LAMPIRAN 1
Data Responden
Data Responden
Nama
: ... ( boleh tidak disi)
NIM
:
Jensi kelamin :
Laki-laki
Perempuan
Usia
:
< 20 Tahun
> 20 Tahun
Apakah sudah mengambil mata kuliah Akuntansi Sosial dan Lingkungan?
Sudah
Belum
Apakah sudah memiliki pengalaman kerja?
a)
Pernah Bekerja :
YA
Tidak
b)
Sedang Bekerja :
< 1 tahun
> 1 tahun
c)
Belum Bekerja :
YA
Tidak
NIM:
PENGISIAN KUESIONER
Terima kasih atas partisipasi anda dalam eksperimen ini. Berdasarkan deskripsi perusahaan yang telah anda baca, silahkan
memberikan tanda (√) pada pertanyaan berikut ini sesuai persepsi anda masing
-masing sesuai dengan skala berikut ini :
1
= Sangat Tidak Setuju
2
= Tidak Seuju
3
= Netral
4
= Setuju
5
= Sangat Setuju
KUESIONER Pengaruh CSR terhadap Efektivitas
No
Pertanyaan
1
2
3
4
5
Social responsibility
dan profitabilitas
1
Untuk tetap kompetitif dalam lingkungan global, perusahaan bisnis
tidak mengabaikan tanggung jawab sosial
2
Untuk tetap kompetitif dalam lingkungan global, perusahaan bisnis
tidak mengabaikan etika
3
Tanggung jawab sosial dan profitabilitas dapat kompatibel
4
Etika yang baik adalah ciri bisnis yang baik
Social responsibility
dan kesuksesan jangka panjang
6
Etika dan tanggung jawab sosial adalah yang paling penting bagi
perusahaan
7
Prioritas utama suatu perusahaan tidak hanya moral karyawan
8
Etika dan tanggung jawab sosial perusahaan sangat penting untuk
mendapatkan profitabilitas dalam jangka panjang
9
Efektivitas bisnis secara keseluruhan dapat ditentukan berdasarkan
etika dan tanggung jawab sosial.
10
Etika bisnis dan tanggung jawab sosial sangat penting untuk
perusahaan
Social responsibility
dan kesuksesan jangka pendek
11
Dalam berbisnis, perusahaan perlu melakukan tanggung jawab
sosial di luar untuk mendapatkan keuntungan.
12
Fokus yang paling penting bagi sebuah perusahaan adalah
membuat keuntungan, tanpa harus melanggar aturan.
13
Efisiensi penting untuk sebuah perusahaan dengan disertai etika
atau tanggung jawab sosial perusahaan.
LAMPIRAN 2
DATA PARTISIPAN EKSPERIMEN
DATA PARTISIPAN DENGAN KONDISI PERUSAHAAN BANGKRUT DAN CSR BAIK
NIM
JENIS
KELAMIN
USIA
ASOSLING
PENGALAMAN
KERJA
CEK
MANIPULASI
13.60.0203
1.0
0.0
1.0
3.0
L
13.60.0118
1.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
L
13.60.0242
1.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
L
14.G1.0058
1.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
L
14.G1.0146
1.0
0.0
1.0
1.0
L
14.G1.0192
1.0
0.0
1.0
1.0
L
14.G1.0185
0.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
L
14.G1.0095
1.0
0.0
1.0
1.0
L
14.G1.0074
1.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
L
14.G1.0084
0.0
0.0
1.0
1.0
L
14.G1.0056
1.0
0.0
1.0
1.0
L
14.G1.0005
1.0
0.0
0.0
2.0
L
14.G1.0097
1.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
L
15.G1.0221
1.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
L
15.G1.0209
1.0
1.0
0.0
1.0
L
15.G1.0080
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
L
15.G1.0122
1.0
1.0
0.0
2.0
L
16.G1.0194
0.0
1.0
0.0
1.0
L
16.G1.0031
1.0
1.0
0.0
2.0
L
16.G1.0028
1.0
1.0
0.0
2.0
L
16.G1.0015
0.0
1.0
0.0
2.0
L
16.G1.0190
1.0
1.0
0.0
2.0
L
DATA PARTISIPAN DENGAN KONDISI PERUSAHAAN BANGKRUT TIDAK ADA CSR
NIM
JENIS KELAMIN
USIA
ASOSLING
PENGALAMAN KERJA
CEK MANIPULASI
13.60.0109
1.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
L
14.G1.0102
1.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
L
14.G1.0080
1.0
0.0
1.0
1.0
L
14.G1.0201
1.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
L
14.G1.0222
1.0
0.0
1.0
1.0
L
14.G1.0156
0.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
L
14.G1.0076
1.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
L
14.G1.0116
1.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
L
14.G1.0192
1.0
0.0
1.0
1.0
L
15.G1.0206
1.0
1.0
0.0
1.0
L
13.G1.0249
1.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
L
15.G1.0196
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
L
15.G1.0074
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
L
15.G1.0050
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
L
15.G1.0011
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
L
15.G1.0017
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
L
16.G1.0145
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
L
16.G1.0146
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
L
16.G1.0169
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
L
16.G1.0213
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
L
16.G1.0018
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
L
16.G1.0172
1.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
L
16.G1.0204
1.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
L
DATA PARTISIPAN DENGAN KONDISI PERUSAHAAN TIDAK BANGKRUT DENGAN REPUTASI CSR
BAIK
NIM
JENIS KELAMIN
USIA
ASOSLING
PENGALAMAN KERJA
CEK MANIPULASI
13.60.0205
1.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
L
13.60.0001
1.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
L
13.60.0194
0.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
L
13.60.0200
1.0
0.0
1.0
1.0
L
13.60.0147
1.0
0.0
1.0
1.0
L
13.60.0058
0.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
L
14.G1.0182
1.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
L
14.G1.0165
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
