Daftar Pustaka. Ahmadi, A. (1991). Sosiologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

(1)

Bambang Ekanara, 2014

Keterampilan Argumentasi Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas : Studi Tentang Keterampilan Pembentukan Klaim Mengenai Isu Sosio-Saintifik Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas Pada Kelompok Budaya Sunda Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

Daftar Pustaka

Abbas, S. & Sawamura, H. (2009). “Developing an argument learning environment using agent-based ITS (ALES)”. Educational Data Mining. 3, (1), 200-209. Acar, O., Turkmen, L., & Roychoudhury, A. (2010). “Student difficulties in socio-scientific argumentation and decision-making research findings: Crossing the borders of two research lines”. International Journal of Science Education. 32, (9), 1191-1206.

Ahmadi, A. (1991). Sosiologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Albe, V. (2008). “When scientific knowledge, daily life experience, epistemological and social considerations intersect: Students’ argumentation in group discussions on a socio-scientific issue”. Research in Science Education. 38, (1), 67-90.

American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Science for all Americans. Project 2061. New York: Oxford University Press.

American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2000). Design for Science Literacy. Washington DC: AAAS.

Aisyah, S. (2010). “Pengaruh pola asuh orang tua terhadap tingkat agresivitas anak”. Jurnal Medtek. 1, (2), 16-24.

Aleixandre, M. P. J. (2008). “Designing argumentation learning environments”, dalam Argumentation in Science Education: Perspective from Classroom-Based Research. Tallahassee: Springer.

Anderson, C. (2012). “On the nature of thought processes and their relationship to the accumulation of knowledge: The process of making a diagnosis”. Dermatology Practical and Conceptual. 2 (4), 47-62.

Beck, J. (1992). Asih, Asah, Asuh, Mengasuh dan Mendidik Anak agar Cerdas. Semarang: Dahara Prize.

Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychological Review. 106, (4), 676-713.

(2)

Campbell, N. A., Reece, J. B., Urry, L. A., Cain, M. L., Wasserman, S. A., Minorsky, P. V., & Jackson, R. B. (2012). Biologi Edisi Kedelapan Jilid 3. Jakarta: Erlangga. Caplan, P. (1987). Cultural Construction of Sexuality. London: Tavistock publication. Chin, C. & Osborne, J. (2010). “Students’ questions and discursive interaction: How

they impact argumentation during collaborative group discussions in science”. Contemporary Science Education Research: Learning and Assessment. 1, (2), 3-12.

Christensen, C. (2001). “Scientific literacy for a risky society”. Designing educational Research: Theories, Methods, and Practices. 1, (2), 141-154.

Council of Ministers of Education Canada. (1997). Common Framework of Science Learning Outcomes K to 12. Toronto: Minister of Education.

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design. Los Angeles: Sage publication.

Curriculum Council of Western Australia. (1998). The Curriculum Framework for Kindergarten to Year 12 Education in Western Australia. Perth: CCWA. Daradjat, Z. (1995). Pendidikan Islam Keluarga dan Sekolah. Jakarta: CV Ruhama. Dawson, V. M. (2007). “An exploration of high school (12-17 years old) student’

understandings of, and attitudes towards biotechnology processes”. Research in Science Education. 37, (1), 59-73.

Dawson, V., & Venville, G. J. (2009). “High-school student’ informal reasoning and argumentation about biotechnology: An indicator of scientific literacy?”. International Journal of Science Education. 31, (11), 1421-1445.

Dawson, V., & Venville, G. J. (2010). “Teaching strategies for developing student’ argumentation skills about socioscientific issues in high school genetics”. Research in Science Education. 40, (1), 133-148.

(3)

Donelson, E. (1990). Asih, Asah, Asuh, Keutamaan Wanita. Yogyakarta: Kanisius. Ennis, R., H. (1996). Critical Thinking. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.

Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). “TAPping into argumentation:

Developments in the application of Toulmin’s Argumentation Pattern for studying science discourse”. Science Education. 88, (6), 915-933.

Erduran, S., Ardac, D., & Yakmaci-Guzel, B. (2006). “Learning to teach argumentation: Case studies of pre-service secondary science teachers”. Eurasia Journal of Mathematic, Science and Technology Education. 2, (2), 1-14.

Erduran, S., & Aleixandre, M. (Eds) (2007). Argumentation in Science Education: Perspective of Classroom-Based Research. Dordrecht: Springer.

Fakih, M. (1999). Analisis Gender dan Transformasi Sosial. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.

