DAFTAR PUSTAKA
1. Arslan S, Demirbuga S, Ustun Y, Dincer AN, Canakci BC, Zorba YO. The effect
of a new generation flowable composite resin on microleakage in class V
composite restorations as an intermediate layer. J Conserv Dent 2013; 16: 189-93.
2. Al-Bazooki AA, Rehman MM. Microleakage in class V nanofilled composite
compared with traditional hybrid and flowable composite restoration. Pakistan
Oral & Dent J 2010; 30 (1): 215-9.
3. Supriyanto. Pengaruh Aplikasi Resin Komposit Flowable sebagai Intermediate
Layer Terhadap Kebocoran Mikro Restorasi Resin Komposit Packable dengan
Teknik Penyinaran Ramped dan Konvensional 2012. Tesis. Yogyakarta: Program
Pendidikan Dokter Gigi Spesialis, 2012: 1-6.
4. Lokhande NA, Padmai AS, Rathore VP, Shingane S, Jayashankar DN, Sharma U.
Effectiveness of flowable resin composite in reducing microleakage - an in vitro
study. J Int Oral Health 2014; 6 (3): 111-4.
5. Küçükeşmen C, Sönmez H. Microleakage of class-V compsite restorations with
different bonding systems on fluorosed teeth. Eur J Dent 2008; 2 (1): 48-58.
6. Chimello DT, Chinelatti MA, Ramos RP, Palma Dibb RG. In vitro evaluation of
microleakage of a flowable composite in class V restorations. Braz Dent J 2002;
13 (3):184-7.
7. Diansari V, Eriwati Y, Indrani J. Kebocoran mikro pada restorasi komposit resin
dengan sistem total-etch dan self etch pada berbagai jarak penyinaran. Indonesia
Journal of Dentistry 2008; 15 (2): 121-30
8. Mousavinasab S, Khosravi K, Tayebghasemi N. Microleakage assessment of
class V composite restoration rebounded with three different methods. Dent Res J
2008; 5 (1): 21-6.
9. Chandki R, Kala M. Total etch vs self etch : still a controversy in the science of
bonding. AOSR 2011;1(1): 38-42.
10.Karthick K et al. Polymerization shrinkage of composites – a review. JIADS
2011; 2: 32-6
11.Sadeghi M. An in vitro microleakage study of class V cavities restored with a
new self-adhesive flowable composite resin versus different flowable materials.
Dent Res J 2012; 9 (4): 460-5.
12.Calheiros FC, Sadek FT, Braga RR, Cardoso PE. Polymerization contraction
stress of low-shrinkage composited and its correlation with microleakage in class
V restorations. J Dentistry 2004; 32: 407-412.
13.Baroudi K, Saleh AM, Silikas N, Watts DC. Shrinkage behavior of flowable resin
composites related to conversion and filler-fraction. J Dentistry 2007; 35: 651-5
14.Roberson TM, Heymann HO, Ritter AV. Introduction to composite restorations.
In: Roberson TM, Heymann HO, Swift EJ. eds. Sturdevant’s art and science of
operative dentistry, 5th ed., St. Louis: Mosby Elsevier, 2009: 193-215.
15.Kakar S, Goswami M, Kanase A. Dentin bonding agents I: complete
classification-a review.World J Dent 2011; 2 (4): 367-370
16. Anusavice KJ, Shen C, Rawls R. Philips’ science of dental materials. 12th ed.,St.
Louis: Elsevier, 2013: 257-305
17.Wahab F, Abu-Tabra IT, Amin WM. An in vitro study of micro leakage of
different types of composites with respect to their matrix compositions. British
Journal of Medicine & Medical Research 2014; 4 (9): 1908-22
18.Garg N, Garg A. Textbook of operative dentistry. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers
Medical Publishers, 2010: 256-280
19.Moldovan M, Prejmerean C, Colcerio A, Tamas A, Furtos G, Prodan D, dkk.
Effect of coupling agents on the local mechanical properties of bioactive dental
composites. Journal of Optoelectronics and Advance Materials 2007; 9 (11):
3415-8
20.Alonso R, Saouza-Junior E, Dressano D, Araujo G, Rodriguez J, Hipolito V, dkk.
