H G U O R H T D E T C E L F E R S A Y G O L O E D I R A W S ’ Y O T S L O T
N I D A R U M I J D A H F O N O I T A Z I R E T C A R A H C E H T
S ’ Y O T S L O
T HADJ IMURAD
S I S E H T E T A U D A R G R E D N U N A
s t n e m e ri u q e R e h t f o t n e m ll if l u F l a it r a P s a d e t n e s e r P
a rt s a S a n a jr a S f o e e r g e D e h t r o f
s r e tt e L h s il g n E n i
y
B
A
b
r
a
m
W
i
d
i
W
i
b
a
w
a
0
:
r
e
b
m
u
N
t
n
e
d
u
t
S
6
4
2
1
4
0
8
4
E
M
A
R
G
O
R
P
Y
D
U
T
S
S
R
E
T
T
E
L
H
S
I
L
G
N
E
S
R
E
T
T
E
L
H
S
I
L
G
N
E
F
O
T
N
E
M
T
R
A
P
E
D
S
R
E
T
T
E
L
F
O
Y
T
L
U
C
A
F
Y
T
I
S
R
E
V
I
N
U
A
M
R
A
H
D
A
T
A
N
A
S
A
T
R
A
K
A
Y
G
O
Y
i
H G U O R H T D E T C E L F E R S A Y G O L O E D I R A W S ’ Y O T S L O T
N I D A R U M I J D A H F O N O I T A Z I R E T C A R A H C E H T
S ’ Y O T S L O
T HADJ IMURAD
S I S E H T E T A U D A R G R E D N U N A
s t n e m e ri u q e R e h t f o t n e m ll if l u F l a it r a P s a d e t n e s e r P
a rt s a S a n a jr a S f o e e r g e D e h t r o f
s r e tt e L h s il g n E n i
y
B
A
b
r
a
m
W
i
d
i
W
i
b
a
w
a
0
:
r
e
b
m
u
N
t
n
e
d
u
t
S
6
4
2
1
4
0
8
4
E
M
A
R
G
O
R
P
Y
D
U
T
S
S
R
E
T
T
E
L
H
S
I
L
G
N
E
S
R
E
T
T
E
L
H
S
I
L
G
N
E
F
O
T
N
E
M
T
R
A
P
E
D
S
R
E
T
T
E
L
F
O
Y
T
L
U
C
A
F
Y
T
I
S
R
E
V
I
N
U
A
M
R
A
H
D
A
T
A
N
A
S
A
T
R
A
K
A
Y
G
O
Y
ii
v i
d
e
v
o
l
e
b
y
m
o
t
v
T N E M E G D E L W O N K C
A S
r o f k n a h t o t e k il d l u o w
I Jesu sCh irs twhose name Imeniton i n my hear t e
m it y r e v
e Ineed to remembe rthe existance o fa bigge rpowe rabove mysefl . k
n a h
T uy o fo ralway sbeingi nmymind . k
n a h t h c u m y r e
V Ihavet o say t o my advisor ,Drs .HrimawanWjianarka , .
M Humwhodoe sno tonlycareabou tmyt hesisbu tmoitvate smeal o ta swel.l A .
s r M o t o s l a k n a h t h c u m y r e v y a s o t e v a
h AdvenitnaPu rtanit .S .S .M .Hum .who d
n a d a e r o t e m it r e h n e v i g s a
h revisemyt hesis.
r g e h
T eatestt hank saref o rmyf amliy .Tomyf ather ,Ttiu sHarnoWibowo , r
e h t o m y m o T . w o n m a I o h w e b n a c I t a h t o s e c i v d a r u o y r o f u o y k n a h t
I andmy
) s e m it e m o s ( d n e ir
f ,Sunarit , rfo alwayss uppo tri ngmewtihl oveandcare .Also,t o e
lt ti l y
m brother and sister ,Diraz Tira sMoro Jait da n Nindya Kurniawait fo r g
n i e b s y a w l
a g do o f irends and enemi esa thome. I t hankfo reverysuppo trtha tal l .
e fi l y m f o t s e r e h t r o f e r u s a e rt s u o i c e r p e h t e b l li w t I . e m o t e v i g u o y f o
e r a s k n a h t g i
B alsopresente d toV ,ia C irsitnaLavian iTinambunan. a s the tr
o p p u s s a h o h w e n
o e ed m in every stiuaiton .To ym f irend sin Media Sasrta , W
, ij u m h a W , h u g e T s a e r d n
A ahyu Ginitng ,SugengUtomo ,etc, they aret heman s
e h c a e t o h
w memoreabou thow i sl fie. Fo rAlw iandallf irend swho helped me e
z i n a g r o o
t theforma tand gramma;r Acong ,dama,r I bank ,and f o rmyf irendsi n .
6 0 0 2 s r e tt e L h s il g n
E I tha sbeenf abulou sitmes pen twtihyouall .
i v
Y T I L A N I G I R O F O T N E M E T A T S
h
I oneslty declared tha t thi s thesis , Tolstoy’ s War Ideology a s Re lfected Through the Charateriza iton o fHadj iMurad in Tolstoy’ sHadj iMurad ,
r e h t o f o k r o w e h t f o s tr a p f o k r o w e h t n i a t n o c t o n s e o d , n e tt ir w e v a h I h c i h w
t o u q e h t n i d e ti c e s o h t t p e c x e , e l p o e
p aiton sand references ,a sscienit ifc pape r .
d l u o h s
, a tr a k a y g o
Y 20J anuary2013
ii v
N A U J U T E S R E P N A A T A Y N R E P R A B M E L
S I M E D A K A N A G N I T N E P E K K U T N U H A I M L I A Y R A K I S A K I L B U P
: a m r a h D a t a n a S a w s i s a h a m , a y a s ,i n i h a w a b i d n a g n a t a d n a tr e b g n a Y
a m a
N :AbramWid iWibawa
a w s i s a h a M r o m o
N :064214084
n a k ir e b m e m a y a s , n a u h a t e g n e p u m li n a g n a b m e n e p i m e
D kepada
Perpustakaan Universtia s Sanata Dharma karya limiah saya yang bejrudul : “ lTostoy’ s Wa r Ideology a s Relfected Through the Charateirzaiton o fHadj i
s ’ y o t s l o T n i d a r u
M Hadj iMurad”besetraperangka tyangdipe lrukan.
s a ti s r e v i n U n a a k a t s u p r e P a d a p e k a y a s n a k ir e b m e m a y a s n a i k i m e d n a g n e D
a m r a h D a t a n a
S hak untuk menyimpan ,mengailhkan dalam bentuk media lain , n a d , s a t a b r e t a r a c e s n a k i s u b ir t s i d n e m , a t a d n a l a k g n a p k u t n e b m a l a d a y n a l o l e g n e m
s i m e d a k a n a g n it n e p e k k u t n u n i a l a i d e m i d u a t a t e n r e t n i i d a y n n a k i s a k il b u p m e m
a y a s a d a p e k i tl a y o r n a k ir e b m e m n u p u a t a a y a s i r a d n i z i a t n i m e m u lr e p a p n a t
e
s lamat etapmencantumkannamas ayas ebaga ipenuil .s
. a y n r a n e b e s n a g n e d t a u b a y a s g n a y i n i n a a t a y n r e p n a i k i m e D
a tr a k a y g o Y i d t a u b i D
l a g g n a t a d a
P 20Januair2013
, n a k a t a y n e m g n a Y
ii i v
S T N E T N O C F O E L B A T
L T I
T EPAGE………………………………………………………….. i V
O R P P
A ALPAGE………………………………………………….. ii .. …
… … … … E G A P E C N A T P E C C
A ……………………………........ .. i ii …
… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … E G A P N O I T A C I D E
D … iv .
W O N K C
A LEDGEMENTS……………………………………………. v Y
T I L A N I G I R O F O T N E M E T A T
S ……… iv
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . N A A T A Y N R E P R A B M E
L v i i
E L B A
T OFCONTENTS…………………………………………….… iv ii A
R T S B
A CT…………………………………………………………….. x B
A STRAK………………………………………………………………. xi
N O I T C U D O R T N I : I R E T P A H
C ………. 1
.
A Backgroundoft heStudy……… 1 .
B Problem sFormulaiton……… 8 .
C Objecitve soft heStudy………. .8 .
D De ifniitono fTerms………... 8
I I R E T P A H
C :THEORETICALREVIEW……….... 11 .
A Reviewo fRelatedStudie s……….. 11 .