Foong, C., & Daniel, E. G. S. (2010). “Assessing student’ arguments made in socio-scientific contexts: The considerations of structural complexity and the depth of content knowledge”. Procedia Social and Behavioral Science. 9, (1), 1120-1127. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate

Research in Education Eigth Edition. New York: McGrawHill Companies. Garliah, L., & Nasution, F. K. S. (2005). “Peran pola asuh orang tua dalam motivasi

berprestasi”. Psikologia. 1, (1), 17-25.

Gillon, R. (1999). “Human reproductive cloning - a look at the arguments against it and a rejection of most of them”. Journal of Royal Society of Medicine. 92, (1), 3-12. Gordon, T. (1994). Menjadi Orang Tua Efektif. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Gunarsa, D. S. Y., & Gunarsa D. S. (1995). Psikologi Perkembangan Anak dan Remaja. Jakarta: Gunung Mulia.

(4)

Hasan, S.H. (1996). Pendidikan Ilmu Sosial. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi. Proyek Pendidikan Tenaga Akademik.

Hauck, P. (1993). Psikologi Populer: Mendidik Anak dengan Berhasil. Jakarta: Arcan. Heyes, S., & Hardy M. (1996). Pengantar Psikologi. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Hurlock, B. E. (1990). Perkembangan Anak. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Inch, E. S., Warnick, B., & Endres, D. (2006). Critical Thinking and Communication: The Use of Reason in Argument Fifth Edition. Boston: Pearson Education Inc. Jamal, I., & Idris, Z. (1992). Pengantar Pendidikan. Jakarta: Gramedia Widiasarana. Jonassen, D. H. (2010). “Research issues in problem solving”. Makalah pada The 11th

International Conference on Education Research New Educational Paradigm for Learning and Instruction.

Kartono, K. (1992). Peran Keluarga Memandu Anak. Jakarta: Rajawali Press. Kemendikbud. (2013). Kurikulum 2013 Kompetensi Dasar SMA/MA. Jakarta:

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Knippels, M. C. P. J., Severiens, S. E., & Klop, T. (2009). “Education through fiction: Acquiring opinion-forming skills in the context of genomic”. International Journal of Science Education. 31, (15), 2057-2083.

Koentjaraningrat. (1982). Manusia dan Kebudayaan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Djambatan. Kutluca, A. Y., Cetin, P. S., & Dogan, N. (2014). “Effect of content knowledge on

scientific argumentation quality: Cloning context”. Necatibey Faculty of

Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 8, (1), 1-30. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. London: Sage Publications

(5)

Lubben, F., Sadeck, M., Scholtz, Z., & Braund, M. (2002). “Gauging students’

untutored ability in argumentation about experimental data: A South African case study”. International Journal of Science Education. 32, (16), 2143-2166.

Mattern, M., & Schau, C. (2002). “Gender differences in science attitude-achievement relationships over time among middle-school students”. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 39, (4), 324-340.

Means, M. L., & Voss, J. F. (1996). “Who reason well? Two studies of informed reasoning among children of different grade, ability, and knowledge Levels”. Cognition and Instruction. 14, (2), 139-178.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative Data Analysis. London: Sage Publication.

Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (1998). Beyond 2000: Science Education for the Future. London: King’s college London.

Molinatti, G., Girault, Y., & Hammond, C. (2010). “High school students debate the use of embryonic stem cell: The influence of context on decision-making”.

International Journal of Science Education. 32, (16), 2235-2251.

Munandar, U. (1992). Hubungan Isteri, Suami, dan Anak dalam Keluarga. Jakarta: Pustaka Antara.

Munandar, U. (1982). Pemanduan Anak Berbakat. Jakarta: Rajawali.

Mustakin, B. (2013). Dampak Pola Asuh Keluarga terhadap Perkembangan Sosial pada Siswa SMA Negeri 6 Kota Jambi. Tesis Universitas Jambi. Jambi: tidak diterbitkan.

National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington DC: National Academy Press.

(6)

Oktafiany, N. D., Solihatin, E., & Japar, M. (2013). “Hubungan pola asuh orang tua dengan kecerdasan emosional siswa di SMP Diponegoro 1 Jakarta”. Jurnal PPKN UNJ. 1, (2), 4-17.

Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon., S. (2004). Ideas, Evidence, and Argument in Science. London: Nuffield foundation.

Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon., S. (2004). “Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science”. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 41, (10), 994-1020. Parsono. (1999). Materi Pokok Landasan Pendidikan. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka. Perkins, D. N. (1985). “Postprimary education has little impact on informal reasoning”.

Journal of Educational Psychology. 77, (5), 562-571.

Poebakawatja, S. (1976). Ensiklopedi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Gunung Agung. Putra, M. G. B. A., & Rahmania, H. N. (2004). Studi Hubungan antara Persepsi

terhadap Pola Asuh Otoriter Orang Tua dengan Kecenderungan Pemalu pada Remaja Awal. Tesis master pada Universitas Airlangga. Surabaya: tidak diterbitkan.

Raven, P., & Johnson, G. (2001). Biology, Sixth Edition. Boston: McGrawHill Companies.

Riser, W. & Ward, S. (2002). The Science and Ethics of Cloning. USA Today (17 Januari 2003).

Rustaman, N. Y. (1990). Kemampuan Klasifikasi Logis Anak: Studi tentang

Kemampuan Abstraksi dan Inferensi Anak Usia Sekolah Dasar pada Kelompok Budaya Sunda. Disertasi Doktor pada FPS IKIP Bandung. Bandung: tidak diterbitkan.

Sadler, T. D. (2004). “Informal reasoning regarding socio-scientific issues: A critical review of research”. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 41, (5), 513-536.

(7)

Sadler, T. D., Chambers, F. W., & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). “Student conceptualisations of the nature of science in response to a socioscientific issue”. International Journal of Science Education. 26, (4), 387-409.

Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). “The significance of content knowledge for informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: Applying genetics knowledge to genetic engineering issues”. Science Education. 89, (1), 71-93.

Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). “Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socio-scientific decision making”. International Journal of Science Education. 28, (12), 1463-1488.

Sadler, T. D., & Donelly, L. A. (2006). “Socioscientific argumentation: The effect of content knowledge and morality”. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 42, (1), 112-138.

Sadler, T. D., & Fowler, S. R. (2006). “A threshold model of content knowledge

transfer for socioscientific argumentation”. Science Education. 90, (1), 986-1004. Shin, N., McGee, S., & Baro, J. A. (2003). “Understanding and facilitating historical

argumentation skills in a multimedia learning environment among high school students”. Center of Educational Technologies. 2, (1), 103-112.

Shochib, M. (1998). Pola Asuh Orang Tua dalam Membantu Disiplin Diri. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Suharsono, J. T., Fitriyani, A., & Upoyo, A. S. (2009). “Hubungan pola asuh orang tua terhadap kemampuan sosialisasi pada anak pra sekolah di TK Pertiwi Purwokerto Utara”. Jurnal Keperawatan Soedirman. 3, (4), 1-9.

Thalib, M. (1995). 40 Tanggung Jawab Orang Tua terhadap Anak. Bandung: Irsyad Baitus Salam.

Toulmin, S. E. (1958). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Udell, W. (2007). “Enhancing adolescent girls’ argument skills in reasoning about

(8)

UNESCO. (2005). Human Cloning Ethical Issue. Paris: Cedex.

Walton, D. (2006). Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Walton, D. (2007). Media Argumentation, Dialectic, Persuasion and Rhetoric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Winarti. (2011). Pengaruh Pola Asuh Orang Tua terhadap Pembentukan Akhlak Anak Usia 7-12 Tahun di Ketapang Tangerang. Skripsi pada UIN Hidayatullah. Jakarta: tidak diterbitkan.

Woodward, J. (2005). The Ethics of Human Cloning. Detroit: Greenhaven Press. Wright, C., Weekes, D., & McGlaughlin, A. (2000). Race, Class, and Gender in

Exclusion from School. London: Falmer Press.

Yatim, D. I., & Irwanto. (1991). Kepribadian Keluarga Narkotika. Jakarta: Arcan. Yusniyah. (2008). Hubungan Pola Asuh Orang Tua dengan Prestasi Belajar Siswa MTs

Al-Falah Jakarta Timur. Skripsi pada UIN Hidayatullah. Jakarta: tidak diterbitkan.

Yusuf, S. (1986). Psikologi Perkembangan Anak dan Remaja. Jakarta: Erlangga. Zamroni. (2002). Pandangan Islam terhadap Kloning Manusia. Kompas (21 April

2002).

Zembal-Saul, C. (2008). “Learning to teach elementary school science as argument”. Science Education. 93, (2), 687-719.

Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). “Fostering student’ knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics”. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 39 (1), 35-62.