• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Karakteristik Penderita Asma Bronkial Dewasa yang Dirawat Inap di RSUP H. Adam Malik Medan Tahun 2014-2015

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "Karakteristik Penderita Asma Bronkial Dewasa yang Dirawat Inap di RSUP H. Adam Malik Medan Tahun 2014-2015"

Copied!
31
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

MASTER DATA

No Umur UmurUni UmurBi JK Suku Pekerjaan Pendidikan TT FktPencetus JnsPencetus RwySerangan RwyKeluarga LmDirwt SbrBiaya KSP

1 55 5 2 2 2 4 3 1 2 4 1 2 14 1 1

2 36 3 1 2 5 7 6 2 1 1 1 2 8 1 1

3 24 1 1 1 5 6 4 1 3 11 1 1 4 1 1

4 21 1 1 1 5 6 3 1 2 6 1 2 4 1 1

5 19 1 1 2 5 5 4 2 2 5 1 2 1 1 1

6 57 5 2 2 2 7 6 2 1 1 1 2 3 1 1

7 53 4 2 2 2 7 5 1 2 5 1 2 8 2 1

8 70 6 2 1 4 7 5 1 3 11 1 2 27 2 1

9 49 4 1 2 2 1 6 2 1 1 1 2 27 2 1

10 60 5 2 2 2 4 3 1 1 1 1 1 4 2 1

11 70 6 2 2 2 1 2 1 3 11 1 3 50 2 1

12 69 6 2 2 5 4 4 1 3 11 1 2 5 2 3

13 47 4 1 1 2 1 4 1 2 5 1 2 4 2 1

14 61 5 2 2 2 1 4 1 2 7 1 2 5 2 1

15 66 6 2 2 2 1 4 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1

16 70 6 2 2 2 4 2 2 2 5 1 3 4 2 1

17 75 7 2 2 2 4 4 2 2 5 1 2 5 2 1

18 54 4 2 1 5 1 4 1 2 4 1 2 10 2 1

19 51 4 2 2 2 4 4 2 2 5 1 2 8 2 1

20 71 6 2 2 2 1 4 1 1 1 1 2 5 2 1

21 50 4 2 2 2 1 4 1 1 2 1 1 6 2 1

22 70 6 2 2 1 7 6 1 1 1 1 2 6 2 1

23 60 5 2 1 5 7 4 2 3 11 1 2 5 2 1

24 66 6 2 1 1 1 4 2 3 11 2 2 34 2 1

25 93 7 2 2 2 4 2 1 3 11 1 1 15 2 1

(2)

27 38 3 1 1 2 3 4 1 3 11 1 2 6 2 1

28 60 5 2 2 2 3 4 2 2 5 1 2 10 2 3

29 71 6 2 2 2 7 6 2 1 1 1 2 13 2 1

30 73 6 2 2 5 3 4 2 3 11 2 2 22 2 1

31 30 2 1 2 2 1 4 2 2 7 1 1 10 2 1

32 65 6 2 2 2 4 4 1 3 11 1 2 4 2 3

33 52 4 2 1 2 3 4 2 3 11 1 2 9 2 1

34 64 5 2 2 3 4 6 2 1 1 1 3 6 2 1

35 53 4 2 2 2 4 6 2 2 7 1 3 2 2 1

36 56 5 2 1 4 3 4 2 3 11 1 3 27 2 1

37 62 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 3 11 2 2 2 2 2

38 53 4 2 1 2 1 5 2 1 3 1 3 2 2 2

39 32 2 1 1 3 1 5 2 3 11 1 2 8 2 1

40 61 5 2 2 2 1 4 2 3 11 2 2 2 2 1

41 35 3 1 2 3 4 6 1 2 7 1 1 4 2 1

42 73 6 2 1 2 1 5 1 2 5 1 2 2 2 2

43 44 3 1 2 2 7 6 2 2 7 1 3 5 2 1

44 60 5 2 2 5 4 2 1 3 11 1 3 15 2 1

45 61 5 2 2 2 3 4 2 3 11 2 2 7 2 1

46 42 3 1 2 3 4 3 1 2 5 1 3 8 2 1

47 44 3 1 2 5 4 3 2 3 11 2 2 4 2 1

48 42 3 1 2 5 4 3 2 3 11 1 2 6 2 1

49 64 5 2 1 5 7 6 2 2 4 1 3 5 2 1

50 37 3 1 2 2 3 1 2 2 6 2 2 6 2 1

51 18 1 1 1 5 7 6 2 2 5 1 1 21 2 1

52 56 5 2 1 2 7 6 2 2 7 1 3 27 2 1

53 63 5 2 1 2 3 2 2 2 6 1 3 9 2 1

54 38 3 1 1 5 7 6 2 2 7 1 3 7 2 1

(3)

