Krishna in the West:
Key issues in the International
Society for Krishna
Consciousness after the
passing of the founder
University of Sydney Religion Seminar, 15 March 2016. Angela Burt, Postdoctoral Fellow, Oxford Centre for Hindu
ISKCON was founded by Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada in New York
Historical background of ISKCON
• ISKCON is a modern institutionalized form of the Gaudiya Vaishnava
tradition – a mono-theistic tradition whose chief deity is the god Krishna. • The Gaudiya Vaishnava tradition
ISKCON’s mission
• ISKCON’s mission has been to teach
Westerners the principles of bhakti-yoga
(yoga of devotion), or Krishna consciousness.
• This involves chanting the names of Krishna
in groups and public settings, as well as privately, worship of the deity of Krishna, studying sacred texts including the
Bhagavad-gita, and refraining from
Institutional structure
• Prabhupada registered ISKCON in New York in 1966. • In 1970 he formed a Governing Body Commission
(GBC) – a governing board comprised of disciples, to manage the afairs of ISKCON.
• Each GBC member has responsibility for a diferent
part of the world.
• In the 1960s and 1970s most members lived in
ISKCON’s ashrams but in the 1980s members
began to move out into their own homes.
Gurus and the principle of
parampara
• The guru has an authoritative position within the Gaudiya
Vaishnava tradition.
• Parampara (a line of teachers) is the means by which knowledge of the
tradition is passed on.
• Initiation (diksha) of a disciple by a guru is an important part of the
The issue of succession
• In May 1977 Prabhupada confrmed that after his death, he wanted his
disciples to continue running ISKCON via the GBC, and that his disciples
should become gurus.
• In July 1977 he named eleven
Prabhupada passed away in
November 1977
• No spiritual successor was explicitly
named i.e. he did not name anyone to be guru, as he had said he would in
the May 1977 conversation.
• The only successor named in his will
was the GBC as the ultimate managing authority of ISKCON.
• GBC members discussed who should
Naming the gurus
At the GBC meetings in February 1978, it was announced by the GBC that the
eleven disciples named in the July 1977 conversation
This system seemed to work for
some time
• The legitimacy of the gurus was accepted.
• However problems became apparent early on.
• Three gurus were suspended in 1980. • One of the suspended gurus left
ISKCON with a large number of
disciples in 1982, in ISKCON’s frst schism.
• Another of the suspended gurus was expelled in 1983 for fouting the
Dissent and protes
t
• Debates ensued about whether the eleven
gurus were legitimate successors to the founder.
• Main issues were their spiritual
• This protest was fueled by the
difficulties that some of the gurus
were having in upholding their vows, as well as other behaviours that were inappropriate and sometimes illegal. • In essence the legitimacy of the
Guru reform
• Dissatisfaction became more
pronounced in 1984 after a North
American Temple President’s meeting.
• Meetings were held about a year later
in 1985 where grievances were aired publicly.
• Resolutions made at these meetings
Reforms 1985-1987
• The authority of the GBC over the gurus was
affirmed.
• The number of gurus was increased, thereby lowering
the exclusive status of the eleven gurus.
• The amount of ritual worship ofered to the gurus was
reduced.
• Gurus were no longer allowed to be called “Acharya”,
thus removing their special status as institutional heads.
• New ISKCON members were authorized to take
Guru exodus
In 1986 three gurus left ISKCON and one guru was suspended from initiating.
In 1987 another guru was expelled for fouting the authority of the GBC and engaging in illegal activities, including racketeering and ordering the murders of
two ISKCON members.
In 1987, the guru who had left ISKCON in 1982 with his disciples was murdered by
Key issues in this period
The issue of succession Authority
Legitimacy Status
Post-reform malaise
The organization subsequently settled into a less turbulent rhythm, but
Decline
• Fallout from the crisis of succession and guru reforms:
• ISKCON members experienced a loss of faith in ISKCON’s leadership.
• Decline in active monastic membership, proselytization, and income.
• Loss of members to other Gaudiya Vaishanva groups.
Increasing eforts to attract
Westerners to ISKCON
The advent of Krishna West
• Hridayananda das Goswami, one of the
original eleven gurus had been concerned for some years about the stagnation of outreach to Westerners and the Indianization and
Hinduization of ISKCON.
• In 2013 he formed a project called Krishna
West within ISKCON, whose sole purpose would be to make Krishna consciousness
attractive to Westerners by stripping it of what he saw as unnecessary Indian cultural
The Krishna West controversy
• In 2014 controversy erupted again when the GBC and Hridayananda clashed regarding Krishna West, and the GBC banned him from undertaking a tour of Europe aimed at expanding Krishna West.
• Krishna West became a divisive issue amongst ISKCON’s leadership and members.
• Main issues of contention were the push to strip the Indian cultural elements from ISKCON’s
A truce is called
• The GBC and Hridayananda met in January this
year to work through the dispute.
• The GBC have accepted Krishna West as a
legitimate preaching project within ISKCON, and Hridayananda as a member in good standing in ISKCON. The GBC and Hridayananda agreed to cease mutual criticism.
• Krishna West continues with a number of
centres around the world, and although tensions have eased, controversy about the goals of
Key issues
• Indian and Western culture • Tradition and modernity
• Institutional reform • The threat of schism • Cultural appropriation
• Orthodoxy and innovation
• How these issues have played out on an
The current controversy and the
future of ISKCON
• This latest development indicates that
the key issues that beset ISKCON’s earlier period are still signifcant.
• Krishna West is currently one of the
most talked about and divisive issues amongst ISKCON devotees. How it is dealt with by ISKCON members will be important for how the institution