Successful Manuscript Submission to JATIT

(1)

3/9/2021 Kalbis Institute Mail - Successful Manuscript Submission to JATIT

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/1?ik=6d04224c42&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1693482783417410731&simpl=msg-f%3A1693482783417410731&simpl=msg-a%3Ar-1050701059276869… 1/4 Hadi Sutopo <hadi.sutopo@kalbis.ac.id>

Successful Manuscript Submission to JATIT

5 messages

JATIT <editor@jatit.org> Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 6:43 PM

To: Hadi-Sutopo <hadi.sutopo@kalbis.ac.id>

We have received the manuscript for review and possible publication in Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology.

ID of the manuscript is " 43364 " and Password is " Kmlwn "

Please note the manuscript ID and use this as reference for correspondence regarding your submission. For updates on the status of your submission, please visit http://www.jatit.org/enter_manuscript.php.

If you want to change your password, please use this URL: http://www.jatit.org/change_password.php

Please fill the agreement form attached and mail it to mailjatit@gmail.com. Submitting this form confirms that you are in agreement with publication polices of the journal. You may also downlaod the agreement from http://www.jatit.org/agreement_form.docx

Evaluation process can take 15-60 working days depending on the time the reviewers take to convey their opinion on your manuscript.

agreement_form.docx 13K

Hadi Sutopo <hadi.sutopo@kalbis.ac.id> Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 6:45 PM

To: meikepaat <meikepaat@gmail.com>, Nurliani Siregar <nurlianisiregar@yahoo.co>

[Quoted text hidden]

agreement_form.docx 13K

Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-daemon@googlemail.com> Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 9:44 PM

To: hadi.sutopo@kalbis.ac.id

(2)

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/1?ik=6d04224c42&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1693482783417410731&simpl=msg-f%3A1693482783417410731&simpl=msg-a%3Ar-1050701059276869… 2/4

Delivery incomplete

There was a temporary problem delivering your message to

nurlianisiregar@yahoo.co. Gmail will retry for 45 more hours. You'll be

notified if the delivery fails permanently.

LEARN MORE

The response was:

The recipient server did not accept our requests to connect. Learn more at https://support.google.com/mail/answer/7720 [yahoo.co

74.6.136.150: timed out] [yahoo.co 124.108.115.100: timed out] [yahoo.co 212.82.100.150: timed out] [yahoo.co 98.136.103.23: timed out]

[yahoo.co 106.10.248.150: timed out]

Final-Recipient: rfc822; nurlianisiregar@yahoo.co Action: delayed

Status: 4.4.1

Diagnostic-Code: smtp; The recipient server did not accept our requests to connect. Learn more at https://support.google.com/mail/answer/7720 [yahoo.co 74.6.136.150: timed out]

Last-Attempt-Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2021 06:44:23 -0800 (PST) Will-Retry-Until: Tue, 09 Mar 2021 03:46:11 -0800 (PST)

--- Forwarded message ---

From: Hadi Sutopo <hadi.sutopo@kalbis.ac.id>

Cc:

Bcc:

Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2021 18:45:59 +0700

Subject: Fwd: Successful Manuscript Submission to JATIT --- Message truncated ---

Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-daemon@googlemail.com> Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 8:33 PM

(3)

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/1?ik=6d04224c42&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1693482783417410731&simpl=msg-f%3A1693482783417410731&simpl=msg-a%3Ar-1050701059276869… 3/4 To: hadi.sutopo@kalbis.ac.id

Delivery incomplete

There was a temporary problem delivering your message to

nurlianisiregar@yahoo.co. Gmail will retry for 22 more hours.

You'll be notified if the delivery fails permanently.

LEARN MORE

The response was:

The recipient server did not accept our requests to connect. Learn more at https://support.google.com/mail/answer/7720 [yahoo.co

124.108.115.100: timed out] [yahoo.co 98.136.103.23: timed out] [yahoo.co 212.82.100.150: timed out] [yahoo.co 74.6.136.150: timed out]

Final-Recipient: rfc822; nurlianisiregar@yahoo.co Action: delayed

Status: 4.4.1

Diagnostic-Code: smtp; The recipient server did not accept our requests to connect. Learn more at https://support.google.com/mail/answer/7720 [yahoo.co 124.108.115.100: timed out]

Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2021 05:33:34 -0800 (PST) Will-Retry-Until: Tue, 09 Mar 2021 03:46:11 -0800 (PST)

--- Forwarded message ---

From: Hadi Sutopo <hadi.sutopo@kalbis.ac.id>

Cc:

(4)

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/1?ik=6d04224c42&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1693482783417410731&simpl=msg-f%3A1693482783417410731&simpl=msg-a%3Ar-1050701059276869… 4/4 Bcc:

Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2021 18:45:59 +0700

Subject: Fwd: Successful Manuscript Submission to JATIT --- Message truncated ---

Hadi Sutopo <hadi.sutopo@kalbis.ac.id> Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 4:36 PM

To: JATIT <editor@jatit.org>

Dear Editor,

Thank you for your information. The agreement-form has been filled, please see the attachements.

