• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

T BIO 1402417 Bibliography

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "T BIO 1402417 Bibliography"

Copied!
8
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Acar, O. & Patton, B. R., (2012). Argumentation and formal reasoning skills in an argumentation basedguided inquiry course. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. 46. 4756 – 4760

Ahmadi, A & Supriyono, W. (2004). Psikologi Belajar. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta Albanese, P. J., (2015). The unconscious processing information. Marketing

Theory. 15. 59–78

Albe, V., & Gombert, M. J., (2012). Students communication, argumentation and knowledge in a citizens’ conference on global warming. Culture Study of Science Education. 7. 659-681

Alexaindre, M. P. J., Rodriguez, A. B., & Duschl, R. A., (1999). “Doing the Lesson” or “Doing Science”: Argument in High School Genetics. Science Education. 757 – 792

Aleixandre, M. P. J., (2012). Determinism and Undetermination in Genetics: Implications for Students’ Engagement in Argumentation and Epistemic Practices. Science & Education. 23. 465-484

Arikunto, S. (2011). Prosedur Penelitian suatu pendekatan praktik. Jakarta: Penerbit Rhineka Cipta

Arvola, A. O., & Lundegard, I., (2011). It’s Her Body. When Students’ Argumentation Shows Displacement of Content in a Science Classroom.

Research Science Education. 42. 1121-1145.

Astirin, O. P., (2000). Permasalahan Pengelolaan Keanekaragaman Hayati di Indonesia (Problems of Biodiversity Management in Indonesia). Biodiversitas. 1. 36 – 40

Atkinson, R.L., Atkinson, R. C., Smith, E. E., & Bem. D. J., (2010). Pengantar Psikologi jilid Satu. Tangerang: Penerbit Interaksara (Karisma Publishing Group)

Berland, L. K., & McNeill, K. L. (2009). Using A Learning Progression to Inform Scientific Argumentation in Talk and Writing. Learning Progresion in Science. Iowa City

(2)

Bulgren, J. A., Ellis, J. D., & Marquis, J. G., (2013). The Use and Effectiveness of an Argumentation and Evaluations Intervention in Science Classes. Journal Science Education Technology. 23. 82-97

Burtschen, M.J. & Meyer, B., (2014). Promoting good decisions: How regulatory focus affects group information processing and decision-making. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. 17. 663–681

Caldwell, R., (2012). Systems Thinking, Organizational Change And Agency: A

Practice Theory Critique Of Senge’s Learning Organization. Journal of

Change Management. 1-20

Campbell, Reece, et.al. (2008). Biologi. Edisi Kedelapan Jilid 1. Jakarta : Penerbit Erlangga

Cetin, P. S., Dogan, N., & Kutlua, A. Y., (2014). The Quality of Pre-service Science Teachers’ Argumentation: Influence of Content Knowledge.

Journal Science Teacher Education. 25. 309-331.

Chin, C. Yang, W & Tuan, H., (2015). Arguemntation in a Socioscientific Context and its Influence on Fundamental and Derived Science Literacies. International Journal of Science and Math Education. 1 – 15

Christenson, N., Rundgren, S. N., & Zeidler., (2014). The Relationship of Discipline Background to Upper Secondary Students’ Argumentation on Socioscientific Issues. Research Science Education. 44. 581-601.

Clifton, C., Ferreira F., Henderson, J., Inhoff, A. Liversedge, S., Reichle, E., & Schotter. E., (2015). Eye Movements in Reading and information processing: Keith Rayner’s 40 year legacy. Journal of Memory and Language. 1 - 19

Coker, D. L., Erwin, E., (2011). Teaching Academic Argument in an Urban Middle School: A Case Study of Two Approaches. Urban Education. 42. 120 – 140

Dawson, V. M., & Venville, G. (2008). Teaching Strategies for Developing Students’ Argumentation Skills about Socioscientific Issues in High School Genetics. Research Science Education. 40. 133 - 148

Desmita. (2012). Psikologi perkembangan peserta didik. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya

(3)

Duschl, R. A., & Osborne, J., (2002). Supproting and Promoting Argumentation Discourse in Science Education. Studies in Science Education. 39 – 72 Gregory, A., Miller. S., (2014). Using Systems Thinking to Educate for

Sustainability in a Business School. Systems. 2. 313-327.

