• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Ketersediaan Beras dan Jagung di Provinsi Sumatera Utara

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Ketersediaan Beras dan Jagung di Provinsi Sumatera Utara"

Copied!
16
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)
(2)

Lampiran 1. Ketersediaan Beras di Provinsi Sumatera Utara

Tahun Ketersediaan (Ton) Harga Domestik (Rp/Ton) Harga Impor (Rp/Ton) Harga Kedelai (Rp/Ton) Luas Panen Jagung (Ha) Konsumsi (Ton/Kap/ Tahun) Tenaga Kerja (Jiwa)

2002 2.020.667,546 3.340.000 2.964.950 3.412.754 198.670 1.412.171,459 2.888.193

2003 2.161.064,094 3.306.400 2.094.490 3.838.014 210.782 1.410.201,321 4.571.093

2004 2.199.371 3.299.000 1.552.360 3.693.055 214.885 1.430.556,48 4.276.453

2005 2.666.092,982 3.992.200 2.725.020 4.397.416 218.596 1.447.151,997 4.399.699

2006 2.432.651,447 5.060.000 2.878.550 5.236.117 194.872 1.470.311,917 4.074.774

2007 2.585.047,643 5.708.000 3.062.280 5.172.916 229.882 1.478.262,852 3.987.998

2008 2.340.626,106 6.143.400 3.579.630 6.859.375 240.413 1.487.737,1 4.203.091

2009 2.440.210,06 6.750.750 3.511.030 6.810.416 247.782 1.440.099,558 4.255.602

2010 2.633.748,272 7.310.750 4.511.730 7.321.981 274.822 1.406.362,159 4.468.816

2011 2.668.400,803 8.656.500 5.011.010 8.177.777 255.291 1.453.188,796 3.845.341

2012 2.382.686,611 9.178.750 4.578.780 8.201.041 243.097 1.303.170,693 3.834.093

2013 2.358.221,225 9.701.000 5.907.950 9.650.000 211.750 1.392.599,082 3.880.703

(3)

Lampiran 2. Ketersediaan Jagung di Provinsi Sumatera Utara

Tahun Ketersediaan Luas Panen (Ha) Harga Domestik (Rp/Ton)

Jumlah Penduduk

(Jiwa)

Tenaga Kerja (Jiwa)

Nilai Tukar (Rp/US$)

1999 683.065 233.506 1.980.873 11.955.400 2.829.078 7.100

2000 666.764 221.906 1.882.469 11.513.973 2.800.396 9.725

2001 634.162 198.709 1.685.660 11.722.397 2.899.214 10.265

2002 640.614,33 198.670 1.663.100 11.847.076 2.888.193 9.260

2003 687.360 210.782 1.691.500 11.890.399 4.571.093 8.570

2004 712.558 214.885 1.833.000 12.123.360 4.276.453 8.985

2005 937.590,278 218.596 2.117.000 12.326.678 4.399.699 9.705

2006 771.636 194.872 2.087.000 12.643.494 4.074.774 9.200

2007 832.151 229.882 2.192.000 12.834.371 3.987.998 9.125

2008 1.190.449,338 240.413 3.172.000 13.042.317 4.203.091 9.666

2009 1.207.639,464 247.782 3.385.000 13.248.386 4.255.602 9.447

2010 1.786.892,977 274.822 3.913.000 12.982.204 4.468.816 9.036

2011 1.749.941,008 255.291 4.146.000 13.103.596 3.845.341 9.113

2012 1.860.226,481 243.097 5.108.000 13.215.401 3.834.093 9.718

2013 1.483.273,448 211.750 6.423.000 13.326.307 3.880.703 12.250

(4)

Lampiran 3. Hasil Analisis Regresi Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Ketersediaan Beras di Sumatera Utara 2002-2013

Variables Entered/Removedb

Model

Variables Entered

Variables

Removed Method

1 Tenaga Kerja,

Harga Kedelai, Konsumsi beras, Luas Panen Jagung, Harga Impor, Harga Domestika . Enter

a. All requested variables entered.

b. Dependent Variable: Ketersediaan Beras

Model Summaryb

Model R R Square

Adjusted R Square

Std. Error of the Estimate

Change Statistics

Durbin-Watson R Square

Change F Change df1 df2 Sig. F Change

(5)

Model Summaryb

Model R R Square

Adjusted R Square

Std. Error of the Estimate

Change Statistics

Durbin-Watson R Square

Change F Change df1 df2 Sig. F Change

1 .916a .838 .644 1.24700E5 .838 4.317 6 5 .065 1.814

a. Predictors: (Constant), Tenaga Kerja, Harga Kedelai, Konsumsi beras, Luas Panen Jagung, Harga Impor, Harga Domestik

b. Dependent Variable: Ketersediaan Beras

ANOVAb

Model

Sum of

Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

1 Regression 4.028E11 6 6.713E10 4.317 .065a

Residual 7.775E10 5 1.555E10

Total 4.806E11 11

a. Predictors: (Constant), Tenaga Kerja, Harga Kedelai, Konsumsi beras, Luas Panen Jagung, Harga Impor, Harga Domestik

(6)

Coefficientsa Model Unstandardize d Coefficients Standardiz ed Coefficien ts t Sig . Correlations Collinearity Statistics B Std.

