• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Pengaruh Restorasi Klas II Resin Komposit Bulk-Fill Pada Gigi Premolar Terhadap Ketahanan Fraktur

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "Pengaruh Restorasi Klas II Resin Komposit Bulk-Fill Pada Gigi Premolar Terhadap Ketahanan Fraktur"

Copied!
4
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

49

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

1. Valian A, Moravej S, Geramy A, Faramarzi E. Effect of extension and type of composite-restored class II cavities on biomehanical properties of teeth : a three dimensional finite element analysis. J Dent 2015; 12(2): 140-9.

2. Garg A, Garg N. Texbook of operative dentistry. 1st ed., New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers., 2010: 3, 84, 125, 147, 240, 250, 257- 61.

3. Moosavi H, Zeynali M, Pour ZH. Fracture Resistance of Premolars Restored by Various Types and Placement Techniques of Resin Composites. Int J Dent 2012; 2012: 1-5.

4. Palamara J, Palamara D, Messer H. Srains in the marginal ridge during occlusal loading. J Aus Dent 2002; 47(7): 218-22.

5. Kubo S. Longevity of resin composite restorations. Jap Den Sci Rev 2011; 47: 43-55.

6. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Serrao G, Dellavia C, Tartaglia M. Single tooth bite forces in healthy young adults. J Oral Rehabil 2004; 31: 18-22

7. Monga P, Sharma V, Kumar S. Comparison of fracture resistance of

endodontically treated teeth using different coronal restorative materials: An in

vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2009; 12: 154-9.

8. Wu Y, Cathro P, Marino V. Fracture resistance and pattern of the upper premolars

with obturated canals and restored endodontic occlusal access cavities. J Biomed

Res 2010; 24(6):474-8.

9. Soares VP, Filho PCFS, Queiroz EC, Araujo TA, Campos RE, Araujo AC, et al. Fracture resistance and stress distribution in endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with composite resin. J Prosthodont 2006; 2008: 114-9.

10. Mantri S, Mantri S. Management of shrinkage stresses in direct restorative light-cured composite: a review. J Esthet Restor Dent 2013; 25: 305-11.

(2)

50 11. Santosh L, Bashetty K, Nadig G. The influence of diffrent composite placement techniques on microleakage in preparations with high c-factor : an in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2008; 11(3): 112-5.

12. Furness A, Tadros MY, Looney SW, Rueggeberg FA. Effect of bulk/incremental fill on internal gap formation of bulk-fill composite. J dent 2014; 42: 439-49.

13. Giachetti L, Russo DS, Bambi C & Grandini R. A Review of Polymerization Shrinkage Stress: Current Techniques for Posterior Direct Resin Restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract 2006; 7: 1-10.

14. Mansour K, Sada A, Sinan H. Curing depth of bulk-fill composite an in vitro study. Pak Oral & Dent J 2015; 35(2): 270-4.

15. Ivoclar Vivadent AG Research & Development Scientific Documentation Tetric N Ceram® Bulk-fill. 2014; 11, 23.

16. Hatrick, Eakle. Dental Materials Clinical Applications For Dental Assistants and Dental Hygienists. 3rd., Missouri : Elsevier; 2016: 70-71.

17. Franca FMG, Worschech CC, Paulillo LAMS, Martins LRM, Lovadino JR. Fracture Resistance of Premolar Teeth Restored With Different Filling Techniques. J Contemp Dent Pract 2005; 6: 1-7.

18. Damanhoury E, Platt J. Polymerization shrinkage stress kinetics and related properties of bulk-fill resin composites. J Oper Dent 2014; 39(4): 1.

19. Kapoor N, Bahuguna N, Anand S. Influence of composite insertion technique on

gap formation. J Conserv Dent 2016; 19: 77-81.

20. Anusavice , Shen , Rawls. Philip's science of dental materials. 12 th ed: Elsevier ., 2012: 277-80, 287.

21. Gladwin M, Bagby M. Clinical aspects of dental materials theory, practice, and cases. 4th ed., Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer., 2013: 36, 65-7.

22. Sakaguchi RL, Powers JM. Craig's restorative dental materials. 13th ed., Philadelphia: Elsevier., 2012: 36, 100, 164-7, 172-9,181, 332.

23. Leprince JG, et al. Progress in dimethacrylatess-based dental composite technology and curing efficiency. Dent Mater 2012: 1-13.

(3)

51 24. Heymann HO, Swift EJ, Ritter AV. Biomaterils. In: Heymann HO, Swift EJ,

Ritter AV. Students art and science of operative dentistry. 6th ed., Misouri: elsevier., 2012: e3, e42, e44, e48.

25. FiltekTM Bulk-fill Posterior Restorative Technical Product Profile. 26. Scientific compendium. SDR smart dentin replacement. 2011: 5-10.

27. Abed YA, Sabry HA, Alrobeigy NA. Degree of conversion and surface hardness of bulk-fill composite versus incremental-fill composite. Tanta Dent J 2015; 12: 71-80.

