• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

T B.ING 1201623 Bibliography

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "T B.ING 1201623 Bibliography"

Copied!
10
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Ajideh, P., & Aghdam, E. 2012. English language teachers’ corrective feedback types in

relation to the learners’ proficiency levels and their error types. Journal of

Academic and Applied Studies 2, 8, 37-51. www.academians.org

Aljafreh, A. & J. Lantolf. 1994. Negative Feedback as Regulation and second language

Learning in the Zone Proximal Development. The Modern Language Journal, 78,

pp. 465-483.

Allwright, R. L. 1975. Problems in the study of the language teacher’s treatment of errors.

In M. K. Burt & D. Dulay (Eds.), On TESOL ’75: New directions in second

language learning, teaching, and bilingual educaion (pp. 96 – 109). Washington,

D.C. : TESOL.

Allwright, R.L. 1984. The Importance of interaction in classroom language learning.

Applied Linguistics, 5, 156-171.

Allwright, R., & Bailey, K.M. 1991. Focus on the Language Classroom. Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press.

Alwasilah, A. C. 2003. Pokoknya Kualitatif. Jakarta: Pustaka Jaya.

Ammar, A. & Spada, N. 2006. One size fits all? Recasts, prompts, and L2 learning. Studies

in second language acquisition, 28, 543-574.

http://dspace.aus.edu/xmlui/handle/11073/70

Basturkmen, H., Loewen, S., & Ellis, R. 2004. Teachers’ stated belief about incidental

focus on form and their classroom practices. Applied Linguistics, 25, 243-272.

Brown, H. D. 1987. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. New Jersey: Prentice

Hall Inc.

Brown, H.D. 2001. Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language

(2)

Campillo, P. S. 2004. An analysis of uptake following teachers’ feedback in the EFL

classroom. RESLA, 17-18, 209 – 222.

Campos, L.V. 2011. Corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Literatura

Linguistica, 19, 283-292.

Choi, S.Y. & Li, S. 2012. Corrective Feedback and Learner Uptake in a Child ESOL

Classroom. RELC Journal, 43(3), 331-351. DOI: 10.1177/0033688212463274.

http://rel.sagepub.com/content/43/3/331

Chu, R. 2011. Effects of Teacher’s Corrective Feedback on Accuracy in the Oral English

of English-Majors College Students. Theory and Practice in Language Studies,

1(5), 454-459. www.academypublisher.com

Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. 2001. Learner uptake in communicative ESL

lessons. Language Learning, 51, 281-318.

Carroll, S., Roberge, Y., & Swain, M. 1992. The role of feedback in adult second language

acquisition: Error correction and morphological generalizations. Applied

Psycholinguistics, 13, 173-198.

Carroll, S. & Swain, M. 1993. Explicit and implicit negative feedback: An empirical study

of the learning of linguistic generalizations. Studies in Second Language

Acquisition, 15, 357-386)

Carron, G. and Carr-Hill, R.A. 1991. Non-formal education: information and planning

issues. (IIEP Research Report 90). Paris: IIEP-UNESCO.

Chaudron, C. 1998. Second language classrooms: New York: Cambridge University Press.

Cohen, L. and Lawrence, M. 1994. Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge.

Corder, S. 1971. Idiosyncratic dialects and error analysis. International Review of Applied

Linguistics, 9, 149 – 159.

Corpuz, F. A, V. 2011. Error Correction in Second Language Writing Teachers’ Belief,

Practices, and Students’ Preferences. Master Thesis: Queensland University.

(3)

Creswell, J. W. 1994. Research Design: Qualitative & Quantitative Approaches. London:

SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J.W. 1998. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five

Traditions. California: SAGE Publication, Inc.

DeKeyser, R. 1993. The effect of error correction on L2 grammar knowledge and oral

proficiency. Modern Language Journal, 77,, 501-514.

Doughty, C. & Varela, E. 1998. Communicative focus on form. In C.J. Doughty and J.

Williams (Eds), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp.

114-138). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Dulay, H. C. et al. 1982. Language two. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R., Loewen, S., and Erlam, R. 2006. Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the

acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 339 –

369.

Ellis, R. & Sheen, Y. 2006. Reexamining the Role of Recast in Second Language

Acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 575-600.

http://journals.cambridge.org

Ellis, R. 2009. Corrective feedback and teacher development. L2 Journal, 1, 3-16.

Retrieved from http://repositories.cdlib.org/uccllt/l2/vol1/ iss1/art2/.