L
14.G1.0004
0.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
L
14.G1.0168
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
L
15.G1.0048
1.0
1.0
0.0
1.0
L
14.G1.0064
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
L
14.G1.0049
0.0
1.0
1.0
0.0
L
15.G1.0153
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
L
15.G1.0239
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
L
16.G1.0039
1.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
L
16.G1.0034
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
L
16.G1.0014
1.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
L
16.G1.0189
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
L
16.G1.0210
1.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
L
16.G1.0181
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
L
16.G1.0192
1.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
L
16.G1.0193
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
L
DATA PARTISIPAN DENGAN KONDISI PERUSAHAAN TIDAK BANGKRUT CSR Buruk
NIM
JENIS KELAMIN
USIA
ASOSLING
PENGALAMAN KERJA
CEK MANIPULASI
15.G1.0081
0.0
1.0
0.0
1.0
L
15.G1.0121
0.0
1.0
0.0
1.0
L
15.G1.0220
0.0
1.0
0.0
1.0
L
15.G1.0031
0.0
1.0
0.0
1.0
L
16.G1.0173
0.0
1.0
0.0
2.0
L
16.G1.0195
0.0
1.0
0.0
1.0
L
16.G1.0019
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
L
16.G1.0017
1.0
1.0
0.0
1.0
L
16.G1.0051
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
L
16.G1.0171
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
L
13.60.0111
1.0
0.0
1.0
1.0
L
13.60.0115
1.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
L
13.60.0215
1.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
L
13.60.0213
1.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
L
13.60.0116
1.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
L
14.G1.0216
1.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
L
14.G1.0126
1.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
L
14.G1.0041
1.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
L
15.G1.0063
1.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
L
14.G1.0071
1.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
L
14.G1.0026
1.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
L
14.G1.0155
1.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
L
15.G1.0021
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
L
15.G2.0016
1.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
L
15.G1.0114
1.0
1.0
0.0
1.0
L
DATA KUESIONER PENGARUH CSR TERHADAP EFEKTIVITAS
(Kondisi Bangkrut dengan CSR Baik)
NO
PCE
1
PCE
2
PCE
3
PC4
PCE
5
PCE
6
PCE
7
PCE
8
PCE
9
PCE
10
PCE
11
PCE
12
PCE
13
PCE
14
PCE
1
1
2
5
5
2
4
4
4
4
4
5
1
1
1
3,1
2
1
1
5
5
2
5
5
5
4
5
5
1
1
1
3,3
3
1
1
5
4
1
2
5
4
3
4
5
2
2
1
2,9
4
1
1
5
5
2
4
5
5
5
5
5
2
1
1
3,4
5
1
1
5
5
1
5
5
5
5
5
5
2
1
2
3,4
6
2
1
5
5
2
4
4
4
4
4
5
1
2
2
3,2
7
1
1
4
4
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
2
1
2,9
8
2
2
5
5
2
4
5
5
4
4
5
1
1
2
3,4
9
2
1
5
4
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
2
2
3,1
10
2
1
3
2
1
4
5
5
4
4
5
1
3
2
3,0
11
1
2
5
5
2
5
5
5
5
5
5
2
2
2
3,6
12
1
1
5
5
1
5
5
5
5
5
5
3
3
3
3,7
13
1
1
4
4
1
4
5
5
4
5
5
2
1
2
3,1
14
2
2
4
4
3
4
5
5
4
5
4
2
3
2
3,5
15
2
2
5
5
2
4
5
5
4
4
4
2
3
3
3,6
16
2
1
3
2
2
2
3
3
4
4
4
2
3
2
2,6
17
2
2
5
5
2
4
3
3
4
4
4
3
3
1
3,2
18
1
1
4
4
2
2
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
2
2,9
19
2
2
5
5
3
1
3
3
3
4
4
2
1
2
2,9
20
1
1
5
5
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
2
3,3
21
1
1
3
3
3
2
3
3
2
2
3
2
3
3
2,4
22
1
1
5
5
1
5
4
4
4
4
4
2
3
2
3,2
23
1
1
4
5
2
4
3
3
3
1
2
2
2
3
2,6
DATA KUESIONER PENGARUH CSR TERHADAP EFEKTIVITAS
(Kondisi Bangkrut dengan Tidak Memilki CSR )
N
O
PCE
1
PCE
2
PCE
3
PC4
PCE
5
PCE
6
PCE
7
PCE
8
PCE
9
PCE
10
PCE
11
PCE
12
PCE
13
PCE
14
PCE
1
1
1
5
5
2
5
5
5
4
5
5
1
1
1
3,3
2
2
1
5
5
2
5
5
5
4
5
5
1
2
1
3,4
3
1
2
5
5
2
4
4
4
3
4
5
1
2
1
3,1
4
1
1
5
5
1
4
4
4
4
5
5
1
1
1
3,0
5
1
1
5
5
2
5
4
4
4
4
4
2
2
1
3,1
6
1
1
5
5
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
2
3
3,2
7
2
1
4
4
1
4
5
5
4
4
5
2
2
2
3,2
8
1
1
4
4
2
4
5
5
5
4
5
2
1
1
3,1
9
2
1
4
4
1
4
4
4
5
4
5
1
1
1
2,9
10
1
2
4
4
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
3
3
3,2
11
1
1
5
5
2
4
5
5
4
5
5
1
2
1
3,3
12
1
1
4
4
2
4
3
3
4
5
4
3
2
2
3,0
13
2
1
5
5
3
4
4
4
5
4
4
2
2
2
3,4
14
2
2
5
5
3
4
3
3
5
4
3
2
2
2
3,2
15
2
2
4
4
1
4
3
3
4
4
4
1
1
1
2,7
16
2
1
5
5
1
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
2
2
3,1
17
1
1
5
5
3
5
4
4
3
4
4
2
3
3
3,4
18
2
2
3
4
2
4
3
3
4
4
4
2
3
4
3,1
19
2
2
4
4
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
3
3
3,3
20
1
2
4
4
1
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
1
1
2,9
21
2
2
4
4
2
5
3
3
4
5
4
2
2
2
3,1
22
2
1
5
5
1
4
4
4
4
5
5
1
3
2
3,3
23
2
3
4
5
2
4
4
4
4
5
5
2
2
1
3,4
DATA KUESIONER PENGARUH CSR TERHADAP EFEKTIVITAS
(KONDISI PERUSAHAAN TIDAK BANGKRUT DAN CSR BAIK)
NO
PCE
1
PCE
2
PCE
3
PC4
PCE
5
PCE
6
PCE
7
PCE
8
PCE
9
PCE
10
PCE
11
PCE
12
PCE
13
PCE
14
PCE
1
2
1
5
5
2
2
5
5
4
5
5
2
2
2
3,4
2
1
1
5
5
1
4
5
5
4
5
5
1
1
1
3,1
3
1
1
5
5
2
5
5
5
4
5
5
1
1
2
3,4
4
2
2
5
4
1
4
5
5
2
4
4
1
1
2
3,0
5
2
2
4
4
1
4
5
5
5
5
5
2
1
2
3,4
6
1
1
4
4
2
4
5
4
4
4
5
2
2
2
3,1
7
2
1
5
5
2
4
4
4
3
4
4
2
2
3
3,2
8
1
1
4
4
2
1
4
4
3
4
4
2
2
2
2,7