B Reviewo fRelatedTheo ire s……… 14 .
1 Theoryof Characte randCha treirzaiton………... 14 .
2 Tolstoy’ sBiography...………... 02 .
C Theoreitca lFramework……….. 22
Y G O L O D O H T E M : I I I R E T P A H
C ……….. 42
.
A Objec toft heStudy………. 42 .
B Approachoft heStudy……….……….. 52 .
C Methodoft heStudy………. 7..2
S I S Y L A N A : V I R E T P A H
C ……… 82 .
A TheCharacteirzaitonoft heMainCharacter. ... 82 .
1 Physica lCharacteirsitc so fMurad………... 82 .
2 Murad’ sPersonaltiy…………... 31 .
a Courageu s... 31 .
b No tAfraido fDeath ... 83 .
c Affecitonate ... 24 .
d Raitonal. ... 44 .B Hadj iMurada saRe lfecitono fTolstoy……... 94
u M .
1 rada saMolodet s... 05 ..
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. t s if i c a P a s a d a r u M .
x i
V R E T P A H
C :CONCLUSION………... 45
Y H P A R G O I L B I
B ………. 95
I D N E P P
A X………. ... 06 …
… … … … … … … … … … … y r o t S e h t f o s i s p o n y
1 I R E T P A H C
N O I T C U D O R T N I
.
A Backgroundoft heStudy
8 1 e h t n
I - 91 thcentury ,Russiawa sabigcounrty .Russiacolonized Poland ,
e n o s a w a y n h c e h C n i r a w s u s a c u a C . a i s A n i s e ir t n u o c r e h t o d n a , e n i a r k U
e h t e r e w l i m a h S d n a , t a z m a G , h a ll o M y z a h G . e l p m a x
e Chechen who tired to
c n a t s i s e r e k a
m e .Shami lwa sthe heroic one .He co uld defense from Russian
0 4 8 1 n i d e n e p p a h t a h T . v o t s n o r o V y b d e l s a w h c i h w k c a tt
a -1843 .Merged wtih
h t li m a h S , n e h c e h C e h
t e y won a wa ra tTha tFew big-itme .“Thecapture of t he
’r e t h g if m o d e e r f‘ m il s u
M Shamli ,in 1859 may be seen a sthe beginning o fthe
. ) 1 4 : 6 0 0 2 : n e v e i L ( ” r e w o p n a i s s u R o t e c n e t s i s e r d e m r a e v it c a r o f d n e
f o r e d a e l e h t h ti w t c il f n o c l a n r e t n i e h T . g n o l t o n s a w y r o l g e h t r e v e w o H
s s e l h t u r s ’l i m a h S . t c il f n o c s u o ir e s a e m a c e b d n a 0 4 8 1 n i d e tr a t s r e y a r p l a n u m m o c
e d a m l a d u e
f the mountaineer sangry .The socia lcon rtadiciton also grew and
a F e h t n e h T . e t u c a e m a c e
b rmersl eaveShami lslowly .Thei nterna lconfilc twhich
9 5 8 1 n I . s w o ll e f s ’l i m a h S y b n o il l e b e r e h t e d a m o s l a a y n h c e h C n i d e n e p p a h
s a w d n a 4 6 8 1 l it n u d e n e p p a h r a w s u s a c u a C e h T . a i s s u R y b d e t s e r r a s a w l i m a h S
. n o it a r a l c e d s 'r a s T e h t y b d e d n e
n o l o c e h t s e d i s e
B izaiton ,Russia had also produced a numbe ro fwrtier s
r e ti r w s u o m a f e h t f o e n O . ii k s v e o d O . F . V d n a n i k s u P s a h c u
s wa sTolstoy .Coun t
s a w e H . w o n l li t a r e s i h n i r e ti r w s u o m a f a s a w y o t s l o T h c i v e y a l o k i N ) o e L ( v e L
a n a y l o P a y a n s a Y n i , 8 2 8 1 , 8 2 t s u g u A n o n r o
s i h n I . y o t s l o T e b ir c s e d o t t n e m e t a t s a e v a g n o it c u d o rt n i s i h n i r e o T . S h a l a s e o K
y o t s l o T w e i v f o t n i o
p wa sa patiroitc man fo rhi snaiton .Remembe rtha the
3 5 8 1 ( r a w m ir K o t t n e w y li r a t n u l o
v -1856)t ha tassistedt heB iritshagains tTurkey ,
r e b m e m e R .. . a i n i d r a S d n a e c n a r
F themasterpieceVoina Imrin (Wa rand Peace) ,
t a h
t told abou t peopl 'e svictory in fending of f Russian mlitiary invasion o f
n o e l o p a
N .
A tfert heCirmean War( 1854-55) ,hebuli tand organizedove r20 school s
d n a e c n a ll i e v r u s n a g e b e c il o p t e r c e s e h t e m it t a h t t A . a i s s u R n i e l p o e p r o o p r o f
sought hi shome .In 1862 ,he marired So ifa Andreevna Bers ,and fathered 13
e h t d e s i a r e l p u o c e h t d n a , d e i d s e i b a b r i e h t f o r u o F . e fi w s i h h ti w n e r d li h c
o s l a d n a , y r a t e r c e s y r a r e ti l s i h o s l a s a w e fi w s i H . n e r d li h c e n i n g n i n i a m e r
, s k r o w t s e b s i h o t d e t u b ir t n o
c "Wa rand Peace"(1863-69 )and "Anna Karenina"
3 7 8 1
( -77) . In "Confes ison" (1879 ) Tolstoy revealed hi s own version o f
. s r e w o ll o f y n a m m i h n o w t a h t m s il a i c o s h ti w d e d n e l b , y ti n a it s ir h C
o t e c it s u j l a i c o s r o f g n il l a c , r a s T e h t o t r e tt e l a e t o r w y o t s l o T 2 0 9 1 n I
o s s u R e h t g n ir u d , 4 0 9 1 n i d n a , r a w l i v i c a t n e v e r
p -JapaneseWar ,Tolstoywrotea
n o e c n a ll i e v r u s e c il o p g n i s a e r c n i y b d e il p e r r a s T e h T . r a w f o n o it a n m e d n o c
a f o h t a p e h t g n i k a t y l b a b o r p , e t a t s e s i h t f e l e h 0 1 9 1 f o r e b m e v o N n I . y o t s l o T
w e m o h t f e l e H . s e d a c e d r o f g n i u s r u p n e e b d a h e h h c i h w , c it e c s a g n ir e d n a
w tihou t
, n i a rt a k o o t d n a s n o it a n a l p x
e anddiedatt her emotestaitono fAstopovobecause
a i n o m u n p f
o .Hewa sburireda thi sestate.
e r u t a r e ti l f o s k r o w s ’ y o t s l o T f o e n
O w sa Hadj iMurad .The story t do l
, a y n h c e h C d n a a i s s u R n e e w t e b t c il f n o c e h t t u o b
t s i n o g a t o r
p character .Tolstoy wrotet hebook atfe rhej oined a war i n Caucasu ,s
Chechnya in 1851 .Tolstoy wrote Hadj iMurad between 1896–1904 bu ti twa s
. k r o w l a n if s ’ y o t s l o T s a w t I . 2 1 9 1 n i y l s u o m u h t s o p d e h s il b u p
b g n i h t o n e n o d e v a h I
“ u tcopy ou tHadj iMurad’ ,countes sTolstoy wrote ”
h t a e d s d n a b s u h r e h e r o f e b r a e y a , 9 0 9 1 n i l a n r u o j r e h n
i (Tolstoy:2003:8 )
d a r u M i j d a
H wa sa rtue story ,and the character swere actua lpersons ,
fl e s m i h d a r u M d n a , ) a i s s u R f o r a s T ( s a l o k i N , li m a h S g n i d u l c n
i .Du irng the
y r u t n e c h t n e e t e n i
n ,Russia wa sa big counrty tha tcolonized some count ire sin
. a i s A d n a e p o r u
E Thi snovelt old tha tRussiacolonized Caucasus ,apar to fAsia .