56 18 1 1 2 5 5 4 1 1 1 1 1 5 2 1

57 50 4 2 1 5 7 6 1 2 7 1 2 5 2 1

58 54 4 2 1 2 3 2 2 3 11 1 2 7 2 2

59 53 4 2 2 5 7 6 2 2 7 1 2 5 2 1

60 52 4 2 2 5 4 4 1 2 4 1 2 20 2 1

61 38 3 1 2 5 4 3 2 1 2 1 2 5 2 1

62 52 4 2 2 1 4 2 2 2 7 1 2 9 2 1

63 36 3 1 2 2 4 3 2 2 7 1 2 10 2 1

64 39 3 1 1 5 6 3 1 2 4 1 2 10 2 1

65 46 4 1 1 5 3 4 1 2 5 1 2 5 2 1

66 35 3 1 2 5 4 6 1 2 4 1 2 4 2 1

67 62 5 2 2 3 4 6 2 2 4 1 2 4 2 1

68 51 4 2 2 2 3 4 1 1 1 1 1 11 2 1

69 58 5 2 2 2 4 2 2 2 5 1 1 12 2 1

70 56 5 2 1 2 3 2 2 2 9 1 2 8 2 1

71 75 7 2 1 2 3 4 2 2 7 1 2 13 2 1

72 51 4 2 2 5 4 3 2 2 7 1 3 6 2 1

73 47 4 1 2 3 4 6 2 2 4 1 3 8 2 1

74 46 4 1 2 2 7 6 1 1 1 1 3 45 2 1

75 50 4 2 1 5 3 4 2 2 4 1 3 17 2 1

76 23 1 1 2 5 5 4 1 1 1 1 1 15 2 1

77 74 6 2 1 2 7 6 2 2 7 1 3 1 2 1

78 24 1 1 1 5 3 4 2 2 8 1 1 44 2 1

79 55 5 2 2 2 3 4 2 2 7 2 1 4 2 1

80 71 6 2 2 2 3 3 2 2 7 1 2 29 2 3

81 40 3 1 1 2 3 4 2 2 10 1 3 2 2 3

82 36 3 1 2 2 7 6 2 1 1 1 2 4 2 1

83 36 3 1 1 3 7 6 2 2 5 1 2 4 2 1

(4)

85 50 4 2 2 2 7 6 2 2 7 1 2 5 2 1

86 33 2 1 2 5 4 4 2 3 11 1 2 5 2 1

87 42 3 1 1 2 3 2 2 3 11 2 2 4 2 3

88 46 4 1 2 5 4 4 2 2 7 1 1 4 2 1

89 85 7 2 2 2 3 2 2 3 11 2 2 9 2 1

90 43 3 1 2 2 3 4 2 2 5 2 2 2 2 1

(5)

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Kelompok Umur * JK 91 100.0% 0 .0% 91 100.0%

Kelompok Umur * JK Crosstabulation

JK

Total Laki-laki Perempuan

(6)

Expected Count 7.6 13.4 21.0

% within Kelompok Umur 33.3% 66.7% 100.0%

% within JK 21.2% 24.1% 23.1%

% of Total 7.7% 15.4% 23.1%

65-74 Count 6 10 16

Expected Count 5.8 10.2 16.0

% within Kelompok Umur 37.5% 62.5% 100.0%

% within JK 18.2% 17.2% 17.6%

% of Total 6.6% 11.0% 17.6%

75+ Count 1 3 4

Expected Count 1.5 2.5 4.0

% within Kelompok Umur 25.0% 75.0% 100.0%

% within JK 3.0% 5.2% 4.4%

% of Total 1.1% 3.3% 4.4%

Total Count 33 58 91

Expected Count 33.0 58.0 91.0

% within Kelompok Umur 36.3% 63.7% 100.0%

% within JK 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 36.3% 63.7% 100.0%

Frequencies

Statistics

N

Valid Missing

Suku 91 0

Pekerjaan 91 0

Pendidikan 91 0

Tempat_tinggal 91 0

Faktor_pencetus 91 0

Jenis_pencetus 91 0

(7)

