T BING 1302568 Bibliography

(1)

Rafita Tioria Sianipar, 2015

THEME AND THEMATIC PROGRESSION ANALYSIS OF ANALYTICAL EXPOSITION TEXTS Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

REFERENCES

Adanza, E. (1995). Research methods: Principles and applications. Manila: Rex Book Store.

Al Bakaa, A. J. (2014). Investigating the manifestation of textual themes in argument English assignments written by Iraqi and Australian postgraduate students. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature. Vol. 3(6) pp. 205-211.

Alboghobeish, A. K. & Sedghi, H. (2014). Information development in Arabic research article abstract. International Journal of English and Education. Vol. 3(1) pp. 42-49.

Alonso, I. & McCabe, A. M. (2003). Improving text flow in ESL learner compositions. The Internet TESL Journal. Vol. 9(2) [online] available at http://iteslj.org/Articles?Alonso-ImprovingFlow.html Accessed on 4 July 2015.

Alwasilah, A. C. (2008). Pokoknya kualitatif: Dasar-dasar merancang dan melakukan penelitian kualitatif. Jakarta: PT Dunia Pustaka Jaya.

Alwasilah, A. C. & Alwasilah, S. S. (2005). Pokoknya menulis. Bandung: PT Kiblat Buku Utama.

Arunsirot, S. (2013). An analysis of textual metafunction in Thai EFL students’ writing. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Young and Language). Vol. 7(2) pp. 160-174.

Bangga, L. A. (2013). An investigation of Theme and Theme progression of students’ exposition text: A case study in a state university in Bandung. An undergraduate thesis submitted to English Education Department Faculty of Languages and Arts Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Unpublished Material.

Banks, D. (2008). The significance of thematic structure in the scientific journal article, 1700-1980. In Norgaard, N. (Ed). Systemic Functional Linguistics in Use, Odense Working Papers in Language and Communication Vol. 29. Belmonte, I. A. & McCabe, A. M. (1998). Theme-Rheme patterns in L2 writing.

Didactica (Lengua y Literatura), Vol. 10 pp. 13-31.

Bloor, T. & Bloor, M. (1995). The functional analysis of English: A Hallidayan approach. London: Arnold.

(2)

110 Rafita Tioria Sianipar, 2015

Borjars, K. & Burridge, K. (2010). Introducing English grammar. London: Routledge.

Borjars, K. & Burridge, K. (2010). Introducing English grammar. (2nd Ed). London: Hodder Education.

Butt, D., Fahey, R., Feez, S. & Yallop, C. (2000). Using functional grammar: An explorer’s guide. (2nd Ed). Sydney: National Centre for English Teaching and Research. Macquarie University.

Christie, F. & Derewianka, B. (2008). School discourse. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.

Coffin, C. (1997). Constructing and giving value to the past: An investigation into secondary school history. In Christie, F. & Martin, J. R. (Eds). Genre and institutions: Social processes in the working place and school. London: Continuum.

Connor, U. (1996). Contrastive rhetoric: Cross-cultural aspects of second language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Coulmas, F. (2003). Writing systems: An introduction to their linguistic analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Couture, B. (1986). Bridging epistemologies and methodologies: Research in written language function. In Couture, B. (Ed). Functional approaches to writing: Research perspectives. New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach. (2nd Ed). California: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach. (3rd Ed). California: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. (4th Ed). Boston: Pearson. Crompton, P. (2002). Theme in argumentative texts: an analytical tool applied and appraised. A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Department of Linguistics and Modern English Language, Lancaster University. Unpublished Material. Danes, F. (1974). Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the

text. In Danes, F. (Ed). Papers on functional sentence perspective. Paris: Mouton The Hague.

Davies, N. F. (2011). Receptive versus productive skills in foreign language learning. The Modern Language Learning. Vol 60 (8), pp 440-443.

(3)

Derewianka, B. & Jones, P. (2012). Teaching language in context. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

Downing, A. (2001). Thematic progression as functional resource in analyzing texts in circle of linguistics applied to communication. [online] available at http://www.ucm.es/info/circulo/no5/downing.html Accessed on 4 July 2015.

Downing, A. & Locke, P. (2006). English grammar: A university course. (2nd Ed). New York: Routledge.

Droga, L. & Humphrey, S. (2003). Grammar and meaning: An introduction for primary teachers. Berry NSW: Target Texts.

Duff, P. A. (2008). Case study research in applied linguistics. New York: Lawrence Elbraum.