9
2
1
4
4
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
2
1
3,1
10
2
1
3
3
2
5
4
4
5
4
5
1
2
1
3,0
11
2
2
5
5
1
5
5
5
5
5
4
1
2
2
3,5
12
1
1
4
4
2
1
4
4
3
4
4
2
2
3
2,8
13
2
3
4
4
3
5
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
2
3,5
14
1
1
4
4
2
5
4
4
4
4
4
2
2
2
3,1
15
2
2
4
4
4
4
3
3
4
4
3
2
2
2
3,1
16
1
3
5
5
3
5
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
1
3,5
17
3
2
5
5
3
5
2
2
5
5
5
2
2
1
3,4
18
2
1
4
5
3
5
4
4
5
5
5
3
1
1
3,4
19
2
2
4
5
1
4
3
3
5
5
5
3
3
1
3,3
20
1
2
4
4
3
5
4
4
3
3
3
2
3
3
3,1
21
2
2
5
5
1
5
3
3
5
5
3
3
2
3
3,4
22
1
1
5
5
1
5
3
3
5
5
4
1
2
2
3,1
23
1
1
2
2
1
5
3
2
3
4
4
1
3
3
2,5
DATA KUESIONER PENGARUH CSR TERHADAP EFEKTIVITAS
(KONDISI PERUSAHAAN TIDAK BANGKRUT DAN MEMILIKI REPUTASI CSR BURUK)
NO
PCE
1
PCE
2
PCE
3
PC4
PCE
5
PCE
6
PCE
7
PCE
8
PCE
9
PCE
10
PCE
11
PCE
12
PCE
13
PCE
14
PCE
1
2
1
5
5
2
4
5
5
5
5
5
1
1
1
3,4
2
1
1
5
5
2
5
5
5
4
5
5
1
1
1
3,3
3
1
2
5
4
2
5
5
4
4
4
4
2
1
2
3,2
4
1
1
5
5
2
5
5
5
4
5
5
1
1
1
3,3
5
1
1
5
5
2
5
5
5
4
5
5
1
1
1
3,3
6
1
1
5
5
2
5
5
5
4
5
5
1
1
1
3,3
7
2
1
3
4
2
4
5
5
4
4
4
3
2
3
3,3
8
3
2
4
4
2
5
5
5
5
5
5
2
2
2
3,6
9
2
1
4
4
2
5
5
5
4
4
4
1
3
2
3,3
10
2
1
4
4
2
4
4
4
4
4
5
2
2
3
3,2
11
2
1
4
4
1
4
5
5
4
4
4
3
1
1
3,1
12
2
2
4
4
2
4
3
3
2
4
4
4
2
2
3,0
13
2
1
4
4
2
4
5
5
4
4
4
3
3
1
3,3
14
2
2
4
4
1
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
2
2
3,1
15
1
1
4
4
2
4
3
3
3
4
3
1
3
3
2,8
16
2
2
4
4
2
4
3
3
4
4
4
2
2
2
3,0
17
2
2
5
5
2
4
3
3
4
4
4
2
2
2
3,1
18
2
2
5
5
2
4
4
4
5
5
5
1
1
1
3,3
19
2
2
4
4
1
5
4
4
5
5
3
2
1
2
3,1
20
2
3
4
4
1
4
3
3
4
5
3
3
1
1
2,9
21
2
1
5
5
3
2
3
3
4
3
3
2
3
2
2,9
22
1
1
5
5
3
5
4
4
3
4
4
2
3
3
3,4
23
1
3
4
4
1
5
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3,4
24
1
1
4
4
2
4
4
3
4
4
4
2
3
3
3,1
25
2
1
5
5
2
2
3
3
3
2
3
2
2
3
2,7
LAMPIRAN 3
HASIL UJI VALIDITAS DAN REBILITAS PENGARUH CSR TERHADAP
EFEKTIVITAS
TAHAP 4
Case Processing Summary
N
%
Cases Valid
98
100.0
Excluded
a
0
.0
Total
98
100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all
variables in the procedure.
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha
Cronbach's
Alpha Based
on
Standardized
Items
N of Items
.792
.791
7
Item Statistics
Mean
Std.
Deviation
N
PCE3
4.3878
.69805
98
PCE4
4.3980
.72850
98
PCE7
4.1020
.79288
98
PCE8
4.0408
.79843
98
PCE9
4.0306
.69541
98
PCE10
4.2653
.71148
98
Inter-Item Correlation Matrix
PCE3
PCE4
PCE7
PCE8
PCE9
PCE10
PCE11
PCE3
1.000
.869
.207
.249
.103
.247
.201
PCE4
.869
1.000
.090
.167
.200
.252
.187
PCE7
.207
.090
1.000
.954
.163
.335
.543
PCE8
.249
.167
.954
1.000
.183
.344
.514
PCE9
.103
.200
.163
.183
1.000
.546
.364
PCE10
.247
.252
.335
.344
.546
1.000
.638
PCE11
.201
.187
.543
.514
.364
.638
1.000
Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if
Item Deleted
Scale
Variance if
Item Deleted
Corrected
Item-Total
Correlation
Squared
Multiple
Correlation
Cronbach's
Alpha if Item
Deleted
PCE3
25.1122
9.297
.454
.788
.777
PCE4
25.1020
9.350
.412
.794
.785
PCE7
25.3980
8.386
.588
.925
.751
PCE8
25.4592
8.230
.622
.919
.744
PCE9
25.4694
9.654
.365
.334
.792
PCE10
25.2347
8.759
.582
.535
.754
PCE11
25.2245
8.671
.620
.537
.747
Scale Statistics
Mean
Variance
Std.
Deviation
N of Items
LAMPIRAN 4A
HASIL UJI HIPOTESIS 1A
Descriptives
PCE
N
Mean
Std.
Deviation Std. Error
95% Confidence Interval for
Mean
Minimum Maximum
Lower Bound Upper Bound
laki-laki
7
3.4429
.49281
.18626
2.9871
3.8986
2.70
4.00
perempuan
17
4.5235
.36491
.08850
4.3359
4.7112
3.90
5.00
Total
24
4.2083
.63856
.13034
3.9387
4.4780
2.70
5.00
Test of Homogeneity of Variances
PCE
Levene
Statistic
df1
df2
Sig.
.859
1
22
.364
ANOVA
PCE
Sum of
Squares
Df
Mean Square
F
Sig.
Between
Groups
5.791
1
5.791
35.508
.000
Within Groups
3.588
22
.163
LAMPIRAN 4B
HASIL UJI HIPOTESIS 1B
Descriptives
PCE
N
Mean
Std.
Deviation Std. Error
95% Confidence Interval for
Mean
Minimum Maximum
Lower Bound Upper Bound
laki-laki
11
4.0182
.24827
.07486
3.8514
4.1850
3.60
4.40
perempuan
13
4.5000
.27988
.07763
4.3309
4.6691
4.00
4.90
Total
24
4.2792
.35750
.07297
4.1282
4.4301
3.60
4.90
Test of Homogeneity of Variances
PCE
Levene
Statistic
df1
df2
Sig.
.528
1
22
.475
ANOVA
PCE
Sum of
Squares
Df
Mean Square
F
Sig.
Between
Groups
1.383
1
1.383
19.553
.000
Within Groups
1.556
22
.071
LAMPIRAN 4C
HASIL UJI HIPOTESIS 1C
Descriptives
PCE
N
Mean
Std.
Deviation
Std. Error
95% Confidence Interval for
Mean
Minimum Maximum
Lower Bound Upper Bound
laki-laki
12
4.0000
.46710
.13484
3.7032
4.2968
2.90
4.90
perempuan
12
4.4167
.41742
.12050
4.1514
4.6819
3.60
4.90
Total
24
4.2083
.48267
.09852
4.0045
4.4121
2.90
4.90
Test of Homogeneity of Variances
PCE
Levene
Statistic
df1
df2
Sig.
.312
1
22
.582
ANOVA
PCE
Sum of
Squares
Df
Mean Square
F
Sig.
Between
Groups
1.042
1
1.042
5.309
.031
Within Groups
4.317
22
.196
LAMPIRAN 4D
HASIL UJI HIPOTESIS 1D
Descriptives
PCE
N
Mean
Std.
Deviation Std. Error
95% Confidence Interval for
Mean
Minimum Maximum
Lower Bound Upper Bound
laki-laki
9
4.6000
.38730
.12910
4.3023
4.8977
4.10
5.00
perempuan
17
3.9647
.39677
.09623
3.7607
4.1687
3.40
4.70
Total
26
4.1846
.49371
.09683
3.9852
4.3840
3.40
5.00
Test of Homogeneity of Variances
PCE
Levene
Statistic
df1
df2
Sig.
.411
1
24
.528
ANOVA
PCE
Sum of
Squares
Df
Mean Square
F
Sig.
