7. LAMPIRAN
Lampiran 1. Foto Pelaksanaan Survey
1.3. Foto Survey di SMP Nusaputera Semarang
Lampiran 2. Hasil Uji Beda Chi Square Antar Jenis Kelamin Responden
Test Statistics jeniskelamin Chi-Square .480a df 1 Asymp. Sig. .488a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected frequencies less than 5. The minimum expected cell frequency is 150,0.
Lampiran 3. Hasil Uji Korelasi Kendall
Correlations
uangsaku frekuensibeli
Kendall's tau_b uangsaku Correlation Coefficient 1.000 .306**
Sig. (2-tailed) . .000
N 317 300
frekuensibeli Correlation Coefficient .306** 1.000
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .
N 300 300
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Lampiran 4. Hasil Uji Korelasi Spearman
Correlations
frekuensibeli umur
Spearman's rho frekuensibeli Correlation Coefficient 1.000 -.111
Sig. (2-tailed) . .054
N 300 300
umur Correlation Coefficient -.111 1.000
Sig. (2-tailed) .054 .
Lampiran 5. Hasil Uji Koefisien Kontingensi
5.1. Uang saku vs merk es krim yang pertama diingat
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,233 ,044
N of Valid Cases 300
a Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
5.2. Uang saku vs jenis es krim yang paling sering dibeli
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,208 ,137
N of Valid Cases 301
a Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
5.3. Uang saku vs alasan membeli es krim
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,159 ,555
N of Valid Cases 300
a Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
5.4. Uang saku vs tempat pembelian es krim
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,203 ,373
N of Valid Cases 301
a Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
5.5. Uang saku vs rasa es krim yang paling disukai
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,269 ,176
N of Valid Cases 300
a Not assuming the null hypothesis.
5.6. Uang saku vs karakter es krim yang disuka
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,198 ,166
N of Valid Cases 315
a Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
5.7. Uang saku vs merk es krim yang paling sering dikonsumsi
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,141 ,913
N of Valid Cases 300
a Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
5.8. Uang saku vs asal mengetahui tentang es krim
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,196 ,213
N of Valid Cases 300
a Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
5.9. Merk es krim yang pertama diingat vs frekuensi konsumsi
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,180 ,344
N of Valid Cases 300
a Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
5.10. Merk es krim yang pertama diingat vs jenis es krim yang sering dibeli
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,193 ,234
N of Valid Cases 300
a Not assuming the null hypothesis.
5.11. Merk es krim yang pertama diingat vs alasan membeli es krim
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,203 ,167
N of Valid Cases 300
a Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
5.12. Merk es krim yang pertama diingat vs tempat pembelian
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,209 ,319
N of Valid Cases 300
a Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
5.13. Merk es krim yang pertama diingat vs rasa es krim yang disuka
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,284 ,092
N of Valid Cases 300
a Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
5.14. Merk es krim yang pertama diingat vs karakter es krim yang disuka
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,167 ,475
N of Valid Cases 300
a Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
5.15.Merk es krim yang pertama diingat vs merk yang sering dikonsumsi
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,523 ,000
N of Valid Cases 300
a Not assuming the null hypothesis.
5.16. Merk es krim yang pertama diingat vs sumber informasi
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,276 ,003
N of Valid Cases 300
a Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
5.17. Frekuensi konsumsi vs jenis es krim
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,233 ,046
N of Valid Cases 300
a Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
5.18. Frekuensi konsumsi vs alasan membeli es krim
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,246 ,023
N of Valid Cases 300
a Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
5.19. Frekuensi konsumsi vs tempat pembelian
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,243 ,091
N of Valid Cases 300
a Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
5.20. Frekuensi konsumsi vs rasa yang disukai
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient
,239 ,442
N of Valid Cases 300
a Not assuming the null hypothesis.
5.21. Frekuensi konsumsi vs karakter es krim yang disuka
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,182 ,328
N of Valid Cases 300
a Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
5.22. Frekuensi konsumsi vs merk es krim yang paling sering dikonsumsi
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,159 ,804
N of Valid Cases 300
a Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
5.23. Frekuensi konsumsi vs sumber informasi tentang es krim
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,170 ,444
N of Valid Cases 300
a Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
5.24. Jenis es krim yang biasa dibeli vs alasan membeli es krim
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,175 ,393
N of Valid Cases 300
a Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
5.25. Jenis es krim yang biasa dibeli vs tempat pembelian
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,240 ,104
N of Valid Cases 300
a Not assuming the null hypothesis.