t u o b a d l o t y l n o m m o c s k r o w e r u t a r e ti l e h t , d n u o r g k c a b l a i c o s a s a r a w e h t h ti W
e u s s
i relatedt o war ,such a snaitonailsm ,pat iroitsm ,ort hewa r tisefl .By w iritng
d a r u M i j d a
H ,Tolstoywantedt os howhisi deologyi nwa.r
t n a n g u p e r w o h l e e f s u s e k a m y o t s l o T ‘ d i a s e d u a M r e m l y
A to him were
fl e s d n a s s e n h s if l e s s ti h ti w " , d e s il i v i c " l l a c e w e fi l e h t f o s y a w y r a m o t s u c e h
t
-’ e c n e g l u d n
i (Tolstoy :2003 :17) .Hadj iMurad impilcilty showe d how Russian
y ti r o h t u
a a dcte topeoplei nChechnyaandpeople ilvedi nt hemountains .
d a r u M i j d a
H , Tolstoy’ snove l rtanslated by Koesalah Soebagyo Toer ,
:l e v o n e h t f o e c a f e r p e h t n i e t o r w
m a l a
d Hadj iMurat ia jusrtu mengetengahkan tokoh Haj i Murat dar i a d a r e b u ti u t k a w g n a y a i s u R n a w a l e m , n a a k e d r e m e k a t n i c g n a y a y n h c e h C
) 5 e g a p ; r e o T . S h a l a s e o K ( .I i a l o k i N r a s T n a a s a u k e k h a w a b i d
m o d e e r f s e v o l o h w n e h c e h C m o r f d a r u M i j d a H d e r o l p x e s a w e
h ,agains t
” I i a l o k i N r a s T f o e l u r e h t r e d n u t a h t s n a i s s u R e h
t (KoesalahS .Toer ;page
t a h t d a r u M f o c it s ir e t c a r a h c a s a w m o d e e r f s e v o l o h w n o s r e p a d n a t o ir t a p A
t n a w r e o T . S h a l a s e o
K e d to show i n hisi nrtoduciton o fHaj iMurad (Indonesian
.) n o i s r e
v Whlieatt ha titme ,Chechnyawa sunde rattackedbyRussia.
y n a d n o y e b s e o g t a h t y ti l a u q a , y t a h p m e s i d a r u M i j d a H o t y e k e h t “
) 2 1 : 3 0 0 2 : y o t s l o T ( ” ,s e ir a d n u o b l a r u tl u c r o , l a i c o s ,l a c it il o p
t n a w r e h c r a e s e r e h t ,t x e t n o c t a h t n o d e s a
B e d to analyzewha tkind of j usitceand
y ti n a m u
h ,the researche rthough tthat Tolstoy wanted to share wtih the reader s
e h t h g u o r h
t Hadj iMuradnov e.l
o t d e lf d n a ) li m a h S ( r e d a e l s i h h ti w d e li t s o h o h w n e h c e h C a , d a r u M i j d a H
d a r u M . y t e f a s r o f a i s s u
R used a moderate way to solve hi sproblem ,wtihou t
e H . r a w a g n i k a
m came to Russia ,aske d fo rhelp ,and watie d there .Severa l
months l ater ,whlie attempitng t o rescuehi sfamliy from Shami’l sp irson ;Hadj i
e s o h t y b d e u s r u p s a w d a r u
M whomhebertayed ,a tfe r ifgh itng ,hedied .
t s e r e t n i e h
T i ng thing i n Murad’ s story was et h reilgiou sfervo ro fsefl
-e h t d n a n o it a g e n b
a wliilngness fo rsefl-sacirifcet o hi sbeloved .Throughou tthe
t n e s e r p e r d a r u M , l e v o
n e d a man who loved peace ,jusitce ,and humanism and
d n a l i m a h S n e e w t e b g n i d n a t S . y ti l a n o it a n n a h t t n a tr o p m i e r o m m e h t s r e d i s n o c
. r a w n o y g o l o e d i n w o s i h s a h d a r u M , s a l o k i N
e s o o h c r e h c r a e s e r e h
T d thi snove lbecausei twascontaine d the value so f
. m s i n a m u h d n a m s it o ir t a
p Aza rNaifsis aid;
“Tolstoyhad w irtten t ohisf irendGoldenweisert ha t"agood work o fatr , n
a
c in ti sentrietybeexpressedonlyby tisel.f"I nTolstoy' sbes t ifcitonand d
á r u M i j d a
H i samong t he best a ifcitona loccu rrence gains t he fee land .
e c n e ir e p x e l a e r f o e r u t x e
n
I Hadj iMurad, t hedescirpiton given wa sbased on t heactualstiuaiton .Tolstoy
d e w o h
s lo to fset git s n tha tmade t he reade rfel ta s fi t hey werei nside the story .
d n a y m r a n a i s s u R t e m d a r u M g n i u s r u p n e m e s r o h e h t n e h w s i s e l p m a x e e h t f o e n O
e b t h g i m t i t a h t y lr a e l c d e b ir c s e d s a w e n e c s e h T . g n it o o h s n i d e v l o v n i e r e w
e h t d e t c e f f a t i w o h d n a r a w f o e r u t a n e h t g n i d r a g e r s y a w s u o ir a v n i d e t e r p r e t n i
. e lt t a b e h t n i d e v l o v n i e l p o e p r o y m r a
d a r u M f o r e t c a r a h c e h t t a h t s a w y r o t s e h t t u o h g u o r h t g n i h t g n it s e r e t n i e h T
g n it s a rt n o c r e h t o o w t f o e l d d i m e h t n i g n i e b s a d e b ir c s e d s a
w characters ,Shami l
.) a i s s u R g n it n e s e r p e r ( s a l o k i N d n a ) a y n h c e h C g n it n e s e r p e r (
e h
T secondreasonwhyt heresearcherchoosed thi snoveli st heIndonesian
f o n o i s r e v n o it a l s n a
rt Hadj iMurad byKoesalahSoebagyoToe rwa sdesrtoyed by
. y ti r o h t u a n a i s e n o d n I e h t
, 8 6 9 1 n u h a t a i s e n o d n I a s a h a b e k n a k h a m e jr e t a y a s h a n r e p h a d u s i n i l e v o N
r i h k a n a h a ti d a y a s u t k a w r e ti li m h e l o a ti s i d u ti n a h a m e jr e t h a k s a n i p a t
) 5 : 9 0 0 2 : r e o T ( . g n a li h a y n ir i d n e s n a g n e d n a d , u ti n u h a t
o d n I a s a h a B o t n i l e v o n s i h t d e t a l s n a rt e v a h I , 8 6 9 1 n
I nesia ,bu ti twa s
e h T . r a e y e h t f o d n e e h t n i d e t s e r r a s a w I d n a y r a ti li m n a i s e n o d n I y b n e k a t
) n o it a l s n a rt r e h c r a e s e r e h T ( . d e r a e p p a s i d t s u j n e h t l e v o n d e t a l s n a rt
e s u a c e b y l b a b o r p d e t s e r r a s a w r o t a l s n a rt e h t d n a d e s s i m s i d s a w l e v o n e h
T tha t
s a
w conveyed in the book wa sconsidered to be offending to the prevaiilng
y ti r o h t u a s ’ o tr a h e o S f o r e d r o w e n e h t , e m i g e
r .
