• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

English Teaching Method’s Subject in English Department at University of Sumatera Utara: A Needs Analysis

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "English Teaching Method’s Subject in English Department at University of Sumatera Utara: A Needs Analysis"

Copied!
4
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

48

REFERENCES

Abbot, G. and Wingard, P. 1981. The Teaching of English as an International Language, Collins.

Akyela, A. and Ozek, Y. 2010. “A language needs analysis research at an English medium university in Turkey” in Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 2, p. 969–975. Istanbul: English Language Education Department.

Allwright, R. 1982. “Perceiving and Pursuing Learner’s Needs” in M. Geddes and G. Sturtrigde (eds) Individualisation Oxford: Modern English Publications. Arikunto, S. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka

Cipta.

Azwar, S. 1998. Metode Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Benesch, S. 1996. “Needs Analysis and Curriculum Development in EAP: An

Example of a Critical Approach” in TESOL Quarterly, Vol. 30, No. 4 p. 723-738. Virgina.

Bungin, B. 2001. Metodolologi Penelitian Sosial: Format-Format Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press.

Dehnad, A et al. 2010. “Syllabus revision: a needs analysis Study” in Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 2, p. 1307–1312.

Dudley-Evans, T. and St John, M.T. 1998. Developments in English for Specific Purposes: A multi-disciplinary Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Erlina. 2011. Metodologi Penelitian. Medan: USU Press.

Ginting, P. 2008. Filsafat Ilmu dan Metode Riset. Medan: USU Press.

(2)

49 Grier, A. 2005. “Integrating Needs Assessment into Career and Technical

Curriculum Development” in ITEJ.Vol. 42.No. 1. Columbia: Midlands Technical College.

Harefa, Y. 2009. Foundation Course in English Teaching Methods. Medan: USU Press.

Harmer, J. 2000. The Practice of English Language Teaching. (3rd edition). London: Longman.

Hutchinson, T. and Waters, A. 1987. English for Specific Purposes, Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press.

Jasso-Aguilar, R. 1999. “A task-based needs analysis of a tertiary Korean as a foreign language program” in Second Language Needs Analysis, Vol. 18, No. 1 p. 225-252.

___________. 1999. “Sources, methods and triangulation in needs analysis: a critical perspective in a case study of Waikiki hotel maids” in Second Language Needs Analysis, Vol. 18, No. 1 p. 27-46.

Jordan, R. 1997. English for Academic Purposes Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Khansir, A. 2013. “Applied Linguistics and English Language Teaching” in Middle East Journal of Scientific Research, Vol 15, No. 8 p. 1140-1146.

Larsen-Freeman, D. 2000. Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching. (2nd

edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

(3)

50 Latif. January 2012. Need Analysis & 7 Approaches to Course Design (ESP).

Retrieved from http://deadlaif2011.blogspot.co.id/2012/01/need-analysis-7-approaches-to-course.html (7 Desember 2016)

Long, M.H. 2005. Second Language Needs Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Munby, J. 1978. Communicative Syllabus Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nunan, D. 1988. Syllabus Design.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ________ . 1991. Language Teaching Methodology, Hemel Hempstead: Prentice

Hall International.

Reid, J.M. 1987. “The Learning Style Preferences of ESL Students”.TESOL Quarterly, Vol. 21 No. 1.

Richards, J.C. 1990. The Language Teaching Matrix. Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press.

___________. 2001. Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J.C. and Rodgers, T S. 1986. Approaches and Methods in Language

Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J.C. and Schmidt, R. 2010. Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. (4th edition). London: Longman.

(4)

51 Saieed, M.N. 2012. “English for Specific Purpose” in Need Analysis. Chabahar:

English Language Teaching CIC.

Seedhouse, P. 1995. “Needs Analysis and the General English classroom” in ELTJ, Vol. 49, No.1 p. 59-65.

Setiyadi, Ag.B. 2006. Metode Penelitian untuk Pengajaran Bahasa Asing; Pendekatan Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Graha Ilmu.

Sugiyono. 2012. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&B. Bandung: Alfabeta.

West, R. 1994. “State of the art article: Needs Analysis in Language Teaching” in ELTJ, Vol 27, No. 1. p. 1-29.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

dengan sistem kerjanya yang memberikan nutrisi secara otomatis pada bak tandon jika. nutrisi tersebut kurang dari nilai referensi dengan cara menggerakan 2 pompa

berbagai pihak yang baik secara langsung maupun tidak telah membantu penulis dalam.. menyelesaikan skripsi

Untuk menjadi berguna, itu harus tertanam dalam konteks pembelajaran yang tepat (Seidel dkk, 2013). Dengan melihat perkembangan teknologi yang semakin pesat maka

2015.” Sistem Penguji Kualitas Air Minum Berdasarkan Nilai Konduktivitas dan PH Serta Pengatur Otomatis Pada Pengisian Air Minum Isi Ulang (AMIU) ”.. Fakultas

[r]

Se Diretor ka Representante ema individual ke residente (sidadaun) Timor-Leste nian  Kompleta formulariu Pakote C Se Diretor ka Representante ema individual ke hela

Dengan demikian kegiatan pengolahan data dalam kegiatan penelitian merupakan kegiatan yang sangat penting yaitu untuk memperoleh suatu kesimpulan atau generalisasi tenang

Faktor-faktor budaya yang menjadi kendala dalam pengembangan pendidikan pada penduduk asli Buru yang paling utama adalah masalah kurangnya kesadaran penduduk asli