Riwayat_keluarga 91 0

Lama_dirawat 91 0

Sumber_biaya 91 0

Keadaan_pulang 91 0

Frequency Table

Suku

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Aceh 3 3.3 3.3 3.3

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid Pegawai Negeri (Sipil, TNI,

Polri, Pensiunan)

16 17.6 17.6 17.6

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Tidak Sekolah 1 1.1 1.1 1.1

Tamat SD 11 12.1 12.1 13.2

Tamat SMP 13 14.3 14.3 27.5

(8)

Tamat D1-D3/PT 5 5.5 5.5 74.7

Tidak Tercatat 23 25.3 25.3 100.0

Total 91 100.0 100.0

Tempat_tinggal

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Medan 32 35.2 35.2 35.2

Luar Medan 59 64.8 64.8 100.0

Total 91 100.0 100.0

Faktor_pencetus

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Alergen 17 18.7 18.7 18.7

Non Alergen 49 53.8 53.8 72.5

Tidak Tercatat 25 27.5 27.5 100.0

Total 91 100.0 100.0

Jenis_pencetus

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Debu 14 15.4 15.4 15.4

Makanan 2 2.2 2.2 17.6

Obat 1 1.1 1.1 18.7

Cuaca 9 9.9 9.9 28.6

Aktivitas 14 15.4 15.4 44.0

Merokok 4 4.4 4.4 48.4

Cuaca dan Aktivitas 18 19.8 19.8 68.1

Cuaca dan Merokok 1 1.1 1.1 69.2

Aktivitas dan Merokok 2 2.2 2.2 71.4

Cuaca, Aktivitas dan Merokok 1 1.1 1.1 72.5

Tidak Tercatat 25 27.5 27.5 100.0

(9)

Riwayat_serangan

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Serangan Berulang 79 86.8 86.8 86.8

Serangan Pertama 12 13.2 13.2 100.0

Total 91 100.0 100.0

Riwayat_keluarga

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Ada Riwayat Keluarga 14 15.4 15.4 15.4

Tidak Ada Riwayat Keluarga 58 63.7 63.7 79.1

Tidak Tercatat 19 20.9 20.9 100.0

Total 91 100.0 100.0

Lama_dirawat

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 2 2.2 2.2 2.2

2 8 8.8 8.8 11.0

3 1 1.1 1.1 12.1

4 17 18.7 18.7 30.8

5 14 15.4 15.4 46.2

6 7 7.7 7.7 53.8

7 3 3.3 3.3 57.1

8 8 8.8 8.8 65.9

9 4 4.4 4.4 70.3

10 5 5.5 5.5 75.8

11 1 1.1 1.1 76.9

12 1 1.1 1.1 78.0

13 2 2.2 2.2 80.2

14 1 1.1 1.1 81.3

15 3 3.3 3.3 84.6

17 1 1.1 1.1 85.7

(10)

21 1 1.1 1.1 87.9

22 1 1.1 1.1 89.0

27 5 5.5 5.5 94.5

29 1 1.1 1.1 95.6

34 1 1.1 1.1 96.7

44 1 1.1 1.1 97.8

45 1 1.1 1.1 98.9

50 1 1.1 1.1 100.0

Total 91 100.0 100.0

Sumber_biaya

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Biaya Sendiri 6 6.6 6.6 6.6

Bukan Biaya Sendiri 85 93.4 93.4 100.0

Total 91 100.0 100.0

Keadaan_pulang

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Pulang Berobat Jalan (PBJ) 81 89.0 89.0 89.0

Pulang Atas Permintaan Sendiri

(PAPS)

4 4.4 4.4 93.4

Meninggal 6 6.6 6.6 100.0

Total 91 100.0 100.0

Explore

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

(11)

Descriptives

Statistic Std. Error

Lama_dirawat Mean 9.86 1.034

95% Confidence Interval for

Mean

Lower Bound 7.80

Upper Bound 11.91

5% Trimmed Mean 8.56

Median 6.00

Variance 97.213

Std. Deviation 9.860

Minimum 1

Maximum 50

Range 49

Interquartile Range 6

Skewness 2.230 .253

Kurtosis 5.085 .500

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Faktor_pencetus = 1 (FILTER)