I am so sorry that I had the mistake to type the email address of the third author when I registered on the submitting of my paper. . I typed nurlianisiregar@yahoo.co, that must be nurlianisiregar@yahoo.com.

Thank you for your attention.

Best regards, Hadi Sutopo

[Quoted text hidden]

agreement_form-meike.docx 15K

(5)

4/26/2021 Kalbis Institute Mail - [JATIT] Letter of Acceptance for Submitted Research Paper ID 43364-JATIT

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/1?ik=6d04224c42&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1697753214600647530&simpl=msg-f%3A1697753214600647530 1/2

Hadi Sutopo <hadi.sutopo@kalbis.ac.id>

[JATIT] Letter of Acceptance for Submitted Research Paper ID 43364-JATIT

1 message

editor jatit <mailjatit@gmail.com> Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 10:00 PM

To: meikepaat@gmail.com, Hadi Sutopo <hadi.sutopo@kalbis.ac.id>, nurlianisiregar@yahoo.com Dear Corresponding Author Meike-Paat

We are pleased to inform you that your submission ID: 43364-JATIT titled "DEVELOPING AUGMENTED REALITY APPLICATION ON KOMODO DRAGON FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CHILDREN DURING THE NEW NORMAL OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC" having author(s): MEIKE PAAT, HADI SUTOPO, NURLIANI SIREGAR has been accepted for publication in JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL AND APPLIED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (E-ISSN 1817- 3195 / ISSN 1992-8645). The acceptance decision was based on the reviewers' evaluation after double-blind peer review and the chief editor's approval.[Attached with this acceptance intimation]

You shall submit the OA processing fee ($450) via Credit Card/PayPal transaction through our online payment system (Use any valid credit card of Yourself / Friend / Family etc) . Please submit the dues via UK Paddle payment system at

https://pay.paddle.com/checkout/507133

so that your paper may get published in upcoming issues. (please forward us with the receipt / order number generated after the completed payment process so that we can easily track your payment). The billing info that appears on your cc statement shall have a reference of JATIT. (Any Authentic Credit Card of Yourself / Friend / Family etc can be legitimately used).

There is also an option of urgent publication fee ($900) available for urgent publication.

Kindly also submit a camera-ready copy (CRC) with updates satisfying reviewer comments in MS Word document and exact journal format [http://www.jatit.org/author_

guidelines.php] along with reply to reviewer comments document and copyright to mailjatit@gmail.com after registration fee submission.

Kindly proceed with registration fee submission for slot allocation in Vol 99 June/July 2021 Issues of the journal, to be assigned on the first APC submission basis. The final updated copy can be submitted at a later time after slot reservation.

We shall encourage more quality submissions from you and your colleagues in the future.

Please do acknowledge receiving this notification.

(6)

4/26/2021 Kalbis Institute Mail - [JATIT] Letter of Acceptance for Submitted Research Paper ID 43364-JATIT

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/1?ik=6d04224c42&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1697753214600647530&simpl=msg-f%3A1697753214600647530 2/2

Regards,

Madiha Azeem PhD Handling Editor Editorial office

Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology

5 attachments

Author Guidelines and Formatting Template.doc 62K

43364-JATIT Final Evaluation Report.pdf 107K

JATIT Reply to Reviewer Comments.docx 16K

JATIT Copyright.doc 31K

Preliminary Evaluation Form.pdf 127K

(7)

1

JATIT

The enclosed manuscript is under consideration for the journal. Please provide feedback on the following criteria so that further process my be initiated

Mark where appropriate YES NO

Is it a research or review paper? X

Is it within to the scope of the journal? X

Is it a full paper submission? X

Is the language of paper English? (up to 5% relaxation*) X

Will the paper be of interest to Journal readership? X

Has the paper or part of it already been published elsewhere?

[Based on Google Search on Tile And Abstract]

X

Recommendations: Mark where appropriate.