Ekanara, B. (2014). Keterampilan argumentasi siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas (studi tentang keterampilan pembentukan klaim mengenai isu sosiosaintifik siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas pada kelompok budaya sunda). (Tesis). Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.

Erduran, S., (2014). Beyond Nature of Science: The Case for Reconceptualising Science for Science Education. Science Education International. 93 – 111 Fraenkel, J.R ., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H., (2012). How to Design and

Evaluate Research in Education Eight Edition. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc

Hefter, M. H., Berthold, K., Renkl, A., Riess, W., Shmid, S., & Fries, S., (2014). Effect of a training intervention to foster argumentation skills while processing conflicting scientific positions. Instructional Science 42. 929-947.

Iskandar, Tb. Z., (2012). Psikologi Lingkungan Teori dan Konsep. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama

Ito, A., Coley, M., Pickering, M., Martin, A., & Nieuwland, M. (2016). Predicting form and meaning: Evidence from brain potentials. Journal of Memory and Language. 157 – 171

Jensen, E., (2011). Pembelajaran berbasis otak paradigma pengajaran baru edisi kedua. Jakarta: PT. Indeks

Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. (2012). Determinism and Undertermination in Genetics: Implications for Students’ Engagement in Argumentation and Epistemic Practices. Science and Education. 23. 465 – 484

Jun, S. H., &Holland, S., (2012). Information Processing Strategies a Focus on pictorial information Roles. Journal of Travel Research. 51. 205–218

Kadayifci, H., Atasoy, B., &Akkus, H., (2012) The Correlation between the flaws students define in an argument and their creative and critical thinking abilities. Procedia Social and Behaviour Sciences. 47. 802 – 806

(4)

Karmilasanti & Supartini (2011). Keanekaragaman jenis tumbuhan obat dan pemanfaatannya di kawasan Tane' Olen desa Setulang Malinau, Kalimantan Timur. Jurnal Penelitian Dipterokarpa. 23 – 38

Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup Republik Indonesia (2010). Status Lingkungan Hidup Indonesia 2010. Jakarta: Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup Republik Indonesia

Kuhn, D., (2009). Teaching and Learning Science as Argument. Science Education. 810 – 824

Kuhn, D., Hemberger, L., &Khait, V., (2016). Tracing the Development of Argumentive Writing in a Discourse-Rich Context. Written Communication. 33. 92 – 121

Kusmana, C. &Hikmat, A. (2015).Keanekaragaman Hayati Flora di Indonesia.

Jurnal Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam dan Lingkungan. 5. 187 – 198 Koeneman, M., Goedhart, M., & Ossevoort, M., (2013). Introducing

Pre-university Students to Primary Scientific Literature Through Argumentation Analysis. Research Science Education. 43. 2009–2034

Larrain, A., Howe, C., Cerda, J., (2014). Argumentation in Whole-Class Teaching and Science Learning. PSYKHE. 23. 1-15

Lemerise, E. A., Thorn, A., & Costello, J. M., (2016). Affectiveties and social information processing. Science Education. 1 – 14

Lunenburg, F.C., (2011). Systems Thinking and the Learning Organization: The Path to School Improvement. Schooling Volume 2, Number 1. 1-6.

Marois, R., Ivanoff, J., (2005). Capacity limits of information processing in the brain. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences. 9. 296 – 305

Matsumoto, D. (2008). Pengantar psikologi Lintas Budaya Buku teks utama dalam kelas psikologi lintas budaya tingkat awal. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Mayer, R., (2009). Multimedia Learning Prinsip-Prinsip dan Aplikasi. Surabaya: ITS Press

Mehr, N., (2010). An Analysis of the use of Toulmin’s Model of Argumentation in

(5)

Mei, W. S., (2013).Certainty Judgements and the Status of Propositions in Undergraduate Essays. RELC Journal. 44.279 –302

