Daftar Pustaka
Abrami, P.C. (2001). Improving judgments about teaching effectiveness using teacher rating forms. In .Theall, M., Abrami, P.C and Mets. L.A., (Eds.). The student ratings debate: Are they valid? How can we best use them? [Special issue]. New Directions for Institutional Research 109, 59-87.
Ackerman, J. M. (1993). The promise of writing to learn. Written Communication, 10, 334- 370
Ainsworth, S. (1999). The functions of multiple representations. Computers and Education,33, 131-152.
Ainsworth, S., & Van Labeke, N. (2004). Multiple forms of dynamic representation. Learning and Instruction, 14(3), 241-255
Ann, W (2008). Teacher transformation in the national writing project. Research in the Teaching of English 43(2). 144-187
Anastasi, A & Urbina, A (2002). Psychological Testing (7th Edition). New
Delhi: Pearson Education (Singapore) Pvt. Ltd., Indian Branch.
Armitage, A., et al (2007).Mutual research design : redefining mixed methods research design. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, Institute Education, University of London.
Atila, M.E., Gunel, M., & Buyukkasap, E. (2010). The effect of using multimodal
representation within writing to learn activities on learning force and motion unit at the midle school setting. Journal of Turkish Science Education. 7(4).113-127
Ball, D. L. & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In G. Sykes and -Hammond,L.D (Eds.), Teaching as the Learning Profession:Handbook of Policy and Practice,. 3-32. 1999, San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Bazerman, C., Little, J., Bethel, L., Chavkin, Whitney T., Fouquette, D., & Garufis, J.
(2005).Writing to learn. In C. Bazerman, J. Little, L.Bethel, T. Chavkin, D. Fouquette, & J. Garufis (Eds.), Reference guide to writing across thecurriculum, 57-65. West Lafayette, IN:Parlor Press.
Bandura,A.(1986). Social foundation of thought and action (ed) annals of child development, 6.Greenwich CT JAI Press
Beran, T., Violato, C., & Kline, D. (2007). What‟s the „use‟ of student ratings of instruction for administrators? One university‟s experience. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 17(1), 27-43.
Beichner, R.J.(1994). Testing student interpretation of kinematics graphs. American Journal of Physics., 62(8), 750-762
Bereiter, Carl; Scardamalia, Marlene (1987) The Psychology of Written Composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bezemer, J., Kress, G. (2008). Writing in multimodal texts a social semiotic account of designs for learning. Written Communication 25 ( 2), 166-195 © 2008 Sage Publications.
Bosse,M.J., Gyamfi,K.A., & Cheetham, M (2011) Translations Among Mathematical Representations: Teacher Beliefs and Practices, Department of Mathematics, Science, and Instruction Technology Education, College of Education, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 28590
Brewster,C & Klump, J. (2004) Writing To Learn, Learning To write: Revisiting Writing Across the Curriculum in Northwest Secondary Schools. Northwest Regional ,Educational Laboratory Portland Oregon
Chan, C.(2009) Assessment: Concept Map, Assessment Resources@HKU, University of Hong Kong [http://ar.cetl.hku.hk].
Coe, R (2000). What is an Effect Size ?.A Guide for User. Draft version.
Cohen, J. (1969) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. NY: Academic Press in Coe, Robert (2000). What is an Effect Size ?.A Guide for User. Draft version.
Coppola, B. P. (1995). Progress in practice: Using concepts from motivational and self-regulated learning research to improve chemistry instruction. In P. R. Pintrich (Ed.), Understanding Self-Regulated Learning (pp. 87-96). San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
Creswell, J.W.(2009)..Research Desaign :Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Approaches. Thousand Oaks,CA:Sage.
Creswell, J.W & Clark, V.L.P (2007) Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods research, Sage Publication.
Danielson, S (2013). The Framework for Teaching, Evaluation Instrument. The Danielson Group,All Righ Reserved, Princeton,NJ,USA
de Jong, T., & van Joolingen, W. R. (1998). Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research,68, (2), 179-201
DeLeone, C. & Gire,E.,(2005). edited by Heron, P., McCullough, L and Marx, J. 2005 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings, Salt Lake City, UT,2005, 45-48.
diSessa, A.(2004). Meta representation: Native competence and target for instruction. Cognitive and Instruction,22 (3), 293-331.
Ecles, J. S.,& Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109-132.