l a c ir o t s i
H and biographicalapproach wa sused i n t his t hesi sbecause t he
t n o d e s a b r o i v a h e b e h t d n a y t e i c o s e h t y d u t s o t s t n a w r e h c r a e s e
r he paralle l
n o n d n a y r a r e ti l f o g n i d a e
o s l a d n a a i s s u R d n a a y n h c e h C f o n o it i d n o c e h t t
a emphasizeon t he srtuggleo f
e s u r e h c r a e s e r e h t , d a r u M i j d a
H d the histo ircal and biographica lapproach to
l a n
a yze how the relaiton o fLeo Tolstoy’ sbackground t oward Hadj iMurad and
o s l
a the condiiton s o f the society and how the occurirng wa r affected the
. d a r u M i j d a H f o n o it a z ir e t c a r a h c
a s a h a b n i y o t s l o T t u o b a n o i n i p o n a e v a g r e d a e r s ’ d a r u M i j d a H a , z n e ir i R
o d n
I nesia .She appreciated Tolstoy in Tolstoy’ sablitiy to mixing the fact so f
d n a y r o t s i
h hi simaginaiton into vivid ltierature language wtihou tdamaging o r
g n i g n a h
c theesessence ,also hecouldexploret hehumantiyand socia lside so fa
. y rt n u o c d n a y li m a f n e e w t e b s e c i o h c e h t y b d e c a f n e h w o r e h t a e r g
a t k a f u m a r e m y o t s l o
T -fakta sejarah dan imaijnasinya ke dalam bahasa
u p m a m a I . a y n i s n e s s e h a b u r e m u a t a k a s u r e m a p n a t g n a l b m a g g n a y a rt s a s
r o l p s k e g n e
m sis ihumanismedansosiailmeseorangpahlawanbesa rkeitka g n a y a y n a r a g e n h a k u a t a a y n a g r a u l e k h a k a p a n a h il i p a d a p n a k p a d a h i d
(. g n it n e p h i b e
l http://www.goodread .scom) y
o t s l o
T w as mixing the fact so fhistory and hi simaginaiton into vivid a
u g n a l e r u t a r e ti
l ge wtihou tdamaging o rchanging the esessence. Hew sa d e c a f n e h w o r e h t a e r g a f o s e d i s l a i c o s d n a y ti n a m u h e h t e r o l p x e o t e l b a
. y rt n u o c d n a y li m a f n e e w t e b s e c i o h c e h t y
b (h ttp://www.goodread .scom
e h
t researcher’ srtanslaiton) ’
z n e ir i R m o r
F sopinion i n goodread.com above, t hereweret wo d fiferen t
y o t s l o T t a h t d i a s e h s n e h w s a w e s n o p s e r t s ri f e h T . s t e g r e h c r a e s e r e h t t a h t s e s u c o f
s i h h ti w m e h t g n i x i m d n a s d r o w s l a n i g ir o s i h g n i k a m t a d o o g y r e v s a w
it a u ti s a d e b ir c s e d o s l a y o t s l o T . n o it a n i g a m
i onwell .The movemen to fasoldier,
e h s , d n o c e s e h T . e s o l c y r e v e d a m e r e w a m a r d e h t d n a t n e m n o ri v n e e h t d n a
, r a
w Hadj iMurad t do l how agrea thero o fChechyawho l oved freedom ,agains t
.I i a l o k i N r a s T f o e l u r e h t r e d n u n e h t s a w o h w a i s s u R
, y o t s l o T d n a d a r u M i j d a H n o m s i c it ir c d n a s t n e m m o c e m o s g n i d a e r r e tf A
r e h c r a e s e r e h
t expectedthatt het hesi swli lcontirbuteadfiferen tpoin to fthatt here
r a w n a h t g n i h t t n a tr o p m i e r o m s a
w .
.
B ProblemFormula iton
: s w o ll o f s a d e t a l u m r o f e r a e z y l a n a o t s m e l b o r p o w T
.
1 Howi sthemaincharacter ( Hadj iMurad )characteirzedi nt henovel?
.
2 How doe sHadj iMurad relfec tTolstoy’ sideology related to the confilc to f
a y n h c e h
C ?
.
C Objecitve soft heStudy
a w e v it c e j b o t s ri f e h
T s to ifgure ou tthe main character’ s characteirsitc s
s r o i v a h e b d n
a . The resutl so fthe fris tobjecitve would bet he foundaiton for t he
. y d u t s e h t f o e v it c e j b o d n o c e
s A tfe r obtaining the foundaiton o f the frist
e v it c e j b
o s ,ther esearche rwli lanalyzed thesecondproblem .Thi ssecondproblem
s u c o
f e d on seeing Murad i deology o fwa rwhich relfected Tolstoy’si deology o f
. r a w
.
D De ifniitono fTerm
e n if e d o t s d e e n r e ti r w e h t , g n i d n a t s r e d n u r e tt e b a e v a h o t r e d r o n
I the
” n o it c e lf e r “ s m r e
n o it c e lf e R
o t g n i d r o c c
A Webster’ sDeluxeUnabridgedDicitonaryre lfecitonmeans:
. n o it a l p m e t n o c ; t h g u o h t s u o ir e s ; s t c e j b u s e m o s f o d n i m e h t f o g n i x if e h T
) 7 1 5 1 : 2 7 9 1 : r e b a B & t e s r o D (
e h t e s u a c e b n o it c e lf e r f o g n i n a e m e v if m o r f h tf if e h t s e s u r e h c r a e s e r e h T
. a e d i r e h c r a e s e r e h t d r a w o t n o it a n a l p x e f e ir b e v i g h tf if
y g o l o e d I
n i s i d ir c a M . C y o
R ContemporaryPoilitcalI deologiesstated themeaning
“ : s w o ll o f s a y g o l o e d i f
o Ideology ha sbeen deifned a s“a se to fclosely related
” y ti n u m m o c r o p u o r g f o c it s ir e t c a r a h c , s e d u ti tt a n e v e r o , a e d i r o , s f e il e b
a s e m o c e b t a h t s a e d i f o e c n e i c s e h t s n a e m y g o l o e d I . ) 2 : 2 9 9 1 : s i d ir c a M (
.t p e c n o c a f o n o it a d n u o f
s t e d o l o M
t g n i d r o c c a s t e d o l o
M oDonnaTursingOrwininAnnivesaryEssay on Tolstoy
s n a e
m :
t c a rt s b a s ti h ti w o v t s e h c e d o l o m d r o w e h T . ti ri p s d n a y d o b n i e n if h t u o y a
, e b d l u o h s t i o s , h t u o y a h c u s f o e c n e s s e e h t s e t a c i d n i ’ o v t s ‘ x if f u
s and
. e v it i s o p , s i y ll a t n e m a d n u
f Atlhough t heconcepti sappiled qutief requen ltyi n f o s e o r e h e h t : r a w h ti w d e t a i c o s s a s i t i y rt e o p k l o f n i , t x e t n o c r e d a o r b a
p e e h t h ti w y ll a u s u , y s t d o l o m d e ll a c e r a y rt e o p k l o f c i p e n a i s s u
R tihe t“ ifne”
. d e h c a tt a ) e y r b o d
( A frequen tsynonym fo r the word i sudalets ,another t o n h g u o h t , n e tf o , ll i k s d n a e g a r u o c o t s r e f e r t a h t e t a l s n a rt o t d r o w t l u c if fi d
t s if i c a P
e h t o t g n i d r o c c
A Webste rDeluxe Unabridged Dicitonary ;“Paciifs ti sa person
( ” e c r o f f o e s u e h t r o r a w o t d e s o p p o e n o ; m s if i c a p s e t a c o v d a o h
w Dorset :1972 :
: s n a e m f l e s ti m s if i c a P . ) 3 8 2 1
r o n o it a n t a h t f e il e b ; y ti li t s o h d e m r a d n a r a w l l a o t n o it i s o p p O
a r s n a e m l u f e c a e p y b d e lt t e s e b d l u o h s s e t u p s i d l a n o it a n r e t n
i ther t han by
( .r a w r o e c r o
1 1
I I R E T P A H C
S W E I V E R L A C I T E R O E H T
.
A Review sof RelatedStudies
e r a e r e h
T only af ewr esearcher swho haveworked ont hi snove lwtiht he
c i s n ir t n i e m a s e h t n o e t a rt n e c n o c y e h T . y d u t s s i h t n i d e y o l p m e e s r u o c s i d r a li m i s
n o g n i k r o w s i h c r a e s e r s i h t t a h t t n e m e l
e .Theyarethemaincharacter (Murad) and
w o
h Muradi sdescirbedbyTolstoy.
s i e r e h t t s e b e h t s i d a r u M i j d a H
“ in hi suniverse-whethe rCaucasian o r
n a i s s u
R -a t every att irbute tha t matters : dairng , horsemanship , r o c i p e r o o r e h r e h t o o N . y ti l a e r f o n o i s i v , p i h s r e d a e l , s s e n l u f e c r u o s e r
s A . e l b a k il e k il y lr a e n r o , m i h o t l a u q e e ti u q s i , n r e d o m r o t n e i c n a , a g a s
M i j d a
H urad dies ,he i spurged o fp tiy ,anger ,and desrie .And so i s h t a e d a e n i g a m i d l u o c , s r e ti r w l l a f o , y o t s l o T t a h T . e w e r a o s d n A . y o t s l o T
n a s i h t a e d f o d a e r d n w o s i h e k il n u o s d n a e t a ir p o r p p a o s e c n o t a
n g i d c it e h t s e a r o f h p m u ir t g n ir u s s a e r d n a d e t c e p x e n
u tiy.” (Bloom :
9 9
1 4:349)
, n o it a tr e s s i d 4 9 9 1 s i h n i , m o o l B d l o r a
H The Western Canon, stated tha tMurad
w o h s t a h t s c it s ir e t c a r a h c f o t o l a s a
h e d hi sskli landcourage ,andalsohi sbravery
h c i h w h t a e d e c a f o
t wa so tfensaida s“visionofr ealtiy” .Oneoft hischaracteirsitc
d n a y g o l o e d i s t e d o l o m e h t s
i thisi sa elsot h youngTolstoy’si deology.
