ATOM INDONESIA JOURNAL

ATOM INDONESIA JOURNAL

Author's Response toward Associate Editor's Report Article No. : #1041

Title of Paper : The First Experience of Implementation Beam Matching Concept of Five Linear Accelerator Elekta Precise Treatment System in Indonesia Comment on Descriptions

Criteria Evaluation

Associate editor's evaluation

Author’s Response

Completely

correct Partly correct

not Correct

at all Comments

1. Originality of the article

 Free of Plagiarism/Similarity

(max 20%)

x

^{13% -}

 New article/not yet Published (presented/ in proceeding max

30%)

x

-

-

2. Related to nuclear/atomic

science and technology

x

- -

3. References

 The number of references at least 10, at most 20 for nonreview papers; at least 26 for review papers.

x

-

Thanks for the correction.

We have changed it to 16 reference

 The use of recent references 80 % (maximum 5 years ago)

x

Only 4 out of 21 references (19%) are published less than 5 years ago

Thanks for the correction.

We have changet it to:

12 journals with published less than 5 years (2015- 2019)

4 journals with published more than 5 years (2009- 2014)

 Type of the references (primarily, secondary etc.) 85

% from journals

x

Only 15 out of 21 references (71%) are not journals

Thanks for the correction.

We have changed all to all journals

 DOI reference (traceable)

x

Some references are not traceable such as

manual books Thanks for the correction.

We have changed it. For manual books, it is not part

of reference anymore.

Is DOI must to write in the reference?



Reference style standard:

Elsevier numeric without title

x

Some references do not follow Atom Indonesia authors guidelines

Thanks for the correction.

We have changed it. We have used the Mendeley desktop to cited the reference. Thanks for the suggestion.

Is DOI must write in the reference? Because while we used the Elsevier numeric without title, there is no DOI will be written.



When reference has more than 3 Authors, write only 3 names, et al.

x

Do not follow atom Indonesia authors guidelines

Thanks for the correction.

We have changed it

 Article follows the Atom Indonesia template and guidelines

x

References style do not follow atom Indonesia authors guidelines

Thanks for the correction.

 Table (clear, without vertical

line)

x

-

 Figure (clear, min 300 dpi)

x

The texts on all figures are too small, hard to read

Thanks for the correction.

We have deleted one picture.

For another picture, it is originally from the software and printed as pdf, so we take a screen capture and paste to paper.

But these pictures can be adjusted to a bigger size



Is the Level of English appropriate? (Excellent, Adequate, poor)

x

Please use Grammarly to check the grammar and spellings of this article as there

are a lot of grammatical errors

Thanks for the correction.

For this revised paper, we have used the Gram- marly.

We have done to screening all of the sentences us- ing the Grammarly

Final recommendation:

1. Continue review process [ ] 2. Return to the Author [ x ] 3. Reject [ ]

Comments:

1. The authors should replace references published more than 5 years ago with the latest ones.

2. Please replace the references which are not journals with recent journals.

3. The texts on all figures must be replaced with bigger font size.

4. Please use Grammarly to check the grammar and spellings of this article as there are a lot of grammatical errors.

5. Please read and follow Atom Indonesia authors guidelines before resubmitting this article

1. Revised 2. Revised

3. Deleted one picture 4. Revised

5.