• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

DAFTAR PUSTAKA. Apriyani. (2016, Januari 28). Jepang Tertarik Investasi di Pariwisata. Infobanknews.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Membagikan "DAFTAR PUSTAKA. Apriyani. (2016, Januari 28). Jepang Tertarik Investasi di Pariwisata. Infobanknews."

Copied!
17
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Agus, Harjito dan Martono. 2011. Manajemen Keuangan. Edisi Kedua, Cetakan

Pertama. Yogyakarta: Ekonosia

Apriyani. (2016, Januari 28). Jepang Tertarik Investasi di Pariwisata.

Infobanknews. http://infobanknews.com

Artanti, Anisa Ayu. (2015, Agustus 18). 4 Alasan Mengapa Sektor Pariwisata

Dianggap Sektor Penting. http://ekonomi.metrotvnews.com

Baroroh, Niswah & Linda Agustina. 2016.

The Relationship Between Enterprise

Risk Management (ERM) And Firm Value Mediated Through The

Financial

Performance

.

GMP

Press

and

Printing

(http://buscompress.com/journal-home.html)

Brigham, E.F dan Houston, 2009. Dasar-Dasar Manajemen Keuangan, Edisi Sepuluh,

Alih Bahasa Ali Akbar Yulianto. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Fahmi, Irham. 2011. Analisis Laporan Keuangan. Cetakan kedua. Bandung:

Alfabeta.

Fuad, M dkk. 2006. Pengantar Bisnis. Cetakan Kelima. Jakarta: PT Gramedia

Pustaka Utama.

Gitman, J Lawrance. 2006. Principle of Managerial Finance. 10th edition. Boston

Gujarati, Damodar N. 2006. Dasar - Dasar Ekonometrika. Jakarta: PT. Gelora

Aksara Pratama.

Hanafi, M.M dan A.Halim. 2012. Analisis Laporan Keuangan. Edisi Keempat.

Cetakan Kedua. Unit Penerbit dan Percetakan Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu

Manajemen YKPN. Yogyakarta.

Harahap, S Sofyan. 2009. Analisis Kritis Laporan Keuangan. Cetakan Ketiga.

Edisi 1. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Perkasa.

Harmono. 2009. Manajemen Keuangan Berbasis Balances Scorecard (Pendekatan

teori, kasus, dan riset bisnis). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Hery. 2015. Analisis Laporan Keuangan. Yogyakarta: CAPS ( Center For

Academic Publishing Service).

(2)

106

Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia. 2009. Standar Akuntansi Keuangan. Jakarta: Salemba

Empat.

Irawati, Susan. 2006. Manajemen Keuangan. Cetakan Kesatu. Bandung: PT.

Pustaka

Irayanti, Desi, & Alje L Tumbel. 2014. Analisis Kinerja Keuangan Pengaruhnya

terhadap Nilai Perusahaan Pada Industri Makanan dan Minuman di BEI.

Jurnal EMBA. Vol 2 No 3. September 2014. Hal. 1473-1482.

Kamaludin. 2011. Manajemen Kauangan, Konsep dasar dan penerapannya.

Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Kasmir. 2009. Analisis Laporan Keuangan. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Kasmir. 2013. Pengantar Manajemen Keuangan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media

Group.

Mahmudah, Rif’atul (2014, Maret 19). Pertumbuhan Sektor Perjalanan dan

Pariwisata Indonesia Tertinggi Dibanding Negara Anggota G20.

https://swa.co.id

Moniaga, Fernandes. 2013. Struktur Modal, Profitabilitas, dan Struktur Biaya

Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan keramik, Porcelen, dan Kaca 2007-2011. Jurnal

EMBA. Vol 1 No 4. Desember 2013. Hal. 433-442.

Munawir, S. 2010. Analisa Laporan Keuangan. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Murhadi, Werner R. 2013. Analisis Laporan Keuangan Proyeksi Valuasi Saham.

Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Nachrowi, N. Djalal dan Hardius Usman. 2006. Pendekatan Populer dan Praktis

Ekonometrika untuk Analisis Ekonomi dan Keuangan, Jakarta: LPFE

Universitas Indonesia.