5.26. Jenis es krim yang biasa dibeli vs rasa es krim yang disuka
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,265 ,206
N of Valid Cases 300
a Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
5.27. Jenis es krim yang biasa dibeli vs karakter es krim yang disuka
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,245 ,024
N of Valid Cases 300
a Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
5.28. Jenis es krim yang biasa dibeli vs merk es krim yang paling sering
dikonsumsi
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,251 ,062
N of Valid Cases 300
a Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
5.29. Jenis es krim yang biasa dibeli vs sumber informasi tentang es krim
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,232 ,048
N of Valid Cases 300
a Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
5.30. Alasan membeli es krim vs tempat pembelian
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,364 ,000
N of Valid Cases 300
a Not assuming the null hypothesis.
5.31. Alasan membeli es krim vs rasa es krim yang disuka
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,164 ,974
N of Valid Cases 300
a Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
5.32. Alasan membeli es krim vs karakter es krim yang disuka
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,216 ,099
N of Valid Cases 300
a Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
5.33. Alasan membeli es krim vs merk yang paling sering dikonsumsi
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,150 ,862
N of Valid Cases 300
a Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
5.34. Alasan membeli es krim vs sumber informasi tentang es krim
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,248 ,021
N of Valid Cases 300
a Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
5.35. Tempat pembelian vs rasa es krim yang disuka
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,339 ,028
N of Valid Cases 300
a Not assuming the null hypothesis.
5.36. Tempat pembelian vs karakter es krim yang disuka
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,175 ,665
N of Valid Cases 300
a Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
5.37. Tempat pembelian vs merk es krim yang paling sering dikonsumsi
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,722 ,000
N of Valid Cases 300
a Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
5.38. Tempat pembelian vs sumber informasi tentang es krim
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,276 ,017
N of Valid Cases 300
a Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
5.39. Rasa es krim yang disukai vs karakter es krim yang disuka
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,231 ,525
N of Valid Cases 300
a Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
5.40. Rasa es krim yang disukai vs merk es krim yang paling sering dikonsumsi
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,258 ,613
N of Valid Cases 300
a Not assuming the null hypothesis.
5.41. Rasa es krim yang disukai vs sumber informasi tentang es krim
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,369 ,000
N of Valid Cases 300
a Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
5.42. Karakter es krim yang disuka vs merk es krim yang paling sering dikonsumsi
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,247 ,078
N of Valid Cases 300
a Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
5.43. Karakter es krim yang disuka vs sumber informasi tentang es krim
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,268 ,006
N of Valid Cases 300
a Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
5.44. Merk es krim yang paling sering dikonsumsi vs sumber informasi tentang es
krim
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,271 ,021
N of Valid Cases 300
a Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
Lampiran 6. Perhitungan Jumlah Responden
Dari penelitian pendahuluan terhadap 31 responden, didapat sebanyak 7 orang
mengkonsumsi es krim 1 kali dalam sebulan, 1 orang mengkonsumsi es krim 2 kali
dalam sebulan, 12 orang mengkonsumsi es krim 3 kali dalam sebulan, dan 11 orang
mengkonsumsi es krim lebih dari kali dalam sebulan. Untuk penentuan jumlah sampel
digunakan proporsi responden yang mengkonsumsi es krim 3 kali atau lebih dalam
sebulan karena dianggap mewakili konsumen yang sering mengkonsumsi es krim yaitu
sebanyak 23 responden.
1
2
23
31
1
23
31
1,96
0,05
N = 0,74 x 0, 26 x 1536,64
N = 295,649 ≈ 300 responden
Lampiran 7. Kuisioner Penelitian
KUISIONER ANALISIS PENGARUH KARAKTERISTIK MUTU ES KRIM
TERHADAP BUDAYA KONSUMSI ES KRIM PADA SISWA SMP DAN SMA
Oleh Brigitta Adiati (08.70.0005)
Mahasiswa Teknologi Pangan
Fakultas Teknologi Pertanian
Universitas Katolik Soegijapranata
Nama :
Jenis Kelamin
: Laki-laki / Perempuan
(coret yg tidak perlu)Nama sekolah / kelas
:
Umur :
Uang Saku
: ( ) kurang dari Rp 5.000,00/ hari
( ) antara Rp 5.000,00-Rp 10.000,00/ hari
( ) antara Rp 10.000,00-Rp 15.000,00/ hari
( ) lebih dari Rp 15.000,00/hari
Petunjuk : Berilah tanda silang “X” pada jawaban yang sesuai dengan pilihan Anda
1. Merk es krim apa yang pertama kali anda ingat ? (satu merk saja)
Jawab :....
2. Berapa kali dalam sebulan, anda membeli es krim ?
a. 1 kali
c. 3 kali
b. 2 kali
d. lebih dari 3 kali
3. Dalam kemasan apa es krim yang biasa anda beli ?
(jawaban boleh lebih dari 1)a. Cone
c. cup
b. Stick
d. box
4.