Error Beta

Zero -orde

r

Parti al Part

Toleran

ce VIF

1 (Constant ) -3.033 E6 1.375 E6 -2.20 6 .07 9 Harga

Domestik .297 .113 3.310

2.61 6

.04

7 .448 .760 .471 .020

49.47 6

Harga

Impor .224 .121 1.350

1.85 6

.12

3 .392 .639 .334 .061

16.36 1

Harga

Kedelai -.406 .146 -3.991

-2.78 0

.03

9 .430 -.779

-.500 .016

(7)

Luas Panen Jagung

1.044 2.150 .121 .486 .64

8 .597 .212 .087 .519 1.929

Konsumsi

beras 2.457 .896 .581

2.74 4

.04

1 .245 .775 .494 .721 1.388

Tenaga

Kerja .388 .139 .821

2.79 6

.03

8 .398 .781 .503 .375 2.666

(8)

Collinearity Diagnosticsa

Model Dimension Eigenvalue

Condition Index

Variance Proportions

(Constant)

Harga Domestik

Harga Impor

Harga Kedelai

Luas Panen Jagung

Konsumsi beras

Tenaga Kerja

1 1 6.799 1.000 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00

2 .179 6.159 .00 .00 .01 .00 .00 .00 .00

3 .012 24.133 .01 .02 .20 .01 .00 .01 .09

4 .005 36.832 .00 .01 .00 .02 .77 .01 .10

5 .004 43.975 .02 .19 .48 .00 .06 .02 .23

6 .001 78.358 .02 .43 .23 .62 .14 .08 .44

7 .000 140.767 .94 .35 .08 .34 .03 .88 .13

(9)
(10)
(11)

Lampiran 4. Hasil Analisis Regresi Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Ketersediaan Jagung di Sumatera Utara 1999-2013

Variables Entered/Removedb

Model

Variables Entered

Variables

Removed Method

1 Tenaga Kerja,

Nilai Tukar, Luas Panen, Jumlah Penduduk, Harga

Domestika

. Enter

a. All requested variables entered.

(12)

Model Summaryb

Model R R Square

Adjusted R Square

Std. Error of the Estimate

Change Statistics

Durbin-Watson R Square

Change F Change df1 df2 Sig. F Change

1 .955a .912 .864 1.68875E5 .912 18.721 5 9 .000 1.499

a. Predictors: (Constant), Tenaga Kerja, Nilai Tukar, Luas Panen, Jumlah Penduduk, Harga Domestik

b. Dependent Variable: Ketersediaan Jagung

ANOVAb

Model

Sum of

Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

1 Regression 2.669E12 5 5.339E11 18.721 .000a

Residual 2.567E11 9 2.852E10

Total 2.926E12 14

a. Predictors: (Constant), Tenaga Kerja, Nilai Tukar, Luas Panen, Jumlah Penduduk, Harga Domestik

(13)

Coefficientsa

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

t Sig.

Correlations

Collinearity Statistics

B Std. Error Beta Zero-order Partial Part Tolerance VIF

1 (Constant) -1.706E6 1.941E6 -.879 .402

Luas Panen 8.115 3.111 .407 2.609 .028 .741 .656 .258 .400 2.503

Jumlah

Penduduk .012 .164 .016 .072 .944 .822 .024 .007 .188 5.309

Harga Domestik .207 .075 .655 2.750 .022 .868 .676 .272 .172 5.826

Nilai Tukar -3.821 70.950 -.009 -.054 .958 .296 -.018 -.005 .360 2.779

Tenaga Kerja .057 .094 .079 .607 .559 .386 .198 .060 .569 1.757

(14)

Collinearity Diagnosticsa

Model Dimension Eigenvalue

Condition Index

Variance Proportions

(Constant) Luas Panen

Jumlah Penduduk

Harga

Domestik Nilai Tukar Tenaga Kerja

1 1 5.827 1.000 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00

2 .141 6.420 .00 .00 .00 .19 .00 .00

3 .019 17.540 .00 .00 .00 .00 .06 .50

4 .012 22.431 .00 .17 .00 .00 .12 .16

5 .001 66.132 .08 .83 .09 .15 .71 .02

6 .000 150.984 .92 .00 .91 .65 .11 .31

(15)
(16)

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Hasil penelitian menunjukkan pertumbuhan galur sorgum mutan BMR secara umum hampir sama dengan galur sorgum mutan non BMR pada musim kemarau, terlihat pada parameter tinggi

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui peran pemaafan (forgiveness) sebagai prediktor regulasi emosi kognitif pada wanita yang hamil di luar pernikahan.. Sampel (N=30)

[r]

Hendro Gunawan, MA

Penulis menggunakan metode UML (Unified Modelling Language) dalam merancang sistem aplikasi website Buku Online dan menggunakan PHP untuk membuat program serta MySQL sebagai

 Apakah instrumen yang Saudara gunakan sudah sesuai dengan tujuan penelitianE.  Apakah pengolahan data sudah sesuai dengan

Rekloml Lanlri II Krnl,us Limau

Himpunan Peraturan Gubernur Tahun 2015 1... Himpunan Peraturan Gubernur Tahun 2015