DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Abdorin, M. (2012). Ilmu Bebas Nilai. [Online]. Tersedia :
http://muhamad-abdorin.blogspot.com/2012/05/ilmu-bebas-nilai.html (26 Oktober 2014).
Agboghoroma, T. E. (-). Integrated Science Teaching Effectiveness in Junior Secondary
schools : Matters Arising. Abraka : Delta State University.
---. (2009). Interaction Effects of Instructional Mode and School Setting on
Students’ Knowledge of Integrated Science. International Journal of Scientific Research in Education. Vol. 2(2), hlm. 67- 75.
---. (2014). Mastery learning approach on secondary students’ integrated science
achievement. British Journal of Education. Vol.2, No.7, hlm. 80-88.
Akerson, V. L. (2001) Teaching science when your principal says, “Teach language
arts. Science and Children., 38(7), 42-47.
Anwar, S. (2014). Hand Out Perkuliahan Pengolahan Bahan Ajar IPA. Program Studi
Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam Sekolah Pascasarjana UPI: tidak
diterbitkan.
Beane, J. (1996). On the shoulder of giants! The case for curriculum integration. Middle
School Journal, 28, 6-11.
Berlin, D. dan White, A. (2012). A longitudinal look at attitudes and perceptions related
to the integration of mathematics, science, and technology education. School
Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 20-30.
Barsoum, M. J., dkk. (2013). Implementing recommendations for introductory biology
by writing a new textbook. Life Sciences Education, Vol. 12, 106-116.
Breiner, J, dkk. (2012). What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in
Brinkmann, A. (2003). Graphical knowledge display – Mind mapping and concept
mapping as efficient tools in mathematics education. Mathematics Education
Review, No 16.
Cano, E. V., dkk. (2013). Concept mapping for developing competencies in European
higher education area. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science,
Vol. 3, No. 17.
Cohen, P. (1995). Understanding the brain: Educators seek to apply brain research.
ASCD Education Update, 37(7), 1, 4-5.
Collopy, R. (2003). Curriculum materials as a professional development tool: How a
mathematics textbook affected two teachers’ learning. The Elementary School Journal. Vol. 103, No. 3, hlm. 287-311.
Czerniak, C. M., dkk. (1999). A literature review of science and mathematics
integration. Journal of School Science and Mathematics. Vol. 99, Issue 8
December 1999 hlm. 421-430
---. (2007). Interdisciplinary science teaching. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman
(Eds.). Handbook of Research on Science Education (hlm. 537–550). London:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Dahar, R.W. (1996). Teori-Teori Belajar. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.
Darmojo, H. (1992). Pendidikan IPA 2. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan
Kebudayaan.
Davison, D. M., dkk (1995). What does integration of science and mathematics really
mean? School Science and Mathematic, 95(5), 226-230.
Depdiknas, Pusat Kurikulum Balitbang. (2007). Kajian Kebijakan Kurikulum Mata
Fatoba. (2015). Readability of biology textbooks and students’ academic performance in
senior secondary schools in Ekiti State Nigeria. European Journal of Research
and Reflection in Educational Sciences. Vol. 3, No. 3.
Fogarty, R (1991). How to Integrated the Curricula. Illinois: Skylight Publishing
Hairunisa. (2009). Efektivitas Penggunaan Bahan Ajar IPA Terpadu Berbasis
SALINGTEMAS (Sain-Lingkungan-Teknologi-Masyarakat) terhadap Prestasi
Belajar Siswa Kelas VII SMP Negeri 4 Malang. [Online]. Tersedia:
http://fisika.um.ac.id [13 Januari 2015].
Hamalik, O. (2007). Dasar-dasar Pengembangan Kurikulum. Bandung: Remaja
Rosdakarya.
Harrel, P. E. (2010). Teaching in integrated curriculum: Linking teacher knowledge and
teaching assignment. Issues in Teacher Education, Volume 19, Number 1.
Herbel-Eisenmann. (2007). From intended curriculum to written curriculum: Examining
the “voice” of a mathematics textbook. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, Vol. 38, No. 4, 344-369.
Hernawan, A. H., dkk. (2010). Pengembahan Bahan Ajar. Makalah: tidak diterbitkan.
Hurley, M. M. (2001). Reviewing integrated science and mathematics: The search for
evidence and definitions from new persepectives. School Science and
Mathematics, 101(5), 259-268.
Irvin, J. L., dkk. (2007). Taking Action on Adolescent Literacy. ASCD Express.
John, Y.J. (2015). A new thematic, integrated curriculum for primary schools of
Trinidad and Tobago: A paradigm shift. International Journal of Higher
Education. Vol.4, No. 3.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2014). Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta:
BPSDMPK-PMP Kemendikbud.
Kesidou, S., dan Roseman, J. E. (2002)/ How well do middle school science programs
measure up? Findings from Project 2061’s review. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Vol. 39, Issue 6, hlm. 522-549.
KKBI. [Online]. Tersedia: http://kbbi.web.id/seleksi [1 Oktober 2014].
Kysilka, M.L. (2014). Understanding integrated curriculum. The Curriculum Journal.
Vol. 9, No. 2.
Lebeaume, J. (2011). Integration of science, technologgy, engineering, and
mathematics: Is this curricular revolution really possible in France? Design and
Technology Education, 16(1), 47-52.