Between
Groups
2.375
1
2.375
15.328
.001
Within Groups
3.719
24
.155
LAMPIRAN 5A
HASIL UJI HIPOTESIS 2A
Descriptives
PCE
N
Mean
Std.
Deviation
Std.
Error
95% Confidence Interval
for Mean
Minimu
m
Maximu
m
Lower
Bound
Upper
Bound
mulai 20
tahun keatas
15
4.4733
.49058
.12667
4.2017
4.7450
3.30
5.00
dibawah 20
tahun
9
3.7667
.63246
.21082
3.2805
4.2528
2.70
4.60
Total
24
4.2083
.63856
.13034
3.9387
4.4780
2.70
5.00
Test of Homogeneity of Variances
PCE
Levene
Statistic
df1
df2
Sig.
.846
1
22
.368
ANOVA
PCE
Sum of
Squares
Df
Mean Square
F
Sig.
Between
Groups
2.809
1
2.809
9.407
.006
Within Groups
6.569
22
.299
LAMPIRAN 5B
HASIL UJI HIPOTESIS 2B
Descriptives
PCE
N
Mean
Std.
Deviation Std. Error
95% Confidence Interval
for Mean
Minimum Maximum
Lower
Bound
Upper
Bound
mulai 20
tahun keatas
10
4.5500
.26771
.08466
4.3585
4.7415
4.30
4.90
dibawah 20
tahun
14
4.0857
.28245
.07549
3.9226
4.2488
3.60
4.60
Total
24
4.2792
.35750
.07297
4.1282
4.4301
3.60
4.90
Test of Homogeneity of Variances
PCE
Levene
Statistic
df1
df2
Sig.
.004
1
22
.953
ANOVA
PCE
Sum of
Squares
Df
Mean Square
F
Sig.
Between
Groups
1.257
1
1.257
16.446
.001
Within Groups
1.682
22
.076
LAMPIRAN 5C
HASIL UJI HIPOTESIS 2C
Descriptives
PCE
N
Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error
95% Confidence Interval
for Mean
Minimum
Maximum
Lower
Bound
Upper Bound
mulai 20
tahun keatas
10
4.4500
.38944
.12315
4.1714
4.7286
4.00
4.90
dibawah 20
tahun
14
4.0357
.47975
.12822
3.7587
4.3127
2.90
4.90
Total
24
4.2083
.48267
.09852
4.0045
4.4121
2.90
4.90
Test of Homogeneity of Variances
PCE
Levene
Statistic
df1
df2
Sig.
.017
1
22
.898
ANOVA
PCE
Sum of
Squares
Df
Mean Square
F
Sig.
Between
Groups
1.001
1
1.001
5.055
.035
Within Groups
4.357
22
.198
LAMPIRAN 5D
UJI BEDA HIPOTESIS 2D
Descriptives
PCE
N
Mean
Std.
Deviation
Std. Error
95% Confidence Interval
for Mean
Minimum Maximum
Lower Bound Upper Bound
mulai 20
tahun
keatas
13
3.9462
.36882
.10229
3.7233
4.1690
3.40
4.70
dibawah 20
tahun
13
4.4231
.49859
.13828
4.1218
4.7244
3.40
5.00
Total
26
4.1846
.49371
.09683
3.9852
4.3840
3.40
5.00
Test of Homogeneity of Variances
PCE
Levene Statistic
df1
df2
Sig.
2.585
1
24
.121
ANOVA
PCE
Sum of
Squares
Df
Mean Square
F
Sig.
Between Groups
1.478
1
1.478
7.688
.011
Within Groups
4.615
24
.192
LAMPIRAN 6A
HASIL UJI HIPOTESIS 3A
Descriptives
PCE
N
Mean
Std.
Deviation
Std.
Error
95% Confidence Interval
for Mean
Minimum Maximum
Lower
Bound
Upper
Bound
belum
mengambil
13
3.9385
.68622
.19032
3.5238
4.3531
2.70
5.00
sudah
mengambil
11
4.5273
.40765
.12291
4.2534
4.8011
4.00
5.00
Total
24
4.2083
.63856
.13034
3.9387
4.4780
2.70
5.00
Test of Homogeneity of Variances
PCE
Levene
Statistic
df1
df2
Sig.
2.872
1
22
.104
ANOVA
PCE
Sum of
Squares
Df
Mean Square
F
Sig.
Between
Groups
2.066
1
2.066
6.215
.021
Within Groups
7.313
22
.332
LAMPIRAN 6B
HASIL UJI HIPOTESIS 3B
Descriptives
PCE
N
Mean
Std.
Deviation
Std.
Error
95% Confidence
Interval for Mean
Minimum
Maximum
Lower
Bound
Upper
Bound
belum
mengambil
14 4.0857
.28245
.07549
3.9226
4.2488
3.60
4.60
sudah
mengambil
10 4.5500
.26771
.08466
4.3585
4.7415
4.30
4.90
Total
24 4.2792
.35750
.07297
4.1282
4.4301
3.60
4.90
Test of Homogeneity of Variances
PCE
Levene
Statistic
df1
df2
Sig.
.004
1
22
.953
ANOVA
PCE
Sum of
Squares
Df
Mean Square
F
Sig.
Between
Groups
1.257
1
1.257
16.446
.001
Within Groups
1.682
22
.076
LAMPIRAN 6C
HASIL UJI HIPOTESIS 3C
Descriptives
PCE
N
Mean
Std.
Deviation
Std.
Error
95% Confidence
Interval for Mean
Minimum Maximum
Lower
Bound
Upper
Bound
belum
mengambil
14
4.0357
.47975
.12822
3.7587
4.3127
2.90
4.90
sudah
mengambil
10
4.4500
.38944
.12315
4.1714
4.7286
4.00
4.90
Total
24
4.2083
.48267
.09852
4.0045
4.4121
2.90
4.90
Test of Homogeneity of Variances
PCE
Levene
Statistic
df1
df2
Sig.
.017
1
22
.898
ANOVA
PCE
Sum of
Squares
Df
Mean Square
F
Sig.
Between
Groups
1.001
1
1.001
5.055
.035
Within Groups
4.357
22
.198
LAMPIRAN 6D
HASIL UJI HIPOTESIS 3D
Descriptives
PCE
N
Mean
Std.
Deviation
Std.
Error
95% Confidence
Interval for Mean
Minimum Maximum
Lower
Bound
Upper
Bound
belum
mengambil
14
4.3929
.49219
.13154
4.1087
4.6770
3.40
5.00
sudah
mengambil
12
3.9417
.38485
.11110
3.6971
4.1862
3.40
4.70
Total
26
4.1846
.49371
.09683
3.9852
4.3840
3.40
5.00
Test of Homogeneity of Variances
PCE
Levene
Statistic
df1
df2
Sig.
1.809
1
24
.191
ANOVA
PCE
Sum of
Squares
Df
Mean Square
F
Sig.
Between
Groups
1.315
1
1.315
6.607
.017
Within Groups
4.778
24
.199
LAMPIRAN 7A
HASIL UJI HIPOTESIS 4A
Descriptives
PCE
N
Mean
Std.
Deviation
Std.