* Jenis_pencetus

17 100.0% 0 .0% 17 100.0%

Faktor_pencetus = 1 (FILTER) * Jenis_pencetus Crosstabulation

Jenis_pencetus

Total Debu Makanan Obat

Faktor_pencetus = 1 (FILTER) Selected Count 14 2 1 17

Expected Count 14.0 2.0 1.0 17.0

% within Faktor_pencetus

= 1 (FILTER)

82.4% 11.8% 5.9% 100.0%

(12)

% of Total 82.4% 11.8% 5.9% 100.0%

Total Count 14 2 1 17

Expected Count 14.0 2.0 1.0 17.0

% within Faktor_pencetus

= 1 (FILTER)

82.4% 11.8% 5.9% 100.0%

% within Jenis_pencetus 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 82.4% 11.8% 5.9% 100.0%

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Faktor_pencetus =

2 (FILTER) *

Jenis_pencetus

49 100.0% 0 .0% 49 100.0%

Faktor_pencetus = 2 (FILTER) * Jenis_pencetus Crosstabulation

Jenis_pencetus

Faktor_pencetus =

(13)

Total Count 9 14 4 18 1 2 1 49

Expected Count 9.0 14.0 4.0 18.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 49.0

% within

Faktor_pencetus =

2 (FILTER)

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Faktor_pencetus = 3 (FILTER) *

Jenis_pencetus

25 100.0% 0 .0% 25 100.0%

Faktor_pencetus = 3 (FILTER) * Jenis_pencetus Crosstabulation

Jenis_pencetus

Total Tidak Tercatat

Faktor_pencetus = 3 (FILTER) Selected Count 25 25

Expected Count 25.0 25.0

% within Faktor_pencetus = 3

(FILTER)

100.0% 100.0%

% within Jenis_pencetus 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 100.0% 100.0%

Total Count 25 25

Expected Count 25.0 25.0

% within Faktor_pencetus = 3

(FILTER)

100.0% 100.0%

% within Jenis_pencetus 100.0% 100.0%

(14)

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Riwayat_keluarga * UmurBi 72 100.0% 0 .0% 72 100.0%

Riwayat_keluarga * UmurBi Crosstabulation

UmurBi

Total 15-49 Tahun >= 50 Tahun

Riwayat_keluarga Ada Riwayat Keluarga Count 8 6 14

Expected Count 5.4 8.6 14.0

% within Riwayat_keluarga 57.1% 42.9% 100.0%

% within UmurBi 28.6% 13.6% 19.4%

% of Total 11.1% 8.3% 19.4%

Tidak Ada Riwayat Keluarga Count 20 38 58

Expected Count 22.6 35.4 58.0

% within Riwayat_keluarga 34.5% 65.5% 100.0%

% within UmurBi 71.4% 86.4% 80.6%

% of Total 27.8% 52.8% 80.6%

Total Count 28 44 72

Expected Count 28.0 44.0 72.0

% within Riwayat_keluarga 38.9% 61.1% 100.0%

% within UmurBi 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 38.9% 61.1% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

Exact Sig.

(2-sided)

Exact Sig.

(1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 2.437a 1 .119

Continuity Correctionb 1.576 1 .209

Likelihood Ratio 2.381 1 .123

(15)

Linear-by-Linear

Association

2.403 1 .121

N of Valid Cases 72

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5,44.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Riwayat_serangan *

UmurBi

91 100.0% 0 .0% 91 100.0%

Riwayat_serangan * UmurBi Crosstabulation

UmurBi

Total 15-49 Tahun >= 50 Tahun

Riwayat_serangan Serangan Berulang Count 30 49 79

Expected Count 29.5 49.5 79.0

% within Riwayat_serangan 38.0% 62.0% 100.0%

% within UmurBi 88.2% 86.0% 86.8%

% of Total 33.0% 53.8% 86.8%

Serangan Pertama Count 4 8 12

Expected Count 4.5 7.5 12.0

% within Riwayat_serangan 33.3% 66.7% 100.0%

% within UmurBi 11.8% 14.0% 13.2%

% of Total 4.4% 8.8% 13.2%

Total Count 34 57 91

Expected Count 34.0 57.0 91.0

% within Riwayat_serangan 37.4% 62.6% 100.0%

% within UmurBi 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

(16)

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

Exact Sig.

(2-sided)

Exact Sig.