f o r o t a l s n a rt e h t , r e o T o y g a b e o S h a l a s e o
K Hadj i Murad into Bahasa
n o it n e m , a i s e n o d n
I e dabou tTolstoy’ spaci ifsti deology r e lfectedbyt hecharacter ,
. d a r u M
j d a H m a l a D
“ iMurad ia jusrtu mengetengahkan tokoh Hadj iMurad dar i .
k a d it e s , i o t s l o T i g a b , n a t a h il e k i n i s i r a
D -itdaknya dalam novel i n idan d i
h a n a t a d a p i r a d g n it n e p h i b e l n a a i s u n a m e k n a d n a li d a e k , a y n t u j n a l a i s u
) 6 : 9 0 0 2 : r e o T ( ” .r i a
m o r f d a r u M i j d a H r e t c a r a h c e h t s t n e s e r p y l e s i c e r p e h d a r u M i j d a H n I “
. m o d e e r f s e v o l o h w a y n h c e h C
d n a e c it s u j ,s r a e y r e t a l s i h n i d n a l e v o n s i h t n i t s a e l t a , i o t s l o T r o f ,s m e e s tI
s ’ r e h c a e s e R e h T ( ” . y ti l a n o it a n n a h t t n a tr o p m i e r o m s i y ti n a m u h
) n o it a l s n a r T
v o b a a t a d e h t m o r f r e o
T e shown the simliartiy between the main characte rand
e c it s u j ,s r a e y r e t a l s i h n i s a w o h w y o t s l o T d n a m o d e e r f d e v o l o h w d a r u M . y o t s l o T
. y ti l a n o it a n n a h t t n a tr o p m i e r o m s a w y ti n a m u h d n a
s d n a t s r e d n u t u b r a w i t n a s i t s if i c a p f o a e d i e h
T the roleo fhuman being .
e v o l ,l e v o n e h t n i , d a r u M i j d a
H d freedom .HaroldBloomalsomenitone ; d
e r o M . y r e g a v a s t u o h ti w t n e t o p , s u o u g i b m a n u , e r u t a m s i d a r u M i j d a H
n i d n a t f a r c n i s u e s s y d O s l a u q e e h , s e ll i h c A n a h t l a ti v y l e m il b u s
9 9 1 : m o o l B ( . y c a m o l p i
d 4 :338)
d a r u M , w e i v f o t n i o p s i h n
I w as no t a ruthles s characte r “poten t wtihou t
o t g n i d r o c c a , ” y c a m o l p i D “ . n o it a u ti s r a w e h t n i s e v il e h , h g u o h tl a , ” y r e g a v a s
.r a w e h t n w o d h s u p o t n o it u l o s r o n o it p o r e h t o o s l a s a w , m i h
y r o t s e h t h g u o h tl
A w as terminated by t hedeath o fMurad, t heresearcher
t h g u o h
t tha tpoin to fview ,hadj iMurad w asa ifgurewho neve rgived up ,wised ,
e v a r
b d andheprefere f dto ound nw -i wins olu itonove rwa.r
g n u o y , d a r u M e k i L . r a w t u o b a a e d i n w o s i h s a h y o t s l o T g n u o y e h T
y o t s l o
T wa samolodets .Donna Tursing Orwin i n Anniversary Essayon Tolstoy
: s ll e t
e g a r u o c d n a , s i r a w t a h w w o n k y o t s l o T i a l o k i N e k il s r e i d l o s d e c n e ir e p x E “
o c ” , d i a R e h T “ n i v o p o l h K n i a t p a C f o e s a c e h t n i s a , m e h t r o
s m i a l c m o o l B d l o r a
H Hadj iMurad a s"my persona lTouchstone fo rthe
I t s e b e h t t s a e l t a r o , d lr o w e h t n i y r o t s t s e b e h t e m o t , n o it c if e s o r p f o e m il b u s
e r r e v e e v a
h ad."(Bloom :1994 :336 .) Bloompraisest ha tHadj iMurad ist hebes t
n i s t s i x e y ll a u t c a o h w r o ir r a w a t u o b a y r o t s e l p m i s a s i t I . d a e r r e v e e h k r o w
s i h t e d a m m o o l B d l o r a H . y o t s l o T y b y l g n it s e r e t n i y r e v d e k c a p s i d n a y ti l a e
r work
e h t f o t s o m d a e r r e tf A . e v o b a t n e m e t a t s s i h h g u o r h t e l p o e p y n a m y b r a l u p o p
n o n n a C n r e t s e
W o fBloom and found the statement ,the reade rstatred to read
d a r u M i j d a
H .
s e i r o e h T d e t a l e R f o s w e i v e R . B
n o it a z i r e t c a r a h C d n a r e t c a r a h C f o y r o e h T . 1
,s m a r b A . H .
M in hi sbook A Glossary o fLtierary Term s(1981 )deifned
: s a s r e t c a r a h c
o h w , k r o w e v it a r r a n r o c it a m a r d a n i d e t n e s e r p s n o s r e p e h t e r a s r e t c a r a h C “
n o it i s o p s i d d n a l a r o m h ti w d e w o d n e g n i e b s a s r e d a e r e h t y b d e t e r p r e t n i e r a
w n i d e s s e r p x e e r a t a h t s e it il a u
q hat t hey say- the dialogue- and by wha t
o d y e h
t -theacitons”( Abrams :1981 :20) .
r e t c a r a h c , s u h
T wa soneo fmanywayst o analyzel tieraryworkst ha thave
s r e t c a r a h c e h T . d e y e v n o c e b o t e g a s s e
m were given a speciifc background and
c it s ir e t c a r a h c c if i c e p
s sfo rfacing a problem provided by t heauthor i n a l tierary
e s u y l n o m m o c s r e ti r w y r a r e ti L . k r o
w d characte’r sdialogues ,acts ,and everyday
y l n o m m o c s i t a h w g n i v i g r e tf A . d e t n a w r o h t u a e h t t a h t r e t c a r a h c a e t a e r c o t e s u
s e r e h t ,r e t c a r a h c a e b ir c s e d o t d e s
u hould besupporitng factorst o srtengthen t he
e r e h t , o S . fl e s ti r e t c a r a h c e h t f o e g a m
i wa scondiiton o rsetitngoft heplace ,itme ,
. k r o w y r a r e ti
l tI w do eul b asrtong conitnu tiy r elaitonships between t hecharacte r
. n o it i d n o c e h t d n a
y r o e h t r e t c a r a h
C wa so tfen used by researcher sto see author’ spoin to f
s r e t c a r a h c e h t t u o h g u o h T . r e d a e r e h t e z it o n p y h o t d n a k r o w y r a r e ti l n i w e i
v w ere
d o o g a e v a h r o , g n o rt s , d a s e b o t e d a
m habti .I tcould no tbedoubtedt ha taf ris t
d a e r o h w , s r e h c r a e s e R r o r e d a e
r s workofl tierature ,wo uld seehowt hecharacte r
a
w sbuitl .Thecharacte rwa sbasically a ilving creaturei n which t hey co uld have
t a h t h g u o h tl a g n il e e
f wa sonly an elementary i n l tierarywork. I tcan beclosert o
s i e s a c s i h t n I . y r o t s e u rt a n o d e s a b s i k r o w y r a r e ti l a f i y ti l a e
r Hadj iMurad who
.r e h c r a e s e r e h t y b d e z y l a n a s i
e w s A . s tr a p o w t o t n i d e d i v i d y l n o m m o c s i e g a s u c i s a b , k r o w y r a r e ti l a n I
t s i n o g a t o r p e h t e r a e r e h t , w o n
k andantagonis tcharacters .WJ. .Harveyi nhi sbook
l e v o N e h t d n a r e t c a r a h
C ,make sdetali so fcharacter .He make sthree type so f
c e w e c n e i n e v n o c r o f , s s e l e h tr e v e N “ s r e t c a r a h
c o uld group mos tcharacter sinto
r p e r a e s o h T . ) 6 5 : 5 6 9 1 : y e v r a H ( ” s e ir o g e t a c e e r h
t otagonist , background
. t n e t n o c l a i c o s d n a , s r e t c a r a h c
s i s i h T . r e d a e r e h t y b d e r e d i s n o c e b t s u m r e t c a r a h c t s i n o g a t o r p e h T
. e n il y r o t s e h t n i e l o r t n a tr o p m i n a s a h f l e s ti r e t c a r a h c t s i n o g a t o r p e h t , e s u a c e b
r a y r o t s i h d n a n o it a v it o m e s o h w s r e t c a r a h c e s o h T
“ emostf ullyestabilshed ,
r u o e g a g n e o h w , s e s s e r g o r p y r o t s e h t s a e g n a h c d n a t c il f n o c o h w
t o n h g u o h t x e l p m o c e r o m y a w a n i , y li d a e t s d n a y ll u f e r o m s e s n o p s e r
) 6 5 : 5 6 9 1 : y e v r a H ( ” .s r e t c a r a h c r e h t o n a h t d i v i v e r o m y li r a s s e c e n
s r e d a e r e h t o s r o h t u a e h t y b y l p e e d d e n i a l p x e e b t s u m r e t c a r a h c t s i n o g a t o r p e h T
c t I . r o h t u a e h t m o r f e v it c e p s r e p r a e l c a n i a g n a
c ould no tbe doubted also fit he
c e W . y r o t s a f o s u c o f e h t s i r e t c a r a h c t s i n o g a t o r
o e h t e h
T ryo fcharacteirzaitont hatt her esearche rusei sf rom M. JMurphy
k o o
b Understanding Unseens :An Introduciton to Engilsh Poetry and the Engilsh
l e v o
N .There are nine way sfo r descirbing the character s according to MJ. .