Error
95% Confidence
Interval for Mean
Minimum Maximum
Lower
Bound
Upper
Bound
belum bekerja
5
4.4600
.46152
.20640
3.8869
5.0331
4.00
5.00
pernah bekerja
12
4.1750
.68108
.19661
3.7423
4.6077
3.00
5.00
sedang bekerja
dibawah 1 tahun
6
4.0333
.75807
.30948
3.2378
4.8289
2.70
5.00
sedang bekerja diatas
1 tahun
1
4.4000
.
.
.
.
4.40
4.40
Total
24
4.2083
.63856
.13034
3.9387
4.4780
2.70
5.00
Test of Homogeneity of Variances
PCE
Levene
Statistic
df1
df2
Sig.
.498
2
20
.615
ANOVA
PCE
Sum of
Squares
Df
Mean Square
F
Sig.
Between
Groups
.550
3
.183
.416
.744
LAMPIRAN 7B
HASIL UJI HIPOTESIS 4B
Descriptives
PCE
N
Mean
Std.
Deviation
Std.
Error
95% Confidence
Interval for Mean
Minimum Maximum
Lower
Bound
Upper
Bound
belum bekerja
16
4.1562
.30104
.07526
3.9958
4.3167
3.60
4.60
pernah bekerja
4
4.2250
.15000
.07500
3.9863
4.4637
4.00
4.30
sedang bekerja
dibawah 1 tahun
4
4.8250
.15000
.07500
4.5863
5.0637
4.60
4.90
Total
24
4.2792
.35750
.07297
4.1282
4.4301
3.60
4.90
Test of Homogeneity of Variances
PCE
Levene
Statistic
df1
df2
Sig.
3.379
2
21
.053
ANOVA
PCE
Sum of
Squares
df
Mean Square
F
Sig.
Between
Groups
1.445
2
.723
10.155
.001
LAMPIRAN 7C
HASIL UJI HIPOTESIS 4C
Descriptives
PCE
N
Mean
Std.
Deviation
Std.
Error
95% Confidence
Interval for Mean
Minimum Maximum
Lower
Bound
Upper
Bound
belum bekerja
18
4.0500
.42461
.10008
3.8388
4.2612
2.90
4.90
pernah bekerja
4
4.5750
.34034
.17017
4.0334
5.1166
4.10
4.90
sedang bekerja
dibawah 1 tahun
2
4.9000
.00000
.00000
4.9000
4.9000
4.90
4.90
Total
24
4.2083
.48267
.09852
4.0045
4.4121
2.90
4.90
Test of Homogeneity of Variances
PCE
Levene
Statistic
df1
df2
Sig.
.877
2
21
.431
ANOVA
PCE
Sum of
Squares
df
Mean Square
F
Sig.
Between
Groups
1.946
2
.973
5.987
.009
LAMPIRAN 7D
HASIL UJI HIPOTESIS 4D
Descriptives
PCE
N
Mean
Std. Deviation Std. Error
95% Confidence Interval for
Mean
Minimum Maximum
Lower Bound Upper Bound
belum bekerja
17
3.9706
.32551
.07895
3.8032
4.1379
3.40
4.70
pernah bekerja
8
4.5500
.53984
.19086
4.0987
5.0013
3.40
5.00
sedang bekerja dibawah
1 tahun
1
4.9000
.
.
.
.
4.90
4.90
Total
26
4.1846
.49371
.09683
3.9852
4.3840
3.40
5.00
Test of Homogeneity of Variances
PCE
Levene Statistic
df1
df2
Sig.
2.699
1
23
.114
ANOVA
PCE
Sum of Squares
df
Mean Square
F
Sig.
Between Groups
2.359
2
1.179
7.261
.004
Within Groups
3.735
23
.162
Lampiran 8
Statistik Deskriptif
Descriptive Statistics
N
Minimum Maximum Mean
Std.
Deviation
PCE
98
2.70
5.00
4.2194
.49631
Valid N
Filename:
Skripsi_12.60.0241_&_Marsiana_Milo_Persepsi_mahasiswa_mengenai_pengaruh_corporate_social_resp
onsibility_terhadap_efek.docx
Date: 2017-05-22 04:48 UTC
Results of plagiarism analysis from 2017-05-22 06:49 UTC
2728 matches from 117 sources
, of which 3 are online sources. PlagLevel: 7.7%/94.3%[0] (398 matches, 0.0%94.2%) from your PlagScan document "Milo_Marsia...s_perusahaan.docx" dated 2017-02-08
[1] (396 matches, 0.0%93.3%) from your PlagScan document "Milo_12.60....s_perusahaan.docx" dated 2017-02-08
[2] (144 matches, 0.0%23.8%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...Masiana Milo.docx" dated 2016-07-13 [3] (34 matches, 1.6%/2.5%) from your PlagScan document "12.60.0123 Claudia.docx" dated 2016-09-09
[4] (33 matches, 1.5%/2.4%) from your PlagScan document "SKRIPSI_12....ngan_Leaders.docx" dated 2016-11-14 [5] (25 matches, 1.2%/2.1%) from your PlagScan document "12.60.0001 IRMINA.docx" dated 2016-04-11 [6] (24 matches, 1.2%/2.0%) from your PlagScan document "Skripsi_Ron...osial_respob.docx" dated 2017-03-09 [7] (22 matches, 1.2%/2.0%) from your PlagScan document "SKRIPSI_13....engejar_Kari.docx" dated 2017-05-09 [8] (22 matches, 0.8%/2.1%) from your PlagScan document "14.G1.0009 nILA.doc" dated 2016-07-12 [9] (22 matches, 0.7%/2.1%) from your PlagScan document "12.603.0194 iren 2.pdf" dated 2016-10-03 [10] (24 matches, 1.1%/1.7%) from your PlagScan document "Erawati_Fit...sional_Audit.docx" dated 2017-02-06 [11] (21 matches, 1.3%/1.7%) from your PlagScan document "12.61.0055 Fransiska Reni.docx" dated 2017-01-25 [12] (23 matches, 1.1%/1.6%) from your PlagScan document "Skripsi_11....onal_Auditor.docx" dated 2017-02-07 [13] (19 matches, 0.8%/1.6%) from your PlagScan document "EllenaOlivi...back,_Reward.docx" dated 2016-02-03 [14] (18 matches, 1.5%/1.9%) from your PlagScan document "CEK PLAGIASI 1-5.docx" dated 2016-03-02 [15] (14 matches, 1.4%/1.7%) from https://blognyaekonomi.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/1335940591_jeffry.pdf [16] (19 matches, 0.9%/1.4%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...inawati_rev1.docx" dated 2016-05-11 [17] (18 matches, 0.6%/1.5%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation... Agnes P (3).docx" dated 2016-06-23 [18] (20 matches, 0.7%/1.5%) from your PlagScan document "12.60.0013 Maria Brigita.docx" dated 2016-09-06
[19] (16 matches, 0.9%/1.3%) from dokumen.tips/documents/pengaruh-bauran-p...p-keputusan-pembelian-konsumen-pada.html [20] (19 matches, 0.7%/1.7%) from your PlagScan document "SKRIPSI_12....nan_Laporan_.docx" dated 2017-03-15 [21] (21 matches, 0.6%/1.4%) from your PlagScan document "AgustinFina...,dan_Kinerja.docx" dated 2016-02-03 [22] (18 matches, 0.8%/1.5%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...11-4980-1-RV.docx" dated 2016-04-20 [23] (19 matches, 0.5%/1.5%) from your PlagScan document "12.60.0015 ...to Kinarjo 3.docx" dated 2016-04-11 (+ 1 documents with identical matches)
