• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

INDUSTRIALIZATION AND DE-INDUSTRIALIZATION IN INDONESIA 1983-2008: A KALDORIAN APPROACH | Priyarsono | Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business 6292 10698 1 PB

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "INDUSTRIALIZATION AND DE-INDUSTRIALIZATION IN INDONESIA 1983-2008: A KALDORIAN APPROACH | Priyarsono | Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business 6292 10698 1 PB"

Copied!
1
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business Volume 25, Number 2, 2010, 143 – 154

INDUSTRIALIZATION AND DE-INDUSTRIALIZATION IN

INDONESIA 1983-2008: A KALDORIAN APPROACH

D.S. Priyarsono

Bogor Agricultural University ([email protected])

Titi Kanti Lestari

Statistics Indonesia ([email protected])

Diah Ananta Dewi

Statistics Indonesia ([email protected] )

Abstract

Economists have for a long time discussed the causes of economic growth and the mechanisms behind it. Kaldor viewed advanced economies as having a dual nature very similar to that of developing countries, with an agricultural sector with low productivity and surplus labour, and a capital intensive industrial sector characterized by rapid technical change and increasing returns. The transfer of labour resources from the agricultural sector to the industrial sector depends on the growth of the latter’s derived demand for labour. With this background this study attempts to show the periods when the Indonesian economy indicated the processes of industrialization and deindustrialization. It also attempts to identify whether the economy experienced positive deindustrialization (i.e., showed signs of economic maturity where service sector substituted the role of industrial sector as the engine of growth) or negative deindustrialization (i.e., showed signs of economic stagnancy where industrial sector could not grow rapidly enough to absorb surplus labour from agricultural sector). Lastly, this study attemps to analyze several factors that might be responsible for the process of the deindustrialization.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

A better estimated model was obtained when we dropped the above dummy variables and include a time trend (YEAR): the signs of the lagged of the coconut supplied

Some conclusions are withdrawn in the case of DIY: first, the informal sectors give a positive contribution to local economic development in terms of output,

The result of analysis shows that Indonesia would need to achieve constantly 8 percent economic growth in order to halve the poverty rate by 2015. In addition, analysis on

The implication of the finding, sustainable development of rural tourism of Kepuharjo Village, should use both an eco-economy way (designed to mesh with Earth's ecosystem instead

The objective of this paper is to identify the right timing of the major structural break on Indonesian economy through the application of Zivot and Andrew’s procedure (ZA) (Zivot

Market structures in infrastructure sectors need to be designed to ensure that government-owned utilities and other suppliers in the formal sector face pressures to downsize their

Overall, the variables that influence regional economic growth in Indonesia include GDRP per capita, oil and gas resources, general allocation funds, and revenue sharing

With positive rate of growth in inputs, al- locative efficiency effect will be positive, negative or zero if the gap resulting from nor- malised output elasticity with respect to each