Rejected After Internal Review

X

*Relaxation is only in special case where use of any other language is curtail to work presented (Either in tables/ figures or text)

Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology

Evaluation Form

Accepted After Initial Review and Recommended for Detaied Technical Review

(8)

Reply TO REVIEWER COMMENTS AND CHANGE LOG

Note: Indicate the updates of changes in the manuscript in red colour font so that changes/updates are easy to track.

S.No Comment Reply to Comment / Change Description Page No.

1) Produce a meaningful title of the paper that reflects the research questions that this work answers concerning IT knowledge

Add table:

Table 5. Evaluation by experts in education, social sciences and information technology

7

2) Clearly state the literature selection criteria and your own

hypothesis on which the work is based In the additional paragraph:

Students’ scientific literacy can be improved well through distance learning with augmented reality-based

multimedia in the COVID-19 pandemic [8].

2

3) Abstract needs attention along with conclusion. In this type of study they should be written in a systematic manner

Changes sentence in abstract:

The research findings show that the learning model is useful to help teachers since it can be used for

independent learning and motivates children to learn in COVID-19 pandemic

1

4) Use of abbreviations either should be standard terms or better be avoided

The abbreviation AR, VR, SDK IDE, E-ADT have not been used

3, 6 5) Discussion on limitations of the work is missing. Are there

any different of conflicting perspectives in literature on the topic. Have authors justify analysis criteria

Add paragraph:

The augmented reality application that was developed using Assemblr Studio has a limitation, since the product cannot be accessed independently. The audiences who accessed the application had to install Assemblr on their

4

(9)

smartphones. While developing augmented reality application using Unity and Vuforia produce an

application that can be accessed through scanning a mark a smartphone or visit a web page. [24]

6) Authors clearly state what they have identified in their

research Add paragraph:

Social science learning in elementary school needs study tours to some important locations showing history, industry, geography, biology, and other topics including a unique animal Komodo Dragon. The activities could not be done since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. There must be a learning model to substitute it. Students’ scientific literacy can be improved well through distance learning with augmented reality-based multimedia in the COVID-19 pandemic [8].

2

7) Methodology used should be presented in a clear and concise manner so that someone else can repeat the same experiments

Add paragraph:

Developing an augmented reality application for education is serial activity development that should be done by a team consisting of a project manager who manages and coordinates the work of educational technology, art design, model design, programming, and expert in the topic that is developed.

3

8) Balance survey of the literature and information so the data is put into context. Difference of research

contribution and achievement of objectives when compared to other such studies in light of results presented in literature is missing or is not clear in text.

Add paragraph:

While Tzima et al. [27], researched with the findings hat results showed that augmented reality applications development is feasible under certain conditions, including the limitation of the curriculum as the main negative factor and the teacher’s personality and the

(10)

desire for co-operation among teachers of different specialties as positive factors.

9) 10)

(11)

JATIT PAPER EVALUATION FORM-II

Paper Number: 43364-JATIT

Note: Copies of the completed evaluation form and comments will be supplied to the author(s) Please return your review results to the Chief Editor after blind peer review. Thank You.

=============================================================================

Paper Title: DEVELOPING AUGMENTED REALITY APPLICATION ON KOMODO DRAGON FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CHILDREN DURING THE NEW NORMAL OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC

=============================================================================

EVALUATION: (please circle the appropriate rating)

Tend to reject | Tend to accept ---|---

Technical Content and Accuracy 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Significance of the Work 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Appropriate Title, Introduction, and Conclusion 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall Organization 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Appropriateness for JATIT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Style and Clarity of the Paper 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Connection to Previous Research 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 OVERALL RECOMMENDATION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 As a Referee how do you rate your knowledge,

ability and confidence in reviewing this paper 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Low High COMMENTS TO AUTHOR: (Please use additional sheet(s) if necessary)

Paper is short on justifications and needs following corrections.

1. Produce a meaningful title of the paper that reflects the research questions that this work answers concerning IT knowledge

2. Clearly state the literature selection criteria and your own hypothesis on which the work is based.

3. Abstract needs attention along with conclusion. In this type of study they should be written in a systematic manner.

4. Use of abbreviations either should be standard terms or better be avoided

5. Discussion on limitations of the work is missing. Are there any different of conflicting perspectives in literature on the topic. Have authors justify analysis criteria

6. Authors clearly state what they have identified in their research

7. Methodology used should be presented in a clear and concise manner so that someone else can repeat the same experiments

8. Balance survey of the literature and information so the data is put into context. Difference of research contribution and achievement of objectives when compared to other such studies in light of results presented in literature is missing or is not clear in text.

=============================================================================

(12)

Confidential Comments to the Chief Editor: