• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

S IPSE 1002556 Table of Content

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "S IPSE 1002556 Table of Content"

Copied!
7
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

vi

CONTENTS

DECLARATION...

ABSTRACT..……….……...

PREFACE...………....

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT...

CONTENTS……….

LIST OF TABLES...………...

LIST OF FIGURES.………...………

LIST OF APPENDIX ...

CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION

A. Background………... B. Research Problem……… C. Scope of the Research….……….... D. Aims of Research………...………. E. Research Benefit...………... F. Operational Definition……...……….. G. Assumption………..………

CHAPTER II THEORETICAL BACKGROUND

A. Cooperative Learning…………....…………..………. B. Numbered Heads Together …….……..………...

Page i ii iii iv vi viii

x xi

1 2 3 3 4 4 5

(2)

vii

CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHOD

A. Location and Subject….……….. B. Research Method andDesign...………... C. Research Instrument…..………..……… D. Data Processing……..………... E. Instrument Development…..……… F. Instrument Analysis Results……..……….. G. Research Procedure……….. H. Research Plot..……….………

CHAPTER IV RESULT AND DISCUSSION

A. Research Result..………...……….. B. Research Discussion ....………...………

CHAPTER V CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

A. Conclusions…….………..……….………... B. Recommendation ………...……….

REFERENCES...………..………....

APPENDICES...…………...……….

23 23 24 28 34 39 42 45

46 62

72 72

(3)

viii

LIST OF TABLES

Page Table 2.1 Three Popular Approach of Cooperative Learning………

Table 2.2 Structure of Cognitive Process Dimension in the Revised

Taxonomy………

Table 2.3 The Cognitive Process Dimension……… Table 3.1 Mastery Concept Test (Pretest and Posttest) Item Specification….. Table 3.2 Mastery Concept Test (Group Test) Item Specification... Table 3.3 Scientific Creativity Test Item Specification... Table 3.4 Students’ Response Item Specification ……….. Table 3.5Teacher’s Numbered Heads Together Implementation Rubric... Table 3.6Students’ Numbered Heads Together Implementation Rubric……

Table 3.7 Scoring Procedure of Scientific Creativity Test……….. Table 3.8 Scoring Procedure of Scientific Creativity Test………..

Table 3.9 Interpretation of Normalized Gain Value………... Table 3.10 Scoring Guideline of Students’ Response………... Table 3.11 Classification validity coefficient……….. Table 3.12 Classification of Reliability Coefficient...………... Table 3.13 Discriminating Power Classification... Table 3.14 Coefficient classification of difficulty level ……….. Table 3.15Recapitulation of test item for students’ mastery concept... Table 3.16 Recapitulation of test item for students’ scientific creativity...

Table 4.1 Profile of Students’ Scientific Creativity Score Before

(4)

ix

Taxonomy……….. Table 4.6 Results of T-test analysis on Students Mastery Concept…………..

Table 4.7 Recapitulation of students’ group results... Table 4.8 Recapitulation of Students’ Response toward NHT... Table 4.9 Recapitulation of Teacher Implementation on NHT……… Table 4.10 Recapitulation of Students Accomplishment Activity in NHT

Implementation (Observer Score)……….. Table 4.11 Recapitulation of Students Accomplishment Activity in NHT

Implementation (Peer Assessment Score)……….

50 52 53 54 58

60

(5)

x

LIST OF FIGURES

Page Figure 2.1 Scientific Structure Creativity Model (SSCM) ...

Figure 4.1 Graphs of Students’ Scientific Creativity Results……….. Figure 4.2 Graphic of Students’ Mastery Concept Results... Figure 4.3 Recapitulation of Students’ Response toward Teamwork Ability

as a Group... Figure 4.4 Recapitulation of Students Response toward NHT

Implementation……… Figure 4.5 Recapitulation of Students Response toward Scientific Creativity Test Implementation……… Figure 4.6 Recapitulation of Students Response toward Problem Based

Group Activity Implementation……….. Figure 4.7 Recapitulation of Teacher Accomplishment in NHT

Implementation……… Figure 4.8 Recapitulation of students’ activity accomplishment on NHT

Implementation (Observer Scoring)... Figure 4.9 Recapitulation of students’ activity accomplishment on NHT

Implementation (Peer Scoring)………..

Figure 4.10 group discussion results that attached the bicycle (the red circle)

as solution on reducing global warming rate……….

Figure 4.11 Interaction among students on Group discussion during NHT Implementation………...

11 48 51

55

56

57

57

59

60

62

64

(6)

xi

LIST OF APPENDICES

Page

A. INSTRUCTIONAL TOOLS

Appendix A.1LessonPlan ……….. Appendix A.2Power Point Slide ………

B. RESEARCH INSTRUMENT

Appendix B.1 Instrument of StudentMasteryConcept ……….

Appendix B.2 Instrument of StudentGroupDiscussion ……… Appendix B.3 Instrument of StudentsGroupDiscussionObservation………...

Appendix B.4Instrument of StudentScientificCreativity ………. Appendix B.5Instrument of Questionnaireof Students Response... Appendix B.6Instrument of Teacher’s NHT Implementation ……….. Appendix B.7Instrument ofStudents‘NHT Implementation(Observer)……...

Appendix B.8 Instrument of Students’NHTImplementation (Peer Scoring)…..

.

C. RESULT OF INSTRUMENT TRIAL

Appendix C.1 Trial Test Item of StudentMastery Concept Result ……… Appendix C.1 Trial Test Item of StudentScientificCreativityResult ………...

D. RESULT OF RESEARCH DATA

AppendixD.1 Data Processing of StudentMastery ConceptResult ………….. Appendix D.2 Data Processing of StudentGroupDiscussionResult ………… Appendix D.3 Data Processing of ScientficCreativityResults ……….. Appendix D.4 Data Processing of StudentResponseResult...………...

Appendix D.5 Data Processing of Teacher’s NHT Implementation…………... Appendix D.6 Data Processing of Students’NHTImplementation……….

(7)

xii

E. RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION

Appendix E.1 Letter of Research Permission……….. 133

Appendix E.2 Letter of Validation Instrument Test……….. 134

Appendix E.3 Letter of Validation Research………. 135

F. RESEARCH DOCUMENTATION

Appendix F.1 Implementation of NHT Syntax………. 136 Appendix F.2 Students Poster Discussion Results……… 138

G. RESEARCH INSTRUMENT JUDGEMENT

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

 Perpolitikan nasional dikuasai oleh elit militer  Munculnya elit politik baru yang berasal dari. aktivis mahasiswa

Persamaan (52) sangat penting dalam teori dan praktek, karena banyak persamaan diferensial linear orde-dua dapat direduksi ke persamaan ini dan karena banyak fungsi khusus

Pada perancangan masukan kendali tak kontinyu seperti yang dapat dilihat pada “persamaan (11)”, dipilih parameter k (penguat pensaklaran) yang sesuai untuk

KOIRI.

Berbeda dengan penelitian tentang kopi yang sudah pernah dibuat, Penelitian tentang perubahan fungsi kopi Gayo ini memberikan sebuah pemaparan tentang adanya sebuah

mengenai efektivitas pembelajaran berbasis praktikum pada uji zat makanan di. kelas

Secara bersamaan variabel pendapatan, tarif dan pelayanan memberikan penjelasan terhadap variabel pemilihan taksi Blue Bird sebesar 90% sedangkan sisanya 10 % dijelaskan

Di dalam Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 53 Tahun 2010 pasal 4 ada beberapa larangan yang harus diperhatikan oleh pegawai negeri sipil dalam melaksanakan tugas dan