[25] (18 matches, 0.8%/1.3%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...wati Santoso.docx" dated 2016-07-20 [26] (19 matches, 0.5%/1.5%) from your PlagScan document "12.60.0015 ...anto Kinarjo.docx" dated 2016-04-06 [27] (18 matches, 0.5%/1.5%) from your PlagScan document "Skripsi_12....ran_Keuangan.docx" dated 2016-11-09 [28] (19 matches, 1.0%/1.4%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...g Bagaskhara.docx" dated 2016-04-04 [29] (18 matches, 0.8%/1.3%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...069 Linawati.docx" dated 2016-03-28 [30] (19 matches, 0.6%/1.4%) from your PlagScan document "SKRIPSI LIVIA (1-5).doc" dated 2016-03-02 [31] (18 matches, 0.8%/1.3%) from your PlagScan document "Skripsi_13....rn_Over_terh.docx" dated 2017-04-06 [32] (18 matches, 0.4%/1.4%) from your PlagScan document "12.60.0255 ANGGI ANDANA.pdf" dated 2017-03-08 [33] (17 matches, 0.8%/1.3%) from your PlagScan document "SKRIPSI_086...ce_Terhadap_N.doc" dated 2017-03-06 [34] (17 matches, 0.5%/1.5%) from your PlagScan document "SKRIPSI_12...._Laporan_Keu.docx" dated 2016-11-09 (+ 1 documents with identical matches)
[36] (15 matches, 0.6%/1.1%) from docplayer.info/361395-Pengaruh-harga-pro...erhadap-minat-beli-k-pop-korean-pop.html [37] (18 matches, 0.4%/1.3%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...pok2.Kelas4.1.pdf" dated 2016-07-18 [38] (16 matches, 0.4%/1.3%) from your PlagScan document "Skripsi_13....i_jawa_tengah.pdf" dated 2017-02-07 [39] (17 matches, 0.5%/1.4%) from your PlagScan document "Skripsi_TyasArum_12.60.0188.pdf" dated 2017-03-08 [40] (18 matches, 0.7%/1.2%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...lentina Meta.docx" dated 2016-08-22 (+ 1 documents with identical matches)
[42] (16 matches, 0.4%/1.3%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...wati Haryoto.docx" dated 2016-06-29 [43] (18 matches, 0.9%/1.1%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...1 Candida SM.docx" dated 2016-06-22 [44] (17 matches, 0.5%/1.4%) from your PlagScan document "12.60.0188 TYAS.pdf" dated 2016-10-03
[45] (16 matches, 0.2%/1.2%) from your PlagScan document "SKRIPSI_13....NDAKAN_PLAGI.docx" dated 2017-03-22 [46] (17 matches, 0.4%/1.2%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...tina Thiveny.docx" dated 2016-06-23 [47] (17 matches, 0.7%/1.2%) from your PlagScan document "Skripsi_12...._usaha_kecil.docx" dated 2017-03-16 [48] (14 matches, 0.0%/1.3%) from your PlagScan document "12.60.0194 Irene.docx" dated 2016-04-06 [49] (18 matches, 0.4%/1.2%) from your PlagScan document "12.60.0013 Maria.docx" dated 2016-06-06
[50] (13 matches, 0.4%/1.2%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...reth Chelsea.docx" dated 2016-06-29 (+ 2 documents with identical matches)
[53] (13 matches, 0.7%/1.0%) from your PlagScan document "SKRIPSI_10...._KAP,Ukuran_.docx" dated 2017-03-13 [54] (17 matches, 0.6%/1.1%) from your PlagScan document "12.60.0037 ...ndy Martin -.docx" dated 2016-05-31 [55] (15 matches, 0.8%/1.0%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...- 12.30.0190.docx" dated 2016-03-30 (+ 1 documents with identical matches)
[68] (15 matches, 0.2%/1.1%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...ISKA ADELINE.docx" dated 2016-04-29 [69] (14 matches, 0.5%/1.1%) from your PlagScan document "Skripsi_13...._RETURN_ON_E.docx" dated 2017-04-06 (+ 1 documents with identical matches)
[71] (14 matches, 0.4%/1.0%) from your PlagScan document "PROPOSAL_SK...osedur_Audit.docx" dated 2016-11-07 [72] (14 matches, 0.3%/1.0%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation... Ryan Renaldi.doc" dated 2016-08-10 [73] (14 matches, 0.4%/1.0%) from your PlagScan document "SKRIPSI_11....MUAN_KOMITE_A.doc" dated 2017-03-05 (+ 3 documents with identical matches)
[77] (13 matches, 0.2%/1.0%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...ndra Anindita.doc" dated 2016-06-27 [78] (15 matches, 0.4%/0.9%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...fani Mutiara.docx" dated 2016-09-06 [79] (13 matches, 0.3%/0.9%) from your PlagScan document "12.60.0082 Maria M.docx" dated 2016-05-10 [80] (13 matches, 0.3%/0.9%) from your PlagScan document "12.30.0281 Ineke F.docx" dated 2016-02-09
[81] (14 matches, 0.1%/0.8%) from your PlagScan document "SKRIPSI_Agu...SR_DAN_IMPLI.docx" dated 2017-05-15 [82] (15 matches, 0.6%/0.9%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...0.0042_grisia.doc" dated 2016-04-28 [83] (8 matches, 0.0%1.0%) from your PlagScan document "13.60.0068 ...rice alodia S.pdf" dated 2017-03-08 [84] (15 matches, 0.3%/0.8%) from your PlagScan document "SKRIPSI_086...CIAL_DISTRESS.doc" dated 2017-03-06 [85] (13 matches, 0.2%/0.9%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...ephen Sanjaya.doc" dated 2016-04-29 [86] (11 matches, 0.5%/0.9%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...ria Gabriela.docx" dated 2016-05-27 [87] (14 matches, 0.3%/0.9%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...60.0158 Risma.doc" dated 2016-09-07 [88] (13 matches, 0.1%/0.9%) from your PlagScan document "Skripsi_Mar...inerja_bisnis.doc" dated 2017-03-22 (+ 2 documents with identical matches)
[91] (12 matches, 0.4%/0.9%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...Felix Wijaya.docx" dated 2016-08-02 [92] (12 matches, 0.2%/0.9%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...melia Devina.docx" dated 2016-06-29 [93] (12 matches, 0.2%/0.9%) from your PlagScan document "SKRIPSI_Jul..._Etis_dalam_.docx" dated 2017-05-02 [94] (13 matches, 0.3%/0.8%) from your PlagScan document "SKRIPSI_12....U_TIDAK_ETIS.docx" dated 2017-04-05 [95] (14 matches, 0.2%/0.8%) from your PlagScan document "SKRIPSI_08....CIAL_DISTRESS.doc" dated 2017-02-09 [96] (10 matches, 0.3%/0.8%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...ALIA CYNTHIA.docx" dated 2016-06-29 [97] (12 matches, 0.3%/0.8%) from your PlagScan document "Riyanto_Feb...RINA_RIYANTO.docx" dated 2017-04-27 (+ 1 documents with identical matches)
[99] (13 matches, 0.1%/0.9%) from your PlagScan document "Yohana_Dian...Perusahaan_d.docx" dated 2017-02-28 [100] (11 matches, 0.1%/0.8%) from your PlagScan document "SKRIPSI_12....AH_DI_LARISSA.doc" dated 2016-11-24 [101] (10 matches, 0.1%/0.8%) from your PlagScan document "SKRIPSI_VAN..._AESTHETIC_CE.doc" dated 2016-11-13 [102] (12 matches, 0.3%/0.9%) from your PlagScan document "12.60.0247 Wilma.docx" dated 2016-05-02