Mendenhall & Beaver.(1994). Introduction to probability and statistic. New York Mohanty, A., (2015). Information Processing and Creative Thinking Abilities of

Residential and Non-Residential School Children: A Pilot Study. Sage open. 1-12

Moleong, L, A. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Edisi Revisi. Bandung: Penerbit Remaja Rosda Karya

Munir. (2012). Multimedia Konsep & Aplikasi dalam Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta

Nahdi, M. (2008). Konservasi Ekosistem dan Keanekaragaman Hayati Hutan Tropis Berbasis Masyarakat. Kaunia. 159 – 172

Nasir, M. et.al. (1994). PenuntunPraktikum Biologi Umum. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Direktorat Jendaral Pendidikan Tinggi

Nichols, K., Gillies, R., & Hedberg, J. (2015). Argumentation-Based Collaborative Inquiry in Science Through Representational Work: Impact on Primary Students’ Representational Fluency. Res Science Education. 1 – 22

Nurbayani, S. (2010). Program Percepatan Kelas (Akselerasi) bagi Siswa yang memiliki Kemampuan Unggul (Sebuah Inovasi dalam pelaksanaan pendidikan di persekolahan). Jurnal Psikologi. 1-24

Nursani, Z. (2014). Analisis Argumentasi dan Penguasaan Konsep dalam Menggambarkan Keterampilan Berpikir Sistem pada Pembelajaran Fisiologi Manusia. (Tesis). Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.

Nursani, Z. (2014). Analisis Argumentasi dan Penguasaan Konsep dalam menggambarkan Keterampilan Berpikir Sistem pada Pembelajaran Fisiologi Manusia. Prosiding Mathematics And Science Forum. 1 – 12

Ostroff, W, L. (2013). Memahami cara anak-anak belajar membawa ilmu perkembangan anak ke dalam kelas. Jakarta: PT. Indeks

(6)

Rahmat, A., & Hindriana, A. F., (2014). Beban kognitif mahasiswa dalam pembelajaran fungsi terintegrasi struktur tumbuhan berbasis dimensi belajar.

Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 66-74

Rahmat, A., Soesilawaty, S, A., Fachrunnisa, R., Wulandari, S., Suryati, Y., & Rohaeni, H., (2014). Beban kognitif siswa sma pada pembelajaran biologi interdisiplin berbasis dimensi belajar. Prosiding Mathematics and Sciences Forum. 475 – 480

Rahmat, A., Nuraeni, E., Soesilawaty, S. A., Hernita, Alawiyah, D., Garnasih, T., & Noorwahidah. (2015). Beban Kognitif dan Kemampuan penalaran siswa SMA, MA dan SMA berbasis pesantren pada pembelajaran Biologi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Sains & Enterpreneurship II. 240 – 245

Riyadi, S. (2011). Pemrosesan Informasi dalam belajar gerak. Jurnal Ilmiah SPIRIT. 11. 1 – 12

Reiser, B. J., Berland, L. K., & Kenyon, L., (2012). Engaging Students in the Scientific Practices of Explanation and Argumentation Understanding A Framework for K12 Science Education. NSTA’s K-12 Journals. 1-6

Roshayanti, F., Rustaman, N., Barlian, A., & Lukmana, I. (2010). Argumentation Skill of Prospective Biology Teachers on the Concept of Neural System. Prosiding. Development of Science Curiculum in 21st Century. Bandung: 4th International Seminar of Science Education

Roshayanti, F. (2012). Pengembangan Model Asesmen Argumentatif untuk mengukur Keterampilan Argumentasi Mahasiswa pada Konsep Fisiolgi Manusia. (Disertasi). Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.