Effect of photoinitiator concentrartion on marginal and internal adaptation of
experimental composite blends photocured by modulated methods. European
Journal of Dentistry 2013; 7 (1): 51-8
21.Albers HF. Tooth-colored restoratives: principles and techniques; resin. 9 th ed.
London: BC Decker Inc, 2002: 111-25, 127-56
22.Ghulman MA. Effect of cavity configuration (C-factor) on the marginal adaptation
of low-shrinking composite: a comparative ex vivo study. Int J Dent 2011; 1-11.
23.Scientific Compendium. SDR: Stress Decreasing Resin. USA: Mildford, 2011:
5-29.
24.Tiba A, Zeller GG, Estrich C, Hong A. A laboratory evaluation of bulk-fill versus
traditional multi-increment-fill resin-based composite. JADA 2013; 8 (3): 13-25
25.Vyver PV. Clinical application of a new flowable base material for direct and
indirect restorations. Int Dent SA 2010; 12(5): 18-27.
26.Meena N, Jain N. Options for dentin bonding-total etch or self etch. IJCD 2011;
2(2): 31-3.
27.Giachetti L, Russo DS, Bambi C, Grandini R. A review of polymerization
shrinkage stress: current techniques for posterior direct resin restoration. J
Contemp Dent Pract 2006; 7 (4): 1-14.
28.Pires-De-Souza F, Casemiro LA, Garcia L, Consani S. Polymerization shrinkage
stress of composites photo activated by different light sources. Braz Dent J 2009;
20 (4): 319-324
29.Wheeler BP, Wilson LJ. Practical microscopy: a laboratory manual. West Sussex:
Wiley, 2008: 61-71
30.Arora R, Kapur R, Sibal N, Juneja S. Evaluatin of microleakage in class II cavtiies
using packable composite restoration with and without use of liners. J Cli Pediatr
Dent 2012; 5 (3): 178-184
31.Majety KK, Pujar M. in vitro evaluation of microleakage of class II packable
composite resin restoration using flowable composite and resin modified glass
ionomers as intermediate layers. J Con Dent 2011; 14 (4): 414-7.
32.Reddy SN, Jayashankar DN, Nainan M, Shivanna V. The effect of flowable
composite lining thickness with various curing techniques on microleakage in
class II composite restoration: an in vitro study. J Cont Dent Pract 2013; 14 (1):
56-60.
33.Garcia AH, Lozano MAM, Vila JC, Escribano AB, Galve PF. Composite resin: a
review of the materials and clinical indications. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal
2006; 11: 215-20.
34.Powers JM, Sakaguchi RL. Craig’s restorative dental materials. 13 th ed., St.
Louis: Mosby Elsevier, 2012: 176.
35.Nunes MCP, Franco EB, Pereira JC. Marginal microleakage: critical analysis of
methodology. Salusvita, Bauru 2004; 24 (3): 487-502.
36.Senawongse P, Pongprueksa P, Tagami J. The effect of elastic modulus of
low-viscosity resins on the microleakage of class V resin composite restorations under
occlusal loading. Dent Mater J 2010; 29 (3): 324-9
37.Scotti N, Comba A, Gambino A, Paolino DS, Alovisi M, Pasqualini D, Berutti E.
Microleakage at enamel and dentin margins with a bulk fills flowable resin. Eur J
Dent 2014; 8 (1): 1-8
38.Sooraparaju SG, Kanumuru PK, Nujella SK, Konda KR, Reddy KB, Penigalapati
S. A comparative evaluation of microleakage in class V composite restoration. Int
J Dent 2014; 2014: 1-4
39.Alonso RCB, Brandt WC, Souza-Junior EJC, Puppin-Rontani RM, Sinhoretti
MAC. Photoinitiator concentration and modulated photoactivation: influence on
polymerization characteristic of experimental composites. Applied Adhesion
Science 2014; 2: 10
40.Lopes MB, Costa LA, Consani S, Gonini AJ, Sinhoretti MAC. SEM evaluation of
marginal sealing on composite restoration using different photoactivation and
composite insertion methods. Indian J Dent 2009; 20 (4): 394-9
41.Oliveira GCB. Influence of tooth age and application time on the microtensile
bond streghts of different adhesive system to dentin. Tesis. Chapel Hill: Degree of
Master of Science in the Department of Operative Dentistry, 2010: 22-6.