[103] (11 matches, 0.2%/0.9%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation....0021 Virgine.doc" dated 2016-03-21 [104] (12 matches, 0.4%/0.9%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...Felix Wijaya.docx" dated 2016-07-29 (+ 1 documents with identical matches)
[106] (13 matches, 0.3%/0.9%) from your PlagScan document "12.60.0246 Erisa.docx" dated 2016-03-30
[107] (13 matches, 0.1%/0.8%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...sica Aprilia.docx" dated 2016-03-21 [108] (9 matches, 0.0%0.9%) from your PlagScan document "12.60.0255 Anggi.docx" dated 2016-04-06
[109] (10 matches, 0.1%/0.8%) from your PlagScan document "SKRIPSI_12....A_ORGANISASI.docx" dated 2017-03-14 (+ 1 documents with identical matches)
[111] (10 matches, 0.1%/0.8%) from your PlagScan document "12.30.0232 VANY DWI HAPSARI.pdf" dated 2016-11-11 (+ 1 documents with identical matches)
[113] (13 matches, 0.1%/0.7%) from your PlagScan document "SKRIPSI_13...._Bertumbuh,_.docx" dated 2017-05-11 [114] (13 matches, 0.2%/0.8%) from your PlagScan document "SKRIPSI_10....YAAN_SEBAGAI.docx" dated 2017-03-17 [115] (13 matches, 0.1%/0.8%) from your PlagScan document "Skripsi_12....ap_kinerja_m.docx" dated 2017-03-13
[116] (13 matches, 0.1%/0.8%) from your PlagScan document "TIRANICA_TH...N_PARIWISATA.docx" dated 2017-02-09Filename: Skripsi_12.60.0241_&_Marsiana_Milo_Persepsi_mahasiswa_mengenai_pengaruh_corporate_social_responsibility_terhadap_efek.docx Date: 2017-05-22 04:48 UTC
Results of plagiarism analysis from 2017-05-22 06:49 UTC 2728 matches from 117 sources, of which 3 are online sources. PlagLevel: 7.7%/94.3%
[0] (398 matches, 0.0%94.2%) from your PlagScan document "Milo_Marsia...s_perusahaan.docx" dated 2017-02-08
[1] (396 matches, 0.0%93.3%) from your PlagScan document "Milo_12.60....s_perusahaan.docx" dated 2017-02-08
[2] (144 matches, 0.0%23.8%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...Masiana Milo.docx" dated 2016-07-13 [3] (34 matches, 1.6%/2.5%) from your PlagScan document "12.60.0123 Claudia.docx" dated 2016-09-09
[4] (33 matches, 1.5%/2.4%) from your PlagScan document "SKRIPSI_12....ngan_Leaders.docx" dated 2016-11-14 [5] (25 matches, 1.2%/2.1%) from your PlagScan document "12.60.0001 IRMINA.docx" dated 2016-04-11 [6] (24 matches, 1.2%/2.0%) from your PlagScan document "Skripsi_Ron...osial_respob.docx" dated 2017-03-09 [7] (22 matches, 1.2%/2.0%) from your PlagScan document "SKRIPSI_13....engejar_Kari.docx" dated 2017-05-09 [8] (22 matches, 0.8%/2.1%) from your PlagScan document "14.G1.0009 nILA.doc" dated 2016-07-12 [9] (22 matches, 0.7%/2.1%) from your PlagScan document "12.603.0194 iren 2.pdf" dated 2016-10-03 [10] (24 matches, 1.1%/1.7%) from your PlagScan document "Erawati_Fit...sional_Audit.docx" dated 2017-02-06 [11] (21 matches, 1.3%/1.7%) from your PlagScan document "12.61.0055 Fransiska Reni.docx" dated 2017-01-25 [12] (23 matches, 1.1%/1.6%) from your PlagScan document "Skripsi_11....onal_Auditor.docx" dated 2017-02-07 [13] (19 matches, 0.8%/1.6%) from your PlagScan document "EllenaOlivi...back,_Reward.docx" dated 2016-02-03 [14] (18 matches, 1.5%/1.9%) from your PlagScan document "CEK PLAGIASI 1-5.docx" dated 2016-03-02 [15] (14 matches, 1.4%/1.7%) from https://blognyaekonomi.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/1335940591_jeffry.pdf [16] (19 matches, 0.9%/1.4%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...inawati_rev1.docx" dated 2016-05-11 [17] (18 matches, 0.6%/1.5%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation... Agnes P (3).docx" dated 2016-06-23 [18] (20 matches, 0.7%/1.5%) from your PlagScan document "12.60.0013 Maria Brigita.docx" dated 2016-09-06
[19] (16 matches, 0.9%/1.3%) from dokumen.tips/documents/pengaruh-bauran-p...p-keputusan-pembelian-konsumen-pada.html [20] (19 matches, 0.7%/1.7%) from your PlagScan document "SKRIPSI_12....nan_Laporan_.docx" dated 2017-03-15 [21] (21 matches, 0.6%/1.4%) from your PlagScan document "AgustinFina...,dan_Kinerja.docx" dated 2016-02-03 [22] (18 matches, 0.8%/1.5%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...11-4980-1-RV.docx" dated 2016-04-20 [23] (19 matches, 0.5%/1.5%) from your PlagScan document "12.60.0015 ...to Kinarjo 3.docx" dated 2016-04-11 (+ 1 documents with identical matches)
(+ 1 documents with identical matches)
[36] (15 matches, 0.6%/1.1%) from docplayer.info/361395-Pengaruh-harga-pro...erhadap-minat-beli-k-pop-korean-pop.html [37] (18 matches, 0.4%/1.3%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...pok2.Kelas4.1.pdf" dated 2016-07-18 [38] (16 matches, 0.4%/1.3%) from your PlagScan document "Skripsi_13....i_jawa_tengah.pdf" dated 2017-02-07 [39] (17 matches, 0.5%/1.4%) from your PlagScan document "Skripsi_TyasArum_12.60.0188.pdf" dated 2017-03-08 [40] (18 matches, 0.7%/1.2%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...lentina Meta.docx" dated 2016-08-22 (+ 1 documents with identical matches)
[42] (16 matches, 0.4%/1.3%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...wati Haryoto.docx" dated 2016-06-29 [43] (18 matches, 0.9%/1.1%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...1 Candida SM.docx" dated 2016-06-22 [44] (17 matches, 0.5%/1.4%) from your PlagScan document "12.60.0188 TYAS.pdf" dated 2016-10-03
[45] (16 matches, 0.2%/1.2%) from your PlagScan document "SKRIPSI_13....NDAKAN_PLAGI.docx" dated 2017-03-22 [46] (17 matches, 0.4%/1.2%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...tina Thiveny.docx" dated 2016-06-23 [47] (17 matches, 0.7%/1.2%) from your PlagScan document "Skripsi_12...._usaha_kecil.docx" dated 2017-03-16 [48] (14 matches, 0.0%/1.3%) from your PlagScan document "12.60.0194 Irene.docx" dated 2016-04-06 [49] (18 matches, 0.4%/1.2%) from your PlagScan document "12.60.0013 Maria.docx" dated 2016-06-06
[50] (13 matches, 0.4%/1.2%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...reth Chelsea.docx" dated 2016-06-29 (+ 2 documents with identical matches)