28. Noronha FD, Scelza MFZ, Silva LE, Carvalho WR. Evaluation of compressive

strength in the first premolars between young and elderly people: ex vivo study.

Gerodontology 2011; e898-e901.

29. Do T, Church B, Verissimo C, Hackmyer S, Tantbirojn D, Simon JF et al. Cuspal Flexure, Depth-of-cure, and Bond Integrity of Bulk-fill Composites. J Pediatric Dent 2014; 36: 468-73.

30. C.M.P. Rosatto, et al., Mechanical properties, shrinkage stress, cuspal strain and fracture resistance of molars restored with bulk-fill composites and incremental filling technique, Journal of Dentistry (2015); 1-10.

31. Hambire UV, Tripathi VK. Experimental Evaluation Of Different Fillers In Dental Composites In Terms Of Mechanical Properties. J Eng & Appl Sci 2012; 7: 147-51.

32. Kim KH, Ong JL, Okuno O. The Effect Of Filler Loading And Morphology On The Mechanical Properties Of Contemporary Composites. J Prosthet Dent

2002;87:642-9.

33. 3MFiltek ™ P60 Posterior Restorative SystemTechnical Product Profile. 1998 :

1-36.

34. Li Y, Swartz, Philips RW, Moore BK & Roberts TA. Effect of Filler Content and

Size on Properties of Composites. J Dent Res 1985; 64(12):1396-1401.

35. Sadeghi M, Lynch CD. The Effect of Flowable Materials on the Microleakage of

Class II Composite Restorations That Extend Apical to the Cemento-enamel

Junction. Oper Dent 2009 : 306-11.

(4)

52 36. Ozgunaltay G, Gorucu J. Fracture resistace of class II packable composite

restorations with and without flowable liners. J Oral Rehabil 2005; 111-5.

37. Amar AB, Sluzky H, Matalon S. The influence of 2 condensation techniques on

the marginal seal of packable resin composite restorations. Quintessence Int

2007;38:423–8.

38. Chadwick RG, McCabe JF, Walls AWG, Storer R. The effect of placement

technique upon the compressive strength and porosity of composite resin. J Dent

1989; 17:230-33.

39. Sood A, Munjal S, Sharma K, Malik M. An In Vitro Evaluation Of Voids And Porosities At Different Sites In Class Ii Composite Resin Restorations Using Different Consistencies And Placement Techniques – A Stereomicroscopic Study. Ind J Dent Sci 2013; 028-31.

40. Pierre LS, Bergeron C, Qian F, Hernandez MM, Kolker JL, Cobb DS, Vargas MA. Effect of polishing direction on the marginal adaptation of composite resin restoration. J Esthet Restor Dent 2013; 25:125-38

41. Makramani A, Razak A, Yi NM, Ying SY, Sanabani A. Effect of restorative

techniques on fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars. J Stomatol

2013; 3: 379-85.

42. Marchan SM, Coldero L, White D, Smith WAJ, & Rafeek RN. Cusp Fracture

Resistance of Maxillary Premolars Restored with the Bonded Amalgam

Technique Using Various Luting Agents. Int J Dent 2008; 2009: 1-4.

43. Morresi AL, D’Amario M, Capogreco M, Gatto R, Marzo G, D’Arcangelo C,

Monaco A. Thermal cycling for restorative materials: does a standardized

protocol exist in laboratory testing? a literature review. J Mech Behav Biomed

Mater 2014; 29:295-308.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

flowable dan SDR dapat digunakan sebagai intermediate layer karena memiliki viskositas yang rendah sehingga dapat mengurangi stress shrinkage pada saat

Bahan ini memiliki karakteristik seperti resin komposit flowable dan dapat diaplikasikan menggunakan sistem aplikasi bulk dengan ketebalan 4 mm dan menyisakan 2

Kelebihan lain yang dimiliki resin komposit bulk fill yaitu shrinkage yang rendah sehingga dapat mengurangi kebocoran tepi pada restorasi.. Tetapi kelemahan utama yang

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat pengaruh perbedaan waktu penyinaran Light Emitting Diode (LED) terhadap kekerasan under-surface resin komposit bulk-fill...

Saat ini telah dikembangkan resin komposit bulk fill yang mampu diaplikasikan ke dalam kavitas secara langsung ( bulk ) dengan ketebalan hingga 4-5 mm dan dapat

Wandania Farahanny, drg., MDSc selaku dosen pembimbing penulis yang telah banyak meluangkan waktu, memberikan masukan, arahan, saran yang sangat menolong penulis

digunakan untuk bahan restorasi gigi posterior terutama pada kavitas dalam yang. terdiri dari kombinasi matriks resin , e-glass fiber dan pengisi

Penelitian ini sejalan dengan hasil penelitian yang didapat oleh Vahid AN dkk (2015) yang meneliti ketahanan fraktur pada gigi premolar pertama maksila yang