1 6 1 : 2 7 9 1 ( y h p r u
M -173) .The nine ways wli lbe in the paragraph sbelow .The
r e ti r w e h t y a w s i h t n I . n o it p ir c s e d l a n o s r e p s ’ r e t c a r a h c e h t g n i z y l a n a y b s i t s ri f
e k il e c n a r a e p p a l a c i s y h p s i h m o r f r e t c a r a h c a g n i e e s y b r e t c a r a h c e h t s e z ir e t c a r a h c
o r i a h s i h , s e y e s i h , n i k s s i h , e c a f s i h , d li u b s i
h rhi sclothes .
r o w e i v f o t n i o p s ’ r e t c a r a h c r e h t o m o r f g n i z y l a n a y b s i d n o c e s e h T
r e h t o n a h g u o r h t d e z y l a n a e b n a c r e t c a r a h c A . r e h t o n a y b n e e s s a r e t c a r a h c
o t s t n a w r e ti r w e h t t a h t r e t c a r a h c e h t e b ir c s e d o t s n o i n i p o d n a t h g i s s ’ r e t c a r a h c
. e s o p x e
ri h t e h
T d i s a characte r can be characte irzed by character’ s speech .
e h t o t n o it n e tt a g n i y a p y b r e t c a r a h c e h t t u o b a n o i n i p o n a p o l e v e d n a c s r e d a e R
e h t h c i h w n i n o it a s r e v n o c e h t e e s o s l a n a c r e d a e r e h T . h c e e p s s ’ r e t c a r a h c
i g e h s r o e h y a w e h t ; d e v l o v n i s i r e t c a r a h
c ve shi so rhe ropinion may also show
. r e t c a r a h c e h t f o y ti l a n o s r e p e h t
e r a s r e d a e r e h t ; e fi l t s a p ’ s r e t c a r a h c e h t g n ir e d i s n o c y b s i h tr u o f e h T
t s a p s ’ r e t c a r a h c e h t t u o b a w o n k t e g o t s e u l c t n a tr o p m i e m o s t u o b a d e m r o f n i
t y b d e b ir c s e d e b n a c t I . s e c n e ir e p x
e he autho ’r sd riec tcomment ,through the
m u i d e m e h t h g u o r h t r o , n o it a s r e v n o c s ’ r e t c a r a h c e h t h g u o r h t ,s t h g u o h t s ’ r e t c a r a h c
k n i h t r e t c a r a h c r o j a m f o y a w e h t w o n k o t d e s u s i t i ; e fi l t s a p ’ s r e t c a r a h c
. d n u o r g k c a b t s a p e h t y b d e c n e u lf n
i Fitfh , a characte r i s analyzed from
s i t I . y a w h tr u o f e h t d n a t s ri f e h t t r o p p u s o t s i y a w s i h t ; s r e h t o f o n o it a s r e v n o c
s
u ed to make the researche r understand deeper . Sixth i s by perceiving the
o t y a w t s a l e h t s i s i h t , s t n e v e d n a s n o it a u ti s s u o ir a v o t s n o it c a e r s ’ r e t c a r a h c
r o t n e v e e h t o t s t c a e r r e t c a r a h c e h t w o h w o n k o t d e s u s i t I . l e v o n e h t e z y l a n a
p e h t w o n k d n a , n o it a u ti
s ersonaltiyoft hecharacte rbys eeingt het endency.
.
1 Tolstoy’ sBiography
m a f a s a w y o t s l o T h c i v e y a l o k i N ) o e L ( v e L t n u o
C ou swrtieri n hi serat li l
. ) e d a l G t h g ir b ( a n a y l o P a y a n s a Y t a , 8 2 8 1 , 8 2 t s u g u A n i n r o b s a w e H . w o n
. s s a l c l a i c o s d e t a v e l e s i h f o l a c i p y t d o o h d li h c d e g e li v ir p a d e y o j n e d i k y o t s l o T
u l c n i e r u t a r e ti l r o f s s e n d n o f s a l l e w s a s e g a u g n a l r o f t fi g a d e w o h s e h n e h
T ding
y r o t s t n e m a t s e t d l o e h t y ll a i c e p s e , e l b i B e h t d n a s n i k h s u P f o s m e o p e h t ,s e l a t y ri a f
n i e t o r w e h n e h w r e ti r w r o j a m a e m a c e b y o t s l o T . h p e s o J f
o Contemporary ,a
e m a c e b e h t a h t r e tf A . l e v o n d o o h d li h C e t o r w e H . 2 5 8 1 t a l a n r u o j g r u b s r e t e P
n it a e r c n i e v it c
a g a nove land shor tsto ires .Hi sgrea tera i swhen he pubilshed
a n i n e r a K a n n
A and Wa rand Peace .One o fthe Tolstoy’ swellknown work so f
s i e r u t a r e ti
l Hadj iMurad.
4 5 8 1 ( r a W n a e m ir C e h t r e tf
A -55) ,hebuli tand organizedove r20 schoolsf o r
R n i e l p o e p r o o
p ussia .A ttha t itme ,the secre tpoilce began surveillance ,and
3 1 d e r e h t a f d n a , s r e B a n v e e r d n A a if o S d e ir r a m e h 2 6 8 1 n I . e m o h s i h d e h c r a e s
e h t d e s i a r e l p u o c e h t d n a , d e i d s e i b a b r i e h t f o r u o F . e fi w s i h m o r f n e r d li h c
l a s a w e fi w s i H . n e r d li h c e n i n g n i n i a m e
a i s s u R n i n o it a u ti s r e p e e d e h t d n a t s r e d n u o
T , t herelaiton between Russia
n o it a u ti s s ’ d a r u M d n a t s r e d n u o t d e s u s i tI . w e i v e r e h t o t n i t u p s i a y n h c e h C d n a
w o h s o t o s l a d n
a the author’ s(Leo Tolstoy )poin to fview abou twar .The las t
d n a t s r e d n u o t d e s u s i y h p a r g o i b s ’ y o t s l o T . y h p a r g o i b s ’ y o t s l o T t u o b a s i w e i v e r
e z y l a n a o t s ’ y o t s l o T f o y g o l o e d i e h t w o n k o t o s l a d n a y o t s l o T f o y e n r u o j e fi l e h t
o t n i o p s ’ d a r u M f o y ti r a li m i s e h
t fviewi nwa.r
4 2
I I I R E T P A H C
Y G O L O D O H T E M
.
A Objec toft heStudy
d e lt it n e l e v o n a s i h c r a e s e r s i h t f o t c e j b o e h
T Hadj iMuradbyLeoTolstoy ,
t a h t r e ti r w n a i s s u R
a wrotecannon rtliogy .Tolstoy becamea majo rwrtie rwhen
n i e t o r w e
h Contemporary ,a Petersburg journa lin 1852 .He wrote Chlidhood .
e h n e h w s a w a r e t a e r g s i H . s e ir o t s tr o h s d n a s l e v o n g n it ir w n i e v it c a s a w e h , n e h T
d e h s il b u
p Wa rand Peace (1863-69) ,Anna Karenina (1873-77 ,and Confession.