[53] (13 matches, 0.7%/1.0%) from your PlagScan document "SKRIPSI_10...._KAP,Ukuran_.docx" dated 2017-03-13 [54] (17 matches, 0.6%/1.1%) from your PlagScan document "12.60.0037 ...ndy Martin -.docx" dated 2016-05-31 [55] (15 matches, 0.8%/1.0%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...- 12.30.0190.docx" dated 2016-03-30 (+ 1 documents with identical matches)
[57] (18 matches, 0.4%/1.2%) from your PlagScan document "Betty_Oktav...kesulitan_tug.doc" dated 2017-04-25 [58] (15 matches, 0.4%/1.2%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...tine Muliani.docx" dated 2016-06-29 [59] (17 matches, 0.6%/1.1%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...lentina Meta.docx" dated 2016-04-11 [60] (16 matches, 0.3%/1.2%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...reta Elisa K.docx" dated 2016-04-01 [61] (17 matches, 0.4%/1.1%) from your PlagScan document "SKRIPSI_12....emimpinan_Et.docx" dated 2016-11-09 [62] (14 matches, 0.5%/1.1%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...dha Prawira 2.doc" dated 2016-09-07 (+ 1 documents with identical matches)
[64] (15 matches, 0.6%/1.0%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation... Permatasari.docx" dated 2016-06-29 [65] (16 matches, 0.3%/1.0%) from your PlagScan document "SKRIPSI_12....mimpinan_Eti.docx" dated 2017-03-14 [66] (14 matches, 0.7%/1.1%) from your PlagScan document "12.60.0037 jAB rENDY MARTIN.pdf" dated 2016-10-20 [66] (14 matches, 0.7%/1.1%) from your PlagScan document "12.60.0037 jAB rENDY MARTIN.pdf" dated 2016-10-20 [67] (17 matches, 0.5%/1.0%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...fani mutiara.docx" dated 2016-07-11 [68] (15 matches, 0.2%/1.1%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...ISKA ADELINE.docx" dated 2016-04-29 [69] (14 matches, 0.5%/1.1%) from your PlagScan document "Skripsi_13...._RETURN_ON_E.docx" dated 2017-04-06 (+ 1 documents with identical matches)
[71] (14 matches, 0.4%/1.0%) from your PlagScan document "PROPOSAL_SK...osedur_Audit.docx" dated 2016-11-07 [72] (14 matches, 0.3%/1.0%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation... Ryan Renaldi.doc" dated 2016-08-10 [73] (14 matches, 0.4%/1.0%) from your PlagScan document "SKRIPSI_11....MUAN_KOMITE_A.doc" dated 2017-03-05 (+ 3 documents with identical matches)
[77] (13 matches, 0.2%/1.0%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...ndra Anindita.doc" dated 2016-06-27 [78] (15 matches, 0.4%/0.9%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...fani Mutiara.docx" dated 2016-09-06 [79] (13 matches, 0.3%/0.9%) from your PlagScan document "12.60.0082 Maria M.docx" dated 2016-05-10 [80] (13 matches, 0.3%/0.9%) from your PlagScan document "12.30.0281 Ineke F.docx" dated 2016-02-09
[81] (14 matches, 0.1%/0.8%) from your PlagScan document "SKRIPSI_Agu...SR_DAN_IMPLI.docx" dated 2017-05-15 [82] (15 matches, 0.6%/0.9%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...0.0042_grisia.doc" dated 2016-04-28 [83] (8 matches, 0.0%1.0%) from your PlagScan document "13.60.0068 ...rice alodia S.pdf" dated 2017-03-08 [84] (15 matches, 0.3%/0.8%) from your PlagScan document "SKRIPSI_086...CIAL_DISTRESS.doc" dated 2017-03-06 [85] (13 matches, 0.2%/0.9%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...ephen Sanjaya.doc" dated 2016-04-29 [86] (11 matches, 0.5%/0.9%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...ria Gabriela.docx" dated 2016-05-27 [87] (14 matches, 0.3%/0.9%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...60.0158 Risma.doc" dated 2016-09-07 [88] (13 matches, 0.1%/0.9%) from your PlagScan document "Skripsi_Mar...inerja_bisnis.doc" dated 2017-03-22 (+ 2 documents with identical matches)
[91] (12 matches, 0.4%/0.9%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...Felix Wijaya.docx" dated 2016-08-02 [92] (12 matches, 0.2%/0.9%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...melia Devina.docx" dated 2016-06-29 [93] (12 matches, 0.2%/0.9%) from your PlagScan document "SKRIPSI_Jul..._Etis_dalam_.docx" dated 2017-05-02 [94] (13 matches, 0.3%/0.8%) from your PlagScan document "SKRIPSI_12....U_TIDAK_ETIS.docx" dated 2017-04-05 [95] (14 matches, 0.2%/0.8%) from your PlagScan document "SKRIPSI_08....CIAL_DISTRESS.doc" dated 2017-02-09 [96] (10 matches, 0.3%/0.8%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...ALIA CYNTHIA.docx" dated 2016-06-29 [97] (12 matches, 0.3%/0.8%) from your PlagScan document "Riyanto_Feb...RINA_RIYANTO.docx" dated 2017-04-27 (+ 1 documents with identical matches)
[99] (13 matches, 0.1%/0.9%) from your PlagScan document "Yohana_Dian...Perusahaan_d.docx" dated 2017-02-28 [100] (11 matches, 0.1%/0.8%) from your PlagScan document "SKRIPSI_12....AH_DI_LARISSA.doc" dated 2016-11-24 [101] (10 matches, 0.1%/0.8%) from your PlagScan document "SKRIPSI_VAN..._AESTHETIC_CE.doc" dated 2016-11-13 [102] (12 matches, 0.3%/0.9%) from your PlagScan document "12.60.0247 Wilma.docx" dated 2016-05-02
[103] (11 matches, 0.2%/0.9%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation....0021 Virgine.doc" dated 2016-03-21 [104] (12 matches, 0.4%/0.9%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...Felix Wijaya.docx" dated 2016-07-29 (+ 1 documents with identical matches)
[106] (13 matches, 0.3%/0.9%) from your PlagScan document "12.60.0246 Erisa.docx" dated 2016-03-30
[107] (13 matches, 0.1%/0.8%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...sica Aprilia.docx" dated 2016-03-21 [108] (9 matches, 0.0%0.9%) from your PlagScan document "12.60.0255 Anggi.docx" dated 2016-04-06
[109] (10 matches, 0.1%/0.8%) from your PlagScan document "SKRIPSI_12....A_ORGANISASI.docx" dated 2017-03-14 (+ 1 documents with identical matches)
[111] (10 matches, 0.1%/0.8%) from your PlagScan document "12.30.0232 VANY DWI HAPSARI.pdf" dated 2016-11-11 (+ 1 documents with identical matches)
