• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

09-21.2010. 98KB Jun 04 2011 12:07:16 AM

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "09-21.2010. 98KB Jun 04 2011 12:07:16 AM"

Copied!
7
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

SOME PROPERTIES OF CERTAIN INTEGRAL OPERATORS

Khalida Inayat Noor, Muhammad Arif and Wasim Ul Haq

Abstract. In this paper, we consider certain subclasses of analytic functions with bounded radius and bounded boundary rotation and study the mapping properties of these classes under certain integral operators introduced by Breaz et. al recently.

Key Words: Bounded boundary and bounded radius rotations, Integral operators. 2000Mathematics Subject Classification: 30C45, 30C50.

1. Introduction

LetA be the class of all functions f(z) of the form

f(z) =z+ ∞ X

n=2

anzn,

which are analytic in the open unit disc E = {z:|z|<1}. Let Cb(ρ) and Sb∗(ρ)

be the classes of convex and starlike functions of complex orderb(b∈C− {0}) and type ρ (0≤ρ <1) respectively studied by Frasin [3].

LetPk(ρ) be the class of functions p(z) analytic inE withp(0) = 1 and 2π

Z

0

Re p(z)−ρ 1−ρ

dθ ≤kπ, z=reiθ,

where k ≥ 2 and 0 ≤ ρ < 1. We note that, for ρ = 0, we obtain the class Pk

defined and studied in [10], and for ρ= 0,k= 2, we have the well known class P of functions with positive real part. The case k= 2 gives the class P(ρ) of functions with positive real part greater than ρ.

A function f(z)∈A is said to belong to the classVk(ρ, b) if and only if

1 +1 b

zf′′ (z) f′

(2)

wherek≥2, 0≤ρ <1 andb∈C− {0}. Whenρ= 0 andb= 1, we obtain the class Vk of functions with bounded boundary rotation, first discussed by Paatero [2].

Similarly, an analytic function f(z)∈Rk(ρ, b) if and only if

1 +1 b

zf′

(z) f(z) −1

∈Pk(ρ) (1.2)

wherek≥2, 0≤ρ <1 andb∈C− {0}. Whenρ= 0 andb= 1, we obtain the class Rk of functions with bounded radius rotation [2]. For more details see [6,7,8]. Let

us consider the integral operators

Fn(z) = z

Z

0

f1(t)

t α1

· · ·

fn(t)

t αn

dt (1.3)

and

1...αn(z) =

z

Z

0

f′

1(t)

α1 . . .

f′

n(t)

αn

dt, (1.4)

wherefi(z)∈Aand αi >0 for alli∈ {1,2, . . . , n}. These operators, given by (1.3)

and (1.4), are introduced and studied by Breaz and Breaz [2] and Breaz et.al [4], respectively. Recently, Breaz and G¨uney [3] considered the above integral operators and they obtained their properties on the classesCb(ρ),Sb∗(ρ) of convex and starlike

functions of complex order band type ρ introduced and studied by Frasin [5]. In this paper, we investigate some propeties of the above integral operatorsFn(z)

and Fα1...αn(z) for the classes Vk(ρ, b) and Rk(ρ, b) respectively. In order to derive

our main result, we need the following lemma.

Lemma 1.1 . [9] Let f(z)∈Vk(α), 0≤α <1.Then f(z)∈Rk(β), where

β = 1 4

h

(2α−1) +p4α2+ 9i. (1.5)

2. Main Results

Theorem 2.1. Let fi(z)∈Rk(ρ, b) for 1≤i≤n with 0≤ρ <1, b∈C− {0}. Also let αi>0, 1≤i≤n. If

0≤(ρ−1)

n

X

i=1

(3)

then Fn(z)∈Vk(λ, b) with

λ= (ρ−1)

n

X

i=1

αi+ 1. (2.2)

Proof. From (1.3), we have zF′′ n(z) F′ n(z) = n X i=1 αi zf′ i(z)

fi(z)

−1

. (2.3)

Then by multiplying (2.3) with 1

b, we have 1 b zF′′ n(z) F′ n(z) = n X i=1 αi 1 b zf′ i(z)

fi(z)

−1 = n X i=1 αi 1 +1

b

zf′

i(z)

fi(z)

−1 − n X i=1 αi or, equivalently 1 +1

b zF′′

n(z)

F′

n(z)

= 1−

n

X

i=1

αi+ n

X

i=1

αi

1 +1

b

zf′

i(z)

fi(z)

−1

. (2.4)

Subtracting and adding ρ on the right hand side of (2.4), we have

1 +1

b zF′′ n(z) F′ n(z) −λ = n X i=1 αi 1 +1

b

zf′

i(z)

fi(z)

−1

−ρ

, (2.5)

where λ is given by (2.2). Taking real part of (2.5) and then simple computation gives 2π Z 0 Re

1 +1 b zF′′ n(z) F′ n(z) −λ dθ≤ n X i=1 αi 2π Z 0 Re

1 +1 b

zf′

i(z)

fi(z)

−1 −ρ dθ. (2.6) Since fi(z)∈Rk(ρ, b) for 1≤i≤n, we have

2π Z 0 Re

1 +1 b

zf′

i(z)

fi(z)

−1 −ρ

(4)

Using (2.7) in (2.6), we obtain

Z

0

Re

1 +1 b

zF′′

n(z)

F′

n(z)

−λ

dθ≤(1−λ)kπ.

Hence Fn(z) ∈ Vk(λ, b) with λ is given by (2.2).By setting k= 2 in Theorem 2.1,

we obtain the following result proved in [3].

Corollary 2.2. Let fi(z)∈ Sb∗(ρ) for 1≤i≤n with 0≤ρ <1, b∈ C− {0}. Also let αi>0, 1≤i≤n. If

0≤(ρ−1)

n

X

i=1

αi+ 1<1,

then Fn(z)∈Cb(λ) withλ= (ρ−1) n

X

i=1

αi+ 1.

Theorem 2.3. Let fi(z) ∈ Vk(ρ,1) for 1 ≤ i ≤ n with 0 ≤ ρ < 1. Also let

αi >0, 1≤i≤n. If

0≤(β−1)

n

X

i=1

αi+ 1<1,

then Fn(z)∈Vk(λ,1)with λ= (β−1) n

X

i=1

αi+ 1and β is given by(1.5). Proof. From (2.6) withb= 1, we have

Z

0

Re

1 +zF ′′

n(z)

F′

n(z)

−λ

dθ≤

n

X

i=1

αi 2π

Z

0

Re

zf′

i(z)

fi(z)

−β

dθ. (2.8)

Since fi(z)∈Vk(ρ,1) for 1≤i≤n, then by using Lemma 1.1, we have 2π

Z

0

Re

zf′

i(z)

fi(z)

−β

dθ≤(1−β)kπ, (2.9)

where β is given by (1.5) with α=ρ. Using (2.9) in (2.8), we obtain

Z

0

Re

1 +zF ′′

n(z)

F′

n(z)

−λ

(5)

Hence Fn(z)∈Vk(λ, b) withλ= (β−1) n

X

i=1

αi+ 1.

Setn= 1, α1 = 1,α2 =· · ·=αn= 0 in Theorem 2.3, we obtain.

Corollary 2.4. Let f(z)∈Vk(ρ). Then the Alexandar operator F0(z),defined in [1],belongs to the class Vk(β), where β is given by (1.5).

Forρ= 0 and k= 2 in Corollary 2.4, we have the well known result, that is, f(z)∈C(0) implies F0(z)∈C

1 2

.

Theorem 2.5. Let fi(z) ∈Vk(ρ, b) for 1≤i≤n with 0≤ρ <1, b∈C− {0}. Also let αi>0, 1≤i≤n. If

0≤(ρ−1)

n

X

i=1

αi+ 1<1,

then Fα1...αn(z)∈Vk(µ, b) withµ= (ρ−1)

n

X

i=1

αi+ 1. Proof. From (1.4), we have

F′′

α1...αn(z)

F′

α1...αn(z)

= n X i=1 αi f′′ i(z) f′ i(z) .

Then by multiplying both sides with z

b, we have 1

b zF′′

α1...αn(z)

F′

α1...αn(z)

= n X i=1 αi 1 b zf′′ i(z) f′ i(z)

This relation is equivalent to

1 +1 b

zF′′

α1...αn(z)

F′

α1...αn(z)

−µ = n X i=1 αi 1 +1

b zf′′ i(z) f′ i(z) −ρ , (2.10)

whereµ= (ρ−1)

n

X

i=1

αi+1. Taking real part of (2.10) and then simple computation

gives us 2π Z 0 Re

1 +1 b

zF′′

α1...αn(z)

F′

α1...αn(z)

−µ dθ≤ n X i=1 αi 2π Z 0 Re

(6)

Since fi(z)∈Vk(ρ, b) for 1≤i≤n, we have 2π

Z

0

Re

1 +1 b

zf′′

i(z)

f′

i(z)

−ρ

dθ≤(1−ρ)kπ. (2.12)

Using (2.12) in (2.11), we obtain

Z

0

Re

1 +1 b

zF′′

α1...αn(z)

F′

α1...αn(z)

−µ

dθ≤(1−µ)kπ.

Hence Fα1...αn(z)∈Vk(µ, b) withµ= (ρ−1)

n

X

i=1

αi+ 1.

By settingk= 2 in Theorem 2.5, we obtain the following result proved in [3]. Corollary 2.6. Let fi(z) ∈Cb(ρ) for 1≤ i≤n with 0 ≤ρ <1, b∈ C− {0}. Also let αi>0, 1≤i≤n. If

0≤(ρ−1)

n

X

i=1

αi+ 1<1,

then Fα1...αn(z)∈Cb(µ) with µ= (ρ−1)

n

X

i=1

αi+ 1.

References

[1] I.W. Alexander, Functions which map the interior of the unit circle upon simple regions, Ann. of Math., 17(1915), 12-22.

[2] D. Breaz, N. Breaz,Two integral operator, Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai, Mathematica, Clunj-Napoca, 3(2002), 13-21.

[3] D. Breaz, H. ¨O Guney,The integral operator on the classesS∗

α(b) andCα(b),

J. Math. Ineq. vol. 2, 1(2008), 97-100.

[4] D. Breaz, S. Owa, N. Breaz, A new integral univalent operator, Acta Univ. Apulensis Math. Inform., 16(2008), 11-16.

[5] B. A. Frasin,Family of analytic functions of complex order, Acta Math. Acad. Paed. Ny. 22(2006), 179-191.

(7)

[7] K. I. Noor, On some subclassess of fuctions with bounded boundary and bounded radius rotation, Pan. Amer. Math. J., 6(1996), 75-81.

[8] K. I. Noor,On analytic functions related to certain family of integral operators, J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(2)(26)(2006).

[9] K.I.Noor, W. Ul-Haq, M.Arif, S. Mustafa,On Bounded Boundary and Bounded Radius Rotations, J. Inequ. Appl., vol. (2009) articls ID 813687, pages 12.

[10] B. Pinchuk,Functions with bounded boundary rotation, Isr. J. Math., 10(1971), 7-16.

Prof. Dr. Khalida Inayat Noor Department of Mathematics

COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Islamabad Pakistan

email: [email protected]

Dr. Muhammad Arif Department of Mathematics

Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan Pakistan

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Keywords and phrases: Analytic functions; Multivalent functions; Starlike func- tions; Subordination; Fractional calculus operators; Majorization

1.Miller S.S., Mocanu P.T.- Integral operators on certain classes of analytic functions, Univalent Functions, Fractional Calculus, and their Applications, Halstead Pres, John

In this paper we define some subclasses of convex functions associated with some hyperbola by using a generalized S˘al˘agean operator and we give some properties regarding

Srivastava, Inclusion and argument properties for certain subclasses of meromorphic functions associated with a family of multiplier transformations, J.. Kwon

In this paper we use the inverse of most famous Carlson Shaffer operator and introduce some new classes of analytic functions.. Some inclusion results, a radius problem

Stivastava, Certain subclasses of analytic functions asso- ciated with the generalized hypergeometric function, Integral Transform.. Owa, On the distortion

Srivastava, Inclusion relationships and argument properties for certain subclasses of multivalent functions associated with a family of linear operators, J.. Srivastava, Some

Yamakawa, Certain subclasses of p-valently starlike functions with neg- ative coefficients, in: Current Topics in Analytic Function Theory, World Scientific Publishing