Lederman, N.G. dan Niess, M.L. (1997). Integrated, interdisciplinary, or thematic
instruction? Is this a question or is it questionable semantics?. School Science
and Mathematics; Feb 1997; 97, 2; ProQuest hlm. 57.
Lestari, I. (2013). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Berbasis Kompetensi. Padang: Akademia
Permata.
Loepp, F.L. (1999). Models of curriculum integration. The Journal of Technology
Studies. A Refereed Publication of Epsilon Pi Tau. Doi:10.21061/jots.v25i2.a.6.
Lonning, R. A., dan DeFranco, T. C. (1997). Integration of science and mathematics: A
theoritical model. School Science and Mathematics, 97(4), 212-215.
Lonning, R. A., DeFranco, T.C., dan Weinland, T. P. (1998). Development of
theme-based, interdisciplinary, integrated curriculum: A theoritical model. School
Science and Mathematics, 98(6), 312-319.
Matthews, J. R., dkk. (2007). Successful Scientific Writing: A step-by-step guide for
biological and medical sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.
McDonald, C.V. (2015). Evaluating junior secondary science textbook usage in
Australian schools. Research in Science Education. Vol. 46, Issue 4, hlm.
481-509.
Mohammad, R.F. dan Kumari, B. (2012). Effective use of textbooks: A neglected aspect
of education in Pakistan. Journal of Education for International Development.
Vol 3 (1). hlm. 1-12.
Muslich, M. (2010). Text Book Writing: Dasar-dasar Pemahaman, Penulisan, dan
Pemakaian Buku Teks. Jogjakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.
Nurlaelati. (2014). Penerapan Pembelajaran IPA Terpadu Berdasarkan Model Webbed
untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Sains Siswa pada Tema Penjernihan Air. Tesis
Pascasarjana UPI. Bandung: Tidak diterbitkan.
Pannen, P. dan Purwanto. (2001). Penulisan Bahan Ajar. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Prabowo. (2000). Pembelajaran Fisika dengan Pendekatan Terpadu dalam Menghadapi
Perkembangan IPTEK Milenium III. Makalah disampaikan pada Seminar dan
Lokakarya Jurusan Pendidikan FMIPA UNESA pada tanggal 10 Februari 2000.
Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Surabaya.
Prastowo, A. (2011). Panduan Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Inovatif. Jakarta: Kencana.
Puskurbuk. (2014). Buku Nonteks Pelajaran. [Online]. Tersedia:
http://puskurbuk.net/web13/buku-nontext.html [1 November 2015].
Remillard, J.T. (2000). Can curriculum materials support teacher’s learning? Two
fourth-grade teachers learning two fourthgrade teachers new mathematics. The
Rochmad. (2011). Model Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Matematika.
[Online]. Tersedia:
http://blog.unnes.ac.id/rochmad/files/2011/03/Desain-Model-Pengembangan.pdf [7 Mei 2015].
Sativa. (2011). Metode Penelitian Research And Development. [Online].
Tersedia:http://oryza-sativa135rsh.blogspot.com/2011/01/metode-penelitia-reearch-and.html[4 September 2012].
Setiadi, R. (2014). Penerapan Analisis Wacana Dalam Pengembangan Bahan Ajar.
Materi pokok pada kegiatan workshop penulisan bahan ajar di Jurusan
Pendidikan Kimia FPMIPA Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Bandung: tidak
diterbitkan.
Sitepu, B.P. (2012). Penulisan Buku Teks Pelajaran. Jakarta: Rosda
Sofou, E., dkk. (2010) Preschool teachers’ understanding of the national preschool curriculum in Greece. Early Childhood Education Journal. Springer. Vol. 37,
Issue 5, hlm. 411-420
Sugiyono. (2008). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif,
dan R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta.
The McGraw-Hill Education. (2010). Glencoe Online, Skill Handbook Glencoe Science,
Erath Science. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. [Online].
Tersedia:http://www.glencoe.com/sec/science/lep_science/earth_science/skill_h
andbook/oinfo.html.[8 Agustus 2015].
Thiagarajan, S., dkk. (1974). Instructional Development for Training Teachers of
Exceptional Children: A Source Book. Educational Resource Information
Center. [Online]. Tersedia: http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED090725. [28 Agustus
2013].
Venville, G. J., dkk. (2002). Curriculum integration: Eroding the high ground of science
as a school subject? Studies in Science Education, 37(1), 43-83.
Wei, B. (2009). In search of meaningful integration: The experiances of developing
integrated science curricula in junior secondary schools in China. International
Journal of Science Education, 31(2), 259-277.
Widhy, P. (2013). ”Langkah Pengembangan Pembelajaran IPA pada Implementasi
Kurikulum 2013”. Makalah pada diklat pengembangan worksheets integrated science process skills bagi guru IPA SMP, Sleman.
Widodo, C. & Jasmadi. (2008). Panduan Menyusun Bahan Ajar Berbasis Kompetensi.
Jakarta: PT Elex Media Komputindo.
Wiguna, F.M. (2014). Kajian Teoritik Tahap Strukturisasi Pengolahan Bahan Ajar 4S
TMD Dilihat dari Komponen Filosofis, Komponen Psikologis, Komponen
Didaktis dan Aplikasinya pada Pokok Bahasan Larutan Asam Basa. (Tesis).
Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Williams, P.J. (2011). STEM education: Proceed with caution. Design and Technology
Education, 16(1), 26-35.
Zulkarnaini. (2009). Teknik Pengembangan Bahan Ajar. [Online]. Tersedia:
