• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Perbandingan Hasil Perawatan Maloklusi Klas I Dengan Pencabutan dan Tanpa Pencabutan Menggunakan Grading System ABO

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "Perbandingan Hasil Perawatan Maloklusi Klas I Dengan Pencabutan dan Tanpa Pencabutan Menggunakan Grading System ABO"

Copied!
6
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

1. Foster TD. Buku ajar ortodonsi edisi III. Jakarta: EGC. 1993;32-39.

2. Rahardjo P. Ortodonti dasar. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press,

2009; 198-204.

3. Singh G. Textbook of orthodontics. 2nd ed., New Delhi: Jaypee,

2007; 65, 94-5, 100-9, 112-5, 119-20, 160, 163, 170-2, 648-653,

655-8.

4. Dewanto H. Aspek-aspek epidemiologi maloklusi. Yogyakarta:

Gadjah Mada University Press, 1993; 135-50,167-75.

5. Graber TM, Vanarsdall RL. Orthodontics: current principles and

techniques. 3rd ed., Missouri: Mosby, 2000; 4, 7, 17-9.

6. Bhalajhi SI. Orthodontics the art and science. 3rd ed., New Delhi:

Arya (MEDI) Pubhishing House, 2003; 63, 66-9, 115, 143-4, 151-7,

239, 242-3, 245-6.

7. Proffit WR, Fields HW. Contemporary orthodontics. 4th Ed., Mosby

Inc., St. Louis, 2000; 5-16,151-8, 218–20, 282–3.

8. Bishara SE. Textbook of orthodontics.USA:W.B Saunders

Company,2001;103-4

9. Sayin MO, Turkkahraman H. Malocclusion and crowding in an

(2)

10.Matya M, Brudvik P, AstrØm AN. Prevalence of malocclusion and

its relationship with socio-demographic factors, dental caries, and

oral hygiene in 12 to 14 year old Tanzanian schoolchildren. Euro J

of Orthod, 2009 (31): 467-76.

11.Aldrees AM. Pattern of skeletal and dental malocclusions in Saudi

orthodontic patients. Saudi Med J, 2012 33(3): 315-20.

12.Wahab R, Idris H, Yacob H. Cephalometric and malocclusion

analysis of Kadazan Dusun Ethnic orthodontic patients. Sains

Malaysiana, 2013; 42(1): 25-32.

13.Farhadiani N, Miresmaeili AF, Soltani MK. Comparison of

extraction and non-extraction orthodontic treatment using the

Objective Grading System .Tehran Dent J, 2005;2(3): 91-5.

14.Al-Duliamy MJ. Orthodontic treatment of Class I malocclusion

with severe crowding without extraction of any sound erupted tooth

- A case report. General Med, 2015 3(2): 1-4.

15.Baumrind S, Korn EL, Boyd RL. Maxwell R.The decision to

extraction: part 1. interclinician agreement. Am J Orthod Dentofac

Orthop, 1996 109(3):297-309.

16.Gianelly AA. Arch width after extraction & nonextraction treatment.

(3)

17.Ismail SF, Moss JP, Hennessy R. Three dimensional assessment of

the effects of extraction and nonextraction orthodontic treatment on

the face. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 2002 121(3):244-56.

18.Firestone AR, Hsler RU, Ingervall B. Treatment results in dental

school orthodontic patients in 1983 and 1993, Angle Orthod ,

1997;69(1): 19-26.

19.Soltani M, Saedi B, Mohammadi Z. Outcome of MBT and standard

Edgewise techniques in Treating Class I malocclusion. American J

Dent Res, 2012; 4(2):61-5.

20.Kattner PF, Schneider BJ. Comparison of Roth appliance and

standard Edgewise appliance treatment results. Am J Orthod

Dentofac Orthop, 1993;103:24-32.

21.Dyken, RA, Sadowsky P.L, Hurst D. Orthodontics outcomes

assessment using the peer assessment rating index. Angle Orthod,

2001;71(3):164-9.

22.Shaw WC, Richmond S, O’Brien KD. The use of occlusal indices: a

European perspective. Am J Orthod. Dentofac Orthop, 1995; 107

(1):1-10.

23.Richmond S, Shaw WC, O'Brien KD, Buchanan IB, Jones R,

(4)

24.The American Board of Orthodontics. ABO objective grading

system for dental casts and panoramic radiographs.

25.Wirtz BR. ABO objective grading system based on clinical

photography.

oktober 2015)

26.Fox NA, Daniels C, Gilgrass T. A Comparison of The Index of

Complexity, Outcome and Need (ICON) with The Peer Assessment

Rating (PAR) and The Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need

(IOTN). Br Dent J 2002; 193 :225-30.

27.Premkumar S. Orthodontics prep manual for undergraduates. New

Delhi: Elsevier, 2008; 436-40.

28.Firestone AR, Beck M, Beglin F, Vig KWL. Evaluation of The Peer

Assessment Rating (PAR) Index as an Index of Orthodontic

treatment need. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 2002;122:463-9.

29.Europian Federation of Orthodontic Specialists. Orthodontic

treatment complexity, need and outcome.

(5)

30.Anthoupoulou C, Konstantonis D, Makou M. Treatment outcomes

after retraction and non retraction treatment evaluated with the

American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system. Am J

Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 20014 146 (6):717-23.

31.Mislik B, Konstantonis D, Katsadouris A, Eliades T. University

clinic and private oractice treatment outcomes in Class I extraction

and nonextraction patients: a comparative study with the American

Board of Orthosontics objective grading system. Am J Orthod

Dentofac Orthop, 20016 149 (2):253-8.

32.Campbell CL, Roberts WE, Hartsfield JK Jr, Qi R. Treatment

outcomes in a graduateorthodontic clinic for cases defined by the

American Board of Orthodontics malocclusion categories. Am J

Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2007132:822-9.

33.Pinskaya YB, Hsieh TJ, Roberts WE, Hartsfield JK. Comprehensive

clinical evaluation as an outcome assessment for a graduate

orthodontics program. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2004

126:533-43

34.Yang-Powers LC, Sadowsky C, Rosenstein S, BeGole EA.

Treatment outcome in a graduate orthodontic clinic using the

(6)

35.Xu TM, Liu Y, Yang MZ, Huang W. Comparison of extraction

versus nonextraction orthodontic treatment outcomes for borderline

Referensi

Dokumen terkait