Prastuti, Ni Kadek Rai & I Gede Merta Sudhiarta. 2016. Pengaruh Struktur

Modal, Kebijakan Dividen, dan Ukuran Perusahaan Terhadap Nilai

Perusahaan Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur. E-Jurnal Manajemen UNUD. Vol

5 No 3

Putra, AA Ngurah Dharma Adi. & Putu Vivi Lestari. 2016. Pengaruh Kebijakan

Dividen, Likuiditas, Profitabilitas, Dan Ukuran Perusahaan Terhadap Nilai

Perusahaan. E-jurnal Manajemen Unud, Vol. 5, No.7

Raharjaputra. Hendra S. 2009. Manajemen Keuangan dan Akuntansi. Cetakan

pertama. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

(3)

107

Riyanto, Bambang. 2011. Dasar-Dasar Pembelanjaan Perusahaan. Edisi Keempat.

Yogyakarta: BPFE.

Rompas, Gisela Prisilla. Likuiditas, Solvabilitas, dan Rentabilitas Terhadap Nilai

Perusahaan BUMN yang Terdaftar di BEI. Jurnal EMBA. Vol 1 No 3.

September 2013. Hal. 252-262.

Rustam , C. W.A. 2013. Pengaruh Tingkat Likuiditas, Solvabilitas, Aktivitas, dan

Profitabilitas Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan pada Perusahaan Real Estate dan

Property di BEI Tahun 2006 – 2008.

Jurnal Ekonom,

Vol 16, No 2.

Salvatore, Dominick. 2011. Ekonomi Manajerial dalam Perekonomian Global.

Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Sawir, Agnes. 2004. Kebijakan Pendanaan dan Restrukturisasi Perusahaan.

Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Suffah, Roviqotus. 2016. Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Leverage, Ukuran Perusahaan,

dan Kebijakan Deviden Pada Nilai Perusahaan. Jurnal Ilmu dan Riset

Akuntansi. Vol. 5 No. 2

Sugiyono. 2013. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Cetakan

ke-19. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta

Syamsudin, Lukman. 2007. Manajemen Keuangan Perusahaan. Jakarta: PT. Raja

Grafindo Persada.

Utomo, Rian. (2016, Oktober 8). Alasan Melakukan Investasi Pada Sektor

Pariwisata Di Indonesia. http://www.liburanbali.web.id

Weston, J. F. dan Copeland, T. E. 2008.

Manajemen

Keuangan. Edisi 9.Bina

Rupa Aksara. Jakarta.

Widarjono, Agus. 2007. Ekonometrika: Teori dan Aplikasi Untuk Ekonomi dan

Bisnis

,

edisi kedua. Yogyakarta: Ekonisia FE Universitas Islam Indonesia.

Winarto, Jacinta. 2015.

The Determinants of Manufacturer Firm Value In

Indonesia Stock Exchange

.

International Journal of Information, Business

and Management

. Vol 7 No 4.

Wulandari, Dwi Retno. 2013. Pengaruh Profitabilitas,

Operating Leverage

,

Likuiditas Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan Dengan Struktur Modal Sebagai

Intervening.

Accounting

Analysis

Journal

.

(4)

Lampiran 1

Daftar Perusahaan Subsektor Pariwisata, Hotel, dan Restoran 2011 - 2015

No.

Kode

Nama Perusahaan

1

ANTA

Anta Express Tour and Travel Service Tbk.

2

BAYU

Bayu Buana Tbk

3

BUVA

Bukit Uluwatu Villa Tbk

4

FAST

PT Fast Food Indonesia Tbk.

5

GMCW

Grahamas Citrawisata Tbk.

6

HOME

Hotel Mandarine Regency Tbk.

7

HOTL

Saraswati Griya Lestari Tbk.

8

ICON

PT Island Concept Indonesia Tbk.

9

INPP

PT Indonesian Paradise Property Tbk.

10

JGLE

Graha Andrasenta Propertindo

11

JIHD

Jakarta International Hotel & Development Tbk.

12

JSPT

Jakarta Setiabudi International Tbk.

13

KPIG

MNC Land Tbk.

14

MAMI

Mas Murni Indonesia Tbk.

15

PANR

Panorama Sentrawisata Tbk.

16

PDES

Destinasi Tirta Nusantara Tbk.

17

PGLI

PT Pembangunan Graha Lestari Indah Tbk

18

PJAA

PT Pembangunan Jaya Ancol Tbk.

19

PNSE

PT Pudjiadi & Sons Tbk.

20

PSAB

J Resources Asia Pacifik Tbk.

21

PSKT

Red Planet Indonesia Tbk

22

PTSP

Pioneerindo Gourment International Tbk

23

SHID

PT Hotel Sahid Jaya International Tbk.