Ebrahimi, S. F. & Khedri, M. (2012). The importance of thematic structure in students’ writing cohesion. [online] available at http://www.languageinindia.com/april/2012/ebrahimithematiccohesionfina l.pdf Accessed on March 2015.

Eemeren, F. V., Grootendorst, R. & Henkemans, F. S. (2002). Argumentation: Analysis, Evaluation, Presentation. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Eggins, S. (1994). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. London: Printer Publishers, Ltd.

Eggins, S. (2004). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. (2nd Ed). New York: Continuum.

Emilia, E. (2005). A critical genre based approach to teaching academic writing in a tertiary EFL context in Indonesia. A PhD thesis submitted to the Department of Language, Literacy and Arts Education, Faculty of Education, The University of Melbourne. Unpublished Material.

Emilia, E. (2008). Linguistik sistemik fungsional dan pengajaran membaca dalam Bahasa Inggris. Konaplin 1. Bandung: Balai Bahasa UPI.

Emilia, E. (2010). Teaching writing: Developing critical learners. Bandung: Rizqi Press.

Emilia, E. (2011). Pendekatan genre-based dalam pengajaran Bahasa Inggris: Petunjuk untuk guru. Bandung: Rizqi Press.

Emilia, E. (2014). Introducing functional grammar. Bandung: Pustaka Jaya. Emilia, E. & Christie, F. (2013). Factual genres in English: Learning to write,

(4)

Emilia, E., Amalia, L. L. & Rodliyah, R. S. (2004). Implementing and developing text-based teaching to improve critical thinking and language ability of English Education Students of UPI (the second year). Submitted to the Center of Research and Community Service, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Unpublished Material.

Fairclough, N. (2003). Analyzing discourse: Textual analysis for social research.

London: Routledge.

Frankel, J. R. & Wallen, N. E. (1990). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw-Hill Publishing Company.

Fries, P. (1995a). A personal view of Theme. In Ghadessy, M. (1995). Thematic development in English texts. Amsterdam: John Benjamin B. V.

Fries, P. (1995b). Themes, methods of development, and texts. In Hasan, R. & Fries, P. H. (Eds). (1995). On subject and Theme: A discourse functional perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamin B. V.

Gerot, L. & Wignell, P. (1994). Making sense of functional grammar. Sydney: Gerd Stabler.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1991). The notion of “context” in language education. In J. J. Webster (Ed). (2007). Language and education. London: Biddles, Ltd., King’s Lynn, Norfolk.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. (2nd Ed). China: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

Halliday, M. A. K. & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman. Halliday, M.A.K. & Martin, J.R. (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive

power (Critical perspectives on literacy and education). London: Falmer Press.

Halliday, M. A. K. & Martin, J. R. (2003). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. London: Routledge.

Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. (3rd Ed). London: Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to

functional grammar. Oxon: Routledge.

Herriman, J. (2011). Themes and theme progression in Swedish advanced learners’ writing in English. University of Gothenburg.

(5)

Business Communication, Business and Social Sciences, Aarhus University.

Humanis, T. (2014). Thematic progression in business letters written by AIESEC. An undergraduate study submitted to Dian Nusantoro University.

Ikaningrum, R. E. (2009). Developing students’ ability to write a report genre through thematic progression approach. A graduate thesis submitted to State University of Semarang.

Jourdan, M. P. (1986). Close cohesion with do so: A linguistic experiment in language function using a multi-example corpus. In Couture, B. (Ed).

Functional approaches to writing: Research perspectives. New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

Joyce, de Silva, H. & Feez, S. (2012). Text-based language literacy education: Programming and methodology. Putney, NSW: Phoenix Education.

Knapp, P. & Watkins, M. (2005). Genre, text, and grammar: Technologies for teaching and assessing writing. Sydney: UNSW Press.

Lianawati. (2008). Analisis tema dan pengembangannya pada surat pembaca dalam surat kabar The Jakarta Post. An undergraduate thesis submitted to Universitas Diponegoro Semarang.

Lock, G. (1996). Functional English grammar: An introduction for second language teachers. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Macken-Horarik, M. (2002). Something to shoot for. In A. M. Johns (2002). (Ed).

Genre in the classroom. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbraum Associates, Publishers.

Martin, J. R. (1985). Factual writing: Exploring and challenging social reality.

Victoria: Deakin University Press.

Martin, J. R. (1992). English text: System and structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Martin, J. R. (1997). Analyzing genre: Functional parameters. In F. Christie & J. R. Martin. (1997). (Eds). Genre and institutions. London: Continuum. Martin, J. R. (2002). Writing history: Construing time and value in discourses of

the past. In Schleppegrell, M. & Colombi, M. C. (2002) (Eds). Developing advanced literacy in first and second languages: Meaning with power. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Martin, J. R., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., & Painter, C. (1997). Working with functional grammar. London: Arnold.