(1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square .096a 1 .757

Continuity Correctionb .000 1 1.000

Likelihood Ratio .097 1 .755

a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4,48.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Faktor_pencetus * JK 66 100.0% 0 .0% 66 100.0%

Faktor_pencetus * JK Crosstabulation

JK

Total Laki-laki Perempuan

Faktor_pencetus Alergen Count 1 16 17

Expected Count 5.7 11.3 17.0

% within Faktor_pencetus 5.9% 94.1% 100.0%

% within JK 4.5% 36.4% 25.8%

% of Total 1.5% 24.2% 25.8%

Non Alergen Count 21 28 49

Expected Count 16.3 32.7 49.0

% within Faktor_pencetus 42.9% 57.1% 100.0%

% within JK 95.5% 63.6% 74.2%

(17)

Total Count 22 44 66

Expected Count 22.0 44.0 66.0

% within Faktor_pencetus 33.3% 66.7% 100.0%

% within JK 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Continuity Correctionb 6.190 1 .013

Likelihood Ratio 9.488 1 .002

Fisher's Exact Test .006 .004

Linear-by-Linear Association 7.647 1 .006

N of Valid Cases 66

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5,67.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Riwayat_keluarga * JK 72 100.0% 0 .0% 72 100.0%

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

(18)

Riwayat_keluarga * JK Crosstabulation

JK

Total Laki-laki Perempuan

Riwayat_keluarga Ada Riwayat Keluarga Count 3 11 14

Expected Count 4.7 9.3 14.0

% within Riwayat_keluarga 21.4% 78.6% 100.0%

% within JK 12.5% 22.9% 19.4%

% of Total 4.2% 15.3% 19.4%

Tidak Ada Riwayat Keluarga Count 21 37 58

Expected Count 19.3 38.7 58.0

% within Riwayat_keluarga 36.2% 63.8% 100.0%

% within JK 87.5% 77.1% 80.6%

% of Total 29.2% 51.4% 80.6%

Total Count 24 48 72

Expected Count 24.0 48.0 72.0

% within Riwayat_keluarga 33.3% 66.7% 100.0%

% within JK 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 33.3% 66.7% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

Exact Sig.

(2-sided)

Exact Sig.

(1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 1.108a 1 .292

Continuity Correctionb .543 1 .461

Likelihood Ratio 1.176 1 .278

a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4,67.

(19)

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Riwayat_serangan * JK 91 100.0% 0 .0% 91 100.0%

Riwayat_serangan * JK Crosstabulation

JK

Total Laki-laki Perempuan

Riwayat_serangan Serangan Berulang Count 30 49 79

Expected Count 28.6 50.4 79.0

% within Riwayat_serangan 38.0% 62.0% 100.0%

% within JK 90.9% 84.5% 86.8%

% of Total 33.0% 53.8% 86.8%

Serangan Pertama Count 3 9 12

Expected Count 4.4 7.6 12.0

% within Riwayat_serangan 25.0% 75.0% 100.0%

% within JK 9.1% 15.5% 13.2%

% of Total 3.3% 9.9% 13.2%

Total Count 33 58 91

Expected Count 33.0 58.0 91.0

% within Riwayat_serangan 36.3% 63.7% 100.0%

% within JK 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 36.3% 63.7% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

Exact Sig.

(2-sided)

Exact Sig.

(1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square .759a 1 .384

Continuity Correctionb .301 1 .583

Likelihood Ratio .797 1 .372

(20)

Linear-by-Linear Association .750 1 .386

N of Valid Cases 91

a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4,35.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Explore

UmurBi

Case Processing Summary

UmurBi

UmurBi Statistic Std. Error

Lama_dirawat 15-49 Tahun Mean 9.09 1.780

95% Confidence Interval for

Mean

Lower Bound 5.47

Upper Bound 12.71

5% Trimmed Mean 7.54

Median 5.00

Variance 107.719

Std. Deviation 10.379

Minimum 1

Maximum 45

Range 44

Interquartile Range 5

Skewness 2.693 .403

Kurtosis 7.016 .788

>= 50 Tahun Mean 10.32 1.272

95% Confidence Interval for

Mean

Lower Bound 7.77

(21)

5% Trimmed Mean 9.25

Median 7.00

Variance 92.184

Std. Deviation 9.601

Minimum 1

Maximum 50

Range 49

Interquartile Range 9

Skewness 2.002 .316

Kurtosis 4.590 .623

Tests of Normality

UmurBi

Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk

Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.

