SELECTIVE CORRECTIVE
FEEDBACK REALLY WORK FOR L2 WRITING ACCURACY? AN OVERVIEW FROM INDONESIAN
CONTEXT
by Herlinawati Herlinawati
Submission date: 03-Feb-2023 01:15PM (UTC+0700) Submission ID: 2005370468
2
4
7
7 7
2
4 4
4 4
4 10
2
4
5
5
6 6
15
15
2 4
4 4
4 10
10
7
8
5
5 8
8
8 8
10 12
15
16
14
20 %
SIMILARITY INDEX
19 %
INTERNET SOURCES
13 %
PUBLICATIONS
8 %
STUDENT PAPERS
1 3 %
2 2 %
3 2 %
4 2 %
5 2 %
6 1 %
7 1 %
8 1 %
FROM INDONESIAN CONTEXT
ORIGINALITY REPORT
PRIMARY SOURCES
Submitted to STIE Perbanas Surabaya
Student Paper
docshare.tips
Internet Source
dspace.univ-msila.dz:8080
Internet Source
journal.iain-samarinda.ac.id
Internet Source
studentsrepo.um.edu.my
Internet Source
eprints.umg.ac.id
Internet Source
journal.unilak.ac.id
Internet Source
relp.khuisf.ac.ir
Internet Source
11 1 %
12 1 %
13 1 %
14 1 %
15 1 %
Science and Business Media LLC, 2014
Publication
inggris.sastra.um.ac.id
Internet Source
John Truscott. "The Case Against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes", Language Learning, 6/1996
Publication
Submitted to Touro College
Student Paper
Durotul Yatimah. "IMPLEMENTATION OF
PSYCHOMOTOR ASSESSMENT ON LIFE SKILLS LEARNING PROGRAM PACKAGE", Humanities
& Social Sciences Reviews, 2020
Publication
aasic.org
Internet Source