24

SMMT

Entertainment International Tbk

(5)

LAMPIRAN 2

Current Ratio

No.

Kode

Perusahaan

Tahun

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

1

BAYU

147.60

147.51

144.40

152.88

160.13

2

BUVA

142.31

153.11

143.92

125.54

64.78

3

FAST

179.66

176.79

170.42

188.26

126.19

4

HOME

122.04

122.12

83.33

76.95

73.36

5

ICON

107.10

102.31

114.23

198.95

151.09

6

INPP

156.92

200.75

231.13

186.85

141.41

7

JSPT

154.78

166.61

148.82

238.05

281.54

8

MAMI

103.73

101.19

99.14

93.74

96.48

9

PANR

97.19

126.95

120.80

103.07

96.89

10

PDES

129.42

129.00

151.73

82.49

100.10

11

PGLI

200.20

233.01

647.78

238.46

374.26

12

PJAA

135.75

156.52

150.38

89.55

117.97

13

PNSE

190.12

198.08

258.70

285.15

167.73

14

PSKT

156.28

191.85

245.28

33.98

20.80

15

PTSP

141.99

147.36

186.13

148.90

100.05

16

SHID

109.02

162.88

125.72

122.44

115.74

Return On Equity

No.

Kode

Perusahaan

Tahun

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

1

BAYU

10.42

10.04

9.52

13.09

6.96

2

BUVA

10.55

7.43

7.66

3.15

-2.91

3

FAST

27.59

20.80

14.20

12.74

9.42

4

HOME

0.72

-4.47

0.76

0.37

0.12

5

ICON

3.74

5.95

16.41

3.51

2.47

6

INPP

0.33

1.18

2.54

6.23

2.84

7

JSPT

12.38

13.00

10.22

13.73

8.54

8

MAMI

0.27

0.40

0.44

0.58

0.36

9

PANR

0.01

11.34

12.96

13.28

12.26

10 PDES

6.19

6.66

11.21

7.43

3.82

11 PGLI

0.92

0.68

-0.37

2.13

0.82

12 PJAA

13.73

13.58

12.93

14.40

16.18

13 PNSE

21.53

18.13

17.46

10.29

5.56

14 PSKT

-5.75

2.27

3.59

-15.85

-52.62

15 PTSP

38.62

30.11

16.22

13.32

-1.15

16 SHID

1.10

1.38

1.57

1.30

0.04

(6)

Debt to Equity Ratio

No.

Kode

Perusahaan

Tahun

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

1

BAYU

1.19

1.10

1.05

0.87

0.72

2

BUVA

0.68

0.60

0.77

0.89

0.83

3

FAST

0.86

0.80

0.84

0.81

1.07

4

HOME

0.56

0.32

0.26

0.26

0.24

5

ICON

4.50

3.15

2.30

0.81

1.61

6

INPP

0.78

0.86

0.89

0.84

0.24

7

JSPT

0.78

0.83

0.68

0.55

0.49

8

MAMI

0.14

0.20

0.25

0.28

0.33

9

PANR

1.92

2.52

2.49

2.73

3.23

10 PDES

0.92

0.67

0.85

0.95

1.21

11 PGLI

0.18

0.22

0.14

0.21

0.14

12 PJAA

0.47

0.82

0.79

0.80

0.75

13 PNSE

0.69

0.55

0.65

0.50

0.53

14 PSKT

1.37

0.33

0.29

1.36

2.36

15 PTSP

0.90

0.72

0.60

0.82

1.15

16 SHID

0.36

0.41

0.55

0.52

0.55

Price to Book Value

No.

Kode

Perusahaan

Tahun

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

1

BAYU

0.77

0.75

0.64

1.21

1.18

2

BUVA

2.43

2.03

2.26

1.93

1.31

3

FAST

5.51

5.58

3.44

3.61

2.06

4

HOME

1.25

0.55

4.05

2.62

2.72

5

ICON

19.64

14.67

11.67

3.07

4.16

6

INPP

1.04

0.85

0.51

0.50

1.01

7

JSPT

1.00

0.96

0.85

0.78

0.88

8

MAMI

0.20

0.20

0.20

0.19

0.44

9

PANR

0.72

0.81

1.27

1.45

1.31

10 PDES

0.53

0.83

0.61

0.77

0.54

11 PGLI

0.66

1.45

1.23

0.89

0.59

12 PJAA

1.36

0.90

1.19

1.92

1.81

13 PNSE

1.50

1.74

1.71

1.49

1.16

14 PSKT

2.59

2.53

2.41

4.44

7.92

15 PTSP

2.17

4.55

5.65

7.19

13.97

16 SHID

0.50

0.44

0.40

0.36

0.55

(7)

Lampiran 3

Uji Statistik Deskriptif

Date: 08/06/17 Time: 10:53 Sample: 2011 2015 ROE PBV DER CR Mean 6.623000 2.410375 0.905625 154.5780 Median 6.210000 1.240000 0.775000 145.8800 Maximum 38.62000 19.64000 4.500000 647.7800 Minimum -52.62000 0.190000 0.140000 20.80000 Std. Dev. 10.71607 3.372114 0.783347 79.99617 Skewness -1.633700 3.147160 2.274084 3.235193 Kurtosis 13.97649 13.69377 8.826741 19.81476 Jarque-Bera 437.1976 513.2503 182.1225 1082.007 Probability 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 Sum 529.8400 192.8300 72.45000 12366.24 Sum Sq. Dev. 9071.901 898.3211 48.47697 505551.6 Observations 80 80 80 80

(8)

Lampiran 4

Uji Stationeritas

Current Ratio 1

st

Difference

Null Hypothesis: Unit root (individual unit root process) Series: D(CR)

Sample: 2011 2015

Exogenous variables: Individual effects Automatic selection of maximum lags

Automatic lag length selection based on SIC: 0 Total (balanced) observations: 48

Cross-sections included: 16

Method Statistic Prob.**

ADF - Fisher Chi-square 51.1653 0.0172

ADF - Choi Z-stat -1.88492 0.0297

** Probabilities for Fisher tests are computed using an asymptotic Chi -square distribution. All other tests assume asymptotic normality. Intermediate ADF test results D(CR)

Cross

section Prob. Lag Max Lag Obs

1 0.6625 0 0 3 2 0.9374 0 0 3 3 0.0106 0 0 3 4 0.2742 0 0 3 5 0.2491 0 0 3 6 0.7193 0 0 3 7 0.5031 0 0 3 8 0.0400 0 0 3 9 0.0874 0 0 3 10 0.2490 0 0 3 11 0.2647 0 0 3 12 0.3290 0 0 3 13 0.7866 0 0 3 14 0.4152 0 0 3 15 0.7123 0 0 3 16 0.0027 0 0 3

(9)

Lampiran 4

Uji Stationeritas

Return On Equity

Null Hypothesis: Unit root (individual unit root process) Series: ROE

Sample: 2011 2015

Exogenous variables: Individual effects Automatic selection of maximum lags

Automatic lag length selection based on SIC: 0 Total (balanced) observations: 64

Cross-sections included: 16

Method Statistic Prob.**

ADF - Fisher Chi-square 48.1121 0.0336

ADF - Choi Z-stat -0.36156 0.3588

** Probabilities for Fisher tests are computed using an asymptotic Chi -square distribution. All other tests assume asymptotic normality. Intermediate ADF test results ROE

Cross

section Prob. Lag Max Lag Obs

1 0.0338 0 0 4 2 0.9688 0 0 4 3 0.1982 0 0 4 4 0.2850 0 0 4 5 0.3749 0 0 4 6 0.4684 0 0 4 7 0.0363 0 0 4 8 0.2615 0 0 4 9 0.0002 0 0 4 10 0.5644 0 0 4 11 0.2084 0 0 4 12 0.9192 0 0 4 13 0.9391 0 0 4 14 0.9718 0 0 4 15 0.8792 0 0 4 16 0.8390 0 0 4

(10)

Lampiran 4

Uji Stationeritas

Debt to Equity Ratio

Null Hypothesis: Unit root (individual unit root process) Series: DER

Sample: 2011 2015

Exogenous variables: Individual effects Automatic selection of maximum lags

Automatic lag length selection based on SIC: 0 Total (balanced) observations: 64

Cross-sections included: 16

Method Statistic Prob.**

ADF - Fisher Chi-square 51.9181 0.0144

ADF - Choi Z-stat -0.46893 0.3196

** Probabilities for Fisher tests are computed using an asymptotic Chi -square distribution. All other tests assume asymptotic normality. Intermediate ADF test results DER

Cross

section Prob. Lag Max Lag Obs

1 0.9747 0 0 4 2 0.6936 0 0 4 3 0.5286 0 0 4 4 0.0001 0 0 4 5 0.3634 0 0 4 6 0.8582 0 0 4 7 0.8835 0 0 4 8 0.5944 0 0 4 9 0.7406 0 0 4 10 0.8039 0 0 4 11 0.0398 0 0 4 12 0.0008 0 0 4 13 0.1721 0 0 4 14 0.7835 0 0 4 15 0.7659 0 0 4 16 0.5106 0 0 4

(11)

Lampiran 4

Uji Stationerits

Price to Book Value 1

st

Difference

Null Hypothesis: Unit root (individual unit root process) Series: D(PBV)

Date: 08/06/17 Time: 11:03 Sample: 2011 2015

Exogenous variables: Individual effects Automatic selection of maximum lags

Automatic lag length selection based on SIC: 0 Total (balanced) observations: 48

Cross-sections included: 16

Method Statistic Prob.**

ADF - Fisher Chi-square 82.9308 0.0000

ADF - Choi Z-stat -3.03820 0.0012

** Probabilities for Fisher tests are computed using an asymptotic Chi -square distribution. All other tests assume asymptotic normality. Intermediate ADF test results D(PBV)

Cross

section Prob. Lag Max Lag Obs

1 0.3357 0 0 3 2 0.5471 0 0 3 3 0.0138 0 0 3 4 0.2304 0 0 3 5 0.0234 0 0 3 6 0.9115 0 0 3 7 0.7590 0 0 3 8 0.0001 0 0 3 9 0.6387 0 0 3 10 0.0115 0 0 3 11 0.0003 0 0 3 12 0.2996 0 0 3 13 0.0052 0 0 3 14 0.8894 0 0 3 15 0.7484 0 0 3 16 0.9297 0 0 3

(12)

Lampiran 5

Model Regresi

Common Effect

Dependent Variable: PBV Method: Panel Least Squares Sample: 2011 2015

Periods included: 5

Cross-sections included: 16

Total panel (balanced) observations: 80

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

C 0.004094 0.889622 0.004602 0.9963

CR 0.000910 0.004153 0.219156 0.8271

ROE -0.010816 0.029485 -0.366815 0.7148

DER 2.580777 0.417651 6.179271 0.0000

R-squared 0.354022 Mean dependent var 2.410375

Adjusted R-squared 0.328522 S.D. dependent var 3.372114

S.E. of regression 2.763236 Akaike info criterion 4.919389

Sum squared resid 580.2960 Schwarz criterion 5.038490

Log likelihood -192.7756 Hannan-Quinn criter. 4.967140

F-statistic 13.88366 Durbin-Watson stat 0.625726

(13)

Lampiran 5

Model Regresi

Fixed Effect

Dependent Variable: PBV

Method: Panel Least Squares Date: 07/09/17 Time: 11:27 Sample: 2011 2015

Periods included: 5

Cross-sections included: 16

Total panel (balanced) observations: 80

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

C -0.644998 0.789635 -0.816831 0.4172

CR 0.000820 0.003409 0.240680 0.8106

ROE -0.033469 0.026113 -1.281704 0.2048

DER 3.478499 0.459448 7.571041 0.0000

Effects Specification Cross-section fixed (dummy variables)

R-squared 0.841687 Mean dependent var 2.410375

Adjusted R-squared 0.794971 S.D. dependent var 3.372114

S.E. of regression 1.526896 Akaike info criterion 3.888198

Sum squared resid 142.2160 Schwarz criterion 4.453929

Log likelihood -136.5279 Hannan-Quinn criter. 4.115016

F-statistic 18.01735 Durbin-Watson stat 1.433586

(14)

Lampiran 5

Model Regresi

Random Effect

Dependent Variable: PBV

Method: Panel EGLS (Cross-section random effects) Sample: 2011 2015

Periods included: 5

Cross-sections included: 16

Total panel (balanced) observations: 80

Swamy and Arora estimator of component variances

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

C -0.467122 0.973928 -0.479627 0.6329 CR 0.000771 0.003276 0.235259 0.8146 ROE -0.032869 0.024632 -1.334414 0.1861 DER 3.286176 0.416865 7.883074 0.0000 Effects Specification S.D. Rho Cross-section random 2.526731 0.7325 Idiosyncratic random 1.526896 0.2675 Weighted Statistics

R-squared 0.513185 Mean dependent var 0.628844

Adjusted R-squared 0.493969 S.D. dependent var 2.130141

S.E. of regression 1.515294 Sum squared resid 174.5048

F-statistic 26.70563 Durbin-Watson stat 0.904926

Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000

Unweighted Statistics

R-squared 0.321130 Mean dependent var 2.410375

(15)

Lampiran 6

Uji T Statistik

Current Ratio

Dependent Variable: PBV

Method: Panel EGLS (Cross-section random effects) Sample: 2011 2015

Periods included: 5

Cross-sections included: 16

Total panel (balanced) observations: 80

Swamy and Arora estimator of component variances

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

C 3.729794 0.968682 3.850381 0.0002 CR -0.008536 0.004237 -2.014380 0.0474 Effects Specification S.D. Rho Cross-section random 2.682418 0.6014 Idiosyncratic random 2.183743 0.3986 Weighted Statistics

R-squared 0.050022 Mean dependent var 0.824605

Adjusted R-squared 0.037843 S.D. dependent var 2.212828

S.E. of regression 2.170554 Sum squared resid 367.4817

F-statistic 4.107190 Durbin-Watson stat 0.714885

Prob(F-statistic) 0.046119

Unweighted Statistics

R-squared 0.028100 Mean dependent var 2.410375

(16)

Lampiran 6

Uji T Statistik

Return On Equity

Dependent Variable: PBV

Method: Panel EGLS (Cross-section random effects) Sample: 2011 2015

Periods included: 5

Cross-sections included: 16

Total panel (balanced) observations: 80

Swamy and Arora estimator of component variances

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

C 2.922066 0.742400 3.935974 0.0002 ROE -0.077260 0.031548 -2.448973 0.0166 Effects Specification S.D. Rho Cross-section random 2.687074 0.6161 Idiosyncratic random 2.120908 0.3839 Weighted Statistics

R-squared 0.070399 Mean dependent var 0.802311

Adjusted R-squared 0.058481 S.D. dependent var 2.202460

S.E. of regression 2.137089 Sum squared resid 356.2375

F-statistic 5.906992 Durbin-Watson stat 0.677259

Prob(F-statistic) 0.017377

Unweighted Statistics

R-squared -0.036324 Mean dependent var 2.410375

(17)

Lampiran 6

Uji T Statistik

Debt to Equity Ratio

Dependent Variable: PBV

Method: Panel EGLS (Cross-section random effects) Sample: 2011 2015

Periods included: 5

Cross-sections included: 16

Total panel (balanced) observations: 80

Swamy and Arora estimator of component variances

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

C -0.642450 0.699840 -0.917996 0.3615 DER 3.370960 0.381562 8.834624 0.0000 Effects Specification S.D. Rho Cross-section random 2.337152 0.7020 Idiosyncratic random 1.522563 0.2980 Weighted Statistics

R-squared 0.496592 Mean dependent var 0.674213

Adjusted R-squared 0.490138 S.D. dependent var 2.147583

S.E. of regression 1.533474 Sum squared resid 183.4203

F-statistic 76.94386 Durbin-Watson stat 0.853184

Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000

Unweighted Statistics

R-squared 0.316864 Mean dependent var 2.410375

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Bahasa Inggris dan Bahasa Asing Lainnya 352 B3. Muatan Peminatan

Fenomena banyak sinergi-sinergi lainnya yang'dapat kafe tenda seperti yang terjadi di Jakarta dijumpai dalam konteks interaksi antara dan beberapa kota besar lainnya beberapa

Jurnal el-Hikmah Fakultas Tarbiyah UIN Malang 231 berlandaskan pada sikap-sikap saling menghargai, memahami, dan mengembangkan prinsip, sikap, perilaku, dan kepentingan

yang telah mencalonkannya, sistem pilkada langsung lebih akuntabel karena adanya akuntabilitas politik, Check and balances antara lembaga legislatif dan eksekutif dapat lebih

HUBUNGAN PROKLAMASI DENGAN PANCASILA DAN PEMBUKAAN UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR

Identifikasi Dan Pendugaan Parameter Genetik Karakter Morfofisiologi Dan Hasil Untuk Toleransi Cekaman Aluminium Pada Tanaman Jagung (Zea mays L.).. Sekolah

Penilaian “proses” tertumpu kepada proses yang digunakan untuk mencapai objektif dan matlamat program. Maklumat ini perlu diketahui dari masa ke masa untuk mengawal

Kebudayaan nasional Indonesia adalah kebudayaan yang berasal dari bangsa.. Indonesia itu sendiri, yaitu semua nilai-nilai luhur dan falsafah bangsa yang