• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

IMPROVING THE STUDENTS SPEAKING ACHIEVEMENT IN NARRATIVE TEXT THROUGH SNOWBALL THROWING MODEL.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "IMPROVING THE STUDENTS SPEAKING ACHIEVEMENT IN NARRATIVE TEXT THROUGH SNOWBALL THROWING MODEL."

Copied!
16
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

IMPROVING THE STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ACHIEVEMENT

IN NARRATIVE TEXT THROUGH SNOWBALL

THROWING MODEL

A THESIS

Submitted to Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Sarjana Pendidikan

By:

IRA PANE

Register Number: 209321004

ENGLISH AND LITERATURE DEPARTMENT

FACULTY OF LANGUAGES AND ARTS

(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)

ii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

First, the writer would like to express great thanks to Allah SWT for the mercy has given Blessings, Health, Protection, Knowledge and Opportunity so that this thesis entitled “Improving the Students’ Speaking Achievement in Narrative Text Through Snowball Throwing Model”could be completed.

This thesis aimed at fulfilling one of the requirements for the degree of Sarjana Pendidikan at English Department, Faculty of Languages and Arts, State University of Medan.

This thesis probably still has many weaknesses so that constructive suggestions and comments from the readers is wished.

During the process of writing this thesis, the writer has worked with a great number of people through their guidance, suggestions, and comments. Thus the writer would like to extend her sincere and special thanks to:

1. Prof. Dr. Ibnu Hajar Damanik, M.Si, the Rector of State University of Medan.

2. Dr. Isda Pramuniati, M.Hum, the Dean of Faculty of Language and Arts, Vice Dean I, Vice Dean II, Vice Dean III, and all the administrative staff in State University Of Medan.

3. Prof. Dr. Hj. Sumarsih, M.Pd, the Head of English Department. 4. Dra. Masitowarni Siregar, M.Ed, the Head of English Education

Study Program.

5. Dra. Tjut Ernidawati, M.Pd, as her thesis consultant for her generous assistance, guidence and advice she spent on supervising the draft of this thesis.

6. All the judges of my Green table in English Department, for the valuable knowledge, advises, and guidance during finished my thesis. Drs. Johan Sinulingga, M.Pd.as the first judge, Drs. Willem Saragih, Dipl. Appl., M.Pd. as the second judge, and Dr. Zainuddin, DIP.TEFL., M.Hum. as the third judge.

7. Achmad Azis, the Headmaster of SMP Swasta Taman Harapan Medan and Mrs. Ita, the English teacher.

8. Her beloved parentFajar Siddik Pane and Roslinda Hutapea, for their endless loveand moral support in completing her education. 9. Her beloved brother Wanda Andika Pane,her sister Lia Kartika

Pane, S.E.and her younger brotherFadli Saputra Panewho have given special support to pursue a better future life in obtaining the S1 Degree.

10.All English Education Department Students ’09 whose names are not mentioned here, for their support.

Medan, March 2014 The Writer,

Ira Pane

(7)

LIST OF TABLES

Table 3.2 The Procedure of Data Collection for the First Meeting ... 23

Table 3.3 Procedure of Data Collection for the Cycle ... 23

Table 3.4 Aspects of Speaking ... 26

Table 3.5 Score Categorize of Speaking ... 29

Table 4.1 Students’ Speaking Score during Six Meetings ... 32

Table 4.2 The Comparison of Students’ Speaking Score ... 36

Table 4.3 Percentage of Students’ Narrative Speaking Competence ... 36

(8)

REFERENCES

Arrends, Richard I. 2004. Learning to Teach (6th Ed). New York: McGraw – Hill Companies.

Clark, H.H and Clark, E.V. 1997. Psychology and Language: An Introduction to Psycholinguistics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Chaney, A.L., and T.L. Burk. 1998. Teaching Oral Communication in Grades K-8. Boston: Allyn&Bacon. Retrived January 29th 2013 at The Internet TESL Journal, Vol. XII, No.11,November 2006http://iteslj.org/.

Hopkins, David. 2008. A teacher’s Guide to Classroom Research (4nd Ed.). London: McGraw – Hill Open University Press.

Hornby, AS. 2005. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. New York: Oxford University Press.

Hughes. Rebecca. 2002. Teaching and Learning Speaking. London : Longman.

Hyland, Ken. 2002. Teaching and Researching Writing. Great Britain: Pearson Education.

Joyce, B & Weil, M. 2004. Models of Teaching :5rd Edition. Raleigh, NC. North California Department of Public Instruction.

Nunan, David. 1989.Designing Tasks for The Communicative Classroom. Sydney: Macquaire University.

Sinaga, Nurcahaya. 2010.The Application of Dictogloss Technique Trough Collaborative Learning to Improve Student’s Achievement Writing: State University of Medan (Unpublished).

Suprijono, Agus. 2010. Cooperative Learning. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.

Swales and Feak. 2001.Academic Writing for Graduate Students. The University of Michigan Press.

Wallace, Michael. J. 1998. Action Research for Language Teachers. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

(9)

http://english-language-education.blogspot.com/2012/12/narrative text.html#!/2012/12/narrative-text.html. Accessed on April, 12 2013

(10)

1

CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION

A.The Background of the Study

Language is a form of social interaction and communication which is used

by the society in order to create relationship one to another. Language consist of

four communicative skills, they are listening, speaking, reading, and writing. All

those skill have different character but they are related each other. For instance,

building and sharing meaning through the use of verbal and non-verbal symbols,

in a variety of contexts. It is usually realized that spoken language develops

naturally or automatically at the right time. Then it tends face to face conversation

and the form or style is more generally colloquial.to be more fragmentary and

sociable because when the students talk to other students, it should involve them.

For example, say such things as „You know what the point?‟, and „You will

accompany me, won‟t you?‟, the last utterance use of tag question persuading a

reply. In addition, spoken language is used in

Speaking as a productive language, it is supposed to be something

complex in students‟ opinion. They ever find themselves stressing out over

(11)

2

learning while they are asked to speak out. The students do not understand clearly

that the measurement of successful speaking is the existence of speaker in

interactive communication because they forget that, as teenagers, they are already

the competent users of language.

Apparently, there is difficult tendency in students‟ mind while speaking.

What‟s their realproblem in speaking? “The affective factors”. The students adopt

a kind of viruses in their mind namely “fear of mistake”. They are not totally sure

if they are saying is right or wrong. It could be caused of the vocabulary,

pronunciation, and grammar lack nesses. The students think English as a difficult

and complex language. Thus they are very worry if teacher will ask them to speak

in front of the class.

Furthermore, speaking is not only as much as is necessary. It should be

achieved the discourse competence. Martin and Rose (2003) state that discourse

competent is a form of students‟ English ability in spoken text. It reflects a

communicative context in terms of the speaking acquisition, for example genre as

a text type specifically for narrative. Genre of narration is the interesting event

that can be conducted in form of entertaining and good lesson story to tell or

retell. But constantly, to speaking narrative is not easy as it is. That is to be

difficult to students by sharing something sophisticated spontaneously or called as

speaking narrative.

The teacher should stimulate a right way for motivate the students

intrinsically. It can be done by applying qualified model in teaching learning

(12)

3

Bruce and Weil (2004:20) defined that to choose certain models and not others are

partly a matter of efficiency and partly a matter of considerable philosophical

import. Then the model that is chosen creates the world of the learner.

According to the writer, one of the models which are appropriated to this

issue for developing their speaking achievement in narrative text is snowball

throwing model. According to Bayor (2010), Snowball Throwing is one of the

active learning models which in practice involve a lot of students. The teacher's

role here is only as giving guidance on the topic of early learning and subsequent

demolition of the course of learning.

However, according Suprijono (2010: 128) Snowball throwing is teacher

presents the material to be presented. Teacher forms a group and call the chairman

of each group to give an explanation about the material. Each group head back to

the group and explain any material submitted by the teacher to his friend. Each

student is given one sheet of paper to write down a question of whatever

pertaining to material that has been described by the group leader. Paper

containing the question is made into a ball and thrown from one student to other

students for 15 minutes. After students got one ball / one question is given the

opportunity for students to answer questions that are written in ball-shaped paper

interchangeably. At the end, the teacher gives evaluation and closing. It can be

concluded that the snowball throwing model has the strength to improve students‟

speaking achievement because it involves the activity of physic and mental while

doing the process of cooperative learning. Then the students are encouraged to

(13)

4

In addition, in the journal of Deni Kurnianengih Darusmin entitled “Using

Snowball Throwing Model to Increase Speaking Ability of the Second Year

Students of SMP N 21 Pekanbaru” states that the snowball throwing model

significantly improves the students‟ writing skill in terms of the narrative text.