Sadiman, A., Rahardjo., Haryono, A., Rahardjito., (1986). Media Pendidikan Pengertian, Pengembangan dan Pemanfaatannya. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada

Sampson, V., & Schleigh, S. (2013). Scientific Argumentation in Biology 30 classroom activities. Virginia: NSTA press

Santrock, J., W. (2007). Remaja Edisi 11 Jilid 1. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga

Santrock, J., W. (2011). Life-Span Development Perkembangan Masa Hidup Edisi Ketigabelas Jilid 1. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga

(7)

Setyawan, A. & SGM, I. (2015). Belajar dengan otak kanan cara belajar asyik dan keren. Jakarta : PT. Eensi Erlangga Group

Sheil, D., Van Heist, M., Liswanti, N., Basuki, I., & Wan, M. (2009). Keanekaragaman Hayati, Lansekap dan Sumber Penghidupan: Sebuah perspektif lokal. 57 – 83

Simosi, M. (2003). Using Toulmin’s Framework for the Analysis of Everyday Argumentation: Some Methodological Considerations. Kluwer Academic Publishers. 185 – 202

Skrzypek, W., Potyrala, K., & Walosik, A. (2011). Formation of biology students social skills with use of ICT tools. Western Anatolia Journal of Education Science. 219 – 224

Smyrnaiou, Z., Petropoulou, E., & Sotiriou, M. (2015). Appling Argumentation Approach in STEM Education: A Case Study of the European Student Parliaments Project in Greece. American Journal of Educational Research.

1618-1628

Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta

Sutarno, E. (2014). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran IPA berbasis Multimedia Interaktif untuk Meningkatkan Kemandirian dan Hasil Belajar Siswa SMP di Kota Bandung (Disertasi). Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.

Tavares, M., Aleixandre, M. & Mortimer, E. F., (2009). Articulation of Conceptual Knowledge and Argumentation Practices by High School Students in Evolution Problems. Science and Education. 19. 573 – 598 Triyono, K. (2013). Keanekaragaman hayati dalam menunjang ketahanan pangan.

Innofarm: Jurnal Inovasi Pertanian. 11. 1-11

VanDerHeide, J., Newell, G, E., (2013). Instructional Chains as a Method for Examining the Teaching and Learning of Argumentative Writing in Classrooms. Written Communication. 30. 300 – 329

Wolfe, C., (2011). Argumentation Across the Curriculum. Written Communication. 28. 193 – 219

(8)

Yahaya, A. (2009). Information processing and its implications to teaching and learning. Kuala Lumpur: Faculty of Education, University Technology Malaysia

Yu, S., & Yore, L. D., (2012). Quality, Evolution, And Positional Change Of University Students’ Argumentation Patterns About Organic Agriculture During An Argument–Critique–Argument Experience. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 11. 1233 – 1254

Yudhistira., Hidayat, W. K., & Hadiyarto, A., (2011). Kajian Dampak Kerusakan Lingkungan akibat Kegiatan Penambangan Pasir di desa Keningar daerah kawasan Gunung Merapi. Jurnal Ilmu Lingkungan volume 9. 76-84 Yusuf, S. (2005). Psikologi Perkembangan Anak dan Remaja. Bandung: Penerbit

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Program Bimbingan dan Konseling Untuk Meningkatkan Kemandrian Perilaku Wirausaha Siswa Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan .Skripsi pada Sarjana PPB FIP UPI Bandung:

[r]

Penelitian ini merekomendasikan pembelajaran dalam pendidikan jasmani sebaiknya menggunakan model pembelajaran inquiry pemodelan multiple - coping agar self-efficacy

Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengaruh substitusi tepung labu kuning pada tepung terigu memberikan pengaruh berbeda sangat nyata terhadap terhadap kadar air,

Perumusan masalah penelitian ini adalah “Apakah Nilai Pelanggan berpengaruh terhadap Kepuasan dan Apakah Kepuasan Pelanggan Berdampak Terhadap Loyalitas Pelanggan Metro

diajukan untuk memenuhi sebagian syarat untuk memperoleh gelar Sarjana Pendidikan pada Program Studi Pendidikan Manajemen Perkantoran, Fakultas Pendidikan Ekonomi dan

Adapun dalam pembuktian kualifikasi ini, peserta yang di undang wajib membawa serta memperlihatkan Dokumen yang disyaratkan dalam dokumen lelang kepada Panitia yang telah

Berdasarkan gambaran tersebut, disadari peluang untuk berkiprah di dunia industri dan perdagangan mejadi berkurang, namun dilihat dari peluang pelaksanaan