(6)

Martin, J. R. & Rose, D. (2008). Genre relations: Mapping culture. London: Equinox.

Martinez-Prieto. (2014). Marked Theme in the Reading Comprehension. MSU Working Papers in SLS. Vol. 5 pp. 32-42. [online] available at sls.msu.edu/soslap/journal/index.php/sls/…/33. Accessed on 22 July 2015. McCabe, A. M. (1999). Theme and Thematic patterns in Spanish and English

history text (Vol. 1). Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School Aston University. Unpublished Material.

McMillan, J. H. (1992). Educational research: Fundamentals for the consumer.

New York: Harper Collin Publisher, Inc.

Nation, I. S. P. (1994). Morphology and language learning. In Asher, R. E. (Ed.)

The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon Press. Nwogu, K. N. & Bloor, T. (1991). Thematic progression in professional and

popular medical texts. In Eija Ventola. (Ed). Trends in Liguistics: Functional and systemic linguistics (approaches and use). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Paltridge, B. (2000). Making sense of discourse analysis. Queensland: Gerd Stabler

Priyatmojo, A. S. (2011). Cohesion and coherence of the students’ recount text

and its implication for teaching writing of text types in English. [online] available at journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/LC/article/view/2409. Accessed on 12 October 2014.

Qi, W. (2012). Systematic functional perspective: Functions of marked theme in English. International Conference on Education Technology and Management Engineering. Lecture Notes in International Technology. 16. pp. 198-2-2

Rakhman, A. N. (2013). An analysis of Thematic progression in high school students’ exposition text. An undergraduate thesis submitted to English Education Department Faculty of Languages and Arts Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Unpublished Material.

Rodgers, H. (2005). Writing systems: A linguistic approach. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Rosa, R. N. (2007). Thematic progression as a means to keep cohesion in exposition texts. [online] Available at http://rusdinoorrosa.blogspot.com/. Accessed on 11 September 2014].

Safitra, Z. (2013). Theme system of systemic functional grammar in students’

(7)

Postgraduate School Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Unpublished Material.

Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing & Health. Vol. 23 pp. 334-340. [online] Available at www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov./pubmed/10940958. Accessed on 13 September 2014.

Schleppegrell, M. J. (2001). Linguistic features of the language of schooling.

Linguistics and Education. Vol. 12(4) pp. 431-459.

Schleppegrell, M. J. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistic perspective. New Jersey: Lawrence Elbraum.

Schleppegrell, M. J. (2006). The linguistic features of advance language use: The grammar of exposition. In Byrnes, H. (2006). Advance language learning. London: Continuum.

Soepriatmadji, L. (2009). Thematic progression in thesis abstract written by English students of FBIB Unisba Semarang. [online] available at https://www.google.co.id/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://www.u nisbank.ac.id/ojs/index/php/fbibl/article/view402&ved...Pg Accessed on 3 October 2014.

Shieh, C. M. & Lin, K. R. S. (2015). Thematic progression patterns on the texts of the department required English texts. [online] Available at 140.127.82.166/retrieve/20777/13-15-34.pdf. Accessed on 9 August 2015. Silverman, D. (2005). Doing qualitative research. (2nd Ed). London: SAGE

Publication.

Stockwell, P. & Mullany, L. (2010). Introducing English language: A resource book for students. London: Routledge.

Sugijarto. (2010). Thematic progression in students’ explanatory texts: A systemic

functional linguistic perspective. A thesis submitted to English Education Department Postgraduate School Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Unpublished Material.

Suraishkumar, G. K. (2013). Improving coherence in technical writing. Mumbai: Indian Institute of Technology.

Thomas, S. (1994). Thematic networks and text types. Asp [En Iigne] , pp. 23-26. [online] Available at http://asp.revues.org/2361. Accessed on 8 August 2015.

(8)

Wang, B. (2014). Theme in translation: A systemic functional linguistic perspective. International Journal of Comparative Literature & Translation Studies, Vol. 2(4) pp. 54-63.

Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. (2nd Ed). Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.

Xu, R. (2000). Theme and cohesion in the writing of English expository texts by Chinese tertiary EFL learners. University of Wollongong Thesis Collection.

[online] available at

ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2807&context=theses. Accessed on 13 October 2014.

Yang, X. (2008). Thematic progression analysis in teaching explanation writing.