Edward,W.M., Bruce, M.K & Gordon,B. (1993). Statistical Reasoning In Psychology and Education. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Emelie, A and Nathalie, L.(2007).Teaching Writing in Theory and Practice :
A Study of Ways of Working With Writing in the 9th Grade. Stockholm Institute of Education Department of Curiculum Studies and Communication
Finkelstein. N, et.al. (2005), When learning about the real world is better done vitually: A Study of Substituting Computer Simulation for laboratory Equipment. Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 1, 010103,
Flores, S., Kanim, S,E, & Kautz, C.H.,Student use of vectors in introductory mechanics. American Journal of Physics., 2004. 72
Funda, O., et.al (2008) What makes physics difficult. International Journal of Environmental of Science Education,3(1)
Galbraith, D. (1999). Writing as a knowledge-constituting process. In D. Galbraith, & M. Torrance(Eds.), Knowing what to write: Conceptual processes in text production. Studies in Writing. 4, 139–160. 1999, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Galbraith, D.(1992). Conditions of discovery throught writing. Instructional Science, 21, 45-72
Garcia, T.(1995).The role of motivational strategies in self regulated learning, in Pintrich,P.R.,(ed).Understanding Self Regulated Learning, an Francisco ,Jossey Bass.
Gonzales,F., Prain, V.,and Waldrip,B. (2007). Using multi modal representations of concepts in learning science,. ESSERA Conference on Research and The Quality of Science Education.
Guba, E.G.,& Lincoln,Y.S.(1988). Do Inquiry paradigm imply methodologies. in Fattermen , D.M. (1988). Qualitative Approaches to Evaluate in Education. New York Praeger.
Gunel, M., Hand, B.,& Prain, V. (2007). Writing for learning in science: A Secondary analysis of six studies. International Journal of science and Mathematics Education, 4(5),615-367
Guilford, J.P.(1965). Fundamental Statistic for Students of Psichologi and Education, New York Mc Graw Hill.
Hand, B., Gunel, M., & Ulu, C. (2009). Sequencing embedded multimodal representation in writing to learn approach to the teaching of electricity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46 (3),225-247
Hale, S. (2003). Concept mapping handout: Handout from Georgia Parimeter College.
Hake, R.R (1998). Interactive–engagement vs traditional methods: A six- thousand student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics course, American Journal of Physics,66 ,64-74
Hayes, J. & Flower,L. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In:Gregg, L. and Steinberg, E. (Eds.) .Cognitive Processes in Writing, 3-30. Hillsdale, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hayes, J.R.,& Nash,J.G. (1996).On the nature of planning in writing. In .Levy, C.M & Ransdell, S.(1966). The Science of Writing: Theories,Methods, Individual Differencies, and Application, Mahwah, NJ; Lawrence Erlbaum.
Heuvelen, A.V. & Zou,X (2001). Multiple representations of work-energy processes. American Journal of Physics.69, 184.
Hedges, L. & Olkin, I. (1985) Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. New York: Academic Press
Hinrichs, B.(2004). In edited by Marx, J , Heron, P. & Franklin, S. (2004) Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings, Sacramento, CA, 117-120.
Hopkins, W. G. (1997). New View of Statistics: Effect Magnitudes. Retrieved November 12, 2001 from http://www.sportsci.org/resource/stats/effectmag.html
Indiana department of Education (2012). RISE Evaluation & Development System Evaluator & Teacher Hanbook version 1.0.
Johnson, R.B., and Turner,R.A.(2003). Data collection strategies in mixed research. In A. Tashakkori, and C. Teddle (Eds), Handbook of Mixed Method in Social and
Behavioral Research. 2003.Thousand Oaks, CA.
Klein, P.D. (2006). The challenges of science literacy: From the viewpoint of second
generation cognitive science. International Journal of Science Education, 28,(2/3) 143-178
Kohl.P.B. et al (2007). Strongly and weakly directed approach to teaching multiple representation use in physics. Physical Review Special Topics. Physics Education Research, 3, 010128
Kohl.P.B.et al (2008). Paterns of multiple representation use by experts and novices during physics problem solving, Physical Review Special Topics, Physics Educational Research,4, 010111
Kozma, R.B.(2003). The material features of multiple representations and their and social cognitive affordances for science understanding. Learning and Instruction, 13 (2), 205-226
Kress, G. (2005). Gains and losses: New forms of texts, knowledge and learning. Computers and Composition, 22, 5-22.
Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Ogborn, J.,& Tsatsarelis, C. (2001). Multimodal Teaching and Learning: The Rhetorics of the Science classroom, London:Continum.
Kozminsky & Gurion. (2012). Concep maps theory, mathology, technologi. Proc.of the Fifth Int. Conference on Concep Mapping, Canas, A.J.; Novac, J.D.; Vanhear,J. Eds. Valenta Malta 2012.
Kellog, R.T. (2008). Training writing skills: a cognitive developmental perspective.Journal of Writing Research, 1(1) 1-26.
Lemke, J.L.(1998).Multiplying meaning:Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In Martin, J and Veel, R.,. Reading science, London Routledge.
Lemke, J.L. (2004). The literacies in science. In Saul, E.W., (Ed.), Crossing Borders in Literacy and Science Instruction: Perspectives in Theory and Practice, 13-32.Newark, DE: International Reading Association/National Science Teachers Association.
Mayer, R.E. (2003). The promise of mulitmedia learning: Using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning and Instruction, 13(2),125-139..
Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McCombs, B. L. (1989). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: A
phenomenological view. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Selfregulated Learning and Academic Achievement: Theory, Research, and Practice.. 51-82. 1989, New York: Springer-Verlag.
Meltzer, D.E.(2002). The relationship between mathematics preparation and conceptual learning gains in physics: A possible “hidden variable” in diagnostic pretest scores. American Journal of Physics., 70, 1259.
Milkova,S (2012). Strategies for effectivenes lesson planning. Center for Research on learning and Teaching. Tersedia di (http://www.crlt.umich.edu)
National Writing Project & Nagin, C. (2003). Because Writing Matters: Improving Student Writing in Our Schools.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Norris,S.P, & Phillips,L.M.(2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense in central to scientific literacy. Scientific Education, 87(2).224-240
Novak, J.D., & Gowin, D.B. (1984). Learning How tolLearn. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Onwuegbuzie, A.J., & Leech, N.L (2004.b). Enhancing the interpretation of significant finding; The role of mixed method research. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of The Eastern Educational Research Association, Clearwater,FL.
Permendiknas no 16 tahun 2007
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T., & Mc Keachie, W. J. (1991).A Manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, National Center for Research to Improve Post Secondary Teaching and Learning.
Pintrich, P. R. (1995). Understanding self-regulated learning. In Pintrich, P.R., (Ed.), Understanding Self Regulated Learning, 3-12. 1995. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation inlearning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 667-686.
Prain, V., & Waldrip, B. (2006). An exploratory study of teachers‟ and students‟ use of multi -modal representations of concepts in primary science. International Journal of
Science Education, 28(15),1843-1866
Prain.V ,et al (2009). Multiple representation in learning about evaporation, International Journal of Science Education, 31(6),787-808
Prain, V (2006). Learning from writing in secondary science: some theoretical and practical implications. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 170-201
Preece, J. (1993). Graphs are not straight forward. In Green,T.R.G. , Payne, S.J., &van der Veer, G.C., (Eds.), The Psychology of Computer Use, 41-56. London:Academic Press.
Rosengrant. D, Van Heuvelen. A, & Etkina. E, (2005) edited by Heron. P, . McCullough. L and Marx. J, (2005). Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings, Salt Lake City, UT, 49-52.
Rosengrant.D, Etkina. E, & Van Heuvelen. A,(2006). National Association for Research in Science Teaching Proceedings, San Francisco, CA (2006).
Ruohotie, P (2000a). Conative Constructs in Learning, in Pintrich, P. and Ruohotie, P.(eds).Conative Constructs and Self Regulated learning, 2000, Hameenlinna , Research Centre for Vocational Education.
Scanlon, E. (1998). How beginning students use graphs of motion. In Van Someren, M.W., et al.(Eds) Learning with Multiple Representation. 1998, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Seldin, P. (1999). Changing practices in evaluating reaching. A Practical Guide to Improved Faculty Performance for Promotion/Tenure Decisions. Bolton, MA: Anker.
Sturm, J. M.,& Rankin, E, J. L. (2002). Effects of hand-drawn and computer-generated concept mapping on the expository writing of middle school students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 117(2), 124-139.
Tabachneck, H. J. M., Leonardo, A. M., & Simon, H. A. (1994). CaMeRa: A computational model of multiple representations, Cognitive Science 21(3), 305–350.
Tashakkori,A., Teddle,C.(1998). Mixed methodology: combining qualitative and quatitative approaches. Applied Social Method Research. Method Series ,46. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
Tashakkori, A.,& Teddle,C.(2003), Handbooks of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavior
Research. Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage.
Unsworth, L. (2001a). Evaluating the language of different types of explanations in junior high school science texts. International Journal of Science Education, 23(6),
Unger.J. & Fleischman.S. (2004). Is Process Writing the “Write Stuff” Research Matters. Printed in Educational Leadership, issue: October 2004, 90-91
UPI (2011). Kurikulum Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Wellington, J., & Osborne, J.( 2001). Language and Literacy in Science Education. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Wolters,C. (1999).Self Regulated Learning and college Students Regulation of motivation, Journal of Education Psychology, .90 (2)
Wright, R.E. (2006). Student evaluations of faculty: Concerns raised in the literature, and possible solutions. College Student Journal, 40(2), 417-422.
Yore, L.D. & Treagust, D.F. (2006). Current realities and future possibilities: Language and science literacy empowering research and informing instruction.International Journal of Science Education, 28, 291-314
Zimmerman, B.J.,& Risenberg, R.(1997). Becoming a self regulated writer: a social cognitive perspective contemporary. Educational Psychology, 22(1),73-101.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). Models of self-regulated learning and academic achievement. In Zimmerman,B.J., & Schunk,D.H., (Eds.), Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1-25. 1989. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Paulsen, A. S. (1995). Self monitoring during collegiate studying: An invaluable tool for academic self-regulation. In P. R. Pintrich (Ed.), Understanding Self-Regulated Learning, 13- 27. 1995.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