. ) 9 7 8 1 (
f o n o it i d e e h
T Hadj iMurad used in thi sresearch i sthe 2003 ediiton
n o it i d e s i h t f o r o t a l s n a rt e h T . k r o Y w e N , y r a r b i L n r e d o M e h T y b d e h s il b u
p wa sa
f o l l a g n it a l s n a rt s e d i s e B . s k r o w s ’ y o t s l o T e h t f o l l a s e t a l s n a rt o s l a o h w r o t a l s n a rt
s ’ y o t s l o
T work ,healsowroteTostoy’ sbiography .
d a r u M i j d a
H consist so f104pagest ha taredividedi nto24chapter .sI tw as
m l a c e b d l u o c e h t u b n o it a u ti s t l u c if fi d d e c a f t a h t n a m a f o e fi l d e t a c il p m o c t u o b a
u o b a s k l a t y r o t s s i h t , h g u o h tl A . m e l b o r p s i h g n i c a f n
i twar ,i twa sno tsimple
, n i a l p x e y lf e ir b l e v o n e h t n i s li a t e d e h T . a e d i s ’ y o t s l o T t a h w t e g o t d a e r e w n e h w
.s e o d r e t c a r a h c e h t t a h w t u o b a s n o it s e u q e m o s d l o h , e m it e m a s e h t n i t e y
, l e v o n e h t f o r e t c a r a h c n i a m e h t , d a r u M f o e fi l e h
T wa spresented very
e l
c alry ,but l eave smany quesiton mark son hi satttiudet ha tmove sfrom east t o
n I . t s e
w Hadj iMurad ,Murad keep smany problem spersonally .Many o fhi s
f o n o it a n i b m o c e h T . c t e , s u o i g il e r , s c i m o n o c e , s c it il o p , n o it i d n o c l a i c o s e h t s a w
p a r g o i b d n a , y r o t s i h , y g o l o i c o s s a w s t c e p s a e e r h
t hyoft heauthori nt hi sapproach .
, s k r o w e h t n e e w t e b p i h s n o it a l e r e h t d n if o t s t p m e tt a g n it ir w s i s e h t s i h t , e r o f e r e h T
l a c ir o t s i h s ti d n a , k r o w e h t n i d e t c e lf e r y t e i c o s e h t , e fi l f o d n u o r g k c a b r o h t u a e h t
h c a o r p p a l a c i h p a r g o i b d n a l a c ir o t s i h e h T . d n u o r g k c a
b hasf undamentallychanged
e h t o s l a t u b d o ir e p e h t t u o b a t s u j t o n s i tI . m s i c it ir c d n a y r o e h t y r a r o p m e t n o c n i
h c a o r p p a l a c i h p a r g o i b l a c ir o t s i h e h t , k r o w e h t n I . d o ir e p t a h t n i n o it i d n o c l a i c o s
a e h t , k r o w e h t n i y t e i c o s e h t n e e w t e b n o it a l e r e h t e e s o t s m i
a uthor’ slfie and
. k r o w e h t f o d n u o r g k c a b l a c ir o t s i
h
y d u t S e h t f o d o h t e M . C
n i d e s u y d u t s f o d o h t e m e h
T thi sthesi swa s ifnding the p irmary source
t s ri
f .The p irmary source wa sthe nove lw irtten by Leo Tolstoy enitlted Hadj i
d a r u
M .Whereas ,the secondary source swere the book stha ti scontain sthe
s k o o b e h t ,r e t c a r a h c e h t e z y l a n a o T . d e s u s e ir o e h
t A Glossaryo fLtieraryTerms
, ) 1 8 9 1 ( s m a r b A . H . M y
b A Handbook to Ltierature (1986:83 ) by C .Hugh
d n a n o m r a H m a il li W d n a n a m l o
H Aspect soft heNove l(1974 )byE.M .Forster .
d a e r o t s a w p e t s t s ri f e h T . s i s y l a n a e h t n i e n o d s p e t s l a r e v e s e r e w e r e h T
e r r e tf A . d a e r e r d n
a -reading, t her esearche rbegant osearcht hedataandcollected
h c i h w t e n r e t n i e h t m o r f a t a d e h t d n u o f o s l a d n a s k o o b l a r e v e s e h t m o r f a t a d e h t
u
s ppo tred t he analysis .Following t hefounding of t he data ,“theory o fcharacte r
r e h c r a e s e r e h T . r e t c a r a h c n i a m e h t e z y l a n a o t d e il p p a s a w ” n o it a z ir e t c a r a h c d n a
s a w t a h w m o r f s n o i s u l c n o c w a r d d l u o w r e h c r a e s e r e h t d n a t l u s e r e h t d n if d l u o c
8 2
V I R E T P A H C
S I S Y L A N A
A .TheCharacteriza itonoft heMainCharacter
1 .Physica lCharacterisitc so fMurad
e h t t e g o t y a w t s ri f e h t ,) 1 6 1 : 2 7 9 1 : y h p r u M ( y h p r u M . J. M o t g n i d r o c c A
e h t t u o b a n o it a m r o f n i y n a t e g o t s i k r o w y r a r e ti l a n i r e t c a r a h c a f o y ti l a n o s r e p
s e z ir e t c a r a h c r e h c r a e s e r e h t y a w s i h t n I .r e t c a r a h c e h t f o n o it a z ir e t c a r a h c l a c i s y h p
s y b r e t c a r a h c e h
t eeingacharacterf romhi sphysica lappearance ilkehi sbulid ,hi s
s a t e g o t s e ir t r e h c r a e s e r e h T . s e h t o l c s i h r o r i a h s i h , s e y e s i h , n o i x e l p m o c s i h , e c a f
r o f n i h c u
m maitona spossibleaboutt hepersona ldesc irpitonoft hemaincharacte r
i h t r u o F .) d a r u M
( ngst hats howphysica lcharacteirzaitono fMuradares eeni nt he
novel . Those are hi s eye ,s smlie , and clothes . Al l o f those physica l
. d a r u M f o e g a m i e h t w o h s s n o it a z ir e t c a r a h c
e z y l a n a r e h c r a e s e r e h t t a h t n o it a z ir e t c a r a h c l a c i s y h p t s ri f e h
T s si Murad’ s
e y
e s .Murad hast hesameeye swtihothe rpeoplei n Chechnya ,heha sblack eye s
. d li h c s ’ o d a S e k il
f o y o b A
“ iftfeen , coming quickly ou t o f the door , me t him and : y o t s l o T ( ” … s e o l s e p ir s a k c a l b , s e y e g n il k r a p s s i h d e x if y l g n ir e d n o w
) 9 1 : 3 0 0 2
s t c a f e h t , r e v e w o
H above wli lchange atfe rcarefu lly observing Murad . The
l u f e r a c d n a , h g u o r o h t , t n a li g i
v characteirsitc swould be radiated from Murad' s
.s e y e
n o t e m e h e s o h t f o s e c a f e h t o t n i s e y e k c a l b k c i u q s i h h ti w g n ir e e p d n A “
s r e h t o e h t n
I tiuaiton ,MaryDmtiirevnaalsogo tMurad’sf risti mpression.
i j d a H t a g n i c n a l g , e h s d i a s ” ,t h g i s n i h ti w e b l li w e h e t a r y n a t a n e h T “
) 6 7 : 3 0 0 2 : y o t s l o T ( . y a w a y l k c i u q d e n r u t e h s s e y e s i h g n it e e m t u b ; d a r u M
e c n ir
P Voronstov (Russian commander )also had an expe irence abou t
m l a c y r e v e r e w s e y e s ’ d a r u M , w e i v f o t n i o p s ’ v o t s n o r o V n o d e s a B . s e y e s ’ d a r u M
. n o it a u ti s e h t n i e t a r u c c a t u b
“He had bu tone pecuilartiy :hi seyes ,se twide apatr ,gazed from unde r f o s e y e e h t o t n i m l a c d n a y l g n it a rt e n e p , y l e v it n e tt a s w o r b k c a l b r i e h t
) 5 3 : 3 0 0 2 : y o t s l o T ( ” .s r e h t o
d e t n e s e r p e r s e y e s ’ d a r u
M a cha irsmaitc man .In the othe rhand ,Voronstov also
h
t oughttha tMurad ha sdfiferen tpurpose swhen hemet theofifcerRussia .There
t n e s e r p e r t a h t n o it a u ti s e n o s a
w e d the cu irostiy o fVoronstov .I thappened when
d n a r e h t e g o t t e m s e y e r i e h
t thi sstiuaiton indrieclty showed wha tMurad and
y ll a u t c a v o t s n o r o
V wanted.