Ellis, R. 2010. Epilogue: A Framework for Investigating Oral and Written Corrective

Feedback. Studies of Second Language Acquisition, 32, pp. 335-449.

DOI:10.1017/S0272263109990544

Esmaeli, F. & Behnam, B. (2014). A Study of Corrective Feedback and Learner’s Uptake

in Classroom Interactions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English

Literature, 3(4), 204-212. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.3n.4p.204

Fatemi, A. H., Seyyedrezai, Z. S., & Vahedi, V. S. 2014. Comparative Effects of Recast

and Metalinguistic Corrective Feedback in Processing Instruction versus

Meaningful Output-based Instruction on The Acquisition of Comparative and

(4)

2(1), 71-89.

http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ijele/article/view/4550/374

Field, J. 2000. Lifelong Learning and the New Educational Order. Stoke on Trent:

Trentham Books.

Frankel, Jack. R, Norman Wallen, Helen Hyun. 2012. How to Design and Evaluate

Research in Education. New York. The McGraw Hill Company.

Gallart. M.A. 1989. The Diversification of the Edicational Field in Argentina. (IIEP

Research Reports 73). Paris: IIEP-UNESCO.

Gholizade, R. 2013. The Investigation of Differential Effects of Recast and Metalinguistic

Feedback on Accuracy, Fluency, and Complexity of Speaking Performance of

Male and Female EFL Learner. Journal of Novel Applied Science, 2(9), 417-428.

http://jnasci.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/417-428.pdf

Harmer, J. 2007. The Practice of English Language Teaching. Essex: Pearson Education.

Hedge, T. 2000. Teaching and learning in the language classroom. Oxford: Oxford

University Press.

Hendrickson, J. M. 1978. Error Correction in Foreign Language Teaching: Recent Theory,

Research, and Practice. Modern Language journal, 62, 387-398.

Jarvis. P. 2004. Adult Education and Lifelong Learning: Theory and Practice, 3rd ed.

London: Falmer Press. Retrieved from:

http://site.ebrary.com/lib/oculryerson/docDetail.action?docID=10093530&p00

Kagimoto, E., & Rodgers, M. P. H. (2008). Students’ Perceptions of Corrective Feedback. JALT 2007 Conference Proceedings. Tokyo: JALT. http://jalt-publications.org

Kassa, A.A. 2011. Oral Corrective Feedback: An Exploratory Case Study of the Interplay

Between Teachers’ Beliefs, Classroom Practices, and Rationales. (Dissertation, Addis Ababa University).

(5)

Kennedy, S. 2010. Corrective Feedback for Learners of Varied Proficiency Levels: A

Teacher’s Choice. TESL Canada Journal, 27(2), 31-50.

www.teslcanadajournal.com

Khaerunisa. 2009. Teachers’ Corrective Feedback on Students’ Spoken Errors in Second

Grade EFL Classrooms of a Senior High School. Master Thesis. Bandung:

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Krashen, S. 1982. Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford:

Pergamon.

Kuhne, G. ADTED 460 – Introduction to Adult Education. Penn State’s World Campus.

(course content)

Lightbown, P. & Spada, N. 1990. Focus on Form and Corrective Feedback in

Communicative Language Teaching: Effects on Second Language Acquisition.

Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 429-448.

http://journals.cambridge.org

Lochtman, K. 2002. Oral corrective feedback in the foreign language classroom: How it

affects interaction in analytic foreign language teaching. International Journal of

Education Research, 37, 271-283.

Loewen, S. & Philip, J. 2006. Recast in adult English L2 classroom: characteristics,

explicitness, and effectiveness. Modern Language Journal, 90, 536-556.

Long, M. H. 1991. Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In

K. de Bot, R. Ginsberg, and C. Krasch (Eds.), Foreign language research in

cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39 – 52). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Long, M. H. 1996. The Role of the Linguistic Environment in second Language

Acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of Second

Language Acquisition, pp. 413-468. San Diego: Academic Press.

Long, M. and Robinson, P. 1998. Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In C.

Doughty and J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language

(6)

Lyster, R. 1998a. Negotiation of form, recast, and explicit correction in relation to error

types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning, 48,

183-218.

Lyster, R. 1998b. Recast, repetition, and ambiguity in L2 classroom discourse. Studies in

Second Language Acquisition, 20, 51-81.

Lyster, R. 2004. Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction.

Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 399-432.

Lyster, R. and Mori, H. 2006. Interactional feedback and instructional counterbalance.

Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 269 – 300.

Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. 1997. Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form

in communicative classrooms. SSLA , 20,37-66.

Lyster, R., & Saito, K. 2010. Oral Feedback in Classroom SLA: A Meta-Analysis. Studies

in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 265-302.

Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. 2013. Counterpoint Piece: The Case for Variety in Corrective

Feedback Research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 167-184.

http://people.mcgill.ca/files/roy.lyster/Lyster-Ranta-2013.pdf

Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M. 2013. Oral Corrective Feedback in Second Language

Classroom. Language Teaching, 46, 1-40.

http://people.mcgill.ca/files/roy.lyster/Lyster-Saito-Sato-2013.pdf

Mackey, A. & Philip, J. 1998. Conversational interaction and interlanguage development:

Recasts, responses, and red herrings? Modern Language Journal, 82, 338-356.

Mackey, A., Gass, S., and McDonough, K. 2000. How do learners perceive interactional

feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 471 – 497.

Majhanovich, S. and Hu, J. 1995. Communicative Strategies for Intermediate Level

Second Language Classes. In Second language practice: classroom strategies for

developing communicative competence. G. Duquette (ed.) 67-97. Clevedon:

(7)

Maolida, E. H. 2012. A Descriptive Study of Teacher’s Oral Feedback in ESL Young

Learner Classroom in Indonesia. Paper (Unpublished). Bandung: Universitas

Pendidikan Indonesia.

Maolida, E.H. 2013. Oral Corrective Feedback and Learner Uptake in a Young Learner

EFL Classroom. (Thesis, UPI, unpublished).

Maxwell, J. A. 1996. Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach. London:

SAGE Publications.

McMillan, James H and Sally Schumacher. 2001. Research in Education. A Conceptual

Introduction. Fifth Edition. Boston: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Nunan, David. 1993. Research Method in Language Learning. Cambridge Language

Teaching Library: Cambridge University Press.

Nunan, D. & Bailey, K.M. 2009. Exploring Second Language Classroom Research.

Boston: Heinle Cengage Learning.

Pandu, G. 2014. Oral Corrective Feedback for Students of Different Proficiency Levels.

Master Thesis. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Panova, I and Lyster, R. 2002. Patterns of Corrective Feedback and Uptake in an Adult

ESL Classroom. TESOL QUARTERLY 36 (4), pp. 575-595.

Rassaei, E., & Moinzadeh, A. 2011. Investigating the Effecys of Three Types of

Corrective Feedback on the Acquisition of English WH-question Forms by Iranian

EFL Learners. English Language Teaching, 4(2), DOI: 10.5539/elt.v4n2p97

www.ccsenet.org/elt

Rezaei, S., Mozaffari, F., & Hatef, A. 2011. Corrective Feedback in SLA: Classroom

Practice and Future Directions. International Journal of English Linguistics, 1(1),

21-29. www.ccsenet.org/jel

(8)

Rogers, A. 2004. Non-Formal Education: Flexible Schooling or Participatory Education?

(CERC Studies in Comparative Education 15). Comparative Education Research

Center, The University of Hong Kong.

Rubenson, K. 2011. Adult Learning and Education. Saint Louis, Mo.: Academic Press.

Retrieved from:

http://site.ebrary.com/lib/oculryerson/docDetail.action?docID=10440525&p00

Russel, V. 2009. Corrective Feedback over Decade of Research since Lyster and Ranta

(1997): Where Do We Stand Today. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language

Teaching, 1(6), 21-31. http://e-flt.nus.edu.sg/v6n12009/russell.pdf

Safari, P. & Alavi, S. M. 2013. On the Relationship between Recast and Learner’s Uptake:

Evidence from a Young Adult Class. The Iranian EFL Journal, 9(3), 172-187.

http://www.iranian-efl-journal.com/index.php/2013-index?layout=edit&id=55

Schachter, J. 1991. Corrective feedback in historical perspective. Second Language

Research, 7, 2: 89 – 102.

Schmidt, R. 2010. Attention, awareness, and Individual differences in Language Learning.

in W. M. Chann, S. Cin, J. Istanto, M. Nagami, L. W. sew, T. Suthiwan & I.

walker, Proceedings of Classic 2010, Singapore, December 2-4 (pp. 721-737).

Singapore: National University of Singapore, Centre for Language Studies.

Sheen, Y. H. 2004. Corrective feedback and learner uptake in communicative classrooms

across instructional settings. Language Teaching Research, 8, 3: 265-300.

