• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Membagikan "INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS"

Copied!
2
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

ATOM INDONESIA

Author's Responses

Article : #396

Name of All Authors : S.L. Butarbutar, G.R. Sunaryo, J. Meesungnoen, J.-P. Jay-Gerin

Article Title : Temperature Dependence of the Primary Species Yields of Liquid Water Radiolysis by 0.8 MeV Fast Neutrons

E-mail : [email protected]

Line # Referee’s Comments Author's Responses

Referee 1

Please concise the abstract We have reduced the length of the abstract Some parts of this manuscript are similar with the

reference no. 32 even some of the sentences are the same. Please modified it (or remove the parts if the information have been already mentioned in the ref no. 32)

We have modified it and also have removed the similar sentences

Please emphasized the novelty of the present results compared with previous

results/publication (ref. no 32)

The novelty of this present work is that we want to reproduce the chemical yield of radiolytic species that formed in water radiolysis induced by the fast 0.8 MeV neutrons incidents as we have data to compare with. And also we wanted to see the energy dependence of the chemical yield of the free radicals and molecular species, if there is any profile similarity between the fast 0.8 MeV neutrons (this present work) with fast 2 MeV neutrons (such as in ref. no 32)

Please mention the important assumption in the calculation/simulation (e.g number of neutrons)

The important assumption in our calculation is: we simplified that neutron produced mainly protons recoil

Referee 2

In the conclusion, the authors should clarify or provide a brief comparison with the previous results obtained by Sunaryo et al in ref [6].

Because both works dealts with the same case, but using different code to perform the simulation

The difference of this present work with the work in ref [6] is that there are (in line 64)

“many updated informations which have been applied into the code that developed by J.-P. Jay-Gerin group in Universite de Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada as follow.

Firstly, as the information of the rate constant of the reaction up to 350 oC

between species are now available according to the report compiled by Elliot and Bartels

(2)

[7]. Secondly, the rate constants of two reactions that remain debatable which are self-recombination of hydrated electron (e-aq) above ~150 oC [7,8] and oxidation reaction of water by hydrogen radical atom above

~200 oC [9-12] are incorporated in the simulation”. These most two update information were not included in their simulation.

Please return to Atom Indonesia Editorial Office via e-mail:

[email protected]

and Faximile: 021-7560895.

This original sheet should be returned to:

Administrator of Atom Indonesia, PPIKSN-BATAN, Gedung 71, Lantai 1, Kawasan Puspiptek Serpong, Tangerang, Indonesia 15310

Author Signature(s) Date

Name(s) (print)

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Other SNP in XRCC3 gene also should be examining in further study to know whether those SNP can contribute to the increase of MN frequencies Comment Please correct the sentence

: 536 Title of Paper : Present Status Marine Radioecology in Jakarta Bay Comment on Descriptions Criteria Evaluation Associate editor's evaluation Yes No Comments 1.. References

: 537 Title of Paper : High Temperature Oxidation Behaviour of Fe-Cr Steel in Air at 1000-1200K Comment on Descriptions Criteria Evaluation Associate editor's evaluation Yes No

: #935 Title of Paper : A New Record of Sediment Accumulation Rate in Sayung Coast, Demak, Central Java Using Unsupported 210Pb Isotope Comment on Descriptions Criteria Evaluation

: 465 Title of Paper : Development of99Mo/99mTc generator column using Zirconium Based Material ZBM for the production of 99mTc radioisotope Associate Editor Name : Comment on

The references are adequate in complete / consist of 85% primary references and recent journals: [2] Partly Correct Comment: primary references and recent journal should be added

Main Text The results are important to be reported* [√] Completely correct [ ] Partly correct [ ] not Correct at all Comment : The paper is of high scientific quality

Main Text The results are important to be reported* [ ] Completely correct [X ] Partly correct [ ] not Correct at all Comment : Several paragraphs still need improvement