ATOM INDONESIA JOURNAL
Author's Response toward Associate Editor's Report
Article No. : 1013
Title of Paper : Evaluating the Diffusion Approximation Capability on the Integral Pressurized Water Reactor Core Calculation Comment on Descriptions
Criteria Evaluation
Associate editor's evaluation
Author’s Response
Completely
correct Partly correct
not Correct
at all Comments
1. Originality of the article
Free of Plagiarism/Similarity(max 20%)
The similarity index of the article by iThenticate is5%.
OK
New article/not yet Published (presented/ in proceeding max30%)
Based on the similarity index checked by iThenticate,it can be assumed that the article is new.
OK
2. Related to nuclear/atomic
science and technology
The article discusses neutron diffusion calculation on 160 MWth Integral Pressurized Water Reactor (IPWR) core using the PARCS nodal diffusion code employing the fewgroup spatially homogenized crosssections generated from the Serpent Monte Carlo code.
OK
3. References
The number of references at least 10, at most 20 for nonreview papers; at least 26 for review papers.
The article has 18 references
Revised article has 17 references
The use of recent references 80 % (maximum 5 years ago)
11 out of 18 references are less than 5 years old 14 out of 17 references are less than 5 years old
Type of the references (primarily, secondary etc.) 85
% from journals
Only 9 out of 18 references are from journal
15 out of 17 references are from journal
DOI reference (traceable) Most references are traceable OK
Reference style standard:
Elsevier numeric without title Title of the article and page number are still included Title of the article and page number are not included in the revised article
When reference has more than 3 Authors, write only 3 names, et al.
All authors are still written References with more than 3 authors are written only 3 names, et al
Article follows the Atom Indonesia template and guidelines
The article has followed the template
OK
Table (clear, without vertical
line) OK OK
Figure (clear, min 300 dpi) OK OK
Is the Level of English appropriate? (Excellent, Adequate, poor)
OK OK
Final recommendation:
1. Continue review process [ ] 2. Return to the Author [ ]
3. Reject [ ]
Comments:
Authors need to revise the article by responding to comments provided above before it goes through to Reviewers.
