ATOM INDONESIA
Editor’s Report
Article No. : # 491
Title of Paper : Dynamic Analysis on the Safety Criteria of the Conceptual Core Design in MTR Type Research Reactor
Referee Name :
Comment on Descriptions 1. Title
[X] Appropriate [ ] Should be changed
2. Abstract
Yes[ ] No [ X] Is the length reasonable?
Yes[ ] No [X] Is it an appropriate summary of the content?
3. Main Text
Yes[X] No[ ] Is there anything new in this work?
Yes[X] No[ ] Is the relation to previous studies adequately stated?
Yes[X] No[ ] Are the assumption(s) and/or method(s) described comprehensively?
Yes[X] No[ ] Are the new results adequately emphasized?
Line # Referee’s Comments
ABSTRACT:
A research One of research activities 0,0846 0.0846
3,96 3.96 2100C 2100 °C
28 RRI ?? Why suddenly the terminology/word is written?
Table 1: E15 1015 229 E03 1003
Fig 10: Reaktivity Reactivity Acknowledgement: heat head
Final comments and recommendations:
The manuscript is able to be published in AI. However there are some items have to be corrected and clarified, i.e.:
1. There were a lot of mistypes/mistakes written in the manuscript. The author should carefully write the manuscript!
2. Please concise the abstract!
3. Please describe clearly the safety criteria for the MTR! Using a table is better to make good understanding.
4. Please describe clearly all the possible accident that can be occur in the MTR and relation with the safety features!
5. What is the correlation between Fig 6, 7 and 8? Why the general profile of them is different? Please explain clearly!
6. The references should be written follow the AI guideline!
This paper is recommended to be [ ] Accepted without further revision [ ] Accepted with minor revision [X] Major Revision is required [ ] Rejected
