (mil. Rp)

AH‐2

      

10

      

95,243,674

       

49

      

212,578,499

       

45

      

127,167,805

AH‐25

      

284

      

1,209,975,462

       

22

      

77,980,418

       

96

      

124,717,035

Grand Total

      

295

      

1,305,219,136

       

71

       

290,558,917

       

140

       

251,884,840

Capacity Expansion

AH‐Code

Betterment/Reconstruction

Rehabillitation/Periodic Maint.

g

<= 6 Bil Rp

6 - 20 Bil Rp

20 - 45 Bil Rp

45 - 90 Bil Rp

> 90 Bil Rp

g

<= 6 Bil Rp

6 - 20 Bil Rp

20 - 45 Bil Rp

45 - 90 Bil Rp

> 90 Bil Rp

Future Priority Projects 2012

z

z

z

z

z

#

z

z

z

z

z

z

z

z

z

z

z

z

z

z

z

z

z

z

~

~

~

~

~

›

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

Jambi Medan Mamuju Padang Serang Bandung JAKARTA Mataram Bengkulu Denpasar Makassar Semarang Surabaya Palembang Pekanbaru Pontianak Samarinda Banda Aceh Yogyakarta Banjarmasin Palangkaraya Pangkalpinang Bandar Lampung Tanjung Pinang - AH Code : AH-25 - AH No. : 5 - Link No. : 005.2

- Link Name : PANTON LABU - SP PEUREULAK - Rehabillitation Cost (mil Rp) : 0

- Betterment Cost (mil Rp) : 25000000 - Capacity Expansion Cost (mil Rp) : 25000000 - AH Code : AH-25

- AH No. : 7 - Link No. : 006

- Link Name : LANGSA - BTS.SUMUT - Rehabillitation Cost (mil Rp) : 0 - Betterment Cost (mil Rp) : 0

- Capacity Expansion Cost (mil Rp) : 51188000

- AH Code : AH-25 - AH No. : 30 - Link No. : 002.2

- Link Name : BTS. KODYA (MANDALA) - MUARA BULIAN - Rehabillitation Cost (mil Rp) : 8901912

- Betterment Cost (mil Rp) : 22500000 - Capacity Expansion Cost (mil Rp) : 30000000

- AH Code : AH-25 - AH No. : 21 - Link No. : 006.2

- Link Name : KANDIS - DURI - Rehabillitation Cost (mil Rp) : 3000000 - Betterment Cost (mil Rp) : 9750000 - Capacity Expansion Cost (mil Rp) : 31075000

Vol (Km)

Cost (mil. Rp)

Vol (Km)

Cost (mil. Rp)

Vol (Km)

Cost (mil. Rp)

AH‐2

      

57

      

258,723,145

       

145

      

535,996,196

       

69

      

109,375,315

AH‐25

      

163

      

683,989,972

       

70

      

250,089,300

       

85

      

170,388,912

Grand Total

      

220

       

942,713,117

       

215

       

786,085,496

       

154

       

279,764,227

AH‐Code

Capacity Expansion

Betterment/Reconstruction

Rehabillitation/Periodic Maint.

g

<= 6 Bil Rp

6 - 20 Bil Rp

20 - 45 Bil Rp

45 - 90 Bil Rp

> 90 Bil Rp

g

<= 6 Bil Rp

6 - 20 Bil Rp

20 - 45 Bil Rp

45 - 90 Bil Rp

> 90 Bil Rp

9

Programme of Road Signs Installation

4.25 BILLION RUPIAH

2010 -2011

2. AH-25 (450 UNIT DIRECTIONAL

SIGNS AND 550 UNIT SINGLE

SIGNS)

2.5 BILLION RUPIAH

2008 - 2009

1. AH-2 (250 UNIT DIRECTIONAL

SIGNS AND 300 UNIT SINGLE

SIGNS)

6.75 BILLION RUPIAH

TOTAL COST

COST ESTIMATION

TIME

PLANNED

ASIAN HIGHWAY ROUTE

CIREBON

1

PURWAKARTA

4

1

PRESENTLY INSTALLED

AH2

CIREBON

1

PURWAKARTA

4

AH2

AH2

AH25

PROPOSED TO BE INSTALLED

10

Sample of Installed Directional Signs

ROUTE

NUMBERING

IN INDONESIA

National Road Safety Master Plan

(NRSMP) 2011 – 2035

AH‐Code

RSA

Blackspot

Total

AH‐2

9

13

22

AH‐25

2

14

16

In the road design projects, Directorate General of Highway (DGH) has been considering safety,

such as on EINRIP projects and SRIP projects as part of National Road Safety Master Plan

(NRSMP) 2011 – 2035.

Following the step above, DGH has been carrying out Road Safety Audit (RSA) including in

detailed design stage, road work, and pre-opening stage.Road safety audit identified a range of

issues that will potentially affect the safety of users of the road when the works are completed.

DGH has the Strategic Plan to reduce the number of hazardous locations in Indonesia. Directorate

General of Highways (DGH) have done Crash Reduction Investigation and prepared the

countermeasures to address road safety issues at the East Corridor in Sumatra (Bakauheni to

Banda Aceh via Palembang) and the North Coast Road in Java (Cilegon to Banyuwangi via

Jakarta and Surabaya). Respectively these corridors are 1800 Km and 1200 Km long. DGH had

collect crash data from Indonesian National Traffic Police before doing the investigation.

Monitoring Road Safety Audit And

Blackspot Investigation Report

Concluding Remarks

•

Asian Highway in Indonesia at this time continues to progress

and is expected to reach the target at the end of 2014, where

the AH-25 will have a standard class II and AH-2 of the

Merak-Cikampek already be Primary class, Merak-Cikampek-Semarang as

Class I and Semarang-Surabaya-Banywangi as Class II and

Gilimanuk Denpasar as Class III.

•

Various development cooperation and the improvement of road

infrastructure needs to be done to accelerate the achievement

of standards

•

Asian highway network availability is less meaningful without

being followed by various facilities in co-operation of traffic

and inter-modal transportation.

13