t a h t h c u m r e h t o h c a e o t d e s s e r p x e d n a , t e m n e m o w t e h t f o s e y e e h T “
e h t t a h w l l a t a t o n s a w t a h t d n a , s d r o w o t n i t u p n e e b e v a h t o n d l u o c
. h t u rt e l o h w e h t r e h t o h c a e d l o t y e h t s d r o w t u o h ti W . d i a s r e t e r p r e t n i
s a e v e il e b t o n d i d e h t a h t d i a s s e y e s ' v o s t n o r o
V ingleword Hadj iMurád
o t y m e n e n a e b d l u o w s y a w l a d n a s a w e h w e n k e h t a h t d n a , g n i y a s s a w
. o t d e g il b o s a w e h e s u a c e b y l n o d e r e d n e r r u s d a h d n a , n a i s s u R g n i h t y r e v e
s i h f o s e c n a r u s s a e v i g o t d e u n it n o c t e y d n a , s i h t d o o t s r e d n u d á r u M i j d a H
s s e y e s i H . y ti l e d
if aid ,"Tha twoldman oughtt o bet hinking o fhi sdeath , " .l u f e r a c e b t s u m I d n a , g n i n n u c s i e h d l o h g u o h t t u b ; r a w f o t o n d n a
d á r u M i j d a H o t e k o p s e h s s e l e h tr e v e n t u b , o s l a s i h t d o o t s r e d n u v ó s t n o r o V
e h t f o s s e c c u s e h t r o f y r a s s e c e n d e r e d i s n o c e h y a w e h t n
i wa.r”(Tolstoy :
) 0 5 : 3 0 0 2
e h
T second physica lcharacteirzaiton o fmurad wa shi ssmlie .Murad’ s
. e l b a t c i d e r p n u s a w e li m
s I twa sunpredictable because behind hi ssmlie ;people
e v e il e b t o n d l u o
v
e erybody. Potloratsky (a company commander )wa sone o fthe Russians who
s wa Murad’ss mlie.
w o h s o t s m r a s i h h ti w e r u t s e g a e d a m y k s t a r o tl o P , s w o r b e y e s i h g n i s i a R “
r o f e li m s m i h e v a g d a r u M i j d a H . d e li m s d n a , d n a t s r e d n u t o n d i d e h t a h t
s e li m s t a h t d n a , e li m
s rtuck Potloratsky by ti s chlidilke kindilnes .s”
) 5 3 : 3 0 0 2 : y o t s l o T (
. a n v e li s a V y r a M d r a w o t n o i s s e r p m i s i h e v a g d a r u M e m it e m a s e h t t A
d n a , d e li m s e h d n a t s r e d n u t o n d l u o c e h h c i h w d i a s s a w g n i h t e m o s n e h W “
p d a h t i s a t s u j , a n v e li s a V a ir a M d e s a e l p e li m s s i
h leased Potloratsky.”
) 7 3 : 3 0 0 2 : y o t s l o T (
. g n i h t e m a s e h t d e c n e ir e p x e o s l a m i h d e t a g o r e t n i o h w v o k il e M s ir o L
r a il u c e p e h t d e li m s d n a , p a c s i h k c a b k o o h s , d a e h s i h d e s i a r e h n e h T “
) 2 5 : 3 0 0 2 : y o t s l o T ( ” . a n v e li s a V y r a M d e t a v it p a c d a h t a h t e li m s e k il d li h c
y k s t a r o tl o
P , Mary Vaslievna (Voronstov’ s wfie) and also Lo ir s Meilkov
e c n e ir e p x
e d the simlia rcase wtih Murad’ ssmlie .Murad showe d hi snatura l
tr o f m o c l e e f d n a t e m e h n e h w e d u ti tt
a a blewtihanewperson.
e e p a c s e n a s A . s e h t o l c s i h s a w d a r u M f o n o it a z ir e t c a r a h c l a c i s y h p t s a l e h T
e ir t d a r u M , li m a h S m o r
f d tobeunno itcedbypeople .“Now ,wtihonemuridonly ,
d n a d o o h n i d e p p a r
w búrka, from unde rwhich prortuded a irlfe ,he rode,a
a t c a rt t a o t g n i y rt , e v it i g u
f sltilte atteniton a spossible” (Tolstoy :2003:19) .The
w d a r u M t a h t s e h t o l
c o nrei the Voronstov’ sofifcet ha tcan beseen i n t henove l
; e r a
n w o r b a r e v o t a o c n a i s s a c ri C e ti h w g n o l a n i d e s s e r d s a w e H
“ beshmet
e c a l r e v li s e n if h ti w r a ll o c e h t d n u o r d e m m ir
t .Heworeblack l eggingand
t h g it s a p e t s n i s i h r e v o d e h c t e rt s e r e w h c i h w , r o l o c e m a s e h t f o s e o h s t f o s
n o i h a f n a b r u t d e p a r d , p a c h g i h a e r o w e h d a e h s i h n O . s e v o l g s
a -tha tsame
: y o t s l o T ( “ , n a h K t e m k h A f o n o it a i c n u n e d e h t n o , h c i h w r o f n a b r u t
s a
B edont hedescirpitono fMurad’ sphysica lcharacters, t her esearcherconclude s
n a m y r a n i d r o a rt x e n a s i d a r u M t a h
t .Al loft hef acts abovemakeMurad dfiferen t
.r e t c a r a h c r e h t o m o r
f
2 .Murad’ spersonaltiy
e h
T second analysi sin the fris tproblem formulaiton i salso the non
-n o n e h T . y ti l a n o s r e p s i h r o d a r u M f o n o it a z ir e t c a r a h c l a c i s y h
p -physica l
d a r u M e r o f e b ) y ti l a n o s r e p ( s c it s ir e t c a r a h c s i h n o s e s u c o f y l n i a m n o it a z ir e t c a r a h c
n i o
j e dwtihShamli ,iti snecessarysot omakeaclea rdfiferencebetweenMurad’ s
. n o it c a r e t n i e h t r e tf a d n a e r o f e b y ti l a n o s r e p
.
a Courageous
. e fi l t s a p s i h m o r f d e z y l a n a e b n a c , d a r u M f o l li k s e h t d n a e g a r u o c e h T
s i h m o r f e s u a c e b e z y l a n a o t t n a tr o p m i s a w e fi l t s a p s ’ d a r u
M pas,t t heresearche r
e h T . )l u fl li k s d n a s u o e g a r u o c e b n a c d a r u M w o h ( m i h t u o b a e r o m d n a t s r e d n u n a c
e l p o e p r a tr a T . r a tr a T , y t e i c o s n w o s i h m o r f d e tr a t s d a r u M f o g n i d li u b r e t c a r a h c
. y t e i c o s ri e h t n i y ti r o n i m a y ll a u t c a e r e w
it u a e b a , m o o l b l l u f n i , h c ti d a n i d e c it o n I n e h w
“ ful t hislte plan tof t he
y ll u f e r a c d n a " ,r a tr a T " ll a c y e h t d o o h r u o b h g i e n r u o n i h c i h w , d n i k n o s m ir c
g n i w o m n e h w d i o v
a — or ,fit heydohappent ocuti tdown,t hrowoutf rom s i h t k c i p o t g n i k n i h T . s d n a h r i e h t g n i k c ir p f o r a e f r o f s s a r g e h t g n o m a
d n a e lt s i h
t pu ti tin the cenrte o fmy nosegay , Icilmbed down into the e
l b m u h y t e v l e v a y a w a g n i v ir d r e tf a , d n a , h c ti
d -bee tha thad penertated
o t t e s I , p e e l s a y lt e e w s n e ll a f e r e h t d a h d n a s r e w o lf e h t f o e n o o t n i p e e d
y r e v a d e v o r p s i h t t u B . r e w o lf e h t k c u l p o t k r o
w dfiifcutl t ask .No tonly
e d i s y r e v e n o k c ir p k l a t s e h t d i
d —even through the handkerchie f I
d n a h y m d n u o r d e p p a r
w —buti twa ssot ought ha t Ihadt osrtugglewtihi t t a d a h I n e h w d n a ; e n o y b e n o s e r b if e h t g n i k a e r b , s e t u n i m e v if y lr a e n r o f
, ti d e k c u l p t s a
l the stalk wa sal lfrayed ,and the lfowe r tisel fno longe r )
