• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

getdoce5ed. 83KB Jun 04 2011 12:05:07 AM

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "getdoce5ed. 83KB Jun 04 2011 12:05:07 AM"

Copied!
3
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Elect. Comm. in Probab. 11(2006), 217–219 ELECTRONIC

COMMUNICATIONS in PROBABILITY

A SHORT PROOF OF THE DIMENSION FORMULA

FOR L ´

EVY PROCESSES

MING YANG

P.O. Box 647, Jackson Heights, NY 11372 email: [email protected]

Submitted June 19 2006, accepted in final form August 28 2006 AMS 2000 Subject classification: 60G51, 60J25, 60G17

Keywords: L´evy processes, Hausdorff dimension, range

Abstract

We provide a simple proof of the result on the Hausdorff dimension of the range of a L´evy process in a recent paper by Khoshnevisan, Xiao, and Zhong [1].

LetXtbe a L´evy process in IRdwith the L´evy exponent Ψ.There was an “open question” which

did not garnered lots of attention until a recent paper on multiparameter L´evy processes by Khoshnevisan et al. [1] showed the simplification of Pruitt’s formula in [2] as one of the main applications of their long-proof theorems. Khoshnevisan et al. [1] obtained:

dimHX([0,1]) = sup{α < d:

Z

|y|α−dRe

1

1 + Ψ(y)

dy <∞} a.s. (1.1)

whereX([0,1]) ={Xs:s∈[0,1]} with the notation dimH for the Hausdorff dimension. The

present author is still puzzled by why Pruitt himself did not reach the same conclusion whereas he made some interesting remarks about the difficulty of this issue. We show that Pruitt’s elegant proof in [2] also yields (1.1).

Proof of (1.1). Let ζ be an exponential random variable with mean 1 independent of Xt,

suggesting that we are dealing with a killed process at rate 1. Observe that E[Rζ

0 1(|Xt| ≤

r)dt] = R∞ 0 e

−t

E[Rζ

0 1(|Xs| ≤ r)ds|ζ =t]dt=

R∞ 0

Rt 0e

−t

P(|Xs| ≤ r)dsdt =

R∞ 0 e

−t

P(|Xt| ≤

r)dt. Define

γ:= sup{α≥0 : lim sup

r→0 r −α

Z ∞

0

e−t

P(|Xt| ≤r)dt <∞}. (1.2)

Conditioned onζ, Theorem 1 of Pruitt [2] implies that

dimHX([0, ζ]) =γ a.s. (1.3)

Clearly, dimHX([0,1]) = dimHX([0, ζ])a.s. It remains to show that

γ= sup{α < d: Z

|y|α−d Re

1

1 + Ψ(y)

dy <∞}. (1.4)

(2)

218 Electronic Communications in Probability

which shows thatR∞ 0 e standard argument imply that

γ= sup{α≥0 :

as well. Thus, we can write

γ= sup{α < d:

There are quite a few ways to compute the integral R∞ 0 e

for some constant

c ∈(0,∞) and Re[(1 + Ψ(x))−1

]>0.Following the calculations given by Pruitt [2], p. 375, we find that

Z ∞

where the second equality holds because for fixedt >0,

(3)

A Short Proof 219

References

[1] Khoshnevisan, D., Xiao, Y. and Zhong, Y. (2003). Measuring the range of an additive L´evy process.Ann. Probab.31, 1097-1141.MR1964960 [2] Pruitt, W. E. (1969). The Hausdorff dimension of the range of a process

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

In particular, the classification the- ory of primitive integral binary quadratic forms by SL(2 , Z) is recovered. Explicit fundamental domains for Γ( D, N ) allow the

The nonlinear filter associated with the discrete time signal-observation model (X k , Y k ) is known to forget its initial condition as k → ∞ regardless of the observation

Since the latter “distance” between measures involves an appropriate coupling, that is, finding the optimal way of “transporting” mass from one measure to another, it has been

In the case of a Markov chain over an infinite state space with a unique stationary distribution, the notion of a mixing time depends on the state of origination of the

Our Berry-Esseen results for the number of isolated balls are analogous to the main results of [ 4 ] (in.. the uniform case) and [ 12 ] (in the non-uniform case) for the number

We emphasise that the scaling limit of the kinetic prudent walk seems to be different from the scaling limit of the uniform prudent walk studied in Combinatorics... The inset is

In [13] the results are shown to be valid for values of the temperature and magnitude of the field in a subset of the region of two absolute minima for the free energy of

Generally, it seems to be difficult to obtain results for the finiteness of the expected values of the passage times when EX 2 = ∞ , not only for the reflected process, but for