Sheen, Y. H. 2006. Exploring the relationship between characteristics of recasts and

learner uptake. Language Teaching Research, 10, 361-392.

ltr.sagepub.com/content/10/4/361.full.pdf

Sheen, Y. & Ellis, R. 2011. Corrective Feedback in Language Teaching. In Hinkel, E. (ed).

2011. Handbook of Reasearch in Second Language Teaching and learning, 2, pp.

(9)

Shulby, C. 2011. Prompts, Uptake, Modified Output, and Repair for L2 Learners with

Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety. Horizontes de Linguistica Aplicada, 10(2),

41-64. seer.bce.unb.br/index.php/horizontesla

Silverman, D. 2005. Doing Qualitative Research: A Practical Handbook. (2nd Edition).

London: SAGE Publications.

Stake, R.E. 2010. Qualitative Research: Studying How Things Work. New York: The

Guilford Press.

Surakka, K. 2007. Corrective Feedback and Learner Uptake in an EFL Classroom. Master

Thesis. Finland: University of Jyvaskyla.

https://jyx.jyu.fi/.../URN_NBN_fi_jyu-2007551.

Suzuki, M. 2004. Corrective feedback and learner uptake in adult ESL classrooms.

Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 1 – 21.

Swain, M. 2007. The Output Hypothesis: Its History and Its Future [PowerPoint Slide].

Retrieved from http://www.celea.org.cn/2007/keynote/ppt/Merrill%20Swain.pdf

Taipale, P. 2012. Oral Errors, Corrective Feedback, and Learner Uptake in an EFL

Setting. Master Thesis. Finland: University of Jyvaskyla.

https://jyx.jyu.fi/.../URN_NBN_fi_jyu-20120312

Tatawy, M. E. 2002. Corrective Feedback in Second Language Acquisition.

Tesolalwebjournal, 2(2), 1-19. www.tc.columbia.edu

Truscott, J. 1999. What’s Wrong With Oral Grammar Correction. Canadian Modern

Language Review, 55, 437-456. http://www.hss.nthu.edu.tw/

Tsang, W. K. 2004. Feedback and uptake in teacher-student interaction: An analysis of 18

english lessons in Hong Kong secondary classrooms. RELC Journal, 35, 2:

187-209.

(10)

White, L. 1991. Adverb placement in second language acquisition: Some effects of

positive and negative evidence in the classroom. Second Language Research, 7,

133-161.

White, L., Spada, N., Lightbown, P.M., & Ranta, L. (1991). Input enhancement and L2

question formation. Applied Linguistics, 12, 416-432.

Yoshida, R. 2008. Teachers’ choice and learners’ preference of corrective feedback types. Language Awareness, 17(1), 78 – 93.

Zhang, S. & Chatupote, M. 2014. Feedback Used in Classroom with Native English and Non-Native English Teachers. International Journal of English language Education, 2(1), 241-258.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Agar Mahasiswa dapat memahami tentang Rangkaian terpadu monolitik, Proses-proses monolitik, Transistor untuk rangkaian monolitik, Dioda-dioda monolitik, Tahanan- tahanan

infeksi malaria falsiparum pada sediaan darah tepi dengan beratnya penyakit.. secara klinis, terbukti dangan didapatkannyaYJ

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui keefektifan metode quantum teaching dalam pengajaran berbicara di kelas dua pada SMP IP Baitul Maal Jurang Mangu Pondok

12.1 Doku men Kualifikasi dimasu kkan dalam sampul pen utup dan ditulis “Dokumen Ku alifikasi” dan n ama paket pekerjaan, nama dan alam at peserta, ser ta

Digital Repository Universitas Jember Digital Repository Universitas Jember... Digital Repository Universitas Jember Digital Repository

Bukti Kepemilikan alat dan Jika dengan Surat perjanjian Sewa Alat, peserta membawa bukti kepemilikan alat dari pemilik alat yang memberi sewa (asli dan 2 copy);. Surat Perjanjian

Faktor-Faktor Yang Berhubungan Dengan Kejadian Hipertensi Pada Lansia Di Pusling Desa Klumpit UPT Puskesmas Gribig Kabupaten Kudus.. Hubungan Indeks Masa Tubuh (IMT)

Tujuan dari perancangan promosi ini adalah mendorong minat masyarakat Indonesia untuk mengkonsumsi susu kambing secara terus menerus, dan untuk mencapai hal