Lama_dirawat 15-49 Tahun .318 34 .000 .602 34 .000

>= 50 Tahun .221 57 .000 .772 57 .000

a. Lilliefors Significance Correction

Catatan:

1.

Hasil uji Shapiro-Wilk dipakai untuk uji normalitas lama dirawat

pada kelompok umur 15-49 tahun (p=0,0001), sedangkan untuk

kelompok umur ≥50 tahun memakai hasil uji Kolmogorov

-Smirnov

(p=0,0001).

2.

Oleh karena nilai p<0,05 maka dapat diambil kesimpulan bahwa

(22)

Lama_dirawat

(23)

NPar Tests

Mann-Whitney Test

Ranks

UmurBi N Mean Rank Sum of Ranks

Lama_dirawat 15-49 Tahun 34 41.97 1427.00

>= 50 Tahun 57 48.40 2759.00

Total 91

Test Statisticsa

Lama_dirawat

Mann-Whitney U 832.000

Wilcoxon W 1427.000

Z -1.131

Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .258

a. Grouping Variable: UmurBi

Explore

JK

Case Processing Summary

JK

Lama_dirawat Laki-laki Mean 11.21 1.861

95% Confidence Interval for

Mean

Lower Bound 7.42

Upper Bound 15.00

5% Trimmed Mean 10.15

Median 7.00

(24)

Std. Deviation 10.688

Minimum 1

Maximum 44

Range 43

Interquartile Range 11

Skewness 1.551 .409

Kurtosis 1.726 .798

Perempuan Mean 9.09 1.230

95% Confidence Interval for

Mean

Lower Bound 6.62

Upper Bound 11.55

5% Trimmed Mean 7.68

Median 6.00

Variance 87.694

Std. Deviation 9.365

Minimum 1

Maximum 50

Range 49

Interquartile Range 6

Skewness 2.830 .314

Kurtosis 9.005 .618

Tests of Normality

JK

Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk

Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.

Lama_dirawat Laki-laki .272 33 .000 .783 33 .000

Perempuan .237 58 .000 .660 58 .000

a. Lilliefors Significance Correction

Catatan:

1.

Hasil uji Shapiro-Wilk dipakai untuk uji normalitas lama dirawat

(25)

2.

Oleh karena nilai p<0,05 maka dapat diambil kesimpulan bahwa

distribusi data kedua kelompok tidak normal, maka tidak dilakukan

uji t tidak berpasangan.

Lama_dirawat

(26)

NPar Tests

Mann-Whitney Test

Ranks

JK N Mean Rank Sum of Ranks

Lama_dirawat Laki-laki 33 48.58 1603.00

Perempuan 58 44.53 2583.00

Total 91

Test Statisticsa

Lama_dirawat

Mann-Whitney U 872.000

Wilcoxon W 2583.000

Z -.706

Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .480

(27)
(28)
(29)
(30)
(31)

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

penulisan artikel, hanya sumber--sumber yang sumber yang digunakan yang dimuat dalam daftar pustaka?. digunakan yang dimuat dalam

Pasal 17 ayat (2) huruf g angka 2) huruf a) Peraturan Presiden Nomor 70 Tahun 2012 Tentang Perubahan Keempat atas Peraturan Presiden Nomor 54 Tahun 2010 Tentang Pengadaan

Metode ini dilakukan dengan mengikuti prosedur tertentu dengan dilakukan dengan mengikuti prosedur tertentu dengan maksud untuk memahami pengaruh suatu kondisi yang maksud

Karya tiga dimensi yang telah dibuat nantinya akan digunakan sebagai bahan pembuatan maket lingkungan tempat tinggal.. Oleh karena itu, pertimbangkanlah benda yang

Aspek kebaruan meliputi kemampuan (1) menggunakan strategi yang bersifat baru, unik, atau tidak biasa untuk menyelesaikan masalah; atau (2) memberikan contoh atau

Dari berita tersebut, siswa diminta memodelkan masalah tersebut ke dalam pemodelan matematika dan dikembangkan pertanyaannya untuk memprediksi jumlah kantong plastik

Jika nilai taraf signifikansi kritis yang ditentukan adalah 5 persen, dengan demikian, nilai koefisien regresi logistik atau log odds nilai NUN ( b = 0,119) dapat digunakan dalam

Tidak ditemukannya pengaruh dari ROA terhadap CSR dimensi masyarakat terjadi karena sebagian besar perusahaan yang digunakan dalam data penelitian ini adalah data perusahaan tambang