However, the statistic gives significant differences of the score results of the two

cycles were found on the Post-test 2, where about 83.33 % of the students reached

the school minimum standard of English subject in speaking ability in narrative

text. Moreover, the students‟ activeness during the snowball throwing model

treatment also improved from one meeting to others.

Then finally, by finding out the real problem and the real fact of the

journal above in classroom activity specifically in speaking achievement in

narrative text, it is interesting to conduct a research in improving students‟

speaking narrative achievement by choosing snowball throwing model.

B. The Problem of the Study

Based on the background of study above, the problem of this study can be

questioned as follows,

“Does the snowball throwing model significantly improve the students‟ speaking

achievement in narrative text?”

C. The Objective of the Study

This study is aimed at finding out whether snowball throwing model could

(14)

5

D. The Scope of the Study

This study basically limited to the students‟ achievement of Senior High

School on Grade XI. It is related to the classroom observation for the first time;

there is a problem in speaking narrative in this certain grade. Thus, one of the

suitable models which can be applied is snowball throwing. It is one of

cooperative learning which conducts the teaching learning process more

meaningful. So, the situation of the classroom is in active learning, and then this

model can significantly attract students‟ competence in group work.

E. The Significance of the Study 1. Theoretical Significance

The findings of the study are theoretically expected to be significant

for improving students‟ speaking achievement in narrative text through

snowball throwing model.

2. Practical Significance

a. Practically this study is useful for teaching learning process to

improve the classroom atmosphere become more active by

applying snowball throwing model in improving students‟

speaking narrative achievement.

b. Practically the students become more active in speaking narrative

(15)

6

c. Practically this study is useful for other researchers to explore more

about speaking narrative as reference in terms of the applying

(16)

CHAPTER V

CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS

A. Conclusion

After analyzing the quantitative data, the writer found out that the students’

scores increased during the cycles. It can be seen from the improvement of the

mean in test I was 64.44, the mean of test II was 68.92, and the mean of test III

was 74.15. Moreover, the qualitative data showed that the students were more

interested and enjoyable in speaking narrative through Snowball Throwing Model.

Therefore, it can be concluded that the application of Snowball Throwing Model

can improve the students’ speaking achievement in narrative text.

B. Suggestions

Related to the writer’s research, some suggestions are pointed out as

follows:

1. For the teaching learning process, it’s better to apply Snowball Throwing

Model in teaching learning process because it’s proven that this

technique can improve the students’ speaking achievement in narrative

text easily and creatively.

2. For the students, it’s suggested that students should learn well the

activities of Snowball Throwing Model in order to make them apply

themselves to be able learn vocabulary and speaking effectively

Gambar

Table 3.2        The Procedure of Data Collection for the First Meeting .........    23 Table 3.3        Procedure of Data Collection for the Cycle ...........................

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

e) Teritip yang mempunyai ukuran lebih besar menempel pada thallus yang tua sedangkan teritip ukuran kecil menempel pada thallus muda. Penempelan teritip biasanya

pengoksida adalah salah satu faktor yang mempercepat terjadinya korosi. Berbagai macam korosi dapat terjadi dengan cepat

Untuk menjawab tujuan tersebut, perlu diketahui luas lahan layak Kyoto untuk ikut dalam kegiatan CDM, kondisi sistem pertanian yang ada, pemilihan alternatif sistem

The termination of this Me-morandum -of Understanding shall not ha\1-e effect on the implementation of ongoing programs and/or activities and/or projects which have

Dalam disertasi ini dikaji secara komprehensif tentang aspek-aspek yang berhubungan dengan daya dukung bagi pengembangan perikanan budidaya ikan kerapu di laut, meliputi

[r]

dalam pengukuran kinerja Bank Rakyat Indonesia Cabang Solo Kartasura. Bab ini berisi simpulan yang didapat dari masalah

textiles rubber and plastics products fabricated metal products, except machinery and equipment other transport equipment computer, electronic and optical products basic